Cardiac tamponade

Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency caused by the progressive accumulation of pericardial fluid (effusion), blood, pus or air in the pericardium, compressing the heart chambers and leading to haemodynamic compromise, circulatory shock, cardiac arrest and death. Pericardial diseases of any aetiology as well as complications of interventional and surgical procedures or chest trauma can cause cardiac tamponade. Tamponade can be precipitated in patients with pericardial effusion by dehydration or exposure to certain medications, particularly vasodilators or intravenous diuretics. Key clinical findings in patients with cardiac tamponade are hypotension, increased jugular venous pressure and distant heart sounds (Beck triad). Dyspnoea can progress to orthopnoea (with no rales on lung auscultation) accompanied by weakness, fatigue, tachycardia and oliguria. In tamponade caused by acute pericarditis, the patient can experience fever and typical chest pain increasing on inspiration and radiating to the trapezius ridge. Generally, cardiac tamponade is a clinical diagnosis that can be confirmed using various imaging modalities, principally echocardiography. Cardiac tamponade is preferably resolved by echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis. In patients who have recently undergone cardiac surgery and in those with neoplastic infiltration, effusive-constrictive pericarditis, or loculated effusions, fluoroscopic guidance can increase the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Surgical management is indicated in patients with aortic dissection, chest trauma, bleeding or purulent infection that cannot be controlled percutaneously. After pericardiocentesis or pericardiotomy, NSAIDs and colchicine can be considered to prevent recurrence and effusive-constrictive pericarditis.

Echo-Doppler and strain assessment of filling pressures in adults with congenitally corrected transposition and systemic right ventricles

AIMS

Systolic dysfunction of the systemic right ventricle (sRV) is common in adults with transposition of the great arteries and sRV. In acquired disease, diastology analysis for assessment of filling pressures (FP) is paramount in patient care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective analysis of 47 adults with sRV without prior systemic tricuspid valve surgery undergoing catheterization and echocardiography within 7 days (median -2 [-1, -3]) from January 2000 to February 2021 at our institution. Median age was 48 (31, 55) years, and 16 (34.0%) patients were female. FPs were normal in 21 patients (44.7%). Left atrial size was enlarged in most patients (83.0%) with mean indexed value 58.3 ± 23.4 mL/m2. Tissue Doppler e' was not significantly different between those with high FPs vs. normal (medial 0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.08 ± 0.03 m/s, P = 0.63; lateral 0.08 ± 0.04 vs. 0.08 ± 0.04 m/s, P = 0.88). E velocity and subpulmonic mitral regurgitant velocity were higher in those with high FPs (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 m/s, P = 0.005; 3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9 m/s, P = 0.004). Left atrial reservoir strain, sRV global longitudinal strain, and subpulmonic left ventricular strain were worse in those with high FP (18.0 ± 7.6 vs. 27.9 ± 10.2%, P = 0.0009; -13.0 ± 4.4 vs. -17.9 ± 5.0%, P = 0.002; -16.8 ± 5.7 vs. -23.0 ± 3.8%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite the complex anatomy, FPs can be assessed non-invasively in adults with sRV without prior systemic tricuspid valve surgery. The current guideline algorithm for diastolic dysfunction in acquired heart disease has limited applicability in this population. Given the limitations of Doppler in this heterogeneous population, strain analysis can be a helpful adjunct for estimation of FPs.

Effusive-Constrictive Tuberculosis Pericarditis with Biventricular Systolic Dysfunction

•

Tuberculosis is a rare etiology of effusive-constrictive pericarditis.

•

It can present with systolic dysfunction, irrespective of myocardial involvement.

•

Anti-TB and steroid therapy are reasonable treatment options.

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis in the spectrum of pericardial compressive syndromes

When pericardial fluid accumulates and exceed the reserve volume of the pericardium or when the pericardium becomes scarred and inelastic, one of three pericardial compressive syndromes may ensue, namely, cardiac tamponade (CT), characterised by the accumulation of pericardial fluid under pressure; constrictive pericarditis (CP), the result of scarring and loss of the normal elasticity of the pericardial sac; and effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP), characterised by the concurrence of a tense pericardial effusion and constriction of the heart by the visceral pericardium. Although relatively uncommon, prevalence estimates vary widely and depend on the nature of the cohorts studied, the methods used to diagnose ECP and the manner in which ECP is defined. Most cases of ECP are idiopathic, reflecting the frequency of idiopathic pericardial disease in general, and other causes include radiation, malignancy, chemotherapy, infection and postsurgical/iatrogenic pericardial disease. The diagnosis of ECP often becomes apparent when pericardiocentesis fails to decrease the right atrial pressure by 50% or to a level below 10 mm Hg. Important non-invasive diagnostic modalities include echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and, to a lesser extent, cardiac CT. In cases with clear evidence of pericardial inflammation, a trial of an anti-inflammatory regimen is warranted. A complete pericardiectomy should be reserved for refractory symptoms or clinical evidence of chronic CP.

Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis: Doppler Findings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the echo-Doppler findings in effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP). ECP corresponds to the coexistence of a hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion and markedly reduced compliance of the pericardium, manifested by constrictive physiology post-pericardiocentesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

We summarize herein the recent observations regarding the prevalence of ECP based on echocardiography as well as the pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler features of ECP. ECP diagnosed by echocardiography was seen in approximately 15% of patients with ECP pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler findings sharing features with both cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis. ECP post-pericardiocentesis is common but its natural history in the current era might be better than previously reported. Further studies and (particularly simultaneous echocardiography-cardiac catheterization) are still critically needed to better understand the underlying hemodynamics of ECP. Moreover, it remains to be determined whether pre- and post-pericardiocentesis echo-Doppler findings can be used to prognosticate or to guide therapy of those undergoing pericardiocentesis.