Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the ratio of blood pressure measured distal to a stenosis and pressure proximal to a stenosis. FFR can be estimated noninvasively using computed tomography (CT) although the usefulness of this technique remains controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated the agreement of FFR estimated by CT (FFR-CT) with invasively measured FFR. The study also evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFR-CT, defined as the ability of FFR-CT to classify lesions as hemodynamically significant (invasive FFR ≤0.8) or insignificant (invasive FFR >0.8).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-three studies reporting on 7291 blood vessels from 5236 patients were included. A moderate positive linear relationship between FFR-CT and invasively measured FFR was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.67). Agreement between the 2 measures increased as invasively measured FFR values approached 1. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FFR-CT were 82.2%, 80.9%, and 83.1%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of 90% could be demonstrated for FFR-CT values >0.90 and <0.49. The diagnostic accuracy of off-site tools was 79.4% and the diagnostic accuracy of on-site tools was 84.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between FFR-CT and invasive FFR is moderate although agreement is highest in vessels with FFR-CT >0.9. Diagnostic accuracy varies widely with FFR-CT value but is above 90% for FFR-CT values >0.90 and <0.49. Furthermore, on-site and off-site tools have similar performance. Ultimately, FFR-CT may be a useful adjunct to CT coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiogram.

Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and CT-derived fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that fractional flow reserves (FFRs) derived from invasive coronary angiograms (CA-FFRs) and coronary computed tomography angiography-derived FFRs (CT-FFRs) are promising alternatives to wire-based FFRs. However, it remains unclear which method has better diagnostic performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the two approaches.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline (Ovid), the Chinese China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), VIP, and WanFang Data databases were searched for relevant studies that included comparisons between CA-FFR and CT-FFR, from their respective database inceptions until January 1, 2023. Studies where both noninvasive FFR (including CA-FFR and CT-FFR) and invasive FFR (as a reference standard) were performed for the diagnosis of ischemic coronary artery disease and were designed as prospective, paired diagnostic studies, were pulled. The diagnostic test accuracy method and Bayesian hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model for network meta-analysis (NMA) of diagnostic tests (HSROC-NMADT) were both used to perform a meta-analysis on the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in this NMA. The results from both the diagnostic test accuracy and HSROC-NMADT methods revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of CA-FFR was higher than that of CT-FFR, in terms of sensitivity (Se; 0.86 vs. 0.84), specificity (Sp; 0.90 vs. 0.78), positive predictive value (PPV; 0.83 vs. 0.70), and negative predictive value (NPV; 0.91 vs. 0.89) for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A cumulative ranking curve analysis indicated that CA-FFR had a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT-FFR in the context of this study, with a higher area under the ROC curve (AUC; 0.94 vs. 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both of these two commonly used virtual FFR methods showed high levels of diagnostic accuracy, we demonstrated that CA-FFR had a better Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, and AUC than CT-FFR. However, this study provided only indirect comparisions; therefore, larger studies are warranted to directly compare the diagnostic performances of these two approaches.

Hybrid model of CT-fractional flow reserve, pericoronary fat attenuation index and radiomics for predicting the progression of WMH: a dual-center pilot study

Objective

To develop and validate a hybrid model incorporating CT-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), pericoronary fat attenuation index (pFAI), and radiomics signatures for predicting progression of white matter hyperintensity (WMH).

Methods

A total of 226 patients who received coronary computer tomography angiography (CCTA) and brain magnetic resonance imaging from two hospitals were divided into a training set (n = 116), an internal validation set (n = 30), and an external validation set (n = 80). Patients who experienced progression of WMH were identified from subsequent MRI results. We calculated CT-FFR and pFAI from CCTA images using semi-automated software, and segmented the pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and myocardial ROI. A total of 1,073 features were extracted from each ROI, and were then refined by Elastic Net Regression. Firstly, different machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression [LR], Support Vector Machine [SVM], Random Forest [RF], k-nearest neighbor [KNN] and eXtreme Gradient Gradient Boosting Machine [XGBoost]) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics signatures for predicting WMH progression. Then, the optimal machine learning algorithm was used to compare the predictive performance of individual and hybrid models based on independent risk factors of WMH progression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate predictive performance and clinical value of the different models.

Results

CT-FFR, pFAI, and radiomics signatures were independent predictors of WMH progression. Based on the machine learning algorithms, the PCAT signatures led to slightly better predictions than the myocardial signatures and showed the highest AUC value in the XGBoost algorithm for predicting WMH progression (AUC: 0.731 [95% CI: 0.603-0.838] vs.0.711 [95% CI: 0.584-0.822]). In addition, pFAI provided better predictions than CT-FFR (AUC: 0.762 [95% CI: 0.651-0.863] vs. 0.682 [95% CI: 0.547-0.799]). A hybrid model that combined CT-FFR, pFAI, and two radiomics signatures provided the best predictions of WMH progression [AUC: 0.893 (95%CI: 0.815-0.956)].

Conclusion

pFAI was more effective than CT-FFR, and PCAT signatures were more effective than myocardial signatures in predicting WMH progression. A hybrid model that combines pFAI, CT-FFR, and two radiomics signatures has potential use for identifying WMH progression.

Enhancing Risk Stratification on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: The Role of Artificial Intelligence

PURPOSE

To describe and outline the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in assisting coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in enhancing risk stratification.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify published work investigating the utility of applying AI to CCTA.

FINDINGS

CCTA is an excellent diagnostic tool for the detection of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The noninvasive nature and high diagnostic accuracy have made CCTA a viable alternative to invasive coronary angiography to detect luminal stenosis. However, it is now understood that stenosis is just one factor that predicts cardiac risk and other factors need to be considered. CCTA-derived plaque biomarkers have since emerged as established predictors of cardiac events to improve risk stratification. Despite awareness of these biomarkers, they are still yet to be incorporated into routine clinical practice. The major barriers to implementation include the specialized skills required for image evaluation and the time intensive nature of analysis. With the many recent advancements in the technology, AI presents itself as a promising solution. AI is attractive because it has the potential to rapidly automate technically challenging tasks with exceptional accuracy.

IMPLICATIONS

Developments in the field of AI are occurring at a rapid rate. There is already increasing evidence of the potential AI has to greatly improve the utility of CCTA by improving analysis time and extracting additional prognostic data from new plaque biomarkers. There are, however, technical and ethical challenges that need to be considered before implementing such technology into routine clinical practice.

Coronary computed tomography angiography imaging features combined with computed tomography-fractional flow reserve, pericoronary fat attenuation index, and radiomics for the prediction of myocardial ischemia

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to predict myocardial ischemia (MIS) by constructing models with imaging features, CT-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), pericoronary fat attenuation index (pFAI), and radiomics based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 96 patients who underwent CCTA and single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). According to SPECT-MPI results, there were 72 vessels with MIS in corresponding supply area and 105 vessels with no-MIS. The conventional model [lesion length (LL), MDS (maximum stenosis diameter × 100% / reference vessel diameter), MAS (maximum stenosis area × 100% / reference vessel area) and CT value], radiomics model (radiomics features), and multi-faceted model (all features) were constructed using support vector machine. Conventional and radiomics models showed similar predictive efficacy [AUC: 0.76, CI 0.62-0.90 vs. 0.74, CI 0.61-0.88; p > 0.05]. Adding pFAI to the conventional model showed better predictive efficacy than adding CT-FFR (AUC: 0.88, CI 0.79-0.97 vs. 0.80, CI 0.68-0.92; p < 0.05). Compared with conventional and radiomics model, the multi-faceted model showed the highest predictive efficacy (AUC: 0.92, CI 0.82-0.98, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

pFAI is more effective for predicting MIS than CT-FFR. A multi-faceted model combining imaging features, CT-FFR, pFAI, and radiomics is a potential diagnostic tool for MIS.

Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging-state of the art

In patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging combined with coronary CT angiography (CTA) has become a comprehensive diagnostic examination technique resulting in both anatomical and quantitative functional information on myocardial blood flow, and the presence and grading of stenosis. Recently, CTP imaging has been proven to have good diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischemia, comparable to stress magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography perfusion, while being superior to single photon emission computed tomography. Dynamic CTP accompanied by coronary CTA can serve as a gatekeeper for invasive workup, as it reduces unnecessary diagnostic invasive coronary angiography. Dynamic CTP also has good prognostic value for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events. In this article, we will provide an overview of dynamic CTP, including the basics of coronary blood flow physiology, applications and technical aspects including protocols, image acquisition and reconstruction, future perspectives, and scientific challenges. KEY POINTS: • Stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion combined with coronary CTA is a comprehensive diagnostic examination technique resulting in both anatomical and quantitative functional information. • Dynamic CTP imaging has good diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischemia comparable to stress MRI and PET perfusion. • Dynamic CTP accompanied by coronary CTA may serve as a gatekeeper for invasive workup and can guide treatment in obstructive coronary artery disease.

Reducing both radiation and contrast doses for overweight patients in coronary CT angiography with 80-kVp and deep learning image reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of an 80-kVp tube voltage combined with a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for overweight patients to reduce radiation and contrast doses in comparison with the 120-kVp protocol and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).

METHODS

One hundred consecutive CCTA patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a low-dose group (n = 50) with 80-kVp, smart mA for noise index (NI) of 36 HU, contrast dose rate of 18 mgI/kg/s and DLIR and 60 % ASIR-V and a standard-dose group (n = 50) with 120-kVp, smart mA for NI of 25 HU, contrast dose rate of 32 mgI/kg/s and 60 % ASIR-V. The radiation and contrast dose, subjective image quality score, attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared.

RESULTS

The low-dose group achieved a significant reduction in the effective radiation dose (1.01 ± 0.45 mSv vs 1.85 ± 0.40 mSv, P < 0.001) and contrast dose (33.69 ± 3.87 mL vs 59.11 ± 5.60 mL, P < 0.001) compared to the standard-dose group. The low-dose group with DLIR presented similar enhancement but lower noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than the standard-dose group. Moreover, the same patient comparison in the low-dose group between different reconstructions showed that DLIR images had slightly and consistently higher CT values in small vessels, indicating better defined vessels, much lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than ASIR-V images (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of 80-kVp and DLIR allows for significant radiation and dose reduction while further improving image quality in CCTA for overweight patients.

Artificial intelligence in atherosclerotic disease: Applications and trends

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the most common cause of death globally. Increasing amounts of highly diverse ASCVD data are becoming available and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques now bear the promise of utilizing them to improve diagnosis, advance understanding of disease pathogenesis, enable outcome prediction, assist with clinical decision making and promote precision medicine approaches. Machine learning (ML) algorithms in particular, are already employed in cardiovascular imaging applications to facilitate automated disease detection and experts believe that ML will transform the field in the coming years. Current review first describes the key concepts of AI applications from a clinical standpoint. We then provide a focused overview of current AI applications in four main ASCVD domains: coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and carotid artery disease. For each domain, applications are presented with refer to the primary imaging modality used [e.g., computed tomography (CT) or invasive angiography] and the key aim of the applied AI approaches, which include disease detection, phenotyping, outcome prediction, and assistance with clinical decision making. We conclude with the strengths and limitations of AI applications and provide future perspectives.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: An Expert Consensus Document of Chinese Society of Radiology

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire is a reference standard for evaluating functional stenosis in coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) uses advanced computational analysis methods to noninvasively obtain FFR results from a single conventional coronary computed tomography angiography data to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. More and more evidence has found good correlation between the results of noninvasive CT-FFR and invasive FFR. CT-FFR has proven its potential in optimizing patient management, improving risk stratification and prognosis, and reducing total health care costs. However, there is still a lack of standardized interpretation of CT-FFR technology in real-world clinical settings. This expert consensus introduces the principle, workflow, and interpretation of CT-FFR; summarizes the state-of-the-art application of CT-FFR; and provides suggestions and recommendations for the application of CT-FFR with the aim of promoting the standardized application of CT-FFR in clinical practice.

Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to 82Rb PET

Background

Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (⁸²Rb PET) MPI is considered a noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Our main goal was to compare the diagnostic performance of static rest/ vasodilator stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) to stress/ rest ⁸²Rb PET-MPI for the identification of myocardial ischemia.

Methods

Forty-four patients with suspected or diagnosed CAD underwent both static CT-MPI and ⁸²Rb PET-MPI at rest and during pharmacological stress. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on PET-MPI were assessed to obtain summed stress score, summed rest score, and summed difference score. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on CT-MPI was visually assessed using the same grading scale. CT-MPI was compared with PET-MPI as the gold standard on a per-territory and a per-patient basis.

Results

On a per-patient basis, there was moderate agreement between CT-MPI and PET-MPI with a weighted 0.49 for detection of stress induced perfusion abnormalities. Using PET-MPI as a reference, static CT-MPI had 89% sensitivity (SS), 58% specificity (SP), 71% accuracy (AC), 88% negative predictive value (NPV), and 59% positive predictive value (PPV) to diagnose stress-rest perfusion deficits on a per-patient basis. On a per-territory analysis, CT-MPI had 73% SS, 65% SP, 67% AC, 90.8% NPV, and 34% PPV to diagnose perfusion deficits.

Conclusions

CT-MPI has high sensitivity and good overall accuracy for the diagnosis of functionally significant CAD using ⁸²Rb PET-MPI as the reference standard. CT-MPI may play an important role in assessing the functional significance of CAD especially in combination with CCTA.

Beyond Coronary CT Angiography: CT Fractional Flow Reserve and Perfusion

심장 전산화단층촬영은 비약적인 기술발전과 다양한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 심혈관위험 계층화와 치료 결정을 위한 관상동맥 질환의 진단과 예후 평가성능이 입증되었다. 전산화단층촬영 관상동맥조영술은 폐쇄성 관상동맥 질환에 대한 음성 예측도가 높아서 침습적 혈관조영술의 빈도를 줄일 수 있는 관상동맥 질환 관련 검사의 관문으로 부상했지만, 진단특이도가 상대적으로 낮다. 하지만 심장 전산화단층촬영을 이용한 분획혈류예비력과 심근관류를 분석하여 관상동맥 질환의 혈역학적 유의성을 확인하는 기능적 평가를 통해 그 한계를 극복할 수 있다. 최근에는 이를 보다 객관적이고 재현 가능하도록 인공지능을 접목하는 연구들이 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 종설에서는 심장 전산화단층촬영의 기능적 영상화 기법들에 대해 알아보고자 한다.

Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives

The aim of this review was to discuss the current practice and patient selection for invasive FFR, new techniques to estimate invasive FFR and future of coronary physiology tests. We elaborate on the indication and application of FFR and on the contraindications and concerns in certain patient populations.

Onsite Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease Initial Experience

Introduction Computed tomographic coronary angiographic (CTCA) has evolved into a robust technique to detect significant stenosis; however, there is a discordance in the anatomic and functional significance of stenosis. Therefore, patients with stable coronary artery disease need to be further evaluated before deciding for any revascularization procedure.

Material and Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients of suspected stable coronary artery disease who underwent CTCA were evaluated for functional significance of lesions using onsite computed tomography fractional flow reserve (CTFFR) and the results were compared for detection of both significant and hemodynamically significant/severe stenosis on per vessel and per patient basis and differences were statistically analyzed. Impact of these differences were analyzed for the final outcome and management plan.

Results CTCA detected 33 patients with severe stenosis, while 54 patients had hemodynamically significant stenosis on CTFFR. The sensitivity and specificity of CTCA for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis per vessel basis were 97.7 and 93.3%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 98.0%. For severe coronary artery stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were 51.6, 89, 68.8, and 80%, respectively, on per vessel basis with CTCA. On per patient basis, CTCA showed as sensitivity and specificity of 61 and 84%, respectively, with area under curve (AUC) being 0.92 and 0.67 for significant and severe stenosis, respectively.

Discussion Onsite CTFFR is a useful tool to calculate functionally significant stenosis and also improves the sensitivity and specificity of CTCA. CTFFR detected 12% more stenotic vessels in the present study on per vessel basis and 21% on per patient basis.

Coronary CT angiography-based estimation of myocardial perfusion territories for coronary artery FFR and wall shear stress simulation

This study aims to apply a CCTA-derived territory-based patient-specific estimation of boundary conditions for coronary artery fractional flow reserve (FFR) and wall shear stress (WSS) simulation. The non-invasive simulation can help diagnose the significance of coronary stenosis and the likelihood of myocardial ischemia. FFR is often regarded as the gold standard to evaluate the functional significance of stenosis in coronary arteries. In another aspect, proximal wall shear stress (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathrm{{WSS}_{prox}}$$\end{document}WSSprox) can also be an indicator of plaque vulnerability. During the simulation process, the mass flow rate of the blood in coronary arteries is one of the most important boundary conditions. This study utilized the myocardium territory to estimate and allocate the mass flow rate. 20 patients are included in this study. From the knowledge of anatomical information of coronary arteries and the myocardium, the territory-based FFR and the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathrm{{WSS}_{prox}}$$\end{document}WSSprox can both be derived from fluid dynamics simulations. Applying the threshold of distinguishing between significant and non-significant stenosis, the territory-based method can reach the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.88, 0.90, and 0.80, respectively. For significantly stenotic cases (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathrm{FFR}_{m}$$\end{document}FFRm\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\le$$\end{document}≤ 0.80), the vessels usually have higher wall shear stress in the proximal region of the lesion.

Clinical application of computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve computed tomography in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis based on pre- and post-test probability

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve computed tomography (FFRCT) in confirming or excluding ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD) and to provide a rational use of CCTA and FFRCT in different pre-test probability (PTP) of CAD.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases from the earliest relevant literature to July 2020 comparing FFRCT or CCTA with FFR. The bivariate random-effects models and Bayes' theorem were used to investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA and FFRCT with the sensitivity, specificity, pre- and post-test probability.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles with 4817 patients and 7026 vessels finally met our inclusion criteria. At the patient level, the sensitivity and specificity of CCTA were (0.94, 0.89-0.97), and (0.50, 0.43-0.58), respectively. For FFRCT, the sensitivity and specificity were (0.90, 0.87-0.93) and (0.81, 0.73-0.87). CCTA or FFRCT could increase the post-test probability to >85 % in patients with a PTP > 74.9 % or 54.5 %; CCTA or FFRCT could decrease the post-test probability to <15 % in patients with a pre-test probability <61.3 % or 59.3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with low to intermediate PTP, CCTA is suggested to exclude CAD, while the time-consuming calculation of FFRCT may be unnecessary. If CCTA detects significant or uncertain stenosis with intermediate to high PTP of CAD, further FFRCT is suggested. The advantages of FFRCT for guiding CAD treatment have sufficiently been demonstrated.

Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic power of separately integrating on-site computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and static CT stress myocardial perfusion (CTP) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in detecting patients with flow-limiting CAD. The flow-limiting stenosis was defined as obstructive (≥ 50%) stenosis by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a corresponding perfusion deficit on stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/MPI).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients (74 vessels) were enrolled who underwent research-indicated combined CTA-CTP (320-row CT scanner, temporal resolution 137 ms) and SPECT/MPI prior to conventional coronary angiography. CT-FFR was computed on-site using resting CCTA data with dedicated workstation-based software. All five imaging modalities were analyzed in blinded independent core laboratories. Logistic regression and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index were used to evaluate incremental differences in CT-FFR or CTP compared with CCTA alone.

RESULTS

The prevalence of obstructive CAD defined by combined ICA-SPECT/MPI was 40%. Per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 95 and 42% for CCTA, 76 and 89% for CCTA + CTP, and 81 and 96% for CCTA + CT-FFR, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CCTA (AUC = 0.82) was improved by combining it with CT-FFR (AUC = 0.92, p = 0.01; IDI = 0.27, p < 0.001) or CTP (AUC = 0.90, p = 0.02; IDI = 0.18, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

On-site CT-FFR combined with CCTA provides an incremental diagnostic improvement over CCTA alone in identifying patients with flow-limiting CAD defined by ICA + SPECT/MPI, with a comparable diagnostic accuracy for integrated CTP and CCTA.

KEY POINTS

• Both on-site CT-FFR and CTP perform well with high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of flow-limiting stenosis. • Comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCTA + CT-FFR and CCTA + CTP is demonstrated to detect flow-limiting stenosis. • Integrated CT-FFR and CCTA derived from a single widened CCTA data acquisition can accurately and conveniently evaluate both coronary anatomy and physiology in the future management of patients with suspected CAD, without the need for additional vasodilator administration and contrast and radiation exposure.

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography: where are we now and where are we heading?

Computed tomography coronary angiography is emerging as the preferred diagnostic tool for patients with chest pain. Additional knowledge of the extent and distribution of myocardial ischemia enables tailored patient management. Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) employs computed tomography coronary angiography raw data processed via complex computational fluid dynamics and produces a surrogate of the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) thus delivering anatomical and physiological assessment in a single test. FFR_CT has been extensively validated against invasive FFR and observational clinical studies have consistently demonstrated its utility as gatekeeper to invasive angiography while also reducing downstream clinical events and costs. Novel workstation-based models of estimating FFR are now being tested. Ongoing and future research results will define their role in clinical practice.

Functional cardiac CT-Going beyond Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease with Cine CT, CT-FFR, CT Perfusion and Machine Learning

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of different functional cardiac CT techniques which can be used to supplement assessment of the coronary arteries to establish the significance of coronary artery stenoses. We focus on cine-CT, CT-FFR, CT-myocardial perfusion and how developments in machine learning can supplement these techniques.

Patient-specific 3D-printed coronary models based on coronary computed tomography angiography volumes to investigate flow conditions in coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

3D printed patient-specific coronary models have the ability to enable repeatable benchtop experiments under controlled blood flow conditions. This approach can be applied to CT-derived patient geometries to emulate coronary flow and related parameters such as Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR).

METHODS

This study uses 3D printing to compare such benchtop FFR results with a non-invasive CT-FFR research software algorithm and catheter based invasive FFR (I-FFR) measurements. Fifty-two patients with a clinical indication for I-FFR underwent a research Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) prior to catheterization. CT images were used to measure CT-FFR and to generate patient-specific 3D printed models of the aortic root and three main coronary arteries. Each patient-specific model was connected to a programmable pulsatile pump and benchtop FFR (B-FFR) was derived from pressures measured proximal and distal to coronary stenosis using pressure transducers. B-FFR was measured for two coronary outflow rates ('normal', 250 ml min^-1; and 'hyperemic', 500 ml min^-1) by adjusting the model's distal coronary resistance.

RESULTS

Pearson correlations and ROC AUC were calculated using invasive I-FFR as reference. The Pearson correlation factor of CT-FFR and B-FFR-500 was 0.75 and 0.71, respectively. Areas under the ROCs for CT-FFR and B-FFR-500 were 0.80 (95%CI: 0.70-0.87) and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.64-0.91) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Benchtop flow simulations with 3D printed models provide the capability to measure pressure changes at any location in the model, for ultimately emulating the FFR at several simulated physiological blood flow conditions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03149042.

Computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial ischemia

Myocardial ischemia is caused by a mismatch between myocardial oxygen consumption and oxygen delivery in coronary artery disease (CAD). Stratification and decision-making based on ischemia improves the prognosis in patients with CAD. Non-invasive tests used to evaluate myocardial ischemia include stress electrocardiography, echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Invasive fractional flow reserve is considered the reference standard for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of CAD. Computed tomography (CT) angiography has emerged as a first-line imaging modality for evaluation of CAD, particularly in the population at low to intermediate risk, because of its high negative predictive value; however, CT angiography does not provide information on the hemodynamic significance of stenosis, which lowers its specificity. Emerging techniques, e.g., CT perfusion and CT-fractional flow reserve, help to address this limitation of CT, by determining the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. CT perfusion involves acquisition during the first pass of contrast medium through the myocardium following pharmacological stress. CT-fractional flow reserve uses computational fluid dynamics to model coronary flow, pressure, and resistance. In this article, we review these two functional CT techniques in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia, including their principles, technology, advantages, limitations, pitfalls, and the current evidence.

Influence of operator expertise and coronary luminal segmentation technique on diagnostic performance, precision and reproducibility of reduced-order CT-derived fractional flow reserve technique

BACKGROUND

Onsite workstation-based CT-derived Fractional-Flow-Reserve (CT-FFR) is accurate in assessing hemodynamic-significance of coronary stenoses. We aim to describe the influence of operator expertise and luminal-segmentation technique on the diagnostic performance, precision and reproducibility of CT-FFR in identifying hemodynamically-significant stenosis (FFR≤0.8).

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive stable-patients (86 vessels) with suspected CAD underwent research indicated invasive-FFR and 320-detector CT-coronary-angiography (CTA). CT-FFR was derived using reduced-order model on standard desktop-computer. Semi-automated coronary luminal segmentation was performed using focused-technique with manual adjustments at regions of stenosis and calcification or comprehensive-technique with manual adjustments along the entire course of the vessel. CT-FFR analysis was performed using 3 blinded operators; core-laboratory engineer using focused-technique and radiographer and cardiologist using the comprehensive-technique. Diagnostic performance was assessed by area under receiver-operating-curve (AUC). Precision with invasive FFR was determined by Bland-Altman analysis, and reproducibility by intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Diagnostic performance was comparable among operators (Engineer: AUC = 0.88, Radiographer 0.84; Cardiologist 0.87; P = 0.59). Coronary luminal-segmentation time was shortest using focused technique (engineer 6:17 ± 2.43 min), compared with comprehensive technique (cardiologist 14.83 ± 7.09, radiographer 24.74 ± 12.65; P < 0.001). Use of focused technique was associated with widest limits of agreement (LOA) with FFR and moderate intra-operator reproducibility (engineer LOA -0.20-0.33; ICC 0.66), when compared with the comprehensive technique which demonstrated narrower LOA and excellent reproducibility [radiographer (LOA -0.17-0.20, ICC = 0.91) and cardiologist (LOA-0.15-0.23, ICC = -0.93)] CONCLUSION: A workstation-based CT-FFR technique was reproducible with high and comparable diagnostic performance among operators with different expertise. A comprehensive luminal segmentation technique was the most time-consuming and associated with the highest reproducibility and precision with FFR.

The year 2018 in the European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging: Part I

The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging has become one of the leading multimodality cardiovascular imaging journal, since it was launched in 2012. The impact factor is an impressive 8.366 and it is now established as one of the top 10 cardiovascular journals. The journal is the most important cardiovascular imaging journal in Europe. The most important studies from 2018 will be highlighted in two reports. Part I of the review will focus on studies about myocardial function and risk prediction, myocardial ischaemia, and emerging techniques in cardiovascular imaging, while Part II will focus on valvular heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathies, and congenital heart disease.

Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis

Computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) and computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging (CTP) are techniques to assess haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. To compare the diagnostic performance of FFR_CT and static rest/stress CTP in detecting fractional flow reserve (FFR) defined haemodynamically-significant stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.8). Fifty-one patients (96 vessels) with suspected coronary artery disease from a single institution planned for elective invasive-angiography prospectively underwent research indicated 320-detector-CT-coronary-angiography (CTA) and adenosine-stress CTP and invasive FFR. Analyses were performed in separate core-laboratories for FFR_CT and CTP blinded to FFR results. Myocardial perfusion was assessed visually and semi-quantitatively by transmural perfusion ratio (TPR). Invasive FFR ≤ 0.8 was present in 33% of vessels and 49% of patients. FFR_CT, visual CTP and TPR analysis was feasible in 96%, 92% and 92% of patients respectively. Overall per-vessel sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for FFR_CT were 81%, 85%, 84%, for visual CTP were 50%, 89%, 75% and for TPR were 69%, 48%, 56% respectively. Receiver-operating-characteristics curve analysis demonstrated larger per vessel area-under-curve (AUC) for FFR_CT (0.89) compared with visual CTP (0.70; p < 0.001), TPR (0.58; p < 0.001) and CTA (0.70; p = 0.0007); AUC for CTA + FFR_CT (0.91) was higher than CTA + visual CTP (0.77, p = 0.008) and CTA + TPR (0.74, p < 0.001). Per-patient AUC for FFR_CT (0.90) was higher than visual CTP (0.69; p = 0.0016), TPR (0.56; p < 0.0001) and CTA (0.68; p = 0.001). Based on this selected cohort of patients FFR_CT is superior to visually and semi-quantitatively assessed static rest/stress CTP in detecting haemodynamically-significant coronary stenosis as determined on invasive FFR.

Initial evaluation of three-dimensionally printed patient-specific coronary phantoms for CT-FFR software validation

We developed three-dimensionally (3D) printed patient-specific coronary phantoms that are capable of sustaining physiological flow and pressure conditions. We assessed the accuracy of these phantoms from coronary CT acquisition, benchtop experimentation, and CT-FFR software. Five patients with coronary artery disease underwent 320-detector row coronary CT angiography (CCTA) (Aquilion ONE, Canon Medical Systems) and a catheter lab procedure to measure fractional flow reserve (FFR). The aortic root and three main coronary arteries were segmented (Vitrea, Vital Images) and 3D printed (Eden 260V, Stratasys). Phantoms were connected into a pulsatile flow loop, which replicated physiological flow and pressure gradients. Contrast was introduced and the phantoms were scanned using the same CT scanner model and CCTA protocol as used for the patients. Image data from the phantoms were input to a CT-FFR research software (Canon Medical Systems) and compared to those derived from the clinical data, along with comparisons between image measurements and benchtop FFR results. Phantom diameter measurements were within 1 mm on average compared to patient measurements. Patient and phantom CT-FFR results had an absolute mean difference of 4.34% and Pearson correlation of 0.95. We have demonstrated the capabilities of 3D printed patient-specific phantoms in a diagnostic software.