Percutaneous coronary intervention for delayed coronary obstruction due to endothelialization of self-expandable transcatheter heart valve: a case report

Risk of Sinus Sequestration During Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Prevalence, Predictors, and Risk Stratification

The number of patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the potential for reintervention is steadily increasing; however, there is a risk of sinus sequestration (SS) during a redo TAVI. The prevalence, predictors, and risk stratification of the risk for SS remain uncertain. We analyzed computed tomography acquired from 263 patients who underwent TAVI between 2021 and 2022: balloon-expandable valve (BEV) (71%) and self-expandable valve (SEV) (29%). Patients were considered at risk for SS if they met the following: (1) BEV frame > sinotubular junction (STJ) or SEV neocommissure greater than the STJ and (2) valve-to-STJ <2 mm. The risk of left, right, and any SS in 51%, 50%, and 65%, respectively, did not differ between BEV and SEV. The predictors of any SS were the height of the left and right coronary cusp (odds ratio [OR] 0.81 and 0.71, cutoff 18.6 and 19.2 mm, respectively) and STJ minus the annulus diameter (OR 0.65, cutoff 3.7 mm) in BEV, and STJ diameter (OR 0.47, cutoff 27.6 mm) in SEV. The number of predictors stratified the risk of any SS: low risk with BEV at 0 predictors (14% at risk of SS), intermediate risk at 1 predictor (65%), high risk at 2 or 3 predictors (81% and 95%), and low risk with SEV at 0 predictors (33%) versus high risk at 1 predictor (91%). In conclusion, 2/3 of patients who underwent TAVI were at risk of SS. The height of the coronary cusp and the STJ diameter were associated with and adequately stratified the risk of SS.

Rare Cause of Late Left Aortic Sinus Obstruction Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

A 74-year-old woman with a history aortic stenosis with prior transcatheter aortic valve replacement presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction secondary to a delayed left coronary sinus obstruction. With physiology and intravascular ultrasound guidance, the patient was treated with stents through the valve struts and to the left main. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Real world coronary artery ostia full accessibility after last generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIM

We evaluate, performing a pooled meta-analysis, the current coronary artery accessibility rate in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients during the follow-up. Full coronary artery accessibility after TAVI has not been adequately addressed by the current literature.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, data on coronary artery access were obtained from the ratio between in the full coronary engagement (n) and the number of coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (N). Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Out of 7048 TAVI patients, 276 (3.9%) (mean age 76.8 years, 111 (40.2%) females) were analysed. Full coronary artery accessibility for coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions were obtained in 83.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.92, p = 0.001, I²: 88.2%) and 96.0% (95% CI: 0.90-0.98, p < 0.0001, I²: 0) of cases (p for difference  < .0.001). Left coronary artery (n = 219) was easily fully engaged compared to the right one (90.9% (95% CI: 0.80-0.96, p < 0.0001, I²: 58.4% and 82.0% (95% CI: 0.60-0.93, p = 0.006, I²: 83.2%), respectively, (p for difference  < 0.001). Using age as moderator variable, meta-regression revealed a positive and negative correlation with coronary artery accessibility in patients treated with Sapien-Edwards (p = 0.008) and CoreValve (p = 0.010) platforms, respectively. Conversely, a negative correlation (p = 0.01) was found between coronary artery accessibility and mean time after Sapien-Edwards platform implantation (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Full coronary artery accessibility during coronary angiographies and/or percutaneous coronary interventions results suboptimal for both coronary artery ostia and worse for right compared to left coronary artery after TAVI.