Modified double guiding catheter 'Ping Pong' technique to treat large coronary perforation: a case report

Detection of Blood Clots Using a Whole Stent as an Active Implantable Biosensor

Many cardiovascular problems stem from blockages that form within the vasculature and often treatment includes fitting a stent through percutaneous coronary intervention. This offers a minimally invasive therapy but re-occlusion through restenosis or thrombosis formation often occurs post-deployment. Research is ongoing into the creation of smart stents that can detect the occurrence of further problems. In this study, it is shown that selectively metalizing a non-conductive stent can create a set of electrodes that are capable of detecting a build-up of material around the stent. The associated increase in electrical impedance across the electrodes is measured, testing the stent with blood clot to mimic thrombosis. It is shown that the device is capable of sensing different amounts of occlusion. The stent can reproducibly sense the presence of clot showing a 16% +/-3% increase in impedance which is sufficient to reliably detect the clot when surrounded by explanted aorta (one sample t-test, p = 0.009, n = 9). It is demonstrated that this approach can be extended beyond the 3D printed prototypes by showing that it can be applied to a commercially available stent and it is believed that it can be further utilized by other types of medical implants.

The Safety and Efficacy of Resolving Burr Entrapment by the Ping-Pong and Mother-in-Child Techniques

Burr entrapment is a serious risk when performing rotational atherectomy on specific anatomical features of lesions such as tortuosity, calcification, and acute angulation. This occurrence, known as the Kokeshi phenomenon in Japanese, is caused by the burr's proximal section being unable to ablate while pulling back the burr, leaving the distal end of the burr covered in diamond crumbs capable of lesion ablation following rotation. There are reports of different approaches used to retrieve an entrapped rotablator burr. In this case, we demonstrate that the ping-pong and mother-in-child techniques, which use separate guide catheters to engage the same coronary artery wiring across the lesion afterward and deep engagement of guide extension catheter manual traction, are highly effective and secure methods for retrieval.

Successful Removal of an Entrapped Stent Delivery Catheter Using Two Arterial Sheaths in the Ipsilateral Groin

Entrapment of devices, such as a Rota bar, an extension catheter, or an intravascular ultrasound device, during percutaneous coronary intervention has been reported and bailout strategies have been discussed. However, there have been few reports on entrapment of devices during endovascular treatment (EVT). A 70-year-old man was referred to our clinic for the management of rest pain in his left lower limb. His left ankle-brachial index was unmeasurable and computed tomography angiography revealed total occlusion of the left common, external iliac, and superficial femoral arteries (SFA). He was diagnosed as having symptomatic limb-threatening ischemia and EVT was planned. The first EVT was performed on an occluding lesion in the left iliac artery. We used a transradial approach and deployed two bare nitinol stents in the left iliac artery without complications. One week after the first EVT, the second EVT was performed on an occluding lesion in the left SFA. A 6.0-French (Fr) guide sheath was inserted antegradely through the left common femoral artery. The occluded lesion was dilated with a 4.0 mm plain balloon, following which intravascular ultrasound revealed a localized severe stenotic lesion in the distal part of the SFA. A 6.0 mm drug-eluting stent was deployed to cover the stenotic lesion in the distal part of the SFA without pre-dilation; however, the stenotic lesion did not dilate sufficiently. When we attempted to extract the stent delivery catheter, we could not detach its tip from the localized severe stenotic lesion and were unable to remove it by force or external compression. Therefore, we decided to implement a double guide technique by inserting a 4.0-Fr sheath simultaneously into the left common femoral artery adjacent to the first puncture site together with another 0.014-inch guidewire via a 4.0-Fr sheath to get past the lesion in which the catheter tip was embedded. We then used a 3.0-mm plain balloon to dilate the severe stenotic lesion sufficiently to enable the removal of the stent delivery catheter. Another 6.0-mm drug-eluting stent was then deployed, after the first stent, to cover the occluded lesion in the middle part of the SFA. Hemostasis was safely achieved at both puncture sites by manual compression. A double guide technique, as in percutaneous coronary intervention, is useful for the bailout of an entrapped device during EVT. Careful consideration of the access site and size and length of the second guide sheath are necessary.

A Novel Strategy for Emergency Treatment of Coronary Perforations by Placing a Drug-Eluting Stent before Sealing off the Leakage with a Covered Stent to Improve Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Perforations

We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and long-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation before covered stents for treating coronary artery perforation (CAP). Between 2015 and 2020, 12,733 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR), whereas secondary endpoints included the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause death at 1 year. A total of 159 patients with CAP were identified during the study period, of whom 47.2% (n = 75) were treated with a covered stent (CS group) because of complex and/or severe CAP and 84 (52.8%) without (non-CS group). In the majority of patients, emergency drug-eluting stent placement before covered stent implantation was feasible (n = 69, 82%). There were no significant differences among patients treated with or without a covered stent in terms of primary or secondary clinical endpoints: a similar rate of TLR (18.67% vs. 21.43%, p = 0.6646), MACCE (25.33% vs. 22.62%, p = 0.6887), and 1-year mortality (12.00% vs. 11.90%, p = 0.9853) were identified comparing cases with covered stent implantation and without. In conclusion, our study implicates that the use of covered stents for sealing coronary perforation might not impact the 1-year clinical outcome if used properly. Moreover, the emergent use of drug-eluting stents before covered stent implantation in CAP is a safe and effective method to avoid target lesion revascularization in patients treated with covered stents.

Stent-graft and double-guiding catheter technique to rescue iatrogenic coronary perforation

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is an infrequent, yet life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary interventions, posing a major risk of cardiac tamponade and mortality.

METHODS

We report on effective management of Ellis type III CAP with use of double-guiding catheter technique and stent-graft implantation.

RESULTS

Prolonged balloon inflation via the first guiding catheter allows for temporary closure of the bleeding site. At the same time, stent-graft is inserted via the second guiding catheter to seal the perforation. After rapid deflation of the balloon, the stent is immediately advanced and expanded.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure minimises the time between deflation of the balloon and implantation of the stent-graft, allowing for successful bleeding cessation.