Long-Term Treatment with the Combination of Rivaroxaban and Aspirin in Patients with Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease: Outcomes During the Open Label Extension of the COMPASS trial

Rivaroxaban, in combination with low-dose aspirin, is associated with a reduction in proinflammatory and prothrombotic circulating vesicle signatures in patients with cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Despite secondary prevention with aspirin, patients with stable cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain at elevated long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Outcomes in People Using Anticoagulant Strategies (COMPASS) double-blind, randomized clinical trial demonstrated that aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban (COMPASS regime) significantly decreased the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events by 24% compared with aspirin alone. However, the mechanisms underlying these potential synergistic/nonantithrombotic effects remain elusive. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are crucial messengers regulating a myriad of biological/pathological processes and are highly implicated in CVD.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that circulating EV profiles reflect the cardioprotective properties of the COMPASS regime.

METHODS

A cohort of stable CVD patients (N = 40) who participated in the COMPASS trial and were previously randomized to receive aspirin were prospectively recruited and assigned a revised regimen of open-label aspirin plus rivaroxaban. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (aspirin only) and 6-month follow-up. Plasma EV concentration, size, and origin were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis and flow cytometry. EVs were enriched by ultracentrifugation for proteomic analysis.

RESULTS

The COMPASS regime fundamentally altered small (<200 nm) and large (200-1000 nm) EV concentration and size compared with aspirin alone. Crucially, levels of platelet-derived and myeloperoxidase-positive EVs became significantly decreased at follow-up. Comparative proteomic characterization further revealed a significant decrease in highly proinflammatory protein expression at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The observed changes in EV subpopulations, together with the differential protein expression profiles, suggest amelioration of an underlying proinflammatory and prothrombotic state upon dual therapy, which may be of clinical relevance toward understanding the fundamental mechanism underlying the reported superior cardiovascular outcomes associated with this antithrombotic regimen.

Incidence and predictors of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on aspirin, low-dose rivaroxaban, or the combination: Secondary analysis of the COMPASS randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients on low-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is relatively unknown. Estimates from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking.

AIMS

To assess GIB incidence and predictors from RCT data of patients on aspirin, low-dose rivaroxaban, or both.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of RCT data wherein patients received aspirin 100 mg daily and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.d., aspirin alone, or rivaroxaban 5 mg b.d. Patients were followed from 2013 to 2016 at 602 centres. Outcomes included overall, upper, and lower GIB. We employed multivariable logistic regression to yield odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for potential exposures.

RESULTS

Among 27,395 patients, the annual incidence of GIB on rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.d. with aspirin was 801.7 per 100,000 compared with 372.3 in 100,000 for aspirin. Age (OR 4.16, 2.53-6.82 for ≥75 vs. 55-64), peptic ulcer disease (PUD, OR 1.57, 1.01-2.44), liver disease (OR 2.09, 1.01-4.33), hypertension (OR 1.42, 1.04-1.94), and smoking (OR 1.85, 1.26-2.73) were associated with overall GIB. Kidney disease (OR 1.68, 1.12-2.51) was significantly associated with upper GIB, whereas diverticular disease (OR 3.75, 1.88-7.49) was associated with lower GIB. Addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin was associated more with lower GIB (OR 2.82, 1.64-4.84) than upper GIB (OR 1.86, 1.18-2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

We established incidences and identified risk factors for GIB in users of low-dose DOACs. Novel risk factors included current or former smoking and diverticulosis. Future studies should aim to validate these risk factors.

Dual-pathway inhibition in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring reintervention for infrapopliteal occlusions

Our study aimed to assess the influence of incorporating new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy on clinical outcomes among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for below-the-knee (BTK) occlusions necessitating reintervention. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and had undergone a successful endovascular intervention for BTK artery occlusion, necessitating reintervention. Patients who underwent endovascular interventions for BTK reocclusion were compared to those who received dual-pathway inhibition with NOAC (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg 2 × 1) and clopidogrel (NOAC group), or dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin (DAPT group). The primary endpoints were target vessel reocclusion and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at the 1-year follow-up, while major and minor amputations served as the secondary endpoint. Additionally, a one-year comparison was conducted between the two groups for major bleeding events. 64 patients in our clinic treated with endovascular reintervention (NOAC = 28, DAPT = 34). The TLR rate is 10.7% in NOAC group (N = 3) and 32.4% in DAPT group (N = 11, p = 0.043). The target vessel reocclusion rate is 17.8% in NOAC group (N = 5) and 41.2% in DAPT group (N = 14, p = 0.048). Minor or major amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 3.6% in NOAC group (N = 1) and 11.7% in DAPT group (N = 4, p = 0.245). The patency rate is significantly higher, and the TLR rate is significantly lower in the NOAC group compared to the DAPT group, with no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Although no statistically significant difference exists in amputation rates, a numerical distinction is evident.

Polyvascular disease is common in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and lower extremity bypass and is associated with worse outcomes

BACKGROUND

Polyvascular disease is strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, its prevalence in patients undergoing carotid and lower extremity surgical revascularization and its impact on outcomes are unknown.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB), 2013-2019. Polyvascular disease was defined as presence of atherosclerotic occlusive disease in more than one arterial bed: carotid, coronary, and infrainguinal. Primary outcomes were (1) composite perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or death and (2) 5-year survival. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using the χ2 test and multivariable logistic regression. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards multivariable models.

RESULTS

Polyvascular disease was identified in 47% of CEA (39.0% in 2 arterial beds, 7.6% in 3 arterial beds; n = 93,736) and 47% of LEB (41.0% in 2 arterial beds, 5.7% in 3 arterial beds; n = 25,223). For both CEA and LEB, patients with polyvascular disease had more comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease (P < .0001). Perioperative MI/death rates increased with increasing number of vascular beds affected following CEA (0.9% in 1 bed vs 1.5% in 2 beds vs 2.7% in 3 beds; P < .001) and LEB (2.2% in 1 bed vs 5.3% in 2 beds vs 6.6% in 3 beds; P < .001). Polyvascular disease was associated independently with perioperative MI/death after CEA (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.81;P < .0001) and LEB (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08; P < .0001). Five-year survival was decreased in patients with polyvascular disease after CEA (82% in 3 beds vs 88% in 2 beds vs 92% in 1 bed; P < .01) and LEB (72% in 3 beds vs 75% in 2 beds vs 84% in 1 bed; P < .01) in a dose-dependent manner, with the lowest 5-year survival observed in those with three arterial beds involved. Polyvascular disease was independently associated with 5-year mortality after CEA (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.24-1.40; P = .0001) and LEB (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.20-1.41; P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Polyvascular disease is common in patients undergoing CEA and LEB and is associated with a higher risk of perioperative MI/death and decreased long-term survival. After revascularization, patients with polyvascular disease should be considered for more aggressive cardioprotective medications and closer follow-up.

Prescribing of low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

AIMS

Low-dose rivaroxaban has been indicated for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) after recent (2019-2020) updates to European guidelines. We aimed to describe prescription trends of low-dose rivaroxaban in ASCVD patients over the period 2015-2022 in two European countries, to compare the trends before and after guideline changes, and to determine the characteristics of users.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional interrupted time series analysis, utilization of low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg, twice daily) was measured in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum (United Kingdom [UK]) and the PHARMO Database Network (the Netherlands) from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2022 in patients with an ASCVD diagnosis. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of new use (within 182 days) compared to the reference period, 2015-2018, were calculated. Age, sex and comorbidities of users were compared to those of nonusers.

RESULTS

In the UK, from 721 271 eligible subjects the IR of new use of low-dose rivaroxaban in the period 2015-2018, before guideline changes, was 12.4 per 100 000 person-years and after guideline changes in 2020-2022 was 124.0 (IRR 10.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5, 11.8). In the Netherlands from 394 851 subjects, the IR in 2015-2018 was 2.4 per 100 000 person-years and in 2020 was 16.3 (IRR 6.7, 95% CI 4.0, 11.4). Users were younger (UK mean difference [MD] -6.1 years, Netherlands -2.4 years; P < .05) and more likely to be male (UK difference 11.5%, Netherlands 13.4%; P < .001) than nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a statistically significant increase in the use of low-dose rivaroxaban for the management of ASCVD after guideline changes in the UK and the Netherlands. There were international differences, but low-dose rivaroxaban has not been put into widespread practice.

Low-dose rivaroxaban: can cardiovascular events be reduced?

Despite available effective guideline-based preventive therapies, patients with vascular diseases remain at high-risk of recurrent ischaemic events. Novel therapeutic strategies are therefore needed in order to further reduce the residual risk that is present in these high-risk patients. The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People using Anticoagulation Strategies trial demonstrated that, in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), a combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg/bid (vascular dose) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg once daily, the so-called dual pathway inhibition (DPI), reduced cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction by 24% and mortality by 18%, as compared with ASA-alone. The rationale that can explain the improvement of cardiovascular outcome is that platelet aggregation and fibrin formation are involved in arterial thrombosis and rivaroxaban is able to target both ways and has a synergic effect with ASA. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential mechanisms and added benefits of DPI, in patients with PAD and CAD.

Antithrombotic therapy following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: a European survey from the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Aims

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) entails dismal outcomes and is an absolute indication to lower extremity revascularization (LER) whenever possible. Antithrombotic therapy is here crucial, but available evidence on best strategies (choice of drugs, combinations, duration) is scarce. We conducted a European internet-based survey on physicians’ use of antithrombotic therapy after revascularization for CLTI, under the aegis of the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Disease in collaboration with other European scientific societies involved in CLTI management and agreeing to send the survey to their affiliates.

Methods and results

225 respondents completed the questionnaire. Antithrombotic therapy following surgical/endovascular LER varies widely across countries and specialties, with dedicated protocols reported only by a minority (36%) of respondents. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the preferred choice for surgical (37%) and endovascular (79%) LER. Dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban is prescribed by 16% of respondents and is tightly related to the availability of reimbursement (OR 6.88; 95% CI 2.60–18.25) and to the choice of clinicians rather than of physicians performing revascularization (OR 2.69; 95% CI 1.10–6.58). A ≥ 6 months-duration of an intense (two-drug) postprocedural antithrombotic regimen is more common among surgeons than among medical specialists (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.10–3.94). Bleeding risk assessment is not standardised and likely underestimated.

Conclusion

Current antithrombotic therapy of CLTI patients undergoing LER remains largely discretional, and prescription of DPI is related to reimbursement policies. An individualised assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risks is largely missing.