Gaps and discontinuation of statin treatment in Norway: potential for optimizing management of lipid lowering drugs

Adherence to Secondary Prevention Measures after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Impact on Patient Outcome-A Nationwide Perspective

Objectives: Secondary prevention is crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients following acute myocardial infraction (MI). However, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and pharmacotherapy remains suboptimal despite strong guideline recommendations. This study investigated the adherence to CR, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and statins following acute MI and evaluated their impact on patient outcomes from a nationwide perspective in Austria. Methods: In this national observational study, all patients diagnosed with acute MI, defined as STEMI or NSTEMI, between April 2011 and August 2015 in Austria were included. Patient characteristics and comorbidities were derived from the Austrian national health insurance system using ICD-10 codes. Adherence to CR, high-intensity statins, and DAPT was assessed based on health insurance records and pharmacy prescription submissions. Cox Regression hazard analysis was used to explore the impact of non-adherence to CR on mortality. Results: Among 16,518 acute MI patients, only 13.4% adhered to the recommended CR programs, which was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98; p = 0.036). In contrast, 66.4% of 23,240 patients did not comply with high-intensity statin therapy, correlating with an increased mortality risk (adjusted HR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06-1.25; p < 0.001). Furthermore, among 22,331 patients analyzed for DAPT adherence, only 29.3% followed the guidelines, yet this adherence was linked to a 21% reduction in mortality over the observation period (adjusted HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide study reveals alarmingly low adherence to CR and secondary preventive medications among acute MI patients, which is significantly linked to higher mortality rates. Enhanced efforts to promote awareness and adherence are crucial, involving structured referrals and personalized follow-ups to improve patient outcomes. Addressing these gaps through comprehensive healthcare strategies could substantially enhance cardiovascular health.

Treatment patterns and adherence to lipid-lowering drugs during eight-year follow-up after a coronary heart disease event

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proper prescription and high adherence to intensive lipid lowering drugs (LLD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are crucial and strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to investigate long-term treatment patterns and adherence to LLD following hospitalization for a CHD event.

METHODS

Patients admitted to two Norwegian hospitals with a CHD event from 2011 to 2014 (N = 1094) attended clinical examination and completed a questionnaire, median 16 months later. Clinical data were linked to pharmacy dispensing data from 2010 to 2020. The proportions using high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 40/80 mg or rosuvastatin 20/40 mg) and non-statin LLD after the CHD event were assessed. Adherence was evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and gaps in treatment.

RESULTS

Median age at hospitalization was 63 (IQR 12) years, 21 % were female. Altogether, 1054 patients (96 %) were discharged with a statin prescription, while treatment was dispensed in 85 % within the following 90 days. During median 8 (SD 2.5) years follow-up, the proportion using high-intensity statin therapy ranged 62-68 %, whereas the use of ezetimibe increased from 4 to 26 %. PDC <0.8 was found in 22 % of statin users and 26 % of ezetimibe users. The proportions with a treatment gap exceeding 180 days were 22 % for statins and 28 % for ezetimibe. Smoking at hospitalization and negative affectivity were significantly associated with reduced statin adherence, regardless of adherence measure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term follow-up of patients with CHD, less than 70 % used high-intensity statin therapy with only small changes over time, and only 25 % used additional treatment with ezetimibe. We identified factors associated with reduced statin adherence that may be target for interventions.

25 years of lipid-lowering therapy: secular trends in therapy of coronary patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Guidelines on dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) over the years recommend lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals by more intense therapy. Nevertheless, LDL‑C has increased in the general population. Real-world trends of LLT medication as well as of LDL‑C levels in cardiovascular high-risk patients are unclear.

METHODS

From 2158 patients who were referred for elective coronary angiography, lipid medication was analyzed at admission in three cardiovascular observational studies (OS) over the last 25 years: OS1: 1999-2000, OS2: 2005-2008 and OS3: 2022-2023. The three studies were performed at the same cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Austria.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients without LLT significantly decreased from OS1 through OS2 to OS3 (49.4%, 45.6%, and 18.5%, respectively, ptrend < 0.001). Moreover, the percentage of patients under high-intensity statin treatment significantly increased from 0% to 5.1%, and 56.5% (ptrend < 0.001). Significantly more patients became treated by more than one compound (OS1: 1.8%, OS2: 1.6%, OS3: 31.2%; ptrend < 0.001). In the latest OS3, a trend to fixed-dose combination of statins with ezetimibe was observed. Mean LDL‑C levels decreased from 129 mg/dL over 127 mg/dL to 83 mg/dL, respectively (ptrend < 0.001). Of the patients on high-intensity therapy 34% met the recent ESC/EAS goals (LDL-C < 55 mg/dL), but only 3% on non-intense therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that during the observational period of a quarter of a century, treatment intensity increased and LDL‑C levels improved considerably. Guidelines apparently matter in this high-risk population and are considered by primary care physicians.

Are statins making older persons weaker? A discontinuation study of muscular side effects

Thirteen percent of the Danish population are treated with a statin-half of these are in primary prevention, and most are > 65 years old. Statins have known muscular side effects (i.e., myalgia) correlated to reduced muscle performance. This study examines if years of statin treatment in older people introduce subclinical muscle discomfort and loss of muscle mass and strength. In total, 98 participants (71.1 ± 3.6 years (mean ± SD)), who were in primary prevention treatment for elevated plasma cholesterol with a statin, were included in this study. Statin treatment was discontinued for 2 months and then re-introduced for 2 months. Primary outcomes included muscle performance and myalgia. Secondary outcomes included lean mass and plasma cholesterol. Functional muscle capacity measured as a 6-min walk test increased after discontinuation (from 542 ± 88 to 555 ± 91 m, P < 0.05) and remained increased after re-introduction (557 ± 94 m). Similar significant results were found with a chair stand test (15.7 ± 4.3 to 16.3 ± 4.9 repetitions/30 s) and a quadriceps muscle test. Muscle discomfort during rest did not change significantly with discontinuation (visual analog scale from 0.9 ± 1.7 to 0.6 ± 1.4) but increased (P < 0.05) with the re-introduction (to 1.2 ± 2.0) and muscle discomfort during activity decreased (P < 0.05) with discontinuation (from 2.5 ± 2.6 to 1.9 ± 2.3). After 2 weeks of discontinuation, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 2.2 ± 0.5 to 3.9 ± 0.8 mM and remained elevated until the re-introduction of statins (P < 0.05). Significant and lasting improvements in muscle performance and myalgia were found at the discontinuation and re-introduction of statins. The results indicate a possible statin-related loss of muscle performance in older persons that needs further examination.

Differenze di genere e ipercolesterolemia: evidenze real-world dallo studio WECARE (Women Effective CArdiovascular Risk Evaluation)

Introduction:

The therapeutic control of LDL-cholesterol is essential in cardiovascular prevention, as recommended by the recent guidelines.

Objective:

To evaluate gender differences in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, treatment adherence and healthcare costs in patients on lipid-lowering therapy, stratified by cardiovascular risk in the Italian real clinical practice.

Methods:

An observational analysis was conducted on the administrative databases of healthcare institutions, covering about 6.1 million health-assisted subjects. After inclusion of all patients on lipid-lowering therapy between January 2017 and June 2020, the population was investigated in the period before the first prescription of a lipid-lowering drug and followed-up for at least 12 months. Clinical and demographic variables were compared after stratification by gender and by cardiovascular risk (very high/high/other risk). The main outcome measures were treatment adherence and direct healthcare costs during follow-up.

Results:

Of the 684,829 patients with high/very high cardiovascular risk, 337,394 were men and 347,435 women, aged on average 69.3 years and 72.1 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Men were characterised by a worse comorbidity profile. Regardless of cardiovascular risk, female subjects were associated with larger utilisation of low-potency statins and lower adherence (p < 0.001). The annual healthcare costs per patient during follow-up were higher in men than in women (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The results highlighted larger utilisation of low-potency statins, a lower adherence and a milder comorbidity profile in women, the latter feasibly explaining the reduced healthcare costs compared to men.