2015 Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and survival after adult and paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Establishment of a Sustainable Program

The rates of survival with functional recovery for out of hospital cardiac arrest remain unacceptably low. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) quickly resolves the low-flow state of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) providing valuable perfusion to end organs. Observational studies have shown an association with the use of ECPR and improved survivability. Two recent randomized controlled studies have demonstrated improved survival with functional neurologic recovery when compared to CCPR. Substantial resources and coordination amongst different specialties and departments are crucial for the successful implementation of ECPR. Standardized protocols, simulation based training, and constant communication are invaluable to the sustainability of a program. Currently there is no standardized protocol for the post-cannulation management of these ECPR patients and, ideally, upcoming studies should aim to evaluate these protocols.

Family presence during resuscitation in paediatric and neonatal cardiac arrest: A systematic review

CONTEXT

Parent/family presence at pediatric resuscitations has been slow to become consistent practice in hospital settings and has not been universally implemented. A systematic review of the literature on family presence during pediatric and neonatal resuscitation has not been previously conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the published evidence related to family presence during pediatric and neonatal resuscitation.

DATA SOURCES

Six major bibliographic databases was undertaken with defined search terms and including literature up to June 14, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

3200 titles were retrieved in the initial search; 36 ultimately included for review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data was double extracted independently by two reviewers and confirmed with the review team. All eligible studies were either survey or interview-based and as such we turned to narrative systematic review methodology.

RESULTS

The authors identified two key sets of findings: first, parents/family members want to be offered the option to be present for their child's resuscitation. Secondly, health care provider attitudes varied widely (ranging from 15% to >85%), however, support for family presence increased with previous experience and level of seniority.

LIMITATIONS

English language only; lack of randomized control trials; quality of the publications.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents wish to be offered the opportunity to be present but opinions and perspectives on the family presence vary greatly among health care providers. This topic urgently needs high quality, comparative research to measure the actual impact of family presence on patient, family and staff outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020140363.

Translation from animal studies of novel pharmacological therapies to clinical trials in cardiac arrest: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of new promising therapies to improve the dismal outcomes from cardiac arrest. The objectives of this study were: (1) To identify novel pharmacological therapies investigated in experimental animal studies and (2) to identify pharmacological therapies translated from experimental animal studies to clinical trials.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to first identify relevant experimental cardiac arrest animal models published within the last 20 years. Based on this, a list of interventions was created and a second search was performed to identify clinical trials testing one of these interventions. Data extraction was performed using standardised data extraction forms.

RESULTS

We identified 415 animal studies testing 190 different pharmacological interventions. The most commonly tested interventions were classified as vasopressors, anaesthetics/gases, or interventions aimed at molecular targets. We found 43 clinical trials testing 26 different interventions identified in the animal studies. Of these, 13 trials reported positive findings and 30 trials reported neutral findings with regards to the primary endpoint. No study showed harm of the intervention. Some interventions tested in human clinical trials, had previously been tested in animal studies without a positive effect on outcomes. A large number of animal studies was performed after publication of a clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

Numerous different pharmacological interventions have been tested in experimental animal models. Despite this only a limited number of these interventions have advanced to clinical trials, however several of the clinical trials tested interventions that were first tested in experimental animal models.

Trends in survival and introduction of the 2010 and 2015 guidelines for adult in-hospital cardiac arrest

AIMS

To examine trends in survival from 2006 to 2018 and to assess whether the introduction of resuscitation guidelines was associated with a change in survival after adult in-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Using the Get With The Guidelines® - Resuscitation registry, we included adult patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2018. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. An interrupted time series analysis was used to compare survival before and after publication of the 2010 and 2015 resuscitation guidelines.

RESULTS

The analysis included 231,739 patients. Survival changed annually by 1.09% (95% CI, 0.74% to 1.43%; P < 0.001) from 2006 to 2010, 0.26% (95% CI, -0.11% to 0.64%; P = 0.17) from 2011 to 2015, and -0.43% (95% CI, -0.96% to 0.11%; P = 0.12) from 2016 to 2018. The survival trend was lower within the post-2010 compared to the pre-2010 period (risk difference, -0.82% per year; 95% CI, -1.35% to -0.30%; P = 0.002) and within the post-2015 compared to the pre-2015 period (risk difference, -0.69% per year; 95% CI, -1.33% to -0.04%; P = 0.04). There was no immediate change in survival after publication of the 2010 and 2015 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital cardiac arrest survival increased from 2006 to 2010, after which the trend plateaued. The annual survival trend was lower following publication of the 2010 and 2015 guidelines. Research targeting in-hospital cardiac arrest as a unique entity may be necessary to improve outcomes.