Cause-specific death and risk factors of one-year mortality after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a nationwide study

Do Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis?

Chronic kidney disease patients appear to be predisposed to heart rhythm disorders, including atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter, ventricular arrhythmias, and supraventricular tachycardias, which increase the risk of sudden cardiac death. The pathophysiological factors underlying arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in patients with end-stage renal disease are unique and include timing and frequency of dialysis and dialysate composition, vulnerable myocardium, and acute proarrhythmic factors triggering asystole. The high incidence of sudden cardiac deaths suggests that this population could benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. The introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators significantly decreased the rate of all-cause mortality; however, the benefits of this therapy among patients with chronic kidney disease remain controversial since the studies provide conflicting results. Electrolyte imbalances in haemodialysis patients may result in ineffective shock therapy or the appearance of non-shockable underlying arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. Moreover, the implantation of such devices is associated with a risk of infections and central venous stenosis. Therefore, in the population of patients with heart failure and severe renal impairment, periprocedural risk and life expectancy must be considered when deciding on potential device implantation. Harmonised management of rhythm disorders and renal disease can potentially minimise risks and improve patients' outcomes and prognosis.

Effects and clinical implications of sacubitril/valsartan on left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients affected by chronic heart failure: A 24-month follow-up

Background

Compared to angiotensin inhibition, angiotensin-neprilysin "blockade" improves mortality and reduces hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Sacubitril/valsartan is known to influence left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling with systolic function improvement, although underlying mechanisms remain partially unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate whether sacubitril/valsartan promotes LV remodeling and improves LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (above the 35% threshold by echocardiographic evaluation) and to identify predictors of reverse remodeling in a real-world setting.

Methods

New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III patients with EF ≤ 35% were consecutively enrolled. All patients were on optimal medical therapy on the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Full clinical and multi-parametric echocardiographic evaluation, electrocardiogram, and laboratory tests were performed at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

In total, 69 patients were recruited from July 2016 to August 2018. Reverse remodeling was observed in 57.7% (30/52) of patients, occurring within 3, 6, 12, and 24 months in 2, 11, 13, and 4 patients, respectively. Twenty-four (46%) patients showed LVEF improvement above the threshold of 35% during follow-up, occurring in 1, 10, 9, and 4 patients within 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Primitive dilated cardiomyopathy and female gender were identified as significant predictors of reverse remodeling. NYHA class was improved in both remodeling and non-remodeling patients.

Conclusion

Sacubitril/valsartan promotes favorable cardiac remodeling and significantly improves LVEF in a significant proportion of HF patients within 24 months, both in NYHA class II and III patients with HF.