Clinical event reductions in high-risk patients after renal denervation projected from the global SYMPLICITY registry

Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence

AIMS

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved for clinical use in the European Society of Hypertension guidelines and by the US Food and Drug Administration. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of RF RDN using contemporary evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A decision-analytic model based on multivariate risk equations projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs. The model consisted of seven health states: hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease, and death. Risk reduction associated with changes in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) was estimated based on a published meta-regression of hypertension trials. The base case effect size of -4.9 mmHg oSBP (observed vs. sham control) was taken from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial of 337 patients. Costs were based on National Health Service England data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the ON-MED subgroup on three medications and pooled effect sizes. RF RDN resulted in a relative risk reduction in clinical events over 10 years (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.72 for HF), with an increase in health benefit over a patient's lifetime, adding 0.35 QALYs at a cost of £4763, giving an ICER of £13 482 per QALY gained. Findings were robust across tested scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN can be a cost-effective strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the UK, with an ICER substantially below the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold.

Physicians' perception of guideline recommendations for the treatment of resistant hypertension by renal denervation: Resistant Hypertension Working Group, Argentine Hypertension Society

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the perceptions and knowledge of specialized Argentine physicians regarding renal denervation (RDN) as a treatment for resistant hypertension (R-HT).

METHOD

A survey was conducted among 206 physicians, mainly cardiologists and internists, to assess their awareness and perceptions of RDN. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's Rho correlation.

RESULTS

The survey revealed that 83% of the responders are aware of RDN. Despite this high awareness, only 60% believe in its safety, while 33.2% are uncertain, and 6.8% consider it unsafe. Significant correlations were found between the awareness of RDN and perceptions of its efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights a gap between knowledge and confidence in RDN among specialized Argentine physicians. Continuous education and shared decision-making are crucial to improve the adoption of RDN in clinical practice. Long-term safety and efficacy data support RDN as a valuable tool for managing R-HT. Addressing safety concerns through targeted educational initiatives is essential.

Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence

Background

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved as an adjunctive treatment for hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the United States based on contemporary clinical evidence.

Methods

A decision-analytic Markov model projected costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and clinical events for an active cohort treated with RF RDN and a control cohort treated with standard-of-care (defined as 1, 2, or 3 antihypertensive medications). Cohort demographics and therapy effect were derived from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study demonstrating an absolute 9.9 mm Hg reduction in office systolic blood pressure and 4.9 mm Hg reduction compared with sham control. Clinical event risk reduction from blood pressure lowering was based on a meta-regression of 47 hypertension trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated against willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 per QALY (high value) and $150,000 per QALY (intermediate value). Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the findings.

Results

RF RDN yielded a significant risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.85 for cardiovascular death over 10 years). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.34 QALY at an additional cost of $11,275, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $32,732 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of RF RDN was robust across a broad range of scenarios and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Based on a lifetime projection, catheter-based RF RDN is a cost-effective, high-value intervention for hypertensive patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Does renal denervation require cardiovascular outcome-driven data?

Hypertension is a major driver of cardiovascular disease with a prevalence of 32-34% in adults worldwide. This poses a formidable unmet challenge for healthcare systems, highlighting the need for enhanced treatment strategies. Since 2017, eight major sham-controlled randomised controlled trials have examined the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation (RDN) as therapy for BP control. Although most trials demonstrated a reduction in systolic 24-hour/daytime ambulatory BP compared to control groups, open to discussion is whether major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-driven RDN trials are necessary or whether the proof of BP reduction as a surrogate for better cardiovascular outcomes is sufficient. We conducted an analysis of the statistical methods used in various trials to assess endpoint definitions and determine the necessity for MACE-driven outcome data. Such comprehensive analysis provides further evidence to confidently conclude that RDN significantly reduces blood pressure compared to sham controls. Importantly, this enables the interpolation of RDN trial endpoints with other studies that report on outcome data, such as pharmacological trials which demonstrate a significant reduction in MACE risk with a decrease in BP. Moreover, limitations associated with directly evaluating outcome data further support the use of BP as a surrogate endpoint. For example, conducting lengthier trials with larger numbers of participants to ensure robust statistical power presents a substantial challenge to evaluating outcome data. Thus, in light of the crucial need to tackle hypertension, there are notable advantages of considering BP as a surrogate for outcome data.

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

Effects of renal denervation on the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases

Renal denervation (RDN) is a neuromodulation therapy performed in patients with hypertension using an intraarterial catheter. Recent randomized sham-controlled trials have shown that RDN has significant antihypertensive effects that last for more than 3 years. Based on this evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved two devices, the ultrasound-based ReCor ParadiseTM RDN system and the radiofrequency-based Medtronic Symplicity SpyralTM RDN system, as adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory and uncontrolled hypertension. On the other hand, there have been no randomized sham-controlled prospective outcome trials on RDN, and the effects of RDN on cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke have not been elucidated. This mini-review summarizes the latest findings focusing on the effects of RDN on organ protection and physiological function and symptoms in both preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, the feasibility of using blood pressure as surrogate marker for cardiovascular outcomes is discussed in the context of relevant clinical studies on RDN. A comprehensive understanding of the beneficial effects of RDN on the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases with their underlying mechanisms will enhance physicians' ability to incorporate RDN into clinical strategies to prevent cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke. This mini-review focuses on the effects of RDN on organ protection and physiological function and symptoms in preclinical and clinical studies. RDN is expected to reduce the onset and progression of cardiovascular diseases including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke in clinical practice. LV left ventricular, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, VO2max maximal oxygen uptake, VT ventricular tachycardia, VF ventricular fibrillation, 6MWD 6-min walk distance, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, NYHA New York Heart Association, BBB blood-brain barrier, BP blood pressure.

Options for patients with out-of-control blood pressure: after all avenues have been exhausted

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for global mortality. Most hypertensive patients can be controlled with standard medication combinations, but some may not respond adequately to ≥3 or even to ≥5 antihypertensive agents.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the recent literature on difficult-to-treat hypertension identified by a Medline search, and we discuss the options for fourth line and subsequent therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

It is essential to confirm resistant hypertension with out-of-office blood pressure measurements and to consider lifestyle factors, adherence to medication and secondary causes of hypertension. When true resistant hypertension is confirmed and blood pressure is not controlled with an optimal triple combination, preferably as a fixed dose combination tablet, spironolactone is usually recommended as the fourth medication. Comorbid conditions should be treated as appropriate with sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sacubitril-valsartan or finerenone. Renal denervation appears to be a useful addition to overcome some of the problems of medication adherence. The endothelin antagonist aprocitentan may be a final option in some countries. Of the drugs in development, the RNA based therapeutics that inhibit angiotensinogen synthesis appear to be some of the most promising.

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

Cost Effectiveness of Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) aims to control BP alongside conventional BP treatment with antihypertensive medication. This analysis assesses the cost effectiveness of the addition of the Paradise uRDN System compared with standard of care alone in patients with rHTN from the perspective of the United Kingdom (UK) health care system.

METHODS

Using RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial data, we developed a state-transition model. Baseline risk was calculated using Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) risk equations to estimate the long-term cardiovascular risks in patients treated with the Paradise uRDN System, based on the observed systolic BP (SBP) reduction following uRDN. Relative risks sourced from a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were then used to project cardiovascular events in patients with baseline SBP ('control' patients); utility and mortality inputs and costs were derived from UK data. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Modelled outcomes were validated against trial meta-analyses and the QRISK3 algorithm and real-world evidence of RDN effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

A mean reduction in office SBP of 8.5 mmHg with uRDN resulted in an average improvement in both absolute life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained compared with standard of care alone (0.73 LYs and 0.67 QALYs). The overall base-case ICER with uRDN was estimated at £5600 (€6500) per QALY gained (95% confidence interval £5463-£5739 [€6341-€6661]); modelling demonstrated > 99% probability that the ICER is below the £20,000-£30,000 (€23,214-€34,821) per QALYs gained willingness-to-pay threshold in the UK. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and validation checks.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular ultrasound RDN with the Paradise system offers patients with rHTN, clinicians, and healthcare systems a cost-effective treatment option alongside antihypertensive medication.

Diagnosis and management of resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure that remains above the therapeutic goal despite concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a diuretic, with all agents administered at maximum or maximally tolerated doses. Resistant hypertension is also diagnosed if blood pressure control requires four or more antihypertensive drugs. Assessment requires the exclusion of apparent treatment resistant hypertension, which is most often the result of non-adherence to treatment. Resistant hypertension is associated with major cardiovascular events in the short and long term, including heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and renal failure. Guidelines from several professional organizations recommend lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drugs. Medications typically include an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a long acting thiazide-type/like diuretic; if a fourth drug is needed, evidence supports addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. After a long pause since 2007 when the last antihypertensive class was approved, several novel agents are now under active development. Some of these may provide potent blood pressure lowering in broad groups of patients, such as aldosterone synthase inhibitors and dual endothelin receptor antagonists, whereas others may provide benefit by allowing treatment of resistant hypertension in special populations, such as non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease. Several device based approaches have been tested, with renal denervation being the best supported and only approved interventional device treatment for resistant hypertension.

Sympathetic Pathophysiology in Hypertension Origins: The Path to Renal Denervation

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Microwave and Radiofrequency Denervation in a Chronic Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) has had inconsistent efficacy and concerns for durability of denervation. We aimed to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter microwave RDN in vivo in normotensive sheep in comparison to conventional radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sheep underwent bilateral RDN, receiving 1 to 2 microwave ablations (maximum power of 80-120 W for 240 s-480 s) and 12 to 16 radiofrequency ablations (180 s-240 s) in the main renal artery in a paired fashion, alternating the side of treatment, euthanized at 2 weeks (acute N=15) or 5.5 months (chronic N=15), and compared with undenervated controls (N=4). Microwave RDN produced substantial circumferential perivascular injury compared with radiofrequency at both 2 weeks [area 239.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 152.0-343.4) mm2 versus 50.1 (IQR, 32.0-74.6) mm2, P <0.001; depth 16.4 (IQR, 13.9-18.9) mm versus 7.5 (IQR, 6.0-8.9) mm P <0.001] and 5.5 months [area 20.0 (IQR, 3.4-31.8) mm2 versus 5.0 (IQR, 1.4-7.3) mm2, P=0.025; depth 5.9 (IQR, 1.9-8.8) mm versus 3.1 (IQR, 1.2-4.1) mm, P=0.005] using mixed models. Renal denervation resulted in significant long-term reductions in viability of renal sympathetic nerves [58.9% reduction with microwave (P=0.01) and 45% reduction with radiofrequency (P=0.017)] and median cortical norepinephrine levels [71% reduction with microwave (P <0.001) and 72.9% reduction with radiofrequency (P <0.001)] at 5.5 months compared with undenervated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter microwave RDN produces deep circumferential perivascular ablations without significant arterial injury to provide effective and durable RDN at 5.5 months compared with radiofrequency RDN.

Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.

Renal Denervation as a Complementary Treatment Option for Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension: A Situation Assessment

Uncontrolled arterial hypertension is a major global health issue. Catheter-based renal denervation has shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based, complementary treatment option for hypertension. In this situation assessment, the authors, who are practicing experts in hypertension, nephrology, general practice and cardiology in the Republic of Ireland, discuss the current evidence base for the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation with different modalities. Although important questions remain regarding the identification of responders, and long-term efficacy and safety of the intervention, renal denervation has the potential to provide much-needed help to address hypertension and its adverse consequences. The therapeutic approach needs to be multidisciplinary and personalised to take into account the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals in a shared decision-making process.

Twenty-Four-Month Blood Pressure Results After Renal Denervation Using Endovascular Ultrasound

BACKGROUND Renal denervation has proven its efficacy to lower blood pressure in comparison to sham treatment in recent randomized clinical trials. Although there is a large body of evidence for the durability and safety of radiofrequency-based renal denervation, there are a paucity of data for endovascular ultrasound-based renal denervation (uRDN). We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of uRDN in a single-center cohort of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from 2 previous studies on uRDN were pooled. Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure measurements were taken before as well as 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment with uRDN. A total of 130 patients (mean age 63±9 years, 24% women) underwent uRDN. After 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, systolic mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure values were reduced by 10±12, 10±14, 8±15, and 10±15 mm Hg, respectively, when compared with baseline (P<0.001). Corresponding diastolic values were reduced by 6±8, 6±8, 5±9, and 6±9 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.001). Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 16 patients, and all recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS In this single-center study, uRDN effectively lowered blood pressure up to 24 months after treatment.

Radio frequency-based renal denervation: a story of simplicity?

Radio frequency-based renal denervation is a safe and effective way of lowering blood pressure, a common condition associated with high cardiovascular risk. Several catheters have been developed to administer energy to the renal arteries and their side branches, thereby modulating sympathetic renal activity. The Symplicity Flex™ and Symplicity Spyral™ are first- and second-generation devices, respectively, for radio frequency-based renal denervation. There is a continuous need to further improve and adjust interventional antihypertensive therapies. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of these catheters and most were able to show radio frequency-based renal denervation to be feasible, safe and effective in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Herein, the authors discuss the pathophysiologic concepts of renal denervation and its procedural approaches, report catheter designs, summarize clinical trials outcomes and, finally, discuss real-world evidence.

Favorable effect of renal denervation on elevated renal vascular resistance in patients with resistant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective

To assess the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on renal vascular resistance and renal function in patients with drug-resistant hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Materials and methods

Fifty-nine patients (mean age 60.3 ± 7.9 years, 25 men) with resistant HTN [mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) 158.0 ± 16.3/82.5 ± 12.7 mmHg, systolic/diastolic] and T2DM (mean HbA1c 7.5 ± 1.5%) were included in the single-arm prospective study and underwent RDN. Renal resistive index (RRI) derived from ultrasound Doppler; estimated glomerular filtration rate (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula), office and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months after RDN to evaluate the respective changes in renal vascular resistance, renal function, and BP during treatment.

Results

Forty-three patients completed 12 months follow-up. The RRI changed depending on the baseline value. Specifically, the RRI decreased significantly in patients with elevated baseline RRI values ≥ 0.7 {n = 23; -0.024 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.046, -0.002], p = 0.035} and did not change in those with baseline RRI < 0.7 [n = 36; 0.024 (95% CI: -0.002, 0.050), p = 0.069]. No significant change was observed in eGFR whereas BP was significantly reduced at 12 months after RDN by -10.9 (95% CI: -16.7, -5.0)/-5.5 (95% CI: -8.7, -2.4) mmHg, systolic/diastolic. No relationship was found between the changes in RRI and BP.

Conclusion

Our study shows that RDN can decrease elevated renal vascular resistance (RRI > 0.7) and stabilize kidney function in patients with RHTN and T2DM independently of its BP-lowering effect.