Utilization and outcomes of early respiratory support in 6.5 million acute heart failure hospitalizations

Quality of Heart Failure Care in the Intensive Care Unit

Patients with heart failure (HF) who are seen in an intensive care unit (ICU) manifest the highest-risk, most complex and most resource-intensive disease states. These patients account for a large relative proportion of days spent in an ICU. The paradigms by which critical care is provided to patients with HF are being reconsidered, including consideration of various multidisciplinary ICU staffing models and the development of acute-response teams. Traditional HF quality initiatives have centered on the peri- and postdischarge period in attempts to improve adherence to guideline-directed therapies and reduce readmissions. There is a compelling rationale for expanding high-quality efforts in treating patients with HF who are receiving critical care so we can improve outcomes, reduce preventable harm, improve teamwork and resource use, and achieve high health-system performance. Our goal is to answer the following question: For a patient with HF in the ICU, what is required for the provision of high-quality care? Herein, we first review the epidemiology of HF syndromes in the ICU and identify relevant critical care and quality stakeholders in HF. We next discuss the tenets of high-quality care for patients with HF in the ICU that will optimize critical care outcomes, such as ICU staffing models and evidence-based management of cardiac and noncardiac disease. We discuss strategies to mitigate preventable harm, improve ICU culture and conduct outcomes review, and we conclude with our summative vision of high-quality of ICU care for patients with HF; our vision includes clinical excellence, teamwork and ICU culture.

Advanced Respiratory Support in the Contemporary Cardiac ICU

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The medical complexity and critical care needs of patients admitted to cardiac ICUs are increasing, and prospective studies examining the underlying cardiac and noncardiac diagnoses, the management strategies, and the prognosis of cardiac ICU patients with respiratory failure are needed.

National trends in mechanical ventilation among patients hospitalized with heart failure: a population-based study in Spain (2001-2017)

BACKGROUND

We evaluated seventeen years' trends (2001-2017) in the utilization of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or both types of ventilator support (NIV+IMV) among patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Observational retrospective epidemiological study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database.

RESULTS

Over a total of 3,634,044 HF hospitalized patients, we identified 164,815 who were treated with ventilator support. 70.5% received NIV, 24.9% IMV and 4.6% both procedures. Patients receiving NIV were the oldest and had the highest mean value for Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score. For all types of ventilation values of CCI≥3 increased significantly over the study period (all p<0.001). Patients who received IMV had the highest IHM (48.1%) followed by those with NIV+IMV (44.7%) and NIV (19.9%). The in hospital mortality (IHM) decreased significantly in patients with NIV+IMV and NIV and remained stable in those with IMV. Compared to admissions without ventilation, the probability of receiving NIV and NIV+IMV increased significantly over time, however IMV decreased significantly. Factors associated with a greater probability of receiving NIV vs not being ventilated included higher age, higher CCI and suffering pneumonia whereas male sex reduced the probability. For IMV and NIV+IMV the factors are the same than for NIV, except male sex that increased the probability for IMV and NIV+IMV.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant change in ventilator strategy in hospitalized HF patients over time. Even if the clinical profile is worsening IHM decreased significantly over time, but only in HF patients who received NIV and NIV+IMV.

Respiratory support in acute heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction

Background

There is little evidence addressing the use and differential impact of respiratory support in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with preserved (HFPEF) vs reduced (HFREF) ejection fraction. Therefore, our objective was to determine the usage and clinical outcomes of critical care respiratory support in AHF across the two populations.

Hypothesis

Respiratory support would be associated with adverse outcome in both HFPEF and HFREF.

Methods

We identified HFPEF, HFREF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) using International Classification of Disease‐Ninth Edition codes in the National Inpatient Sample between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014. We determined rates of IMV and NIV use. We identified predictors of need for IMV and NIV and the association between ventilation strategies and in‐hospital mortality in HFPEF vs HFREF.

Results

1.3 million AHF‐HFPEF and 1.7 million AHF‐HFREF hospitalizations were included; 5.98% of AHF HFPEF hospitalizations included NIV and 0.57% included IMV. Among HFREF hospitalizations, fewer (4.1%) included NIV and more (0.93%) included IMV. In HFPEF hospitalization, NIV use was associated with 2.24‐fold increased risk for death compared to no respiratory support in an adjusted model (HR 2.24 95% CI 2.05‐2.44) and IMV use was associated with 2.85‐fold increased risk for death (HR 2.85 95% CI 2.30‐3.53). This increased risk of in‐hospital mortality was similar among HFREF patients.

Conclusions

Use of respiratory support is increasing among patients with both HFPEF and HFREF and associated with substantially increased mortality in both heart failure subtypes.