Total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk for aortic dissection in aberrant right subclavian artery

A stented elephant trunk procedure with retrograde cerebral perfusion for a rare type of pseudoaneurysm with an aberrant right subclavian artery

BACKGROUND

Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly that increases the risk of aortic dissection (AD). Although several treatment options for cases of AD with ARSA have been proposed, such as traditional surgery, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and a hybrid procedure, a consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established. And there are no reported cases of pseudoaneurysm combined with ARSA.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 44-year-old male was admitted with a 7-days history of chest pain. A physical examination was almost normal. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed an ARSA arose from the distal aortic arch and pseudoaneurysm located distal to the origin of the ARSA. The stented elephant trunk (SET) procedure with retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) was performed under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. The postoperative CTA demonstrated a well-perfused ARSA, left subclavian artery (LSA), left common carotid artery (LCCA), and right common carotid artery (RCCA), and occluded pseudoaneurysm with no endoleaks. He was discharged on postoperative day 9 and was doing well during his 6-months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With a smaller incision, a simple cannulation method, shorter surgical and circulatory arrest times, fewer blood transfusion requirements, and effective brain protection, the SET procedure with RCP can be a safe and feasible treatment option for complicated aortic arch anomalies with ARSA.

Morphological characteristics and outcomes of aortic repair of acute type A aortic dissection occurring in patients with aortic arch branching variants

PURPOSE

To investigate the morphological characteristics and operative outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in patients with aortic arch variants.

METHODS

Of 616 patients with ATAAD, 97 (15.7%) had aortic arch variants, including bovine aortic arch (BAA, n = 66), isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA, n = 25), and aberrant subclavian artery (ASA, n = 6). The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the normal branching group (control, n = 519) and the total/individual arch variant groups.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, arch entry was more prevalent in the BAA (18.5% vs. 31.8%) and ILVA groups (44%) (both, P < 0.05), and right common carotid arterial occlusion was less common in the arch variant group (6.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.017). The in-hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 9.3%), new-onset stroke (7.3% vs. 7.2%), and 5-year survival (81.7% vs. 78.8%) did not differ markedly between the control and arch variant groups. Arch repair was performed in 28.9% (28/97) of the arch variant group using 3-4 vessel antegrade cerebral perfusion, with 3.8% in-hospital mortality and a 15.4% stroke rate, which were comparable to those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic arch variants may influence tear location and involvement of the supra-arch vessels but may not affect postoperative outcomes.

Management of complex thoracic aortic diseases with aberrant right subclavian artery

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively evaluated early and intermediate outcomes of hybrid repair of complex thoracic aortic diseases involving an aberrant right subclavian artery. This paper aims to report features and available treatment options for this rare, hard-to-diagnose, and manage, aorta-related vascular condition.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and May 2019, 13 patients (mean age, 60.1 ± 9.3 years; nine men) underwent complex thoracic aorta repair surgery. Six patients had a thoracic aortic aneurysm, two had type A aortic dissection, and five had complicated type B aortic dissection. Hybrid repair strategies included de-branching in combination with single-stage aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique performed in four patients, thoracic endovascular aortic repair in six patients, and 2-stage hybrid repair consisting of a total arch replacement with a conventional/frozen elephant trunk (first stage) and subsequent endovascular repair (second stage) in three patients.

RESULTS

One early death occurred: a patient with acute type A aortic dissection, who underwent Bentall procedure and aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique, died in-hospital of multiorgan failure 41 days after the procedure. The remaining 12 patients were discharged in stable condition. The median follow-up duration was 36 months (2-71 months). Two late mortalities occurred: a patient with residual type A aortic dissection, who underwent arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique, died of intracranial hemorrhage 3 months after the surgery. And 72 years old female patient died of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2 months after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that various hybrid strategies can be used to treat complex thoracic aortic diseases involving an aberrant right subclavian artery. The approach of choice depends on the features of disease pathology, the aortic segments involved, and the operating surgeon's experience.

A systematic review of open, hybrid, and endovascular repair of aberrant subclavian artery and Kommerell's diverticulum treatment

BACKGROUND

Aberrant subclavian artery (AScA) with or without associated Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) is the most frequently encountered anomaly of the aortic arch, it may be life threatening, especially when associated with aneurysmal degeneration. The best management is still debated and depends on many clinical and anatomical factors. A systematic review was conducted to assess the current evidence on the treatment options and their efficacy and safety for AscA and KD repairs.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed and Cochrane Library was performed, and articles that were published from January 1947 to August 2021 reporting on AscA and KD management were identified. Multicenter studies, single-center series, and case series with three or more patients were considered eligible in the present review. A comparison of outcomes of patients who underwent open surgery (OS), a hybrid approach (HA), and total endovascular repair (ER) (ie, 30-day mortality and stroke were analyzed when available and compared among the three groups (P < .05; Benjamini and Hochberg-adjusted P < .05; Bonferroni-adjusted P < .05). Titles, abstracts, and full texts were evaluated by two authors independently. Primary outcomes included survival rate, perioperative stroke, arm ischemia, and spinal cord ischemia. Endoleak, in the case of HA and ER, and reintervention rates were considered outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one articles were initially evaluated and 30 studies, totaling 426 patients treated for AScA with 324 KD, were included. Of the 426 patients, 241 were male (56.5%), and the mean patient age was 57.9 ± 12.0 years. The approach was OS in 228 patients, HA in 147 patients, and ER in 51. Dysphagia was the most common presentation in 133 cases. Aortic rupture was observed in 16 of the 426 patients (3.8%), including 14 AScA/KD (3.3%) aneurysm rupture. KD maximum diameter varied widely from 12.6 to 63.6 mm. The overall 30-day mortality was 20 (4.7%) (OS group 8/228 [3.5%]; HA group 10/147 [6.8%]; ER 2/51 [3.9%]; P = NS). The overall stroke rate was 4.9% (21/426) (OS group 10/228 [4.4%]; HA group 6/147 [4.1%]; ER group 5/51 [9.8%]; P = NS), including nine transient and nondisabling neurological deficits. Overall secondary procedures for complications were reported in 36 of the 426 cases (8.4%), mostly owing to endoleak. Follow-up varied from 13 to 74 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review assessed the current outcomes of the three types of therapeutic management for AScA and KD and demonstrated that they are all relatively safe and effective, providing satisfactory early and midterm outcomes. Long-term outcomes are warranted, especially for total ERs since the long-term durability of stent grafts remains unknown.

Surgical treatment strategies for patients with type A aortic dissection involving arch anomalies

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate surgical modalities and outcomes in patients with type A aortic dissection involving arch anomalies.

Method

Patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical treatment at our center between January 2017 and 31 December 2020 were selected for this retrospective analysis. Data including computed tomography (CT), surgical records, and cardiopulmonary bypass records were analyzed. Perioperatively survived patients were followed up, and long-term mortality and aortic re-interventions were recorded.

Result

A total of 81 patients with arch anomalies were included, 35 with “bovine” anomalies, 23 with an aberrant right subclavian artery, 22 with an isolated left vertebral artery, and one with a right-sided arch + aberrant left subclavian artery. The strategies of arch management and cannulation differed according to the anatomic variation of the aortic arch. In total, seven patients (9%) died after surgery. Patients with “bovine” anomalies had a higher perioperative mortality rate (14%) and incidence of neurological complications (16%). Overall, four patients died during the follow-up period, with a 6-year survival rate of 94.6% (70/74). A total of four patients underwent aortic re-intervention during the follow-up period; before the re-intervention, three received the en bloc technique (13.6% 3/22) and one received hybrid therapy (11.1% 1/9).

Conclusion

With complete preservation and reconstruction of the supra-arch vessels, patients with type A aortic dissection combining arch anomalies can achieve a favorable perioperative prognostic outcome. Patients who received the en bloc technique are more likely to require aortic re-intervention than patients who underwent total arch replacement with a four-branched graft vessel. Cannulation strategies should be tailored according to the variation of anatomy, but routine cannulation with the right axillary artery can still be performed in most patients with arch anomalies, even for patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Does preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy affect bleeding and mortality after total arch repair for acute type A dissection?

OBJECTIVES

Data are scarce and mixed regarding the impact of preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on the surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We seek to evaluate the impact of DAPT on bleeding-related events and early- and mid-term mortality after total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk in such patients.

METHODS

This study comprised 48 ATAAD patients on preoperative DAPT and 418 without DAPT (the whole series, i.e. unmatched cohort), from which 45 matched pairs were selected by propensity score (matched cohort). Bleeding-related events (reoperation for bleeding, bleeding of ≥1500 ml within the first 12 h postoperatively or transfusion of ≥10 units of red blood cell or use of recombinant activated factor VII), operative mortality and mid-term survival were compared in the unmatched and matched cohorts. The impact of preoperative DAPT was evaluated with multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort, bleeding of ≥1500 ml/12 h postoperatively was more common in the DAPT group (18.8% vs 8.4%, P = 0.020); operative mortality was 9.7%, which did not differ with DAPT (12.5% vs 9.3%, P = 0.48). Nor did bleeding-related events (54.2% vs 43.5%, P = 0.16) differ significantly between 2 groups. In the matched cohort, neither were drainage of ≥1500 ml/12 h (20% vs 6.7%, P = 0.063) and bleeding-related events (53.3% vs 42.2%, P = 0.30), nor operative mortality (13.8 vs 8.9%, P = 0.50) and mid-term survival (79.3% vs 76.4%, P = 0.93) significantly different between 2 groups. DAPT was not identified as a predictor for operative mortality [odd ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-3.08; P = 0.96; adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.22-7.20; P = 0.78] and bleeding-related events (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.76-2.95; P = 0.24; adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 0.80-3.66; P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ATAAD undergoing total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk, although preoperative DAPT led to more postoperative bleeding, it did not increase bleeding-related events nor operative mortality nor mid-term death. The results of this study imply that for patients with ATAAD, emergency surgical repair, even if as extensive as total arch repair, should not be contraindicated or delayed simply because of ongoing DAPT.