Thromboembolic complications in transfemoral aortic valve implantation due to aortic wall thrombus and shaggy aorta syndrome

Association Between Aortic Wall Thrombus and Thromboembolic Events After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events, particularly strokes, remain a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Embolic protection devices have failed to show significant clinical benefit in large randomized clinical trials. Aortic wall thrombus (AWT) is often observed on multidetector computed tomography during TAVR work-up, but its prognostic significance is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the association between the presence of AWT and the incidence of thromboembolic outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR for severe aortic stenosis.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent TF TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between January 2011 and April 2022. A dedicated scale (range: 0-10) was qualitatively used to assess AWT. The primary outcome was a composite of procedural thromboembolic events defined as ischemic stroke, blue toe syndrome, bowel ischemia, or other solid organ infarction. The secondary endpoints were ischemic strokes and procedural death.

RESULTS

Of the 641 patients included, severe AWT (score ≥8) was identified in 73 (11.4%). The presence of severe AWT was strongly associated with an increase in the primary outcome (OR: 8.48; 95% CI: 3.36-21.40; P < 0.001). This relationship persisted following multivariable analysis, which adjusted for comorbidities and procedural characteristics. The presence of severe AWT was also found to be associated with an increased incidence of stroke and procedural death (OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 2.00-15.30; P = 0.002 and OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 1.80-11.30; P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of severe AWT on preprocedural multidetector computed tomography is strongly associated with thromboembolic complications including stroke and mortality after TF TAVR.

A comparison of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms open repair in patients with or without "shaggy aorta"

OBJECTIVE

In the field of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open surgical repair (OSR), some preoperative characteristics are established risk factors for adverse outcomes, whereas others are supposed to be relevant, but their role still need to be defined; among them, the presence of "shaggy aorta" (SA), an extensive and irregular atheroma within the aorta. The aim of this study is to report the results of a single-center large cohort of patients treated with OSR for TAAA with SA, comparing the outcomes with patients affected by TAAA without SA, and analyzing the impact of the scores for SA on the outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive patients receiving OSR for TAAA between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data from patients with degenerative TAAA were included and analyzed for preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes; patients with ruptured TAAA, and patients with aortic dissection were excluded from the analysis. Patients with degenerative aortic aneurysm, thrombus measurement in non-aneurysmal aortic segments (≤40 mm), atheroma thickness ≥5 mm, and finger-like thrombus projection were included in the SA group, whereas the others were included in the non-shaggy aorta group (NSA group). The SA group and NSA group were compared using a propensity-matched comparison. Preoperative computed tomography scans of patients in the SA group were also stratified according to SA grading scores.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients with SA were identified (male, n = 43 [74.1%], mean age 70.1 ± 7.8 years) among 497 patients with TAAA treated with open surgical repair. After propensity matching, there were 57 patients in the SA group and 57 in the NSA group with correction of all differences in baseline characteristics. Patients in the SA group presented significantly higher in-hospital mortality (SA group, 14.0% vs NSA group, 3.5%; P = .047), postoperative acute renal failure (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease [RIFLE], 3-5) (SA group, 21.1% vs NSA group, 5.3%; P = .013), and postoperative embolization (SA group, 28.1% vs NSA group, 8.8%; P = .008). Spinal cord ischemia and stroke rate were not significantly influenced by the presence of SA. In the SA group, 16 patients (27.6%) with end-organ embolization were compared with 42 patients (72.4%) without a documented embolization considering the grade of aortic "shagginess" and no significant difference was identified (P = .546).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a better knowledge of the SA disease, new classifications, and intraoperative adjuncts, TAAA patients with SA treated with OSR have worse postoperative outcomes if compared with patients without SA. The presence of SA is a risk factor itself, whereas the grade of "shagginess" seems not to impact on postoperative outcomes.