Most hospitalized patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation have advanced disease preventing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

BACKGROUND

More than moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high mortality. Surgical tricuspid valve repair and replacements are rarely performed due to high operative mortality risk, mainly attributed to late presentation. Novel transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) devices are being developed as an alternative to surgery. The population of patients presenting to tertiary care centers who can benefit from TTVI has not been well defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 12,677 consecutive 2D echocardiograms completed at our tertiary care center between March 2021 and March 2022 and identified hospitalized patients with more than moderate TR. A total of 569 patients were included in this study. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected by individual chart review. We used the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on the management of valvular disease to retrospectively assign patients to medical, surgical, or transcatheter therapy.

RESULTS

458 patients (80.5 %) were assigned to medical therapy, 57 (10.0 %) were assigned to TTVI, and 54 (9.5 %) were assigned to tricuspid valve surgery. Of note, 75.7 % (431/569) of patients were precluded from any intervention due to advanced disease, and only 4.7 % (27/569) presented too early for intervention, being both asymptomatic and without RV dilatation.

CONCLUSION

Only 10.0 % of patients presenting to a tertiary care center with significant TR would be candidates for TTVI when these technologies are approved in the United States. Earlier identification and treatment of TR could increase the number of patients who may benefit from interventions including TTVI.

Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Review of Current Interventional Management

Tricuspid regurgitation is a common yet clinically complex problem, traditionally managed with diuretic therapy with no observable mortality benefit. Older studies on surgical intervention observed poor outcomes; however, this clinical reasoning predates current surgical approaches and novel transcatheter technology. The tricuspid apparatus is a complex structure that poses a technical challenge for surgeons and interventional cardiologists. Recent advances in surgical techniques and transcatheter therapy, particularly edge-to-edge repair devices, have demonstrated promising results for safety, reduction in tricuspid regurgitation, and improving quality of life. We review the clinical, imaging, and hemodynamic findings that characterize patients who should be considered for intervention, alongside the rapidly evolving approaches to interventional management.

Investigating the unmet need for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation

INTRODUCTION

Tricuspid regurgitation has been increasingly recognized as a clinically relevant entity with long-term prognostic impact on quality of life and survival. Despite this, there are still some unmet clinical needs regarding the management of tricuspid regurgitation that require further investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses current evidence for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation, focusing primarily on new catheter-based technologies. In addition, we discuss recent registries and clinical trial results.

EXPERT OPINION

A multimodality and multiparametric integrative approach has been preconized to assess tricuspid regurgitation mechanism and severity, and new technologies have been developed to address the main causative factors of tricuspid regurgitation. Matching the right device to the right patient and deciding when is the best time for intervention are major challenges in the management of tricuspid regurgitation.

Transcatheter and surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: Predicting right ventricular decompensation and favorable responders

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has gained increasing recognition in recent years both in the surgical and in the cardiological community. Left untreated, isolated TR significantly worsens survival. Despite being a strong predictor of negative prognosis, interventions to correct TR are rarely performed due to increased surgical risk and late patient presentation. Recently, the ultimate focus has been on patient selection, surgical or transcatheter indication, and correct timing. Furthermore, of paramount importance is the identification of predictors of outcome following treatment, in order to discriminate between favorable and unfavorable responders and guide the decision-making process of the most adequate treatment for every patient.