Robotic subxiphoid thymectomy versus lateral thymectomy: A propensity-score-matched comparison

Robotic-assisted extended thymectomy for large resectable thymoma: 21 years' experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and midterm oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy for patients with large resectable thymomas compared with small thymomas.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 204 patients with thymomas who underwent robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy between January 2003 and February 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the thymoma size (5-cm threshold).

RESULTS

The study comprised 114 patients (55.9%) in the small thymoma group and 90 patients (44.1%) in the large thymoma group. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding gender, age, proportion of elderly patients, or pathologic high-risk classifications. Apart from a longer operative time (P = .009) in the large thymoma group, no differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding surgical parameters and postoperative outcomes. No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group. During a median follow-up of 61.0 months (95% CI, 48.96-73.04), 4 patients experienced recurrence (1.96%). No significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (P = .25) or recurrence-free survival (P = .43) were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy is technically feasible, safe, and effective for treating large resectable thymomas. Moreover, midterm outcomes for patients with completely resected large thymomas were comparable to those with small thymomas during a median follow-up period of up to 5 years.

Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study

Subxiphoid thymectomy is a novel alternative to the transthoracic approach and sternotomy, with potential benefits, such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. We previously reported the initial experience with subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (SRATS) thymectomy using the single-port robotic system (SPS). However, the efficacy of this technique remains unknown. Thus, this study examined the multi-institutional experience with SRATS thymectomy and compared the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) thymectomy. The data of patients who underwent subxiphoid SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, performed by three thoracic surgeons at three institutions between September 2018 and May 2024, were retrospectively collected. In total, 110 patients were included, with 85 and 25 undergoing SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, respectively. After propensity score matching, 25 patients were included in each group. The SRATS group was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.05), shorter chest tube drainage duration (1.32 ± 0.75 vs. 2.00 ± 1.29 days, p = 0.003), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.52 ± 1.00 vs. 5.08 ± 5.20 days, p = 0.003). Subxiphoid SRATS thymectomy using the SPS is feasible and is a good alternative to conventional thymectomy. Further studies are necessary to confirm its benefits.

Short-term outcomes of robotic subxiphoid-optical thymectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of robotic subxiphoid-optical thymectomy (RST).

METHODS

Thirty-seven procedures (thymoma, n = 19; thymic carcinoma, n = 1; myasthenia gravis, n = 3; and others, n = 14) performed between October 2020 and December 2023 were included. The right and left 6th intercostal midclavicular lines and subxiphoid, with an assistant port placed in the right third intercostal anterior axillary line, were adapted. Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

A good view of the surgical field is obtained. The median console time was 113 min and the time to roll-in was 30 min. The body mass index (BMI) was 21.6. One patient with thymic carcinoma required combined resection of the left phrenic nerve and left brachiocephalic vein without conversion to thoracotomy, and 1 patient had post-pericardiotomy syndrome with bilateral pleural effusion. There was a correlation between the prolonged time to roll-in and BMI (ρ = 0.439; p = 0.007). Pain was controlled with oral medication on postoperative day 1 and significantly decreased at discharge and at the first outpatient visit without epidural anesthesia (median NRS scores: 4, 1, and 1, respectively).

CONCLUSION

RST is a safe procedure that provides surgeons with a sufficient view of the anterior mediastinum and causes minimal postoperative pain.

Robotic thymectomy in thymic tumours: a multicentre, nation-wide study

OBJECTIVES

Robotic thymectomy has been suggested and considered technically feasible for thymic tumours. However, because of small-sample series and the lack of data on long-term results, controversies still exist on surgical and oncological results with this approach. We performed a large national multicentre study sought to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in thymic epithelial tumours.

METHODS

All patients with thymic epithelial tumours operated through a robotic thoracoscopic approach between 2002 and 2022 from 15 Italian centres were enrolled. Demographic characteristics, clinical, intraoperative, postoperative, pathological and follow-up data were retrospectively collected and reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 669 patients (307 men and 362 women), 312 (46.6%) of whom had associated myasthenia gravis. Complete thymectomy was performed in 657 (98%) cases and in 57 (8.5%) patients resection of other structures was necessary, with a R0 resection in all but 9 patients (98.6%). Twenty-three patients (3.4%) needed open conversion, but no perioperative mortality occurred. Fifty-one patients (7.7%) had postoperative complications. The median diameter of tumour resected was 4 cm (interquartile range 3-5.5 cm), and Masaoka stage was stage I in 39.8% of patients, stage II in 56.1%, stage III in 3.5% and stage IV in 0.6%. Thymoma was observed in 90.2% of patients while thymic carcinoma occurred in 2.8% of cases. At the end of the follow-up, only 2 patients died for tumour-related causes. Five- and ten-year recurrence rates were 7.4% and 8.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the largest collection of robotic thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumours we demonstrated that robot-enhanced thoracoscopic thymectomy is a technically sound and safe procedure with a low complication rate and optimal oncological outcomes.

[Robot-assisted Mediastinal Surgery]

Because of the many important anatomical structures located closely together at very small distances, mediastinal surgery has been traditionally demanding and challenging within thoracic surgery. With their great variability, mediastinal masses in the anterior, middle or posterior mediastinal compartment result in surgical indications with different principle focuses. The technical opportunities of robotic assistance can thereby most effectively support the requirement of precision for all oncological aspects. Anterior mediastinal operations are most often performed, thymectomy being the most common operation. The radicality of thymectomy is of special importance. The worldwide tremendous development of robot-assisted mediastinal surgery confirms its initial and continuous role as a pacemaker for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Robotic Mediastinal Tumor Resections: Position and Port Placement

This study aimed to determine the optimal position and port placement during robotic resection for various mediastinal tumors. For anterior mediastinal tumors, total or extended thymectomy is commonly performed in the supine position using the lateral or subxiphoid approach. Although it is unclear which approach is better during robotic thymectomy, technical advantages of subxiphoid approach are beneficial for patients with myasthenia who require extended thymectomy. Partial thymectomy is performed in the supine position using a lateral approach. Superior, middle, and posterior mediastinal tumors are resected in the decubitus position using the lateral approach, whereas dumbbell tumor resection, which requires a posterior approach, can be performed in the prone position. The position and port placement should be chosen depending on the size, location, and aggressiveness of the tumor. In this study, we describe how to choose which of these different robotic approaches can be used based on our experience and previous reports.