Lymph but Not Blood Vessel Invasion Is Independent Prognostic in Lung Cancer Patients Treated by VATS-Lobectomy and Might Represent a Future Upstaging Factor for Early Stages

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The patient’s outcome depends on tumor size, lymph node involvement and metastatic spread at the time of diagnosis. The prognostic value of lymph and blood vessel invasion, however, is still insufficiently investigated. We retrospectively examined the invasion of lymph vessels and blood vessels separately as two possible prognostic factors in 160 patients who underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer at our institution between 2014 and 2019. Lymph vessel invasion was significantly associated with the UICC stage, lymph node involvement, tumor dedifferentiation, blood vessel invasion and recurrence. Blood vessel invasion tended to be negative prognostic, but missed the level of significance (p = 0.108). Lymph vessel invasion, on the other hand, proved to be a prognostic factor for both histological subtypes, adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001) as well as squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.018). After multivariate analysis apart from the UICC stage, only lymph vessel invasion remained independently prognostic (p = 0.018). Remarkably, we found analogue survival curve progressions of patients with stage I, with lymph vessel invasion, compared to stage II non-small-cell lung cancer. After further validation in prospective studies, lymph vessel invasion might be considered as an upstaging factor in resectable lung cancer. Especially in the early-stage of the disease, it might represent an additional risk factor to consider adjuvant therapy after surgical resection.

Biomarker Potential of Preoperative Tumor Size in Determination of the Lymphovascular Invasion in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer and Lung Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The invasion of blood and lymph vessels with tumor tissue represents a negative prognostic factor of the disease course in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM

The aim of the study was to determine the marker value of a preoperatively determined size of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and its impact on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in resected lung tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The conducted observational cross-sectional study included 322 patients with a complete resection of confirmed squamous cell lung carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma. Preoperative size and type of tumor were determined by a preoperative chest computed tomography scan and cytological/histological analysis of obtained samples, while LVI status was determined by pathohistological analysis of resected tumor lung tissue. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess whether tumor size could serve as a reliable marker for LVI. P < 0.05 was considered statically significant.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference in the frequency of tumor size (P = 0.580) along with LVI (P = 0.656) was not established between the patients with squamous cell lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma. A ratio between the size of lung adenocarcinoma and LVI status (P < 0.001) was determined as statistically significant, while such a difference was not established in squamous cell lung cancer (P = 0.052). The ROC analysis revealed that tumor size >39 mm in patients with lung adenocarcinoma has obtained a sensitivity of 70.8% and a specificity of 60.9% to differentiate patients with a LVI (areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.70; 95% CI 0.60‒0.79; P < 0.001). A tumor size >4.6 cm in patients with squamous cell lung cancer obtained a sensitivity of 56.5% and a specificity of 60.3% to differentiate patients with a LVI (AUC = 0.59; 95% CI 0.50‒0.67; P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative size of lung adenocarcinoma could be an acceptable marker of LVI presence in resected lung tissue, while in the squamous cell lung cancer, a potential biomarker role of the preoperative size of the tumor was inadequate.

Tumor Differentiation and EGFR Mutation Associated with Disease-Free Survival in Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Curative Surgery

Background

Nearly 30% of stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer patients eventually die of recurrence or metastasis. This study aimed to predict stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) patients who underwent radical resection with a high risk of recurrence or metastasis.

Methods

Information on clinicopathological, genetic and therapeutic features and recurrence status was collected in this retrospective and two-center study. A nomogram based on multivariate analysis was established to predict disease-free survival. Further stratification was performed to identify populations with a high risk of relapse.

Results

A total of 1584 patients with pathological stage IA LADC who underwent radical surgery between 2011 and 2015 were enrolled from two medical institutions in this study. The nomogram including tumor differentiation and EGFR mutation had a higher C-index of 0.880 (95% CI 0.833–0.926) compared to 0.598 (95% CI 0.486–0.711) for the AJCC 8th TNM staging system. Furthermore, the C-index for the validation cohort was 0.798 (95% CI 0.738–0.857). In addition, the 3-year cumulative nonrecurrence rate in the high-risk group stratified by this model was 21.8% compared to 98.1% in the low-risk group.

Conclusion

This study proposed a new nomogram including tumor differentiation and EGFR mutation to predict recurrence or metastatic probability in stage IA LADC patients who underwent radical surgery. This nomogram could identify patients in the high-risk group and help guide adjuvant treatment in the future.

Comparison of prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after lobectomy versus sublobar resection: A propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-known poor prognostic factor after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the prognostic effect of LVI in patients who undergo sublobar resection has not been fully evaluated. Thus, we compared the prognostic impact of LVI in stage IA patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2016. The prognostic impact of LVI was calculated by the Cox proportional hazard regression model. To adjust for the differences in confounding variables between LVI-positive and LVI-negative patients, propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out in patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection.

RESULTS

Among the stage IA NSCLC patients (n = 2134), 184 (8.6%) had been diagnosed with LVI, of whom 144 (8.9%) were in the lobectomy group (n = 1614) and 40 (7.7%) were in the sublobar resection group (n = 520). In multivariable analysis, LVI was a significant risk factor for both overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.96; p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.68-3.17; p < 0.001). After PSM, the prognostic impact of LVI was greater in the sublobar resection group (HR = 4.93 and 4.25 for OS and RFS, respectively) than in the lobectomy group (HR = 1.77 and 2.51 for OS and RFS, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LVI was significantly associated with worse OS and RFS in stage IA NSCLC patients. The prognostic impact of LVI was more pronounced in the sublobar resection group than in the lobectomy group.

Lymphatic invasion is a cause of local recurrence after wedge resection of primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

After securing a sufficient surgical margin at wedge resection and finding no pathologic evidence of residual tumor at the surgical margin, a considerable number of patients develop local recurrence. We investigated the correlation between sub-pleural lymphatic flow and local recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 144 non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent wedge resection between January 2006 and December 2014 at our institution.

RESULTS

Postoperative recurrence was observed in 36 patients (25%). Of these, local recurrence was observed in 29 patients (80.5%). The proportion of all recurrence and local recurrence were significantly higher among patients with lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) (p < 0.0001). Recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with LVI (24.8%) than in patients without LVI (80.2%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated LVI (odds ratio = 6.420, p = 0.0009) as a significant predictor of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral lymphatic invasion represents a major cause of local recurrence. Although we should aim for radical surgery whenever possible, when limited surgery is the only option, postoperative adjuvant treatment may need to be considered for patients showing lymphatic invasion even at an early stage.

Proposal on incorporating lymphovascular invasion as a T-descriptor for stage I lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and Visceral Pleural Invasion (VPI) have been reported to be risk factors for stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, only VPI was incorporated into the current 8th Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification. This study aimed to explore the prognostic effect of LVI and VPI on TNM staging in pathological stage I NSCLC.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 2633 consecutive p-stage I NSCLC patients in the Shanghai Chest Hospital (2008-2012). By using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model, we identified the correlations between LVI, VPI, and clinical outcomes in p-stage 1 NSCLC.

RESULTS

Of all 2633 p-stage I NSCLC patients, 222 were pathologically diagnosed with LVI and 836 pathologically with VPI. The 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with LVI was significantly worse compared to those without LVI (61.2% vs 82.0%, p < 0.001; 73.3% vs 88.1%, p < 0.001). The same results emerged for patients with VPI (70.1% vs 85.9%, p < 0.001; 82.3% vs 90.0%, p < 0.001). Using the univariable and multivariable analysis, we found that when tumor diameter was 3 cm or smaller, LVI (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.86-3.50; p < .001; OS: HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.72-3.71; p < .001) and VPI (RFS: HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.71-2.67; p < .001; OS: HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.04; p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors for RFS and OS. When tumor size was between 3-4 cm, LVI (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03-3.29; p = 0.039) and VPI (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.61-4.07; p < .001) were associated with inferior OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LVI significantly affected OS and RFS in stage I NSCLC patients. Our results suggested that it might be better to incorporate LVI as a T descriptor as VPI in the further TNM classification.

The Significance of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

A raised carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may be associated with significant pathology during the postoperative follow-up of lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 305 patients who underwent surgical resections for primary lung adenocarcinoma at a single institution between April 2006 and February 2013.

Results

Preoperative CEA levels were significantly associated with age, smoking history, pathologic stage including pT (pathologic tumor stge), pN (pathologic nodal stage) and overall pathological stage, tumor size and differentiation, pathologically positive total lymph node, N1 and N2 lymph node, N2 nodal station (0/1/2=1.83/2.94/7.21 ng/mL, p=0.019), and 5-year disease-free survival (0.591 in group with normal preoperative CEA levels vs. 0.40 in group with high preoperative CEA levels, p=0.001). Preoperative CEA levels were significantly higher than postoperative CEA levels (p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Postoperative CEA level was also significantly associated with disease-free survival (p<0.001). A follow-up serum CEA value of >2.57 ng/mL was found to be the appropriate cutoff value for the prediction of cancer recurrence with sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 72.3%, respectively. Twenty percent of patients who had recurrence of disease had a CEA level elevated above this cutoff value prior to radiographic evidence of recurrence. Postoperative CEA, pathologic stage, differentiation, vascular invasion, and neoadjuvant therapy were identified as independent predictors of 5-year disease-free survival in a multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The follow-up CEA level can be a useful tool for detecting early recurrence undetected by postoperative imaging studies. The perioperative follow-up CEA levels may be helpful for providing personalized evaluation of lung adenocarcinoma.

Risk factors of recurrence for resected T1aN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 177 patients

Background

This study aimed at identifying risk factors of recurrence for completely resected pathologic T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 177 T1aN0M0 invasive adenocarcinoma patients, and re-classified achieved surgical specimens according to the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) lung adenocarcinoma classification. Impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) for age, gender, smoking history, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and new classification was analyzed by log-rank test and Cox regression. Two existing prognostic grouping schemes of new classification were compared, and subsequently, the correlation of high-grade group in the better prognostic grouping model with clinical data was investigated statistically.

Results

The 5-year recurrence-free rate was 83.7%. The LVI and new adenocarcinoma classification were significantly associated with 5-year RFS (P = 0.012; P = 0.022, respectively). The designation of papillary predominant subtype in the low-grade group, along with lepidic- and acinar predominant subtype had more prognostic significance than the model of combining papillary-, solid- and micropapillary predominant subtypes as the high-grade group (P = 0.005 versus P = 0.181). This high-grade group has increased risk of recurrence in a multivariate Cox regression (adjusted HR 2.815, 95% CI: 1.239 to 6.397, P = 0.013), and is associated significantly more with male gender (adjusted OR 2.214, 95% CI: 1.050 to 4.668, P = 0.037), and, with borderline significance, the presence of LVI (adjusted OR 2.091, 95% CI: 0.938 to 4.662, P = 0.071).

Conclusions

Our results showed that the solid- and micropapillary predominant subtype of IASLC/ATS/ERS classification remains the only risk factor for post-operative recurrence of T1aN0M0 adenocarcinomas, suggesting that they can be indicators of aggressive tumor behaviors.