Ward-based, nurse-led, outpatient chest tube management: analysis of impact, cost-effectiveness and patient safety

Discharging Patients Home With a Chest Tube and Digital System After Robotic Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes for patients discharged home with a chest tube connected to a digital drainage system after robotic pulmonary resection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database as a quality improvement initiative. All patients had planned discharge on postoperative day one (POD1) after robotic pulmonary resection. Those with an air leak were discharge home with a chest tube connected to a digital drainage system with daily communication with the surgeon.

RESULTS

From January 2019 to February 2023 there were 580 consecutive robotic resections, of which 69 (12%) patients had an air leak on POD1; 38 of 276 (14%) after lobectomy, 24 of 226 (11%) after segmentectomy, and 7 of 78 (9%) after wedge resection. Of these 69 patients, 52 patients (75%) were discharged on POD1, 15 patients (22%) on POD2, and 2 patients (3%) on POD3. Chest tubes were removed a median outpatient chest tube duration was 4 days (interquartile range, 3-5 days). Of the 69 patients sent home with a digital drainage system, there was 1 complication requiring readmission for increasing subcutaneous emphysema. Five patients (7%) had system malfunctions that required return to our clinic for problem-solving. There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo robotic pulmonary resection and have an air leak can be safely and effectively discharged on the first postoperative day and managed as an outpatient by using daily texts and or videos with pulse oximetry data on a digital drainage system with limited morbidity.

Enhanced recovery after surgery program focusing on chest tube management improves surgical recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Chest drainage is a standard procedure in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. However, chest tube placement may deteriorate the ventilation capacity and increase difficulty of postoperative management of patients. The study investigated on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program focusing on chest tube management on surgical recovery of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 60 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) after implementation of ERAS program and another group of 60 patients undergoing VATS before implementation of ERAS program.

RESULTS

The mean time of first food intake was 12.9 h required for the ERAS group, which was significantly shorter than 18.4 h required for the control group (p < 0.0001). The mean time of out-of-bed activity was 14.2 h taken for the ERAS group, which was notably shorter than 22.8 h taken for the control group (p < 0.0001). The duration of chest tube placement was 68.6 h in the ERAS group, which was remarkably shorter than 92.8 h in the control group (p < 0.0001). The rate overall postoperative complications were notably lower in the ERAS group than in the control group (p = 0.018). The visual analogue score (VAS) scores on the second postoperative day exhibited significant differences between the ERAS group and the control group (p = 0.017). The patients in the ERAS group had a shorter hospitalization stay than those in the control group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests the ERAS program focusing on chest tube management could improve surgical recovery, remove patient chest tube earlier, and relieve patient pain after VATS.

Closed thoracic drainage in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) combined with spontaneous pneumothorax, is characterized by significant decline in lung function, and even cause cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters and indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) in managing closed thoracic drainage in patients diagnosed with COPD with concomitant by spontaneous pneumothorax.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical information of 60 elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax admitted to the Shexian Branch of the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine between March 2020 and March 2023. The clinical efficacy, complications, hospitalization duration, and costs were compared between patients with an indwelling thoracic catheter and those with a central venous catheter. Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the causes of catheter displacement.

RESULTS

According to our findings, there were significant differences in the IPC group's clinical efficacy, catheter operation time, and lung recruitment time (P < 0.05). Comparing the complications after catheter treatment between the two groups revealed statistically significant variations in the incidence of postoperative analgesics, catheter abscission, catheter blockage, and subcutaneous emphysema in the IPC group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between patients with and without catheter dislodgement regarding duty nurse's working years (less than three), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores (less than 15), lack of catheter suture fixation, and the proportion of catheters not fixed twice (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that when treating elderly COPD patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, indwelling thoracic catheters are more effective than the central venous catheter group. Patients' catheter shedding is influenced by the primary nurse's working years, APACHE II scores, and catheter fixation technique.

Review of patients discharged post thoracic surgery with chest drain <em>in situ</em> and nurse-based follow-up clinic

Persistent air leak and prolonged drainage are recognized complications of thoracic surgery, increasing hospital stay and costs. Patients can be discharged with a chest drain and followed up in a nurse-led clinic. We reviewed such patients and the rate of readmission after discharge to assess the effectiveness of the drain follow up clinic. Retrospective review of our prospective database for 22 months (March 2019 to January 2021). Analysis focussed on indication and duration of chest drainage, complications, and readmission for any reason. 62 patients (representing 5% of all thoracic surgery patients) were discharged with a chest drain. Median age was 67 years (range 22-85 years), 24 females and 38 males. 52% underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, 27% had a thoracotomy, and 21% had bedside chest drain insertion. Following discharge, median duration of chest drainage was 11 days [interquartile range (IQR) 7-18.75 days]. Patients had 106 review episodes in the ward-based nurse-led clinic. Indication was prolonged air leak (71 %; 72 clinic reviews), persistent fluid drainage following empyema evacuation (16%; 24 clinic reviews) and persistent fluid drainage for simple effusion (13%; 10 clinic reviews). Median length of drain stay was 30 days (IQR 19.75-54 days) for empyema, 10 days (IQR 6-16 days) for air leak and 8 days (IQR 6.5-12 days) days for simple effusion. 9 patients required readmission (14.5%) and empyema had developed in 3 patients (4.8%). Patients discharged with a chest drain in place can be followed up in a dedicated ward-based nurse-led monitoring clinic for optimal quality of care.

Outcomes of patients discharged home with a chest tube after lung resection: a multicentre cohort study

Background:

Prolonged air leaks are increasingly treated in the outpatient setting, with patients discharged with chest tubes in place. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors associated with readmission, empyema development and further interventions in this patient population.

Methods:

We undertook a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients from 4 tertiary academic centres (January 2014 to December 2017) who were discharged home with a chest tube after lung resection for a postoperative air leak lasting more than 5 days. We analyzed demographics, patient factors, surgical details, hospital readmission, reintervention, antibiotics at discharge, empyema and death.

Results:

Overall, 253 of 2794 patients were analyzed (9.0% of all resections), including 30 of 759 from centre 1 (4.0%), 67 of 857 from centre 2 (7.8%), 9 of 247 from centre 3 (3.6%) and 147 of 931 from centre 4 (15.8%) (p < 0.001). Our cohort consisted of 56.5% men, and had a median age of 69 (range 19–88) years. Despite similar initial lengths of stay (p = 0.588), 49 patients (19.4%) were readmitted (21%, 0%, 23% and 11% from centres 1 to 4, respectively, p = 0.029), with 18 (36.7%) developing empyema, 11 (22.4%) requiring surgery and 3 (6.1%) dying. Only chest tube duration was a significant predictor of readmission (p < 0.001) and empyema development (p = 0.003), with a nearly threefold increased odds of developing empyema when the chest tube remained in situ for more than 20 days.

Conclusion:

Discharge with chest tube after lung resection is associated with serious adverse events. Given the high risk of empyema development, removal of chest tubes should be considered, when appropriate, within 20 days of surgery. Our data suggest a potential need for proactive postdischarge outpatient management programs to diminish risk of morbidity and death.

Safety of early discharge with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Early removal of chest tube is an important step in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. However, after pulmonary resection with a wide dissection plane, such as pulmonary segmentectomy, prolonged air leak, a large volume of pleural drainage and the risk of developing empyema in patients can delay chest tube removal and result in a low rate of completion of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of discharging patients with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's experience of pulmonary segmentectomy from May 2019 to September 2019. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for discharging with a chest tube were discharged and provided written instructions. They returned for chest tube removal after satisfactory resolution of air leak or fluid drainage.

RESULTS

In total, 126 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy. Ninety-five (75%) patients were discharged with a chest tube postoperatively. The mean time to chest tube removal after discharge was 5.6 (range 2-32) days, potentially saving 532 inpatient hospital days. Overall, 90 (95%) patients experienced uneventful and successful outpatient chest tube management. No life-threatening complications were observed. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Five (5%) patients experienced minor complications. Overall, all patients reported good-to-excellent mobility with a chest tube.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful postoperative outpatient chest tube management after pulmonary segmentectomy can be accomplished in selected patients without a major increase in morbidity or mortality.

Uniportal Thoracoscopic Decortication for Stage III Tuberculous Empyema With Severe Rib Crowding

BACKGROUND

This study explored the safety and feasibility of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) decortication in patients presenting with stage III tuberculous empyema with severe rib crowding.

METHODS

From August 2017 to January /2019, 33 patients with stage III tuberculous empyema and severe rib crowding underwent uniportal VATS decortication with partial rib resection and the use of a customized periosteal stripper. Preoperative and postoperative chest computed tomography (CT) imaging and pulmonary function testing were analyzed to evaluate the clinical significance of certain imaging findings and surgical efficacy.

RESULTS

There was 1 conversion to open thoracotomy. Median operative time was 3.5 hours (range, 2.1-4.5 hours) and the median blood loss was 500 mL (range, 250-1000 mL). There were no perioperative mortalities. The incidence of prolonged air leaks (>5 days) was 81.8%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 4-5 days). All patients were discharged with 2 chest tubes, and median duration drainage was 39 days (range, 30-60 days). The presence of a low-density line between the parietal fibrous pleural rind and chest wall was demonstrated on chest CT in 13 patients. Intraoperative blood loss was considerably lower in these patients compared with those without this imaging finding. Follow-up was complete in all patients over a median of 8 months (range, 6-11.5 months). All patients recovered well and achieved notable improvement in pulmonary function.

CONCLUSIONS

Uniportal VATS decortication is safe and effective. Patients presenting with a low-density line around the thickened fibrous pleural rind on preoperative chest CT scan may be good candidates.

Outpatient air leak management after lobectomy: a CMS cost analysis

BACKGROUND

Air leaks after lobectomy are associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and protracted resource utilization. Portable drainage systems (PDS) allow for outpatient management of air leaks in patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria. We evaluated the safety and cost efficiency of a protocol for outpatient management of air leaks with a PDS.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer at our institution between 2004 and 2014. All patients discharged with a PDS for air leak were included in the analysis. The study group was compared to an internally matched cohort of patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer managed without the need for outpatient PDS. Study end points included resource utilization, postoperative complications, and readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 739 lobectomies were performed during the study period, 73 (10%) patients with air leaks were discharged with a PDS after fulfilling postoperative milestones. Shorter LOS was observed in the study group (3.88 ± 2.4 versus 5.68 ± 5.7 d, P = 0.014) without significant differences in 30-d readmission (11.7% versus 9.0%, P = 0.615). PDS-related complications occurred in 6.8% of study patients (5/73), and 2.7% (2/73) required overnight readmission. PDSs were used for 8.30 ± 4.5 outpatient days. A CMS-based cost analysis predicted an overall savings of $686.72/patient (4.9% of Medicare reimbursement for a major thoracic procedure), associated with significantly fewer hospital days and resources used.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria, outpatient management of air leaks is safe and effective. This strategy is associated with improved efficiency of postoperative care and a modest reduction in hospital costs. This model may be applicable to other thoracic procedures associated with protracted LOS.