Duct Stenting vs. Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt: New Insights Learned From High-Risk Patients With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation

Background

As no data were available on the comparison of outcomes between modified Blalock-Taussig shunts (MBTs) vs. duct-stenting (DS) in patients with pulmonary atresia (PA) and an increased ductal tortuosity and in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact septum (PA-IVS) with right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (RVDCC), we aimed to perform a single-center retrospective evaluation.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) underwent either MBTs (without additional repairs) (n = 56) or DS (n = 71). The primary endpoint was defined as arriving at the next planned surgery (Glenn or biventricular repair) avoiding one of the following: (1) unplanned surgery or unplanned perforation of the pulmonary valve (PVP) with a stent, (2) procedure-related permanent complications, and (3) death. Two subgroups were considered: (1) patients who had a ductal curvature index (DCI) >0.45 (n = 32) and (2) patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC (n = 13). Ductal curvature index (DCI) was measured in all the patients to assess the tortuosity of the ducts. Patients with DCI >0.45 were considered as being in a high-risk group for the duct-stenting; a previous study showed that the patients with a DCI < 0.45 had a better outcome when compared with those with a DCI> 0.45.

Results

The primary outcome was achieved equally in the two groups (77.5% in DS, 75% in MBTs). Hospital deaths, need for ECMO, and the occurrence of major complications was more frequent in the group with MBTs with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5, 0.8, and 4, respectively, and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.1–22.6, 0.7–0.9, and 1.6–10.3, respectively, and a P-value < 0.05. For the two subgroups, the primary outcome was achieved in 64% of patients with a DCI >0.45 who received MBTs compared to 20% in those with DS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2–10, P 0.005). While 74.1% of the patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC after DS had achieved the primary outcome, all patients with MBTs had an impaired outcome (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1–11.2, P 0.004).

Conclusion

MBTs showed a better outcome in patients with tortuous ducts compared to DS. DS seems to be superior in patients with DDPC with DCI <0.45 and patients with PA-IVS with RVDCC.

Percutaneous obliteration of the right ventricle to avoid coronary damage by sinusoids in patients with pulmonary atresia intact ventricular septum during staged single ventricle palliation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Suprasystemic pressure waves can damage the coronary arteries resulting in myocardial ischemia and excess early mortality. We aimed to reduce the coronary pressure wave through the sinusoids by abolishing RV volume with percutaneous devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four patients with PA-IVS and coronary sinusoids from the hypertensive rudimentary RV were evaluated at a median age 26.6 months (range: 2.7-51.7). Right ventricle coronary dependent flow to the left ventricular myocardium was excluded. All four patients had dual perfusion with competitive flow from the RV through the sinusoids to the coronary arteries. Devices used were: Amplatzer vascular plug II of 10-16 mm; 27 coils (diameter 5-15 mm) in the oldest patient. Right ventricular angiography after cavity obliteration showed no more significant coronary perfusion through the sinusoids. There were no complications or deaths. Only minor and transient changes in the levels of troponin were observed. Coronary angiography at pre-Fontan evaluation showed no progress of coronary abnormalities in two patients.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with functionally single left ventricle, obliteration of the hypertensive RV cavity by percutaneous devices is safe and abolishes the systolic pressure wave in coronary sinusoids. When performed early, this may halt coronary damage and avoid excess mortality.

Assessing the borderline ventricle in a term infant: combining imaging and physiology to establish the right course

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the challenges associated with the diagnosis and treatment of children with borderline ventricles. A borderline ventricle is one in which there is concern that it will not be able to support its circulation. If a biventricular repair is attempted and fails, outcome is often poor. Thus, this early decision is important.

RECENT FINDINGS

For the borderline right ventricle, options to add an additional source of pulmonary blood flow make the surgical strategy a bit more flexible than for patients with a borderline left ventricle. In general, outcome for a so-called one and one-half ventricle repair are generally good, though the long-term outcome and the effects of this physiology on lifelong exercise performance and quality of life remain to be seen. For the small left ventricle, often multiple surgeries are required to 'force' blood into the left ventricle and potentially help it grow. Though this strategy is successful in some, in others it results in significant residual cardiac issues including pulmonary hypertension.

SUMMARY

Determining whether a patient will be better off in the long term with a marginal biventricular repair versus a Fontan circulation remains one of the most difficult problems in the field of pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery.