Four-year outcomes with third-generation centrifugal left ventricular assist devices in an era of restricted transplantation

Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review

Background

End stage heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence is expected to rise with the ageing population. For suitable patients, orthotopic heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy, however, a paucity of donor organs has led to the development of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). These devices can be utilized as either a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or as an alternative to heart transplantation. While these devices can prolong life and improve quality of life, they are associated with a significant number of adverse events. We aim to systematically review the literature to quantify survival and the incidence of adverse events following implantation of continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVAD).

Methods

A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes following implantation of a cf-LVAD. Primary outcomes were survival and frequency of adverse events (such as bleeding, infection, thrombosis, stroke and right ventricular failure). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and assessment of functional status.

Results

Sixty-three studies reported clinical outcomes of 9,280 patients. Survival after cf-LVAD varied between studies. Industry-funded trials generally reported better overall survival than the single- and multi-center case series, which showed significant variation. The largest registry report documented twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight-month survival rates of 82%, 72% and 57% respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), device-related infection, neurological events and right heart failure (RHF). Bleeding, RHF and infection were the most frequent complications experienced by those supported with cf-LVAD, occurring in up to 35%, 40% and 55% of patients, respectively. Quality of life as measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and functional status as measured with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved after cf-LVAD implantation with no decline evident two years after implantation.

Conclusions

The paucity of donor hearts has led to the development of left-ventricular assist devices as a BTT or as a destination therapy (DT). Outcomes after cf-LVAD implantation are excellent, with short-term survival comparable to heart transplantation, but long-term survival remains limited due to the incidence of post-implantation adverse events. Despite these complications, quality of life and functional status improve significantly post-implantation and remain improved over the long-term. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of cf-LVAD therapy whilst also identifying adverse events as an area of increased morbidity and mortality.

Using existing technology better: Improving outcomes with the HeartWare left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

The HeartWare left ventricular assist device has been in use for over 12 years. We sought to determine how outcomes at our centre have improved over time.

METHODS

Review of electronic hospital records at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

RESULTS

A total of 255 first time adult implants were divided into 2 eras: Era 1: 2009-2015 (N = 154) and Era 2: 2016-2020 (N = 101). We prospectively aimed to avoid higher risk Intermacs Classifications in Era 2, which resulted in significant changes in Intermacs class to lower risk in Era 2 (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in survival in Era 2, with 1 year survival increasing from 70 to 80% (P < 0.05). This was particularly associated with lower 30 day mortality in Era 2 (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 15.5 ± 7%, P < 0.005). This was associated with better right ventricular function in Era 2, and there was a trend to more temporary right ventricular assist devices used in Era 2 (28 ± 13 vs 12 ± 14%, P = 0.06). Deaths from intracranial haemorrhage, sepsis and right heart failure were unchanged between eras, though there was a trend towards less deaths in Era 2 from combined thromboses deaths (stroke and device thrombosis; 3.3 ± 5.4 vs 11.1 ± 7.4%, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Better patient selection in association with more use of temporary right ventricular assist support has resulted in a significant improvement in survival. Intracranial haemorrhage, sepsis and right heart failure remain significant problems.

Effect of Preoperative Tricuspid and/or Mitral Regurgitation on Development of Late Right-Sided Heart Failure After Insertion of the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device

Right-sided heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device implantation is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although multiple predictors of early RHF have been described, information on late RHF is scarce. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of late RHF in left ventricular assist device patients. A retrospective analysis of all adult patients who underwent HeartWare-ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation in a single-centre was performed. Late RHF was defined as RHF requiring rehospitalization after 30 days of implantation. A total of 16 (10.3%) patients from 156 implantations developed late RHF. Median time to late RHF onset was 182.5 (interquartile range 105 to 618) days. Patients developing late RHF were older at surgery. A significantly higher rate of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation before implantation was found in patients presenting with late RHF (81.2% vs 33.5%; p <0.001). Several echocardiographic parameters at discharge postimplant, such as significant mitral regurgitation, demonstrated a strong association with late RHF. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that significant preoperative tricuspid regurgitation was the strongest predictor of late RHF (hazard ratio 5.50, 95% confidence interval [1.34 to 22.58]; p = 0.02). Significant mitral regurgitation postimplantation and older age also significantly predicted late RHF. In conclusion, preoperative significant tricuspid regurgitation and mitral regurgitation after implantation predict the occurrence of late RHF.

Initial conservative management strategy of HeartWare left ventricular assist device thrombosis with intravenous heparin or bivalirudin

Introduction and objectives:

Pump thrombosis is a serious left ventricular assist device complication, though there are no guidelines regarding its treatment. The main aim of this study was to describe a strategy of intravenous anticoagulation as the initial treatment in these patients and then to compare intravenous heparin with bivalirudin.

Methods:

All consecutive patients who received a HeartWare left ventricular assist device from July 2009 to March 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Patients developing a pump thrombosis were selected, and treatment, outcomes and complications were recorded.

Results:

During this period of time (116 months), 220 patients underwent HeartWare left ventricular assist device implantation and 57 developed pump thrombosis, with an incidence rate of first pump thrombosis of 0.17 events per patient-year of support (incidence rate of all episodes of pump thrombosis: 0.30 events per patient-year of support). All the patients were initially treated medically, predominantly with either intravenous heparin (n = 26) or bivalirudin (n = 16). Patients treated with bivalirudin during the first pump thrombosis episode had less subsequent re-thrombosis episodes (18.7% vs 57.7%, p < 0.05). In addition, percentage time in therapeutic range was greater for bivalirudin compared with heparin (68.5% ± 16.9% vs 37.4% ± 31.0%, p < 0.01). During the first pump thrombosis episode, 26.3% of the patients needed surgery (left ventricular assist device exchange (n = 8), transplant (n = 6) or decommissioning (n = 1)). The overall survival at 1 year was 61.4%, and there was no significant difference in survival.

Conclusion:

Left ventricular assist device thrombosis is a serious life-threatening complication; hence, we propose an initial conservative management of pump thrombosis with enhanced intravenous anticoagulation with either intravenous heparin or bivalirudin, with surgery reserved for refractory cases.

Heterotopic transplantation of a decellularized and recellularized whole porcine heart

OBJECTIVES

One of the final treatments for end-stage heart failure is heart transplantation. However, a shortage of donor hearts has created a long waiting list and limited benefits. Our ultimate goal is to create a whole beating heart fabricated on an organ scaffold for human heart transplantation. Here, we successfully performed the first transplantation using a decellularized whole porcine heart with mesenchymal stem cells.

METHODS

A porcine heart was harvested following cardiac arrest induced by a high-potassium solution and stored at -80°C for 24 h. The porcine heart was completely decellularized with 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate and 1% Triton X-100 under the control of perfusion pressure (100 mmHg) and maintained at 37°C. A decellularized whole-heart scaffold was sterilized with gamma irradiation. Cultured mesenchymal stem cells were collected and either infused into the ascending aorta or injected directly into the left ventricular wall. Finally, recellularized whole-heart scaffolds were transplanted into pigs under systemic anticoagulation treatment with heparin. Coronary artery angiography of the transplanted heart graft was performed.

RESULTS

In our decellularization method, all cellular components were removed, preserving the heart extracellular matrix. Heterotopic transplantations were successfully performed using a decellularized heart and a recellularized heart. The scaffolds were well perfused, without bleeding from the surface or anastomosis site. Coronary angiography revealed a patent coronary artery in both scaffolds. The transplanted decellularized heart was harvested on Day 3. Haematoxylin and eosin staining showed thrombosis in the coronary arteries and migrated inflammatory cells. Haematoxylin and eosin staining of the transplanted recellularized heart showed similar findings, with the exception of injected mesenchymal stem cells.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of heterotopic transplantation of a decellularized whole porcine heart with mesenchymal stem cells. The scaffolds endured surgical procedures. We detected short-term coronary artery perfusion in the transplanted scaffolds by angiography. Future studies should analyse the histological features of transplanted decellularized scaffolds and optimize the system for recellularization to apply this unique technology clinically.

How to cope with a temporarily aborted transplant program: solutions for a prolonged waiting period

BACKGROUND

Due to budgetary restrictions our university heart transplant program came to a standstill to be gradually restarted early 2011. Consequently waiting-times for transplantation increased dramatically beyond the usual 10-15 months. We reviewed the clinical results of this peculiar transplant program over the past 4 years.

METHODS

Since March 2011 until February 2015, 65 patients (age 48±23 years) were listed for heart transplantation. Eight patients (11%) of whom three in high emergency were transplanted without any form of mechanical assistance. Fifty-one patients required a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) Heartware (Heartware Inc., Miami Lakes, FL, USA) as a bridge-to-transplant due to terminal heart failure. Merely 5 listed patients remain without assistance.

RESULTS

One patient without assistance and 11 LVAD patients (22%) died on the waiting-list. Meanwhile 10 LVAD patients were transplanted after a 2-year waiting time (770±717 days). Four transplanted patients died of early graft failure none after LVAD explantation. Survival at 1 and 3 years was respectively 78 (72%) and 83 (78%) for transplanted and assisted patients (log-rank P=0.056). Cox multivariable regression analysis identified crash-to-burn patients (P=0.002) and waiting-times over 2 years (P=0.044) as risk factors for early death, while age above 60 (P=0.008) and ischemic aetiology (P=0.029) and pulmonary hypertension (P=0.092) were risk factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In times of donor shortage mechanical assistance proves very effective as bridge-to-transplant in patients for whom candidacy follows the standard inclusion procedures. In our settings, a steep increase in LVAD implantation served to salvage patients for whom transplantation became jeopardized due to an ever increasing waiting-time. Circulatory LVAD support could be considered as primary therapy in the future.

National Trends in Utilization, Mortality, Complications, and Cost of Care After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation From 2005 to 2011

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have shown survival benefit in end-stage heart failure patients. LVAD technology has evolved considerably with the development of continuous-flow devices.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2005 to 2011 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition procedure code 37.66, Insertion of Implantable Heart System, in any procedure field. Patients with primary diagnosis of orthotopic heart transplant or use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices were excluded. Procedural complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition codes and patient safety indicators. Cochran-Armitage and Cuzick tests for trend were used to identify time trends for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 2,038 LVAD implantations from 2005 to 2011. LVAD use increased from 127 procedures in 2005 to 506 procedures in 2011, and in-hospital mortality declined from 47.2% to 12.7% (p < 0.001), with sharp inflection points in the year 2008. Average length of stay decreased from 44 days in the pulsatile-flow era (2005 to 2007) to 36 days in the continuous-flow era (2008 to 2011). Cost of hospitalization increased from $194,380 in 2005 to $234,808 in 2011 but remained constant from 2008 to 2011. There was a trend of increased incidence of major bleeding and thromboembolism and decreased incidence of infectious and iatrogenic cardiac complications in the continuous-flow era.

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD use has increased and in-hospital mortality and LOS after LVAD implantation have declined. These changes coincide with United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of continuous-flow devices in 2008.

Initial 3-year outcomes with left ventricular assist devices in a country with a nascent heart transplantation program

AIMS

The need for the left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in patients with end-stage heart failure is well established, but prior to 2011, this was not available to patients in Kazakhstan. We describe the development of the sole LVAD programme in the context of a nascent heart transplantation programme and clinical outcomes for the first three years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From November 2011 to November 2014, 146 patients underwent implantation of 152 VADs (approximately 50 devices implanted per year). We retrospectively analyzed data from 135 LVAD patients who received HeartMate II (n = 95) or HeartWare (n = 40) devices. In 75 patients LVAD was used as a bridge-to-transplantation and in 60 patients as destination therapy, but only 3 of 135 LVAD patients received heart transplant. Forty-three patients of the LVAD cohort had died by the end of the follow-up period. The mean time on LVAD was 466 ± 330 days (range 5-1200 days). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients who continued on LVAD support were 93% after 1 month, 86% after 6 months and 77% after 12 months. The most common complications within the first 30 days after implant included right ventricular failure (n = 20, 1.85 events/patient-year), renal failure (n = 19, 1.76 events/patient-year) and bleeding (n = 33, 3.0 events/patient-year). Beyond 30 days adverse events included driveline infections (n = 46, 0.56 events/patient-year) and stroke (n = 33, 0.21 events/patient-year).

CONCLUSIONS

LVADs are an important therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation in the context of a developing heart transplant programme with outcomes that are comparable to those reported by other centres.