Mid-term outcome with pericardial patch augmentation for redo left atrioventricular valve repair in atrioventricular septal defect†

The V-shaped double-layer patch technique for complete atrioventricular septal defect: A novel surgical technique

OBJECTIVE

Several surgical techniques for repair of a complete atrioventricular septal defect have been developed. However, the postoperative complications with these methods may lead to reoperation during follow-up. The aim of this report is to share our experience with a modified surgical technique for complete atrioventricular septal defect that has anatomic advantages postoperatively and could reduce the reoperation rate.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients who underwent repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect using a V-shaped double-layer patch between April 2011 and September 2019 were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

There were no deaths (0%) and only 1 reoperation (3.4%) in the series. The aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 62.7 ± 16.0 minutes and 113.9 ± 25.9 minutes, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 5.1 years. To date, no significant residual ventricular septal defects have been detected and no left ventricular outflow tract obstruction has been seen on echocardiography in any patient. During follow-up, the left atrioventricular valve status was assessed as no incompetence in 9 patients (31.0%), trivial in 18 patients (62.1%), and mild in 2 patients (6.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The V-shaped double-layer patch technique is a valuable surgical option for patients with complete atrioventricular septal defects. The midterm results in our series document excellent performance of this technique, which augments the area of the anterior valve of the left atrioventricular valve to make it closer to a normal mitral valve and may also reduce the need for reoperation.

Propensity score matched analysis of cleft closure in complete atrioventricular septal defect repair

BACKGROUND

Repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (cAVSD) is achieved with low mortality. However, there is a high rate of reoperation on the left atrioventricular valve (LAVV), which is often attributed to non-closure of the cleft. Although non-closure of the cleft has been reported to be a risk factor for reoperation, no randomized-controlled or propensity-matched trials have ever been performed. We investigated the effect of cleft closure on outcomes following cAVSD repair.

METHODS

We reviewed 455 patients who underwent cAVSD repair between 1990 and 2019. To determine the effect of cleft closure, propensity score matching was performed on risk factors for reoperation following cAVSD repair.

RESULTS

Median age was 3.6 months (mean 9.6±20.4), median weight was 4.3 kg (mean 4.7±4.3kg) and 41.9% (191/455) were male. Early mortality was 2.9% (13/455), and survival was 89.8±1.9% at 20 years. Early reoperation was a risk factor for mortality (p=0.004). Freedom from reoperation was 72.5±4.0% at 20 years. Freedom from LAVV reoperation was 74.1±4.0% at 20 years. Preoperative severe LAVV regurgitation (p<0.001) and early postoperative moderate or greater LAVV regurgitation (p=0.007) were risk factors for reoperation, while trisomy 21 (p=0.03) and recent era of surgery (p=0.02) were protective. Propensity score matching yielded 106 pairs. There were no differences in long-term survival (p=0.71) or reoperation (p=0.26) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of cAVSD can be achieved with low mortality and good long-term survival, however, the reoperation rate remains high. Similar freedom from reoperation can be achieved with or without closure of the LAVV cleft.

A Modified Technique for Valve Regurgitation after Partial Atrioventricular Septal Defect Repair

Given its complex pathological anatomy, recurrent left atrioventricular valve regurgitation after partial atrioventricular septal defect repair remains a challenge for surgical correction. Here, we introduce a modified bridging technique by shortening the anteroposterior leaflet distance in selected patients with inadequate coaptation to compensate for the short leaflet height, specifically that of the anterior leaflet.

Double orifice and atrioventricular septal defect: dealing with the zone of apposition†

OBJECTIVES

A double orifice of the left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) associated with atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) can significantly complicate surgical repair. This study reports our experience of AVSD repair over 3 decades, with special attention to the zone of apposition (ZoA) of the main orifice, and presents a technique of hemivalve pericardial extension in specific situations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study from 1987 to 2016 on 1067 patients with AVSD of whom 43 (4%) had a double orifice, plus 2 additional patients who required LAVV pericardial enlargement. Median age at repair was 1.3 years. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years (1 month-32 years).

RESULTS

Associated abnormalities of the LAVV subvalvular apparatus were found in 7 patients (5 parachute LAVV and 2 absence of LAVV subvalvular apparatus). ZoA was noted in 4 patients (9%): partially closed in 15 (35%) and completely closed in 24 (56%). Four patients required, either at first repair or secondarily, a hemivalve enlargement using a pericardial patch without closure of the ZoA. The early mortality rate was 7% (n = 3), all before 2000. Two patients had unbalanced ventricles and the third had a single papillary muscle. There were no late deaths. Six patients (14%) required 7 reoperations (3 early and 4 late reoperations) for LAVV regurgitation and/or dysfunction, of whom 4 (9%) required mechanical LAVV replacement (all before 2000). Freedom from late LAVV reoperation was 97% at 1 year, 94% at 5 years and 87% at 10, 20 and 30 years. Unbalanced ventricles (P = 0.045), subvalvular abnormalities (P = 0.0037) and grade >2 LAVV postoperative regurgitation (P = 0.017) were identified as risk factors for LAVV reoperations. Freedom from LAVV mechanical valve replacement was 95% at 1 year, 90% at 5 years and 85% at 10, 20 and 30 years. An anomalous LAVV subvalvular apparatus was identified as a risk factor for mechanical valve replacement (P = 0.010). None of the patients who underwent LAVV pericardial extension had significant LAVV regurgitation at the last follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of AVSD and double orifice can be tricky. Preoperative LAVV regurgitation was not identified as an independent predictor of surgical outcome. LAVV hemivalve extension appears to be a useful and effective alternate surgical strategy when the ZoA cannot be closed.