Paediatric aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and microsimulation study

AIMS

To support decision-making in children undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), by providing a comprehensive overview of published outcomes after paediatric AVR, and microsimulation-based age-specific estimates of outcome with different valve substitutes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of published literature reporting clinical outcome after paediatric AVR (mean age <18 years) published between 1/1/1990 and 11/08/2021 was conducted. Publications reporting outcome after paediatric Ross procedure, mechanical AVR (mAVR), homograft AVR (hAVR), and/or bioprosthetic AVR were considered for inclusion. Early risks (<30d), late event rates (>30d) and time-to-event data were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model. Sixty-eight studies, of which one prospective and 67 retrospective cohort studies, were included, encompassing a total of 5259 patients (37 435 patient-years; median follow-up: 5.9 years; range 1-21 years). Pooled mean age for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 9.2 ± 5.6, 13.0 ± 3.4, and 8.4 ± 5.4 years, respectively. Pooled early mortality for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 3.7% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.7%), 7.0% (5.1%-9.6%), and 10.6% (6.6%-17.0%), respectively, and late mortality rate was 0.5%/year (0.4%-0.7%/year), 1.0%/year (0.6%-1.5%/year), and 1.4%/year (0.8%-2.5%/year), respectively. Microsimulation-based mean life-expectancy in the first 20 years was 18.9 years (18.6-19.1 years) after Ross (relative life-expectancy: 94.8%) and 17.0 years (16.5-17.6 years) after mAVR (relative life-expectancy: 86.3%). Microsimulation-based 20-year risk of aortic valve reintervention was 42.0% (95% CI: 39.6%-44.6%) after Ross and 17.8% (95% CI: 17.0%-19.4%) after mAVR.

CONCLUSION

Results of paediatric AVR are currently suboptimal with substantial mortality especially in the very young with considerable reintervention hazards for all valve substitutes, but the Ross procedure provides a survival benefit over mAVR. Pros and cons of substitutes should be carefully weighed during paediatric valve selection.

Comparison of early-stage stenosis and regurgitation results among patients who underwent aortic valve repair

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyse the results of paediatric aortic valve repairs in our institution.

METHOD

The data of 57 patients under 18 years of age who underwent aortic valve repair between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Early postoperative reoperation and hospital mortality rates were evaluated based on the ages of the patients, their preoperative diagnoses, and the surgical techniques used. Survival curves for groups of patients were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of reoperation was 14% (n = 8), and there were no significant differences regarding valve pathologies and preoperative diagnoses (p > 0.05). Among the repair techniques, tricuspidisation was considered to be a risk factor for reoperation (p < 0.05). Augmentation, the material used (0.1 PTFE or pericardium), and the number of cusps were not found to have significant effects on reoperation or mortality. The mean follow-up period was 29.86 ± 21.30 months. The survival rates of the patients were 88%, 100%, and 88.2% for those with aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and mixed disease, respectively, and no significant difference was found when these rates were evaluated with the log-rank test (p > 0.05). The mortality rate was 8.8% (n = 5), and undergoing surgery before the age of 1 year was found to be significant in terms of mortality (p = 0.032, p < 0.05). The bicuspid aortic valve group had the lowest mortality risk, while the Shone complex group had the highest.

CONCLUSION

With its acceptable reoperation and mortality rates, aortic valve repair should be the first choice of treatment in the paediatric age group. Early results were satisfactory in all groups.

Technical Modifications that Might Improve Long-Term Outcome of the Ross Procedure in Children

BACKGROUND

Failure of the pulmonary autograft (PVA) following the Ross procedure (RP) has discouraged its widespread use and led to modifications or alternatives to the procedure. We sought to analyze whether certain technical modifications could improve results of the RP in children.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients (median age 12 years, range 0.25 to 17.9) underwent the RP between 01/1996 and 12/2018. Concomitant Konno procedure was performed on 20/69 (29%). Prior interventions included balloon valvuloplasty in 30/69 (44%), and/or surgical valvuloplasty in 39/69 (57%). Technical modifications included utilizing the native aortic root for external annuloplasty, implanting the autograft using uniplanar horizontal sutures through the aortic wall, normalizing the sinotubular junction and wrapping the native root remnant around the PVA.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1/69 (1.5%), with no late death. No patient had neoaortic valvar stenosis and 7/68 (10%) had mild regurgitation on discharge echocardiogram. At latest follow-up (median 9.4 years, range 0.4 - 21.3) there was no significant change in the latest follow up Z scores of annulus, sinus or sinotubular junction diameters when compared to those at discharge. Three patients (4.4%) required late autograft replacement, two PVA repair, and two resection of pseudoaneurysm. Actuarial freedom from PVA replacement was 87% at 20 yrs. Freedom from right ventricular outflow tract catheter reintervention or reoperation was 83% and 80% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical modifications of the RP used in this cohort might successfully prolong the life of the PVA without compromising its growth, an important advantage in pediatric patients.

Congenital aortic valve repair using CorMatrix® : A histologic evaluation

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of heart valves provides substantial benefits, particularly in the pediatric population. We present our experience using decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM, CorMatrix^® ) for aortic valve procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the case histories of 6 patients (aged from 2 months - 14 years) who underwent surgery for severe aortic valve stenosis (n = 4) or regurgitation (n = 2). Aortic valve repair was performed on all patients using dECM as a leaflet replacement or leaflet extension. Follow-ups were performed using echocardiography. Reoperation was necessary in 4 cases, and the dECM was explanted and examined histologically and immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

The early post-operative period was uneventful, and the scaffold fulfilled the mechanical requirements. Significant valve insufficiency developed in 5 patients during the post-operative period (119-441 days postoperatively). In all specimens, only a migration of inflammatory cells was identified, which induced structural and functional changes caused by the chronic inflammatory response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a mixed immunological response of remodeling and inflammation following the implantation. The expected process of seeding/migration and remodeling of the bioscaffold into the typical 3-layered architecture were not observed in our explanted specimens.