Hybrid Repair of an Aneurysm of the Innominate Artery

Introduction

Innominate artery aneurysms (IAAs) are rare. They are notorious for causing thromboembolic events. Modern imaging modalities make early detection in an asymptomatic phase possible. In Kieffer group B aneurysms the origin of the innominate artery is affected. Thanks to the combination of open and endovascular techniques, off pump repair is feasible in patients with a fragile aortic arch. During this hybrid procedure the aortic arch is debranched and reinforced with a stent graft.

Report

A 73 year old white man with a history of extensive thoraco-abdominal aortic reconstructions for aneurysmal disease presented with a progressive Kieffer B IAA of 35 mm. He underwent an off pump hybrid repair. A bifurcated Dacron prosthesis was used for the debranching. The main body originated from the ascending aorta. The right limb was anastomosed to the common ostium of the right carotid and subclavian arteries. The left limb was anastomosed to the left subclavian and carotid artery. The aortic arch was reinforced with a 40 × 162 mm Zenith TX2 endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis was inserted through a temporary conduit on the main body and deployed during rapid ventricular pacing. The endoprosthesis lined the ascending aorta distal to the debranching up to Ishimaru zone 3. The antegrade insertion prevented excessive manipulation of the aortic arch and the tortuous aorta, which was lined with mural thrombus. Post-operative computed tomography showed a patent debranching with excellent alignment of the endoprosthesis without endoleak.

Discussion

Hybrid repair of the aortic arch is well described in literature. This technique was adapted in the treatment of a Kieffer group B IAA. The tortuous aorta and mural thrombus led to the antegrade placement of the endoprosthesis through the main body of the debranched aorta. This approach seems safe and feasible.

•

An innominate artery aneurysm (IAA) is rare and notorious for causing a thromboembolic event (cerebral and upper limb).

•

Surgery (interposition graft) is indicated in symptomatic lesions or lesions >30 mm.

•

Aneurysmal involvement of the aortic arch may require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

•

Aortic arch stent graft plus an interposition graft (hybrid) can prevent CPB.

•

The stent graft was implanted in an antegrade fashion preventing groin cutdown.

Midterm Outcomes of Zone 0 Antegrade Endograft Implantation During Type I Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair

OBJECTIVE

Type I hybrid arch repair has become popular as a procedure that is less invasive than total arch replacement. The major advantage of this technique is that antegrade endograft implantation can be performed during the procedure, thereby avoiding the complications of introducing the endograft from the groin. The aim of this study was to assess the midterm outcomes of type I hybrid aortic arch repair with antegrade endograft implantation.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients who underwent type I hybrid repair with antegrade endograft implantation from 2009 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, and peri-operative and late results were collected from a prospective database and analysed.

RESULTS

Four patients (13%) were female and the median age was 78 years. Median aneurysm size was 64 mm. Six patients (20%) developed stroke, and the 30 day mortality rate was 3%. Two patients suffered aortic dissection at the site of debranching anastomosis. The median follow up was 5.2 years. All aneurysms remained stable or had decreased in size at three years, and 82% were stable at five years. Overall survival was 79% at three years and 71% at five years. The rates of freedom from aorta related death were 86% at three and five years, respectively. During the follow up period, three additional left subclavian artery embolisations and one endograft relining due to type IIIb endoleak were required.

CONCLUSION

Midterm outcomes of type I hybrid aortic arch repair with antegrade endograft implantation for aortic arch aneurysms are reported. Although the incidence of peri-operative stroke was high, late sac behaviour was acceptable.

Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair using an ascending aortofemoral through-and-through wire technique for a severely tortuous aorta associated with rickets

Background

Severe aortic tortuosity of the access route often prevents successful complete exclusion of an aneurysm in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Case presentation

We performed antegrade TEVAR on a 79-year-old man with right hemiparesis. We deployed the stent graft from the ascending aorta with a tube graft conduit to treat a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm associated with rickets and multiple comorbidities. Although the application of a ministernotomy diminished the potential advantages of endovascular treatment in view of less invasive surgery, antegrade TEVAR using an ascending aortofemoral through-and-through wire technique was a good option in this patient because a conventional retrograde approach was not feasible due to his severely tortuous aorta.

Conclusions

To avoid device-related complications, it is crucial to make a prudent preoperative decision on a patient-by-patient basis, taking into account the appropriate access site, adjuvant guidewire technique, and adjunctive surgical interventions.

The feasibility and safety of a through-and-through wire technique for central venous occlusion in dialysis patients

Background

To retrospectively compare the operation time, success rate and efficacy between unidirectional and bidirectional procedures in the treatment of central venous occlusion diseases (CVOD), assess the advantages of the bidirectional approach, and determine the characteristics of CVOD appropriate for the bidirectional approach treatment.

Methods

A total of 49 patients who underwent endovascular interventions with all relevant data between January 2011 and December 2015 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, were included in this retrospective study, and were categorized into two groups: the 19 patients in group 1 had undergone percutaneous transluminal venoplasty (PTV) via a conventional technique (unidirectional procedure from the vein distal or proximal to the obstructive lesion), and the 30 in group 2 had undergone flossing wire technique (bidirectional procedure from femoral vein and the vein distal to obstructive lesion and using a flossing wire technique). The technical success rate, the fluoroscopy time in the procedure, perioperative complications, and patency were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

Compared with group 1, group 2 had a higher initial technical success rate (83.33% vs. 47.36%, p = 0.012) but a shorter fluoroscopy time (82.6 ± 26.1 vs. 116.1 ± 42.1, p = 0.048). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a lesion with a length of 6.5 cm was the best predictor of technique success (p = 0.02) in group 1, but no cut-off value was identified for group 2. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications between these two groups. The complication rates were 31.58% (6/19) in group 1 and 6.67% (2/30) in group 2, (p = 0.043), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two groups with respect to the stent patency rate.

Conclusion

Compared with the conventional technique, the flossing wire technique has a higher success rate, shorter fluoroscopy time, fewer complications and similar patency rate. It is a feasible treatment for CVOD, especially for long obstructive lesions.