Salvage surgery for local recurrence after carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with lung cancer

Local surgery feasibility and safety after carbon ion radiotherapy for primary bone sarcomas

BACKGROUND

It is known that several complications are caused by local surgery after radiotherapy. Clinical reports that describe the postoperative complications associated with surgery after carbon ion radiotherapy are sparse. This study aimed to elucidate local surgery feasibility after carbon ion radiotherapy specifically for primary bone sarcomas.

METHODS

The medical, surgical, and irradiation records of patients who had local surgery at the area irradiated with carbon ion beams between 2004 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the feasibility and indication of local surgery after CIRT.

RESULTS

There were eight patients who had 10 local surgeries at the irradiated sites among the 42 carbon ion radiotherapy patients. There were seven males and one female with a median age of 50 years (range 26-73 years). The reasons for surgery were three for skin toxicity and associated infection, five for bone collapse, and associated implant failure, and two for tumor regrowth. All surgical fields included the area of more than 60 Gy (RBE) irradiated dose. All three surgical cases caused by skin toxicity and associated infection had Grade I wound complication after surgery according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

CONCLUSION

Local surgery after CIRT appeared feasible in selected patients with primary bone sarcoma, especially for the patients with bone collapse and associated implant failure. However, infection and prescribed irradiation dose at the incision site must be carefully evaluated.

Reduction of Blood Loss by Means of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator for Thoracoscopic Salvage Anatomic Lung Resections

In centrally located lung tumors, salvage pulmonary resections pose challenges due to adhesions between the pulmonary parenchyma, chest wall, and hilum. This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes associated with Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) usage in thoracoscopic salvage pulmonary resections. Patients with centrally located advanced-stage lung tumors who underwent salvage anatomic resections following systemic or radiotherapy were included. They were categorized into CUSA and non-CUSA groups, and perioperative parameters and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study included 7 patients in the CUSA group and 15 in the non-CUSA group. Despite a longer median surgical time in the CUSA group (3.8 h vs. 6.0 h, p = 0.021), there was a significant reduction in blood loss (100 mL vs. 250 mL, p = 0.014). Multivariate analyses revealed that the use of CUSA and radiotherapy had opposing effects on blood loss (β: -296.7, 95% CI: -24.8 to -568.6, p = 0.034 and β: 282.9, 95% CI: 19.7 to 546.3, p = 0.037, respectively). In conclusion, while using CUSA in the salvage anatomic resection of centrally located lung cancer may result in a longer surgical time, it is crucial in minimizing blood loss during the procedure.

Results of emergency salvage lung resection after chemo- and/or radiotherapy among patients with lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of emergency salvage surgery following life-threatening events (serious haemorrhage and/or infections) among patients with lung cancer who had undergone chemo- and/or radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed the data of patient from 2015 to 2020, retrospectively. The clinical characteristics, including preoperative treatment, perioperative outcomes and survival time, were analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 862 patients who underwent primary lung cancer surgeries, 10 (1.2%) underwent emergency surgeries. The preoperative clinical characteristics were: median age, 63.7 years [interquartile range (IQR) 55-70.5]; sex (male/female), 9/1; clinical staging before initial treatment (I/II/III/IV), 1/1/3/5; initial treatment (chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy/proton beam therapy), 5/4/1; and indications for emergency surgery (lung abscess/lung abscess with haemoptysis/haemoptysis/empyema), 5/3/1/1. The selected procedures and results were as follows: lobectomy/bilobectomy/pneumonectomy, 8/1/1 (all open thoracotomies); median operation time, 191.0 min (IQR 151-279); median blood loss, 1071.5 ml (IQR 540-1691.5); postoperative severe complications, 3 (30%); hospital mortality, none; median postoperative hospital stay, 37 days (12-125); control of infection and/or haemoptysis, all the cases; final outcome (alive/dead), 3/7 (all the cancer deaths); median postoperative survival, 9.4 months (IQR 4.3-20.4); and median survival from initial treatment, 19.4 months (IQR 8.0-66.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency salvage lung resection is a technically challenging procedure; however, the results were feasible and acceptable when the surgical indication, procedure and optimal timing were considered carefully by a multidisciplinary team. Although the aim was palliation, some patients who received additional chemotherapy afterwards and, thus, had additional survival time.

Research Progress of Heavy Ion Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high incidence and poses a serious threat to human health. However, the treatment outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer are still unsatisfactory, especially for high grade lesions. As a new cancer treatment, heavy ion radiotherapy has shown promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. This article discusses the clinical progress of heavy ion radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer mainly from the different cancer stages, the different doses of heavy ion beams, and the patient's individual factors, and explores the deficiency of heavy ion radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and the directions of future research, in order to provide reference for the wider and better application of heavy ion radiotherapy in the future.

Virtual randomized study comparing lobectomy and particle beam therapy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in operable patients

To the best of our knowledge there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing lobectomy-a standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-and particle beam therapy (PBT), the best performing existing radiotherapy. We conducted a virtual randomized trial in medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC to compare lobectomy and PBT effectiveness. A Markov model was developed to predict life expectancy after lobectomy and PBT in a cohort of patients with stage IA NSCLC. Ten thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to each group. Sensitivity analyses were performed as model variables and scenarios changed to determine which treatment strategy was best for improving life expectancy. All estimated model parameters were determined using variables extracted from a systematic literature review of previously published articles. The preferred strategy differed depending on patient age. In young patients, lobectomy showed better life expectancy than that of PBT. The difference in life expectancy between lobectomy and PBT was statistically insignificant in older patients. Our model predicted lobectomy as the preferred strategy when operative mortality was under 5%. However, the preferred strategy changed to PBT if operative mortality post lobectomy was over 5%. For medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC, our Markov model revealed the preferred strategy of lobectomy or PBT regarding operative mortality changed with varying age and comorbidity. Until randomized controlled trial results become available, we hope the current results will provide a rationale background for clinicians to decide treatment modalities for patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Long Term Results of Single-Fraction Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

There were no reports on long-term results of single-fraction passive carbon-ion radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. We showed that this treatment was not inferior compared to stereotactic body radiotherapy or proton beam therapy with no ≥grade 2 pneumonitis. This study suggests that single-fraction passive carbon-ion radiotherapy can serve as an alternate treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, especially in medically inoperable patients.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, stage T1-2N0M0, and treated with single-fraction CIRT (50Gy (relative biological effectiveness)) between June 2011 and April 2016 were identified in our database and retrospectively analyzed. Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: The study included 57 patients, 22 (38.6%) of whom had inoperable cancer. The median age was 75 years (range: 42–94 years), and the median follow-up time was 61 months (range: 6–97 months). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.2% and 81.7%, respectively. All survivors were followed up for more than three years. The 3- and 5-year local control rates were 96.4% and 91.8%, respectively. No case of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis was recorded. Conclusions: This study suggests that single-fraction CIRT for T1-2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer patients is feasible and can be considered as one of the treatment choices, especially in medically inoperable patients.

Role of Surgical Intervention in Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

With the development of systemic treatments with high response rates, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, some patients with unresectable lung cancer now have a chance to undergo radical resection after primary treatment. Although there is no general consensus regarding the definition of “unresectable” in lung cancer, the term “resectable” refers to technically resectable and indicates that resection can provide a favorable prognosis to some extent. Unresectable lung cancer is typically represented by stage III and IV disease. Stage III lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and in some patients with technically resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), multimodality treatments, including induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, are the treatments of choice. The representative surgical intervention for unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC is salvage surgery, which refers to surgical treatment for local residual/recurrent lesions after definitive non-surgical treatment. Surgical intervention is also used for an oligometastatic stage IV NSCLC. In this review, we highlight the role of surgical intervention in patients with unresectable NSCLC, for whom an initial complete resection is technically difficult. We further describe the history of and new findings on salvage surgery for unresectable NSCLC and surgery for oligometastatic NSCLC.

Salvage surgery for local recurrence after carbon ion radiotherapy for lung cancer: A case report

Background

The good local control rate of radiation therapy has been reported due to recent advances in irradiation technology. Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) has been shown to be effective for early lung cancer. We report a case of performing salvage surgery on the local recurrence of lung cancer after CIRT.

Case presentation

A 79-year-old man was referred to our hospital for treatment of local recurrence of left lung cancer at fifty nine months after CIRT. We performed wedge resection for diagnostic purposes. It was diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma and was regarded as local recurrence. Subsequently, we performed left upper lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. The patient had recurrent lesions at 4 months after surgery and died 10 months after surgery.

Conclusions

Surgery was safe even after CIRT. We considered that salvage surgery after CIRT may be one of the options of local control therapy for lung cancer.

Salvage surgery after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy including SBRT and proton therapy: A consecutive analysis of 38 patients

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence after definitive chemoradiation therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy with curative intent is often seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of salvage pulmonary resection after definitive non-surgical treatments and the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and medical courses of patients who had undergone salvage pulmonary resections after local relapse or progression between January 2000 and March 2018 at the National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. All the candidates were evaluated, and curability by surgical resection was assessed by a multidisciplinary tumor board.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patient received salvage surgery: 26 of the patients were men, and the median age was 64.5 years (range, 20-78 years). Among these 38 patients, salvage lung resection was performed after chemoradiotherapy in 23 patients, after chemotherapy in 9 patients, and after radiotherapy with curative intent in 6 patients. The surgical resection methods were as follows: 26 lobectomies (2 bilobectomy, 15 right upper, 5 right lower, 1 right middle, 2 left lower and 1 left upper), 8 pneumonectomies (5 left and 3 right), and 4 segmentectomies. A complete resection (R0 resection) was achieved in 35 cases (92.1 %). Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients (prolonged air leakage, bronchopleural fistula and surgical site infection in 1 patient each). No postoperative deaths occurred within 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Along with better outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the frequency of salvage surgery has been increasing in recent years. Salvage pulmonary resections after definitive non-surgical treatments with curative intent are feasible with an acceptable morbidity rate and oncological outcomes in thoroughly assessed patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Neck Dissection Following Carbon-ion Radiotherapy with Chemotherapy for a Patient with Mucosal Malignant Melanoma of Head and Neck

Mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck is a rare diagnosis. The safety and efficacy of salvage neck dissection following carbon–ion radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy are not well described, and carbon–ion radiation protocols have not been fully developed. A 77 year old woman with crT0N1M0 mucosal melanoma of the head and neck achieved a complete response following initial treatment with carbon–ion radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. She was treated with salvage neck dissection for as a cervical lymph node metastasis 16 months after initial treatment. She experienced neither Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications nor subsequent recurrence of disease at 3 months following salvage neck dissection. Surgical specimens may be useful for future precision oncology based on the molecular biology of recurrence melanoma with poor prognosis.

Is salvage surgery for patients with lung cancer after carbon ion radiotherapy easy or difficult?

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) shows higher local control rates and minimal damage to normal lung parenchyma compared with conventional radiotherapy; however, some patients experience local recurrence. The efficacy and safety of salvage surgery after CIRT for non-small-cell lung cancer are unclear. We reviewed clinical, surgical, pathological and prognostic data of 6 patients who underwent salvage surgery after CIRT between 2010 and 2015. All patients were men with a smoking history, and their median age was 67 years. The time from CIRT to surgery was 18 (range 12-24) months. All patients underwent at least lobectomy with mediastinal node dissection. Viable tumour cells were confirmed pathologically in all cases. Five patients required combined resection or extra procedure because of strong adhesions and the possibility of tumour extension; however, none of the patients had a tumour invasion to the adjacent organ. None of the patients had severe complications, perioperative death and local recurrence, and 3 patients are alive without recurrence (range 28-84 months). Salvage surgery appears to be safe and effective. Even though the tumours did not invade the adjacent organs, combined resection was required because of severe adhesion.

Lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age

BACKGROUND

Although the choice between stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been debated for years, the two procedures have not yet been directly compared in a randomized trial. We conducted a virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age to compare the effectiveness of lobectomy and SABR for medically operable patients with stage IA (AJCC eighth) NSCLC using the Markov model analysis.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 45-85 years with stage IA NSCLC who had undergone either lobectomy or SABR and were followed up for their remaining lifetime. Each virtual patient was randomly assigned to undergo lobectomy or SABR, and 10 000 patients were allocated to each group. All estimates of the variables were obtained by a systematic review of published articles.

RESULTS

The lobectomy group showed a better life expectancy than the SABR group, in patients under 75 years of age. However, no statistically significant difference was seen in patients 75 years or older. The predicted life expectancy was 9.43 and 8.70 years in 75-year-old patients in the lobectomy and SABR groups, respectively. However, the 95%CI for the difference in life expectancy between the two groups was - 0.06-1.50 years (P = 0.0689).

CONCLUSIONS

The Markov model showed no statistically significant difference in the expected overall survival in stage IA NSCLC patients who were older than 75 years and had undergone SABR or lobectomy.

Salvage thoracic surgery in patients with lung cancer: potential indications and benefits

Background

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of salvage lung resection and describe the possible indications and contraindications in patients with primary lung cancer.

Methods

Thirty patients undergoing anatomical salvage lung resection were classified into three groups: GI, patients with progressive lung tumor despite definitive chemo- and/or radiotherapy; GII, patients who underwent emergency resection; and GIII, patients in whom neoadjuvant or definitive chemo- and/or radiotherapy was contraindicated because of severe comorbidities. The groups were compared based on, peri- and postoperative factors, and survival rates.

Results

The morbidity rate was 70%. Revision surgery was required in 23% of patients. Morbidity was affected by lower hematocrit and hemoglobin levels (P = 0.05). Mean hospital stay was 11 ± 4 days, which was longer in patients in whom complications developed (P = 0.0003). The in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate was 3%. Mean relapse-free survival and overall survivals were 14 ± 12 and 19 ± 13 months.

Conclusion

Patients with progression of the persistent primary tumor after definitive chemo- and/or radiotherapy can undergo salvage lung resection with acceptable mortality and high morbidity rates, if the tumor is considered resectable. Other indications may be considered for salvage lung resection based on each patient’s specific evaluation.

Five-fraction SBRT for ultra-central NSCLC in-field recurrences following high-dose conventional radiation

Purpose/objective

Local treatment options for patients with in-field non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence following conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising modality to achieve reasonable local control, although toxicity remains a concern.

Materials/methods

Patients previously treated with high-dose CF-EBRT (≥59.4 Gy, ≤3 Gy/fraction) for non-metastatic NSCLC who underwent salvage SBRT for localized ultra-central in-field recurrence were included in this analysis. Ultra-central recurrences were defined as those abutting the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or esophagus and included both parenchymal and nodal recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control and overall survival. Durable local control was defined as ≥12 months. Toxicity was scored per the CTC-AE v4.0.

Results

Twenty patients were treated with five-fraction robotic SBRT for ultra-central in-field recurrence following CF-EBRT. Fifty percent of recurrences were adenocarcinoma, while 35% of tumors were classified as squamous cell carcinoma. The median interval between the end of CF-EBRT and SBRT was 23.3 months (range: 2.6 – 93.6 months). The median CF-EBRT dose was 63 Gy (range: 59.4 – 75 Gy), the median SBRT dose was 35 Gy (range: 25 – 45 Gy), and the median total equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 116 Gy (range: 91.3 – 136.7 Gy). At a median follow-up of 12 months for all patients and 37.5 months in surviving patients, the majority of patients (90%) have died. High-dose SBRT was associated with improved local control (p < .01), and the one-year overall survival and local control were 77.8% and 66.7% respectively in this sub-group. No late esophageal toxicity was noted, although a patient who received an SBRT dose of 45 Gy (total EQD2: 129.7 Gy) experienced grade 5 hemoptysis 35 months following treatment.

Conclusions

Although the overall prognosis for patients with in-field ultra-central NSCLC recurrences following CF-EBRT remains grim, five-fraction SBRT was well tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile. Dose escalation above 35 Gy may offer improved local control, however caution is warranted when treating high-risk recurrences with aggressive regimens.

Clinical outcomes using carbon-ion radiotherapy and dose-volume histogram comparison between carbon-ion radiotherapy and photon therapy for T2b-4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer-A pilot study

The safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer have not been established. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and dose-volume histogram parameters of carbon-ion radiotherapy compared with photon therapy in T2b–4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Twenty-three patients were treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy between May 2011 and December 2015. Seven, 14, and 2 patients had T2b, T3, and T4, respectively. The median age was 78 (range, 53−91) years, with 22 male patients. There were 12 adenocarcinomas, 8 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 non-small cell lung carcinoma, and 2 clinically diagnosed lung cancers. Eleven patients were operable, and 12 patients were inoperable. Most patients (91%) were treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy of 60.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 4 fractions or 64.0 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. Local control and overall survival rates were calculated. Dose-volume histogram parameters of normal lung and tumor coverages were compared between carbon-ion radiotherapy and photon therapies, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median follow-up of surviving patients was 25 months. Three patients experienced local recurrence, and the 2-year local control rate was 81%. During follow-up, 5 patients died of lung cancer, and 1 died of intercurrent disease. The 2-year overall survival rate was 70%. Operable patients had a better overall survival rate compared with inoperable patients (100% vs. 43%; P = 0.04). There was no grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis. In dose-volume histogram analysis, carbon-ion radiotherapy had a significantly lower dose to normal lung and greater tumor coverage compared with photon therapies. Carbon-ion radiotherapy was effectively and safely performed for T2b–4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer, and the dose distribution was superior compared with those for photon therapies. A Japanese multi-institutional study is ongoing to prospectively evaluate these patients and establish the use of carbon-ion radiotherapy.

A Dose Escalation Clinical Trial of Single-Fraction Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Peripheral Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to report initial results of a dose escalation trial of single-fraction carbon ion radiotherapy for peripheral stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and February 2012, a total of 218 patients were treated. The total dose was raised from 28 to 50 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). There were 157 male and 61 female patients, with a median age of 75 years. Of the tumors, 123 were stage T1 and 95 were stage T2. A total of 134 patients (61.5%) were medically inoperable. By histological type, there were 146 adenocarcinomas, 68 squamous cell carcinomas, three large cell carcinomas, and one mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 57.8 months (range 1.6-160.7). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 49.4%. The local control (LC) rate was 72.7%. A statistically significant difference in LC rate (p = 0.0001, log-rank test) was seen between patients receiving 36 Gy (RBE) or more and those receiving less than 36 Gy (RBE). In 20 patients irradiated with 48 to 50 Gy (RBE), the LC rate at 5 years was 95.0%, the overall survival rate was 69.2%, and the progression-free survival rate was 60.0% (median follow-up was 58.6 months). With dose escalation, LC tended to improve. As for adverse lung and skin reactions, there were no patients with grade 3 or higher reactions, and less than 2% had a grade 2 reaction. Regarding chest wall pain, only one patient had grade 3 late toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported the outcome of a dose escalation study of single-fraction carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I NSCLC, showing the feasibility of obtaining excellent results comparable to those with previous fractionated regimens.

Current Topics on Salvage Thoracic Surgery in Patients with Primary Lung Cancer

Salvage primary tumor resection is sometimes considered for isolated local failures after definitive chemoradiation, urgent matters, such as hemoptysis (palliative intent), and in cases judged to be contraindicated for chemotherapy or definite radiation due to severe comorbidities, despite an initial clinical diagnosis of stage III or IV disease. However, salvage surgery is generally considered to be technically more difficult, with a potentially higher morbidity. This review discusses the current topics on salvage thoracic surgery such as the definition of salvage surgery and its outcome, and future perspectives.