Outcomes of segmentectomy and wedge resection for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

Robotic thoracic surgery: lessons learned from the first 1,000 procedures

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the thoracic robotic approach in a high-volume center regarding procedures and clinical outcomes after 1,000 procedures.

Methods

In a single-center subset of the Epithor® database, a prospective cohort database of French thoracic surgery, we analyzed procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes from February 2014 to April 2023. A surgical technique for lung surgery was conducted with a four-arm closed chest with the port access approach and vascular sewing and knotting were preferred over stapling. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-2 test for discontinuous variables and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. Tests were considered significant for a p-value <0.05.

Results

Robotic thoracic surgery was used in anatomical lung resection in 85% of the cases. Over the study period, 1,067 patients underwent robotic surgery, of which 509 had lobectomies and 391 segmentectomies. In the segmentectomy group vs. lobectomy group we observed a shorter length of stay (9 ± 7 vs. 7 ± 5.6 days, p < 0.001), a shorter surgery time (99 ± 24 vs. 116 ± 38 min, p < 0.001) a lower conversion rate (n = 2 vs. n = 17, p = 0.004), and a lower complication rate (28% vs. 40%, p = 0.009, mainly Clavien-Dindo II, 18% and 28%, respectively). For cancer treatment surgery, we found more previous cancer in the segmentectomy group (48% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). We also observed a progressive change of lobectomy vs. segmentectomy from 80%/20% to 30%/70% over the 9 years.

Discussion

A robotic platform is an appropriate tool to perform anatomical lung resection and especially to develop a safe and systematic approach to lung-sparing sub-lobar resection.

Prognostic Outcome of Pulmonary Resection for Pulmonary Metastases from Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Regardless of the devastating outcomes of pulmonary resection for metastases from gastric cancer, a handful of patients survive long after pulmonary metastasectomy. This study aimed to identify a good candidate for pulmonary resection for metastases from gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2023, 564 patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy in our department, of which 12 patients underwent pulmonary resection for metastases from gastric cancer. Variables evaluated were the number and size of metastatic lesions, surgical procedure, disease-free interval (DFI), and the serum carcinoembryonic antigen at pulmonary metastasectomy.

RESULTS

The DFI following gastrectomy ≤12.5 months group had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the other group (p = 0.005). A comparison between DFI following gastrectomy ≤12.5 months group and DFI following gastrectomy >12.5 months group showed a significant difference in serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) value at pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.048). The serum CEA value at pulmonary metastasectomy >5.8 ng/ml group had a significantly worse OS than the other group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary metastasectomy can be indicated in some patients with metastasis from gastric cancer who have longer DFI from gastrectomy and lower serum CEA at pulmonary metastasectomy.

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment that can provide improved long- term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In this mini-review, we discuss the state of the art of thoracic surgery in surgical management of lung metastases which actually occurs for a large part of surgical activity in thoracic surgery department. We describe the principles of surgical therapy that have been defined across the time, and that should remain the milestones of lung metastases treatment: a radical surgery and an adequate lymphadenectomy. We then focus on current surgical indications and report the oncological results according to the surgical approach (open vs. mini-invasive), the histological type and number of lung metastases, and in case of re-metastasectomy. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview about the future perspectives in thoracic surgery in treatment of lung metastases.

Management of single pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: State of the art

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of death from cancer. Lung seeding occurs in approximately 10% of patients surgically treated for primary CRC with radical intent: the lung is the most common site of metastases after the liver. While surgical treatment of liver metastases is widely accepted to affect long-term outcomes, more controversial and not standardized is the therapy for CRC patients developing lung metastases. Experience suggests the potential curative role of pulmonary metastasectomy, especially in oligometastatic disease. However, the optimal strategy of care and the definition of prognostic factors after treatment still need to be defined. This review focused on the uncommon scenario of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. We explored pertinent literature and provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and imaging of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. Additionally, we identified the best available evidence for overall management. In particular, we analyzed the role and results of locoregional approaches (surgery, radiotherapy or ablative procedures) and their integration with systemic therapy.

Anatomical Resection Improves Disease-Free Survival After Lung Metastasectomy of Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the role of anatomical resection (AR) in lung metastasectomy (LM) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to investigate clinically relevant prognostic factors.

Patients and Methods

The medical records of 350 consecutive patients who underwent LM of CRC from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. The patients were designated into AR group (lobectomy and segmentectomy), and non-anatomical resection (NAR) group (wedge resection), respectively. Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS), pulmonary-specific disease-free survival (PDFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to analyze the factors associated with DFS, PDFS and OS.

Results

A total of 92 (31.2%) patients were enrolled in AR group and 203 (68.8%) in non-anatomical resection (NAR) group. AR significantly improved the 3-year DFS (64.1% vs 46.8%, HR 0.587, 95% CI 0.397–0.867, P = 0.007) and PDFS (75.0% vs 60.1%, HR 0.565, 95% CI 0.356–0.899, P = 0.016) compared with NAR. However, the extent of resection did not significantly impact the 3-year OS (AR 92.4% vs NAR 85.7%, HR 0.511, 95% CI 0.224–1.165, P = 0.110). In multivariate analysis, AR was identified as a protective factor for DFS (HR 0.576, 95% CI 0.356–0.934, P = 0.025) and PDFS (HR 0.631, 95% CI 0.409–0.973, P = 0.037). Preoperative abnormal CA19-9 was identified as the only prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusion

AR was superior to NAR for DFS and PDFS after LM from CRC.

Image-guided combined ablation and resection in thoracic surgery for the treatment of multiple pulmonary metastases: A preliminary case series

Objectives

To demonstrate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a novel hybrid technique combining percutaneous microwave ablation and wire-assisted wedge resection for patients with multiple pulmonary metastases using intraoperative imaging.

Methods

We describe our technique and present a retrospective case series of 4 patients undergoing iCART at our institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Procedures were performed in a hybrid operating suite using the ARTIS Pheno cone beam computerized tomography scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, German). Patient information included past history of malignancy as well as lesion size, depth, location, and histology result. Surgical complications and length of stay were also recorded.

Results

Five procedures were performed on 4 patients during the study period. One patient underwent bilateral procedures 4 weeks apart. All patients underwent at least 1 ablation and 1 wedge resection during the combined procedure. Patient ages ranged from 40 to 66 years and the majority (75%) were men. All had a past history of cancer. Lesions were treated in every lobe. Size and depth ranged from 6 to 24 mm and 21 to 33 mm, respectively, for ablated nodules and 5 to 27 mm and 0 to 22 mm, respectively, for the wedge resected nodules. Three procedures were completed uniportal and operative time ranged from 51 to 210 minutes. All cases sustained <10 mL blood loss. There were 2 intraoperative pneumothorax, 1 prevented successful completion of the ablation. One patient required a prolonged period of postoperative physiotherapy and was discharged on day 6. The other patients were discharged on postoperative day 2 or 3. All 5 histology specimens confirmed metastatic disease.

Conclusions

Our hybrid approach provides a minimally invasive and comprehensive personalized therapy for patients with multiple pulmonary metastases under a single general anesthetic. It provides histology-based diagnosis whilst minimizing lung tissue loss and eliminating the need for transfer from radiology to operating theatre. Emergence of ablation as a treatment for stage 1 non–small cell lung cancer and the expansion of lung cancer screening may widen the application of iCART in the future.

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Segmentectomy

Although lobectomy remains the gold-standard surgical treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer, the frequency of thoracoscopic segmentectomy is increasing. Multiple factors must be considered in the choice of the procedure, ranging from adequate surgical planning or simulation, tumor localization, and identification of the intersegmental plane to severing the intersegmental plane to achieve an oncologically safe surgical margin with no or minimal manual palpation and different landmarks. In this article, we present an overview of methods for each procedural step of thoracoscopic segmentectomy, from preoperative planning to division of the intersegmental plane.

Prospective study of recurrence at the surgical margin after wedge resection of pulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy is a common treatment for selected patients with pulmonary metastases. Among pulmonary resections, wedge resection is considered sufficient for pulmonary metastases. However, a major problem with wedge resection is the risk of local recurrence, especially at the surgical margin. The aim of this prospective study was to explore the frequency of and the risk factors for recurrence at the surgical margin in patients who underwent wedge resection for pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 177 patients (220 lesions) with pulmonary metastases from 15 institutions were enrolled. We studied 130 cases (169 lesions) to determine the frequency of and risk factors associated with recurrence at the surgical margin in patients who underwent wedge resection. Moreover, we evaluated the recurrence-free rate and disease-free survival after wedge resection.

RESULTS

A total of 81 (62.3%) patients developed recurrence. Recurrence at the surgical margin was observed in 11 of 130 (8.5%) cases. The 5-year recurrence-free rate was 89.1%. Per patient, multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of multiple pulmonary metastases was a significant risk factor for recurrence. Per tumor, distance from the surgical margin and tumor/margin ratio were risk factors for local recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 34.7%, and the presence of multiple pulmonary metastases and small surgical margin were risk factors for disease-free survival by univariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who undergo wedge resection for pulmonary metastasis, patients with multiple pulmonary metastases tend to develop recurrence at the surgical margin.

Past, present, and future perspectives of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Over a half-century has passed since Thomford et al. proposed the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy, and several prognostic factors have been identified. Although screening modalities and operations have changed dramatically, the important concepts of the selection criteria remain unchanged. Recent improvements in the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy may be the result of strict adherence to the selection criteria for oligometastatic lung tumors, which can mimic local disease. Pulmonary metastasectomy has become an important option for selected patients with oligometastasis, based mainly on a large amount of retrospective data, but its effect on survival remains unclear. Curable pulmonary metastasis might be regarded as a "semi-local disease" under the spontaneous control of an acquired alteration in host immune status. The current practice of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer focuses on selecting the most appropriate operation for selected patients. However, in the rapidly evolving era of immunotherapy, treatment-naïve patients for whom surgery is not suitable might be pre-conditioned by immunotherapy so that they may be considered for salvage surgery.

Surgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of pulmonary metastases. A systematic review of literature

It is not clear as to which is the best treatment among surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung oligometastases. A systematic review of literature with a priori selection criteria was conducted on articles on the treatment of pulmonary metastases with surgery or SBRT. Only original articles with a population of patients of more than 50 were selected. After final selection, 61 articles on surgical treatment and 18 on SBRT were included. No difference was encountered in short-term survival between pulmonary metastasectomy and SBRT. In the long-term surgery seems to guarantee better survival rates. Mortality and morbidity after treatment are 0–4.7% and 0–23% for surgery, and 0–2% and 4–31% for SBRT. Surgical metastasectomy remains the treatment of choice for pulmonary oligometastases.

Patients with metastatic cancer with a limited number of deposits may benefit from surgical removal or irradiation of tumor nodules in addiction to chemotherapy. Surgical resection has been demonstrated to improve survival and, in some cases, can be curative. Stereotactic radiotherapy is emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery, but settings and implications of the two treatments are profoundly different. The two techniques show similar results in the short-term, with lower complications rates for radiotherapy, while in the long-term surgery seems to guarantee higher survival rates.

Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Several prognostic factors have been analysed, but to date, it is still not well defined which is the optimal resection margin during lung metastasectomy (LM). This study analyses the long-term results and prognostic factors after LM in CRC patients with particular attention to the resection margins. Primary endpoint of this study is to assess the correlation between resection margins and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Observational cohort study on all proven cases of CRC lung metastases (2000-2016) resected with curative intent in a single centre.

RESULTS

The series included 210 consecutive patients (M/F 133/77) with a mean age of 65.4 (± 9.96) years, 75% (159/210) of them with a solitary metastasis. Mean size of metastasis was 2.57 cm (± 1.45). One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent wedge resections (80%) and lymphadenectomy was carried out in 90 cases (42.9%). With a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 5-192), we observed a 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, 74% and 54%, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the resection margin distance from the tumour: (a) ≥ 2 cm (145 cases); (b) < 2, ≥ 1 cm (37 cases); and (c) < 1 cm (12 cases). The OS was significantly different between the three groups (p = 0,020); univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a narrow resection margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse survival (p = 0.006 and HR 3.4 p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival of patients after LM is strongly associated with a greater distance between the lesion and the resection margin.

Pulmonary laser-assisted metastasectomy is associated with prolonged survival in patients with colorectal cancer

Background

Pulmonary metastases develop in 10-15% of patients with colorectal cancer. Surgical metastasectomy currently provides the only hope for a cure for these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the expanding role of pulmonary metastasectomy in the context of laser-assisted surgery (LAS) vs. non-laser-assisted surgery (NLAS).

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 204 patients who underwent curative pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer between 01/2005 and 12/2016. The main endpoint was survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied for statistical analysis and survival rates were compared with the log rank test.

Results

Median follow-up was 53 months. A total of 267 metastases were resected in 154 operations in the NLAS group (median: 1) vs. 438 metastases in 122 operations in the LAS group (median: 5; P<0.0001). The interval between treatment of the primary tumor and the first pulmonary metastasectomy was significantly shorter in the LAS group (19 vs. 32 months; P=0.008). Anatomical resections were significantly reduced using LAS, 8% vs. 23% respectively. Despite more negative predictors in the LAS group, there was no statistically significant difference in overall disease-specific 5-year survival (70% LAS vs. 58% NLAS; P=0.18).

Conclusions

Survival after pulmonary metastasectomy has previously been shown to correlate with a low number of metastases and a longer disease-free interval. However, with the tissue-saving LAS technique complete resectability can be achieved in patients with more metastases and long-term survival is possible for selected patients.

Impact of resection margin length and tumor depth on the local recurrence after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection of a single colorectal metastasis

Background

To evaluate the influence of tumor depth on preoperative computed tomography (CT) image, and resection margin length on local recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection for single pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer origin from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Factors such as resection margin, tumor size and depth were analyzed. The local recurrences of two subgroups based on the pulmonary resection margin (Group 1: resection margin 1-10 mm or shorter than the tumor size, Group 2: resection margin >10 mm or at least greater than the tumor size) were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The local recurrence rate was 12/65 (18.5%). Median follow up period was 33 months. Median tumor size and depth on preoperative CT were 1.1 and 1.6 cm. Median length of resection margin was 0.5 cm (group 1: 0.4 cm, group 2: 1.0 cm, P<0.001). No difference was noted in 3-year local recurrence-free survival (80.8% vs. 76.7%, P=0.756) between the two subgroups. No significant correlation was noted between the length of resection margin and the tumor size and depth. However, tumor depth was an independent factor related to higher local recurrence on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Extent of resection margin in pulmonary metastasectomy does not seem to affect significantly on the local recurrence if complete resection is accomplished. However, preoperative tumor depth on CT image and postoperative distant metastasis seem to affect on local recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy.

The potential role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the further investigation of colorectal cancer patients with nonspecific findings on standard investigations

Early detection of metastatic colorectal cancer, at initial diagnosis or during routine surveillance, can improve survival outcomes. Current routine investigations, including CEA and CT, have limited sensitivity and specificity. Recent studies of colorectal cancer cohorts under post surgery surveillance indicate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) evidence of recurrence can occur many months before clinical detection. Another possible role for ctDNA is in the further assessment of indeterminate findings on standard CEA or CT investigations. To further explore this potential, we undertook a prospective study. Further investigation, including FDG-PET imaging, was at clinician discretion, blinded to ctDNA analysis. Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Analyzed here are the 45 patients with an evaluable blood sample of whom 6 had an isolated elevated CEA, 30 had indeterminate CT findings, and 9 had both. FDG-PET scans were performed in 30 patients. Fourteen of 45 patients (31%) had detectable ctDNA. At completion of the planned 2 year follow-up, recurrence has occurred in 21 (47%) patients. Detectable ctDNA at study entry was associated with inferior relapse free survival (HR 4.85, p < 0.0001). Where FDG-PET scan was normal/equivocal (n = 15, 50%) 1 of 1 with detectable ctDNA versus 3 of 14 with undetectable ctDNA ultimately had recurrence confirmed. In summary, for colorectal cancer patients with indeterminate findings on routine investigations, ctDNA detection increases the probability that the findings indicate metastatic disease, including in a nonpredefined subset that also underwent FDG-PET imaging. Further studies of the value of ctDNA analysis during patient surveillance are warranted.

Morbidity, mortality, and survival in elderly patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is increasing. Nevertheless, they are undertreated compared to younger patients. This study compares postoperative morbidity, mortality, survival, and morbidity risk factors of elderly and younger patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our prospective database of 224 patients operated for colorectal lung metastases between 1999 and 2014. Two groups were defined to evaluate the influence of the patients' age (A: < 70 years; B: ≥ 70 years). Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors for morbidity were analyzed using χ²-test and Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess survival and prognosticators.

RESULTS

Altogether, minor morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 17%, 5.8%, and 0%, respectively. Between groups A (n = 170) and B (n = 54), there was no difference in minor and major morbidity (p = 0.100) or mortality (0%). Heart arrhythmia was a risk factor for increased morbidity in group B (p = 0.007). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 43%, 30%, and 27%, respectively, in group A and 55%, 36 and 19%, respectively, in group B (p = 0.316). Disease-free interval ≥ 36 months (p = 0.023; OR 2.88) and anatomic resections (p = 0.022; OR 3.05) were associated with prolonged survival in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity, mortality, and overall survival after PM with lymphadenectomy for elderly patients were comparable to younger patients. A disease-free interval > 36 months and anatomic lung resections might be associated with prolonged survival. However, elderly patients should also be evaluated for a curative treatment.

Determination of the intersegmental plane using the slip-knot method

Background

Visualization of intersegmental planes in the lung is desirable for precise anatomical lung segmentectomy. We developed the slip-knot method for creating inflation-deflation lines. This study aimed to assess relevant data for thoracoscopic segmentectomy performed using this method.

Methods

In the slip-knot method, the objective segmental bronchus is looped with a monofilament thread. One end of the thread is then pulled during temporary bilateral ventilation, causing the knot to slip toward the bronchus. Thereafter, bronchial ligation is tightened to block the outflow of segmental air, ensuring that the segment remains expanded while the other reserved segments collapse on resumption of unilateral ventilation. Data from 221 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed.

Results

A total of 147 patients (67%) were indicated for the slip-knot method, and 74 cases (33%) were non-adaptive cases. Ninety six percent of 147 cases were well adapted to the slip-knot method, which allowed us to obtain good inflation-deflation line images to determine the intersegmental plane. The mean operative time was 171±51 min (range, 71-367 min). The mean duration of chest tube insertion was 1.5±1.2 days (range, 1-7 days). Three cases (2.0%) had prolonged air-leakage and one (0.7%) case had readmission for late air-leakage.

Conclusions

Our method enables determination of anatomical intersegmental planes using only one monofilament thread, thus facilitating thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomical segmentectomy.

VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gradually been implemented in thoracic surgery, and the VATS approach has now been extended to technically challenging procedures, such as segmentectomy. The definition of VATS segmentectomy is changing over time, and the repertoire of segmentectomy is getting wider with increasing reports on atypical segmentectomy. VATS segmentectomy bears surgical, oncological, and technical advantages; however, there are still areas of controversy, particularly regarding oncological outcomes. The indication of VATS segmentectomy is diverse and is used for treating lung cancer, metastatic lung tumors, or a variety of nonmalignant diseases. It is particularly valuable for the lung-sparing resection of deeply located small nodules or repeated surgery for multiple lung lesions. VATS segmentectomy requires a thorough analysis of segmental anatomy and a tailored preoperative planning with the assessment of surgical margins. Technical challenges include intraoperative navigation, methods to identify and dissect the intersegmental plane, and the prevention of air leakage. This review will discuss the present state of VATS segmentectomy, with a focus on past studies, current indications and techniques, and future view.

3D-CT anatomy for VATS segmentectomy

Segmentectomy has become a widely adopted surgical procedure, with recent reports describing the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic surgery. A major feature of segmentectomy is that it requires a three-dimensional (3D) understanding of the patient's pulmonary structure and a thorough preoperative analysis of the patient's individual anatomy. Here, we present our method for VATS segmentectomy based on 3D-computed tomography (3D-CT), with a review of the literature. We focus on techniques for 3D-CT reconstruction, analyses of the individual anatomy and anomalies, preoperative simulations of the procedure and surgical margin, and intraoperative navigation with 3D-CT images. We also reference the roles of members of our multi-disciplinary surgical team.