Re: Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis

Hybrid (Digital/Water Seal) Chest Drainage System - An Innovative Device for Patients with Anticipated Air Leaks

BACKGROUND

To date, several chest drainage systems are available, such as digital drainage systems (DDS) and traditional systems with continuous suction or water seal. However, none of these systems were yet shown to be favorable in the treatment of complex situations such as persistent air leaks or residual spaces. We present in-vitro as well as clinical data of a novel hybrid drainage system consisting of an optimized digital drainage system (ODDS) and an underwater seal drainage system (UWSD).

METHODS

For in-vitro analysis, a DDS and an ODDS were connected to a pleural cavity simulator. Different air leaks were produced and data on intrapleural pressure and air flow were analyzed. Furthermore, we tested the hybrid drainage system in 10 patients with potential air leaks after pulmonary surgery.

RESULTS

In in-vitro analysis, we could show, that with advanced pump technology, pressure fluctuations caused by the drainage system when trying to maintain a set pressure level in patients with airleaks were much smaller when using an ODDS and could even be eliminated when using a fluid collection canister with sufficient buffer capacity. This minimized air leak boosts caused by the drainage system. Optimizing the auto-pressure regulation algorithms also led to a reduced airflow through the fistula and promoted rest. Switching to a passive UWSD also reduced the amount of airflow. Clinical application of the hybrid drainage system yielded promising results.

CONCLUSION

The novel hybrid drainage system shows promising results in the treatment of patients with complex clinical situations such as persistent air leaks.

Optimal Chest Drainage Method After Anatomic Lung Resection: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Several methods for chest drainage after pulmonary resection of malignant lung tumors exist, but consensus on the ideal method has not been reached.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study. We enrolled 2200 patients who underwent lung resection for lung tumors. Of the 1470 patients who underwent anatomic resection, 347 showed air leak on the morning of postoperative day 1. They were assigned to 3 groups according to the chest drainage method on postoperative day 1.

RESULTS

Of 347 patients with postoperative air leaks, 107 (30.8%), 179 (51.6%), and 61 (17.6%) were assigned to water seal, continuous suction, and digital drainage, respectively. The median postoperative air leak duration was significantly longer with digital drainage (4.0 days) than with either water seal (2.5 days) or continuous suction (3.0 days; P = .009). Chest tubes were required for significantly more days on average with digital drainage (6.0 days) than with water seal (4.0 days) or continuous suction (4.0 days; P = .003). Prolongation of air leak duration was significantly more likely to occur in patients with body mass index <18.5 kg/m² (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), moderate or severe air leak on postoperative day 1 (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.6), or digital drainage (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.01-1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Water seal was associated with significantly shorter duration of postoperative air leak and chest drainage compared with continuous suction and digital drainage.