Unifying classification for transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia and other costal margin injuries

Anatomy of the interchondral joints and the effects on mobility of ribs

BACKGROUND

Variations in the anatomy of the anterior rib cage and costal margin have been observed. We sought to evaluate the location of interchondral joints and evaluate their effect on mobility of the rib cage.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissections were performed to evaluate the anatomy of the anterior ribs and the composition of the costal margin. Experienced chest wall surgeons and anatomists evaluated this anatomy through a standardized dissection and assessment. The presence of interchondral joints, and morphology and mobility of ribs were quantified. In addition, the movement and interactions of the ribs with upward pressure on the costal margin at the tip of the 10th rib were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight cadavers were evaluated bilaterally. In all patients, the first rib attached to the manubrium, the second rib attached to the sternal/manubrial junction, and ribs 3 to 6 attached directly to the sternum. Interchondral joints were present between ribs 4/5 in 0%, 5/6 in 35%, 6/7 in 96%, and 7/8 in 96%. The eighth/ninth ribs had free tips in 58% and 92%, respectively, and 10th rib was floating in 46%. Upward pressure on the costal margin resulted in compression of the ribs up to, on average, the 5.7 ± 0.6 rib with no compression above this level. This level corresponded to the rib interspace just above the most superior interchondral joint in 98% of evaluation. The transmission of these upward forces demonstrated an articulation of the ribs at the costal cartilage-sternal junction in the lower ribs.

CONCLUSION

Bridging interchondral joints are common between ribs 5 to 8 and participate in distributing forces from the costal margin across the chest wall. Upward forces at the costal margin are transmitted across the lower rib cage and result in increased mobility of the lower half of the ribs. The eighth/ninth ribs often have mobile tips, and the 10th is often a floating rib.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test; Level II.

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia induced by sternutation: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Sternutation is, by definition, a situation that increases abdominal pressure. However, it has not been clearly linked to protrusion of abdominal content through weaknesses in the abdominal boundaries.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we present a case report in which the only trigger factor found for an abdominal content protrusion was a sternutation episode. The patient arrived in our institution with the diagnosis of a transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia, proven in CT-scan. He was, then, submitted to emergent surgery, where through thoracotomy and subcostal laparotomy, hernia content was reduced. The patient had a favorable evolution.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

TDIH is a rare entity, for which there are still no consensus regarding its management. This makes clinical practice more challenging, leaving to the surgeon the therapeutic decision tailored to each patient.

CONCLUSION

This entity should be further studied, and consensus reached regarding its management.

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation in the setting of trauma

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation is a rare injury that can be associated with blunt trauma. Since its first documentation within the literature in 1946, there have been less than 50 cases reported. We present a case involving a 56-year old female who presented to our Trauma Center with transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation caused by blunt trauma from a high-velocity T-bone vehicular collision. Upon presentation, she exhibited bilateral breath sounds; however, with labored breathing, chest pain, and hypoxia. The initial chest radiograph interpretation indicated the presence of "left lower lobe infiltrates", and subsequent computed tomography imaging identified "a small lateral hernia along the left mid abdomen". After initial resuscitation, her condition deteriorated, exhibiting respiratory distress and becoming increasingly hypercarbic, requiring intubation. Review of the imaging showed disruption of the left hemidiaphragm with intrathoracic herniation of colon and stomach through the thoracic wall between the ninth and tenth ribs. Consequently, a thoracotomy was performed in the operating room, revealing a large defect between the two ribs with disruption of the intercostal muscles and inferior displacement of rib space. Lung and omentum had herniated through the disrupted rib space and the diaphragmatic rupture was attenuated anteriorly, measuring 11x6cm. After reduction of the herniated organs, a biologic porcine mesh was placed and an intermediate complex closure of the thoracic wall hernia was performed. The patient was later extubated, recovered from her injuries with no complications and was discharged. With the low incidence of transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation, there is no standardized surgical management. Recent literature suggests that these injuries should be managed with mesh, rather than sutures only, due to high rates of recurrence. Furthermore, diaphragmatic injuries may suffer a delay in diagnosis. Therefore, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in patients with respiratory distress following a blunt trauma, with close review of computed tomography.

Robotic thoracoabdominal hernia repair: a novel approach

PURPOSE

Thoracoabdominal hernias remain a rare and poorly understood entity. Data remain sparse as terminology varies in the literature and case reports demonstrate wide variability in technique. We present a novel approach for repair of thoracoabdominal hernias using the robotic platform.

METHODS

Two patients underwent a robotic thoracoabdominal hernia repair in June 2022. They were followed for 1 year with CT scans every 6 months to exclude recurrence. Patient demographics and peri-operative details including defect size, closure technique, mesh size, length of stay, and complications were reported.

RESULTS

Both patients successfully underwent a robotic repair of a thoracoabdominal hernia, addressing the intercostal hernia, diaphragmatic disruption, and flank hernia discretely during the operation. One patient had an uneventful recovery and discharged on post-operative day 3; the other developed a small bowel obstruction due to an early port site hernia which required surgical intervention. He eventually discharged on post-operative day 9. At one year, there is no clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence for either patient.

CONCLUSION

Robotic thoracoabdominal hernia repair is feasible and offers a minimally invasive repair option for these extremely complex hernias.

Anatomy of the anterior ribs and the composition of the costal margin: A cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Traditional rib anatomy and costal margin teaching contends that the costal margin consists of a combined costal cartilage made up of ribs 7 to 10. Variations in 9th and 10th rib anatomy have been observed. We sought to evaluate the variability of interchondral joints and the make-up of the costal margin.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissections were performed to evaluate the anatomy of the anterior ribs and the composition of the costal margin. Experienced chest wall surgeons evaluated this anatomy through a standardized dissection and assessment. Dissection videos were performed to allow for further review/assessment.

RESULTS

Bilateral chest wall anatomy of 30 cadavers was evaluated (15 male, 15 female). The average age was 78 ± 12 years, and all patients were Caucasian. In all patients, the first rib attached to the manubrium, the second rib attached to the manubriosternal junction, and ribs 3 to 6 attached directly to the sternum. Interchondral joints were present between ribs 4/5-3%, 5/6-68%, 6/7-83%, 7/8-72%. Ribs combining to form a common costal cartilage via cartilaginous unions were observed between 6/7-3%, 7/8-45%, 8/9-30%, and 9/10-20%.The 8th rib attached directly to the sternum without joining the 7th rib in 10% of cadavers. The 8th and 9th ribs had free tips in 45% and 60% of evaluations, respectively. The 10th rib was found to have a hooked tip in 25% of cases and was a floating rib without attachment to the 9th rib 52% of the time. Rib tip mobility was noted in ribs 8, 9, and 10 in 52%, 70%, and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Interchondral joints are common between ribs 5 and 8. Significant variability exists in the chest wall and costal margin compared with traditional teaching. It is important for chest wall surgeons treating diseases of the costal margin to appreciate this anatomic variability.

Costal margin injuries and trans-diaphragmatic intercostal hernia: Presentation, management and outcomes according to the Sheffield classification

BACKGROUND

Costal margin rupture (CMR) injuries are under-diagnosed and inconsistently managed, while carrying significant symptomatic burden. We hypothesized that the Sheffield Classification system of CMR injuries would relate to injury patterns and management options.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively between 2006 and 2023 at a major trauma center in the United Kingdom. Computed tomography scans were interrogated and injuries were categorized according to the Sheffield Classification. Clinical, radiologic, management and outcome variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in the study. Intercostal hernia (IH) was present in 30 patients and associated with delayed presentation ( p = 0.004), expulsive mechanism of injury (i.e. such as occurs with coughing, sneezing, or retching), higher body mass index ( p < 0.001), and surgical management ( p = 0.02). There was a bimodal distribution of the level of the costal margin rupture, with IH Present and expulsive mechanism injuries occurring predominantly at the ninth costal cartilage, and IH Absent cases and other mechanisms at the seventh costal cartilage ( p < 0.001). There were correlations between the costal cartilage being thin at the site of the CMR and the presence of IH and expulsive etiology ( p < 0.001). Management was conservative in 23 and surgical in 31 cases. Extrathoracic mesh IH repairs were performed in 3, Double Layer Mesh Repairs in 8, Suture IH repairs in 5, CMR plating in 8, CMR sutures in 2, and associated Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in 11 patients. There was one postoperative death. There were seven repeat surgical procedures in five patients.

CONCLUSION

The Sheffield Classification is associated statistically with presentation, related chest wall injury patterns, and type of definitive management. Further collaborative data collection is required to determine the optimal management strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

The evolution of a chest wall injury and reconstruction clinic during a pandemic

BACKGROUND

In 2019, we sought to develop a chest wall injury and reconstruction clinic (CWIRC) to treat patients with chest wall pain and rib fractures. This initiative was fueled by the recognition of an unmet need and evolving research demonstrating improved patient care and experience. We will describe the evolution of this clinic program from an acute care surgery/general surgery (ACS/GS) clinic to a CWIRC.

METHODS

We identified outpatient encounters generated from a general surgery clinic staffed by a physician and nurse practitioner team. A retrospective cohort review was performed to identify all outpatient encounters and surgeries associated with these encounters from January 1, 2017, to November 30, 2021. Outpatient and operative work relative value unit (wRVU) production as well as payer mix was compared as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Over this time period, the number of clinic interactions decreased (2017-284 vs. 2021-229). Clinic productivity increased however from 181 wRVUs in 2017 to 295 wRVUs in 2021. The CWIRC patient visits increased from 4% to 70%. In addition, telehealth visits increased from 0% to 23% of encounters. The operative wRVU productivity attributable to outpatient clinic visits increased (2017-253 vs. 2021-591). Combined, the CWIRC resulted in an overall growth of 104% in total wRVUs. The payer mixes for patients with rib diagnosis have a higher number of Blue Cross Blue Shield, Medicare, and Managed Care compared with ACS/GS. The most common diagnosis was rib fracture initial evaluation (37%), rib fracture subsequent encounter (25%), rib pain (24%), and flail chest initial evaluation (4%).

CONCLUSION

The initiation of a CWIRC increased wRVU production despite a decrease in clinical encounters. These clinics may produce more wRVUs per encounter than ACS/GS clinics. An underserved population has been identified of chest wall pathology patients presenting for initial evaluation as outpatients. Further investigation into this concept is warranted to serve this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Combined Disruption of the Thoracic Spine and Costal Arch Fracture: An Indicator of a Severe Chest Trauma

Blunt high-energy chest trauma is often associated with thoracic and abdominal organ injuries. Literature for a hyperextension-distraction mechanism resulting in a costal arch fracture combined with a thoracic spine fracture is sparse. A 65-year-old male suffered a fall from a height of six meters. Initial X-ray of the chest shows left-sided high-riding diaphragm and CT scan proves anterior cartilage fracture, posterolateral serial rib fractures, traumatic intercostal pulmonary hernia, avulsion of the diaphragm, and 7th thoracic vertebral fracture. An exploratory thoracotomy was performed and the rupture of the diaphragm, creating a two-cavity injury, had been re-fixed, the pulmonary hernia was closed, and locking plate osteosyntheses of the fractured ribs including the costal arch were performed. We generally recommend surgical therapy of the thorax to restore stability in this severe injury entity. The spine was fixed dorsally using a screw-rod system. In conclusion, this thoracovertebral injury entity is associated with high overall injury severity and life-threatening thoracoabdominal injuries. Since two-cavity traumata and particularly diaphragmatic injuries are often diagnosed delayed, injuries to the costal arch can act as an indicator of severe trauma. They should be detected through clinical examination and assessment of the trauma CT in the soft tissue window.

Coexistence of Late Diagnosed Pericardial and Diaphragmatic Ruptures Caused by Rib Fracture: Case Report

INTRODUCTION: While rib fractures due to blunt traumas are common, pericardial and diaphragmatic injuries caused by rib fractures are rarely seen. Diagnosis is challenging due to the difference in clinical symptoms which may have severe clinical consequences. CASE: A 58-year-old female patient who had a traffic accident was referred to our centre due to left pericardial effusion while being followed up for tibial fracture. Left diaphragmatic rupture was detected in the radiographs taken. Intraoperative pericardial rupture was observed in the operated patient. The defects were repaired primarily and the patient was discharged in good health. CONCLUSION: Although the diagnosis is difficult In multitraumas including thoracic trauma, especially in cases with multiple rib fractures, one should be more attentive considering the possibility of diaphragmic and pericardial ruptures.

Gastric volvulus and tension gastrothorax secondary to spontaneous transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia

Spontaneous transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia is an extremely rare clinical entity featuring dual defects in the diaphragm and chest wall. We report on the case of a 59-year-old man who developed a large left-sided hernia secondary to the minor trauma of a coughing fit. The hernia subsequently enlarged over the course of 3 years until it contained the stomach, leading to a gastric volvulus and tension gastrothorax with secondary pneumothorax. A subtotal gastrectomy was performed with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, and he made a full recovery.

Radiographic identification of thoracoabdominal hernias

PURPOSE

Hernias spanning both chest and abdominal walls are uncommon and associated with chest wall trauma, coughing and obesity. This study describes the radiographic appearance of these hernias to guide proper identification and operative planning. Proposed standardized reporting patterns are also presented.

METHODS

The cross sectional imaging of patients presenting with thoracoabdominal hernias was reviewed. Radiographic reports were supplemented by surgeon imaging review and operative findings during repair. Defect dimensions, hernia content, level of herniation, presence of osseous or cartilaginous disruption of the chest wall and degree of rib displacement were collected. Disruption of myofascial planes was also noted.

RESULTS

Six patients were identified. All hernias occurred below the 9th rib and were associated with complete intercostal muscle disruption. The transversus abdominis was disrupted in all hernias and the internal oblique was disrupted in five of the hernias. The majority (83%) had caudal rib displacement (median 6.8 cm compared to contralateral side). Median hernia width was 10.35 cm (1.6-19.1 cm) and median length was 10.2 cm (1.8-14.3 cm). Five patients had associated bone/cartilage injuries: two with 11th rib fractures, two with combined bone and cartilaginous fractures and one with a surgical rib resection.

CONCLUSION

The typical injury pattern of thoracoabdominal hernias includes disruption of the intercostal muscles, transversus abdominis, and commonly the internal oblique with an intact external oblique. Inferior rib displacement by hernia contents and unopposed pull of the abdominal musculature is common. Osseous or cartilaginous disruption always occurs unless the defect is bounded on at least one side by a floating rib.

Clinicoradiological diagnosis: Cough-induced transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation can occur following blunt or penetrating trauma and is usually associated with rib fractures. It is uncommon and only sporadically reported in literature. We report a case of cough-induced intercostal herniation containing large bowel, on a background of sustaining a blunt chest trauma 25 years prior to presentation. The patient was treated by reducing the hernia followed by surgical repair of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles defect. He was discharged without further complications and remained well at follow-up.

Thoracolaparoscopic management of a traumatic subacute transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia. Second case reported

Background

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernias are extremely rare. Their physiopathology is different from traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures, and their clinical presentation and management strategies place them in a different category than abdominal intercostal hernias.

Case presentation

A 56 yo female presented to the outpatient trauma clinic with a symptomatic, subacute left sided transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia secondary to a motor vehicle crash almost 3 months prior to presentation. The injury was managed with a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach, only the second time ever this has been reported. She was discharged on POD#3, and after 6 months of follow up continues to do well, without clinical evidence of hernia recurrence.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive management of this rare pathology is possible and should be encouraged.

Testing the clinical validity of the Bemelman Rib Fracture Management Guideline

Whilst surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) results in better outcomes, selection algorithms are lacking. We aimed to validate the Rib Fracture Management Guideline proposed by Bemelman. From a cohort of 792 patients with multiple rib fractures, 2 sequential cohorts were selected: 48 patients who underwent SSRF and 48 patients who managed conservatively. Admission computed tomography scans and records were reviewed by an investigator blinded to the SSRF outcome. Adherence to the Bemelman guideline, revised to take account of consensus rib fracture definitions, was tested. Fifty-seven patients had multiple rib fractures only, and 39 patients also had a flail segment. Thirty-nine patients with flail segment underwent SSRF, and 18 patients were managed conservatively. Of the patients that the guideline predicted should have received surgery, 87% did. Of those that it predicted should not receive SSRF, 98% did not. The guideline displayed a sensitivity (95% confidence interval) and specificity for predicting the fixation of 0.98 (0.89-0.9995) and 0.83 (0.70-0.93), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for surgical fixation were 0.87 (0.76-0.92) and 0.98 (0.85-0.99), respectively. The Bemelman guideline was thus a good predictor of SSRF in retrospective cohort but should be used in conjunction with clinical judgement. Further validation is indicated in a prospective study.