Long-term survival following on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

Survival and Mid-Term Outcomes of On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in A First Peruvian Registry

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and outcomes of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain uncertain, especially in Latin America. Our study aims to explore survival and shortand mid-term outcomes in the first reported Peruvian registry of patients treated with both techniques.

METHODS

This is an observational, analytical, and longitudinal study using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis in a single-center retrospective registry of 2280 patients during 2000-2019; 846 patients were analyzed after PSM (on-pump = 423 vs. off-pump = 423). Baseline variables, comorbidities, and major outcomes were studied in the short term (≤ 30 days) and in midterm (30 days-36 months) with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The matched groups were compared by descriptive, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS

Before PSM, previous myocardial infarction < 7 days (27.03%) and ejection fraction ≥ 50% (45.72%) were higher in off-pump CABG (P<0.05). After PSM, pre-surgery percutaneous coronary intervention (27.18% vs. 26.71%, P=0.049) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score (1.98% vs. 1.90%, P=0.047) were higher in off-pump CABG. In the short term, there was higher mortality (2.12% vs. 0.47%, P=0.048), blood transfusion > 500 ml (57.91% vs. 7.56%, P=0.049), reintervention (7.32% vs. 2.12%, P=0.045), hospital stay (nine vs. four days, P=0.048), arrhythmia (9.92% vs. 4.96%, P=0.049), and renal failure (20.09% vs. 5.91%, P=0.009) in on-pump CABG. Long-term mortality (4.25% vs. 1.65%, P=0.044), myocardial infarction (17.02% vs. 7.32%, P=0.046), and repeat revascularization (17.49% vs. 8.26%, P=0.045) predominated in on-pump CABG. There was a higher 36-month adjusted survival for off-pump over on-pump CABG (97.88% vs. 93.63%, P=0.046).

CONCLUSION

This first reported Peruvian registry of patients treated with CABG has demonstrated that off-pump CABG is associated with lower shortand mid-term morbidity and mortality rates and better-adjusted survival rates compared to on-pump CABG; however, further multicenter studies in Latin America are needed to elucidate its benefits over classic on-pump CABG.

10-Year Mortality of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

The longstanding debate on off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) has primarily focused on short-term and mid-term outcomes, with limited attention to long-term survival. This study aims to address this gap by providing an updated analysis of 10-year mortality rates after OPCAB versus ONCAB. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporating 22 studies comprising 69,449 patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 10 years. Meta-regression analysis explored sources of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in long-term all-cause mortality between OPCAB and ONCAB (hazard ratio 1.000, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.08, p = 0.95). Although substantial heterogeneity existed across studies, meta-regression identified older age as a significant factor favoring OPCAB. However, patient characteristics like gender, co-morbidities, and graft numbers did not significantly influence the choice of surgical technique. In conclusion, this study challenges historical concerns regarding OPCAB's quality of revascularization and long-term survival demonstrating comparable outcomes to ONCAB in well-selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons. The results emphasize the importance of surgeon proficiency and advocate for recognizing surgical revascularization as a subspecialty.

15-year outcomes of the JOCRI study (JOCRIED study): a randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

The Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) study reported a non-significant difference in early outcomes and graft patency between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in 2005. The JOCRIED study aimed to review the long-term outcomes of the JOCRI study participants.

METHOD AND RESULTS

The JOCRIED study enrolled 123 of the JOCRI study participants completing the clinical follow-up between August 2018 and August 2020; 61 patients in the off-pump group and 62 patients in the on-pump group. The follow-up period was 13.8 ± 2.8 years. The groups were compared regarding mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and repeat revascularisation. The 15-year cumulative survival rate (off-pump vs on-pump, respectively; 77.7% vs 75.3%; p = 0.85), major adverse events-free survival rate (62.5% vs 55.6%; p = 0.27) and repeat revascularisation-free rate (84.8% vs 78.0%; p = 0.16) were not significantly different between the two groups. Revascularisation was the most common major adverse events in the JOCRIED participants. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 8 patients (13%) in the off-pump group and in 14 patients (23%) in the on-pump group (p = 0.23), no patients underwent redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides comparable 15-year outcomes to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Induced blood oxidation in myocardial revascularization

Background: The use of artificial circulation in surgical myocardial revascularization is one of the key pathogenetic factors in the development of the oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory response in the postoperative period. Aims: the purpose of the study was to describe the dynamics of the induced blood oxidation parameters during coronary artery bypass surgery in the conditions of artificial circulation and on the working heart. Methods: The study included 64 patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery, with 31 (48.4%) on-pump patients and 33 (51.6%) off-pump patients. The oxidative stress simulations were conducted under the in vitro conditions. The blood oxidation-induced values were studied using a biological oxygen monitor. Results: In patients with coronary heart disease, regardless of the choice of the revascularization method (on-pump / off-pump), we observed statistically significantly (p 0.05) higher initial and maximum blood oxidation rates, the oxidative activity factor, and a shorter initiation period than those in healthy volunteers. No significant differences were found by the inter-group comparison analysis both 10 days and 6 months post-surgery. Conclusion: The indicators of induced blood oxidation do not depend on the method of revascularization during coronary bypass grafting (artificial circulation or a working heart). The changes in the parameters indicating activation of the oxidative and antioxidant blood systems may be transient by their nature and occur in the early postoperative period.

Ten-year outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an inverse probability of treatment weighting comparative study

AIMS

The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump myocardial revascularization (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

METHODS

The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG. Data on isolated CABG were linked to two administrative datasets. The inverse probability of treatment weight was employed to balance the treatment groups. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze endpoints.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 10 988 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB). The median follow-up time was 7.9 years and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, confirmed by weighted models (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.14, P = 0.01). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACCE at 10 years (weighted hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23, P < 0.001). Inside the MACCEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.39-3.85, P < 0.001, in the first 6 months, hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001 afterward) and stroke (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that OPCAB was associated with an increased risk of mortality, repeat myocardial revascularization and stroke at 10 years compared with on-pump CABG.

The Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) on Long-Term Survival in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB) Procedures

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases, apart from commonly known risk factors, are related to inflammation. There are several simple novel markers proposed to present the relation between inflammatory reactions activation and atherosclerotic changes. They are easily available from whole blood count and include neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelets to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The RDW results were excluded from the analysis.

METHOD AND RESULTS

The study based on retrospective single-centre analysis of 682 consecutive patients (131 (19%) females and 551 (81%) males) with median age of 66 years (60-71) who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) procedure. During the median 5.3 +/- 1.9 years follow-up, there was a 87% cumulative survival rate. The laboratory parameters including preoperative MLR > 0.2 (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.33-4.55, p = 0.004) and postoperative NLR > 3.5 (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09-2.79, p = 0.019) were found significant for long-term mortality prediction in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Hematological indices NLR and MLR can be regarded as significant predictors of all-cause long-term mortality after OPCAB revascularization. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative values of MLR > 0.2 and postoperative values of NLR > 3.5 as simple, reliable factors which may be applied into clinical practice for meticulous postoperative monitoring of patients in higher risk of worse prognosis.

Long-term survival after endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic vein harvest is the technique of choice in North America, where it constitutes 80% of conduit harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. The UK has much lower rates, despite demonstrable perioperative benefits. Concerns about patency and long-term survival are often cited as reasons for poor uptake and evidence in the literature thus far has only addressed mid-term outcomes. We sought to identify the long-term survival of patients undergoing endoscopic vein harvest compared with a contemporaneous cohort of open vein harvest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution between 2007 and 2017. All-cause long-term mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7,527 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (1,029 receiving endoscopic vein harvest) were studied. The groups were well matched for preoperative characteristics, except that there were more patients with triple-vessel disease and good left-ventricular function in the endoscopic vein harvest group. There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term survival (p = 0.23). At five years (median follow-up), survival was 86.1% (95% confidence interval 85.3-87.0) in the open vein harvest group compared with 85.5% (95% confidence interval 82.8-88.2) in the endoscopic vein harvest group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Endoscopic vein harvest does not affect long-term survival in an unselected population. The contraindications for minimally invasive vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting are increasingly diminishing.