Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017

Contrast echocardiography is widely used in cardiology. It is applied to improve image quality, reader confidence and reproducibility both for assessing left ventricular (LV) structure and function at rest and for assessing global and regional function in stress echocardiography. The use of contrast in echocardiography has now extended beyond cardiac structure and function assessment to evaluation of perfusion both of the myocardium and of the intracardiac structures. Safety of contrast agents have now been addressed in large patient population and these studies clearly established its excellent safety profile. This document, based on clinical trials, randomized and multicentre studies and published clinical experience, has established clear recommendations for the use of contrast in various clinical conditions with evidence-based protocols.

Assessment of image quality in real time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography: an integrated 2D/3D approach

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography is a relatively new technique offering the potential to acquire images of the entire left ventricle from 1 or 2 transducer positions in a time-efficient manner. Relative to two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the ability to quickly acquire full volume images during peak stress with 3D echocardiography can eliminate left ventricular (LV) foreshortening while reducing inter-operator variability. Our objectives were to (1) determine the practicality of a novel integrated 2D/3D stress protocol in incorporating 3D imaging into a standard 2D stress echocardiogram and (2) to determine whether the quality of imaging using the novel 2D/3D protocol was sufficient for interpretation.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients referred for stress echocardiography underwent an integrated 2D/3D image acquisition protocol. LV segments were scored from 0 (absent or no clear endocardial visualization) to 3 (excellent/full visualization of endocardial border) with each modality. 2D segment quality scoring was compared with 3D. An integrated score was compared with either 2D or 3D imaging alone.

RESULTS

Two-dimensional and 3D imaging were optimal for differing segments and the integrated protocol was superior to either modality alone. 3D imaging was superior in visualizing the anterior and anterolateral region of the base segments, compared to 2D imaging. 3D imaging was less useful for the base, the mid-inferior, and the inferoseptal segments, thus emphasizing the need to retain 2D imaging in stress echocardiography at this time.

CONCLUSION

The integrated 2D/3D protocol approach to stress echocardiography is technically feasible and maximizes image quality of dobutamine stress echocardiography, improving patient assessment.

Value of real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of myocardial wall-motion and perfusion assessment using contrast echocardiography during real-time three-dimensional (RT3D) adenosine stress test, and compare its diagnostic accuracy with the two-dimensional (2D) method using coronary angiography as reference.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) have been submitted to adenosine stress contrast echocardiography and coronary angiography, within a 1-month period. Two-dimensional apical four, two, and three chamber, as well as three-dimensional (3D) pyramidal full-volume data sets were acquired at rest and at peak stress. The 17-segment division of the left ventricle was used and each segment was evaluated based on wall motion and perfusion. Sixty patients (age: 60.1 ± 8.5 years, 38 men) were enrolled, i.e. 1020 segments were evaluated at rest and at peak stress. Wall-motion analysis per patient revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of 2D to detect CAD were 80 and 82% and of RT3D echocardiography were 82 and 64%, respectively, whereas in the per patient perfusion analysis the respective percentages were 88, 64% for 2D and 90, 73% for RT3D. Regarding left anterior descending artery and right coronary system, there seems to be no statistical significant difference in terms of wall-motion and perfusion evaluation between the two modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time 3D adenosine stress echocardiography is a feasible and valuable technique to evaluate myocardial wall motion and perfusion in patients with suspected CAD, despite existing problems concerning lower spatial and temporal resolution when compared with 2D echocardiography.