Cardiac re-synchronization therapy in a patient with isolated ventricular non-compaction: a case report

Intraventricular synchronism assessment by gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Does cardiomyopathy type influence results?

Purpose

To analyze the evolution post-cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy (CM) patients compared to other types of CM, according to clinical and functional variables, by using gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

Methods

Ninety-three patients (60 ± 11 years, 28% women) referred for pre-CRT assessment were studied and divided into three groups: 1 (non-ischemic CM with LVNC, 11 patients), 2 (ischemic CM, 28 patients), and 3 (non-ischemic CM, 53 patients). All were studied by a ^99mTc-MIBI gated-SPECT MPI at rest pre-CRT implantation and 6 ± 1 months after, including intraventricular dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis. Quality of life was measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ).

Results

No differences in sex, atherosclerotic risk factors other than smoking habit, and MLHFQ results were found among groups. LVNC CM patients were younger, with greater QRS width and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline, but the differences were not significant. No significant differences were found at baseline regarding ventricular function, although end-systolic volume was slightly higher in LVNC CM patients. Mean SRS was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in ischemic patients (14.9) versus non-ischemic ones (8.7 in group 1 and 9 in group 2). At baseline, LVNC CM patients were significantly more dyssynchronous: Their phase standard deviation (PSD) was higher (89.5° ± 14.2°) versus groups 2 (65.2° ± 23.3°) and 3 (69.7° ± 21.7°), p = 0.007. Although the quality of life significantly improved in all groups, non-ischemic patients (with or without LVNC) showed a higher LVEF increase and volumes reduction at 6 months post-CRT. Dyssynchrony reduced post-CRT in all groups. Nevertheless, those more dyssynchronous at baseline (LVNC CM) exhibited the most significant intraventricular synchronism improvement: PSD was reduced from 89.5° ± 14.2° at baseline to 63.7° ± 20.5° post-CRT (p = 0.028). Six months post-CRT, 89% of patients were responders: 11 (100%) of those with LVNC CM, 25 (86%) of those with ischemic CM, and 47 (89%) of patients with non-ischemic CM. No patient with LVNC CM had adverse events during the follow-up.

Conclusion

CRT contributes to a marked improvement in non-ischemic CM patients with non-compaction myocardium. Phase analysis in gated-SPECT MPI is a valuable tool to assess the response to CRT.

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling and dyssynchrony in patients with left ventricular noncompaction and heart failure

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare cardiomyopathy with high incidence of heart failure (HF). It is unclear whether LVNC patients with desynchronized HF would benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In order to evaluate the effect of CRT on LVNC, this study explored left ventricular (LV) remodeling and mechanical synchronicity before and after CRT in LVNC patients, and compare with that in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. We collected 15 LVNC and 30 matched DCM patients. All the patients underwent clinical evaluation,electrocardiogram and echocardiography before CRT and ≥6 months later. LV response was defined as ≥15 % decrease in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). Longitudinal synchronicity was quantified by YU-index using tissue Doppler imaging. The time delay of peak radial strain from anteroseptal to posterior wall, which derived from speckle tracking imaging, was used to quantify radial synchronicity. In LVNC group, LV ejection fraction increased from 27.6 ± 5.5 to 39.1 ± 7.0 % (P < 0.01) during follow-up, but LV volumes did not change significantly (both P > 0.05). Five LVNC patients (33.3 %) responded to CRT, and all of them were super-responders (reduction in LVESV > 30 %). In addition, the number of noncompacted segments and the thickness ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium decreased (both P < 0.05). Inter-ventricular, longitudinal and radial intra-ventricular dyssynchrony also reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). Compared with DCM group, there was no significant difference in LV response rate (33.3 vs. 60.0 %, P = 0.092), improvement of LV function and dyssynchrony index (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, CRT improved heart function, morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony in LVNC patients.

Noncompaction cardiomyopathy is associated with mechanical dyssynchrony: a potential underlying mechanism for favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the presence of evidence of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with isolated left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (IVNC) and the potential usefulness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in those patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 25 patients consecutively diagnosed with IVNC and a control group of 50 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of different etiologies. Mechanical dyssynchrony was assessed by echocardiography by the presence of a septal flash, the time from peak septal to posterior wall displacement, and the time from septal to lateral wall peak systolic velocity. Among the patients with IVNC, 9 received CRT and were followed at 12 months. Overall, dyssynchrony parameters were significantly more frequent in IVNC, regardless of QRS duration. All 9 IVNC patients treated with CRT showed a septal flash, and a favorable response was observed in 8/9 patients (89%) regardless of QRS width.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony, amenable to correction with CRT, is common in patients with IVNC, independently from QRS width. This might be related to altered electrical endocardial activation associated with abnormal myocardium and could be the justification for the high response rate to CRT observed in these patients.

Left ventricular non-compaction and its cardiac and neurologic implications

Left ventricular non-compaction, also known as left ventricular hypertrabeculation (LVHT), is a morphological abnormality of the left ventricular myocardium, characterised by a meshwork of myocardial strings, interlacing, and orderless in arrangement. LVHT is most frequently located in the apex and the lateral wall and may occur with or without other congenital or acquired cardiac abnormalities. LVHT is believed to be congenital in the majority of the cases but may develop during life in single cases (acquired LVHT). Congenital LVHT is believed to result from defective late-stage embryonic development of the myocardial architecture. The pathogenesis of acquired LVHT remains speculative. LVHT is most frequently found on transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac MRI but may be visualised also with other imaging techniques. In the majority of the cases, LVHT is associated with hereditary cardiac, neuromuscular, non-cardiac/non-muscle disease, or chromosomal aberrations. In the majority of the cases, LVHT is complicated by ventricular arrhythmias, systolic dysfunction, cardiac embolism, or sudden cardiac death. LVHT per se does not require a specific treatment. Only in case of complications, such as ventricular arrhythmias, cardioembolism, or systolic dysfunction, adequate therapy is indicated. Though initially assessed as poor, the prognosis of LVHT has meanwhile improved, most likely due to the increased awareness for the abnormality and the timely administration of adequate therapy.