Impact of left atrial strain on clinical outcomes in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of pre-procedural left atrial strain (LAS) in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This single-centre retrospective study enrolled 434 patients who were admitted for transvenous PPI between 2010 and 2020. After excluding patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, PPI for complete atrioventricular block, severe valvular disease, history of open-heart surgery and those without LAS data, 172 patients were analysed. The LAS was measured using commercially available software to calculate the average strain value of the apical four- and two-chamber views before PPI. The primary composite endpoint was hospitalization due to heart failure or cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for the primary composite endpoint. The mean patient age was 78 ± 8 years, and 42% of the patients were men. PPI was performed for sick sinus syndrome in 64% and second-degree atrioventricular block in 36% of the patients. The pre-procedure left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) was 28 ± 11%. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years, and the primary endpoint was observed in 23 (13%) patients. In multivariate Cox proportional risk analysis, LASr was independently associated with the primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 1.08 per 1% decrease; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.15; P = 0.007). The receiver operating characteristic curve of the LASr for the primary composite endpoint showed a cutoff value of 21% (area under the curve 0.657, P = 0.004). The prognostic impact of LASr was consistent with that of sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

CONCLUSIONS

A decreased pre-procedure LASr was associated with long-term adverse outcomes after PPI use.

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Myopathy, and Thromboembolism: The Additive Value of Echocardiography and Possible New Horizons for Risk Stratification

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac sustained arrhythmia, and it is associated with increased stroke and dementia risk. While the established paradigm attributes these complications to blood stasis within the atria and subsequent thrombus formation with cerebral embolization, recent evidence suggests that atrial myopathy (AM) may play a key role. AM is characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the atria, and can occur with or without AF. Moving beyond classifications based solely on episode duration, the 4S-AF characterization has offered a more comprehensive approach, incorporating patient's stroke risk, symptom severity, AF burden, and substrate assessment (including AM) for tailored treatment decisions. The "ABC" pathway emphasizes anticoagulation, symptom control, and cardiovascular risk modification and emerging evidence suggests broader benefits of early rhythm control strategies, potentially reducing stroke and dementia risk and improving clinical outcomes. However, a better integration of AM assessment into the current framework holds promise for further personalizing AF management and optimizing patient outcomes. This review explores the emerging concept of AM and its potential role as a risk factor for stroke and dementia and in AF patients' management strategies, highlighting the limitations of current risk stratification methods, like the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Echocardiography, particularly left atrial (LA) strain analysis, has shown to be a promising non-invasive tool for AM evaluation and recent studies suggest that LA strain analysis may be a more sensitive risk stratifier for thromboembolic events than AF itself, with some studies showing a stronger association between LA strain and thromboembolic events compared to traditional risk factors. Integrating it into routine clinical practice could improve patient management and targeted therapies for AF and potentially other thromboembolic events. Future studies are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in AM patients with and without AF and to refine the diagnostic criteria for AM.

Insights Into the Standard Echocardiographic Views From Multimodality Imaging: Ventricles, Pericardium, Valves, and Atria

The widespread use of cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing echocardiography presents an opportunity to correlate the images side by side. Accordingly, the aim of this report is to review aspects of the standard echocardiographic examination alongside similarly oriented images from the two tomographic imaging modalities. It is hoped that this exercise will enhance understanding of the structures depicted by echocardiography as they relate to other structures in the thorax. In addition to reviewing basic cardiac anatomy, the authors take advantage of these correlations with computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to better understand the issue of foreshortening, a common pitfall in transthoracic echocardiography. The authors also highlight an important role that three-dimensional echocardiography can potentially play in the future, especially as advances in image processing permit higher fidelity multiplanar reconstruction images.

Left atrial reverse remodeling improves risk stratification in patients with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction

We aimed to investigate the relationship between left atrial (LA) reverse remodeling and prognosis of heart failure (HF) with recovered ejection fraction (EF) (HFrecEF). Among 1,246 patients with acute heart failure enrolled in the prospective longitudinal follow-up study, 397 patients with HF with mildly-reduced EF and with reduced EF at discharge were analyzed. Echocardiography was performed during the index hospitalization and at the 6-month follow-up after discharge. They were divided into non-HFrecEF (n = 227) and HFrecEF (n = 170) groups. The primary outcome measure was a composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for HF. The cumulative 180-day incidence of the primary outcome measure after follow-up echocardiography was significantly lower in the HFrecEF group than in the non-HFrecEF group (8.9% versus 23.4%, log-rank P = 0.0002). LA reverse remodeling was associated with a lower cumulative 6-month incidence of the primary outcome measure in the HFrecEF group (4.7% versus 18.0%; HR: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.09–0.79, P = 0.01), but not in the non-HFrecEF group (24.4% versus 22.6%; HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 0.65–1.96, P = 0.28) with a significant LA reverse remodeling-by-HFrecEF interaction (P for interaction = 0.02). Combination of left ventricular and atrial reverse remodeling may help in improving HF risk stratification.

Standardization of normal values for cardiac chamber size in echocardiography

Echocardiography is used worldwide to evaluate cardiac size and function. To determine what values are abnormal, it is essential to establish normal reference values for echocardiography. The current guidelines for chamber quantification specify normative values for cardiac chambers and recommend that gender and body size be taken into account. However, these normative data were established using databases for which a variety of measurement methods were used and the majority of subjects consisted of Whites in Europe and the United States. However, several regional studies from other countries suggest that cardiac size varies globally. To overcome these limitations, the Normal Reference Ranges for Echocardiography study and the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Normal Values study have recently been conducted to examine similarities and differences in cardiac chamber size and to establish normal reference values while taking worldwide diversity into account. The results from these studies have demonstrated that standardization of normal reference values for cardiac size is important. This review article aims to summarize the current status of normative echocardiographic values for cardiac chamber size.

Echocardiographic Measurement of Left Atrial Strain - A Key Requirement in Clinical Practice

Unlike the left ventricle (LV), the left atrium (LA) has a thin-walled structure and has been regarded as a simple conduit chamber. However, the unique function of the LA to modulate LV filling has recently drawn much attention. Because LA structure and function are directly influenced by the LV filling pressure, LA assessment is an essential step in the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction that can help predict new-onset atrial fibrillation, assess the risk of further embolic events, and identify high-risk patients for adverse cardiovascular events. Even in the recent era of multimodality imaging, 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is the most common imaging method and the central modality for evaluation of LA function. LA strain derived from 2D echocardiography can help assess LA function objectively and demonstrates the 3 distinct phasic motions of the LA cycle. Further, LA strain provides invaluable pathophysiologic information and helps to predict clinical prognosis in various cardiovascular diseases. In this review article, we focus on LA strain: basic concepts, advantages over conventional parameters, and some unresolved issues. Additionally, we present a brief history of the clinical evidence for LA strain. Through this review, we suggest echocardiography for LA strain assessment in clinical practice.

Validation of evaluating left ventricular diastolic function with estimated left atrial volume from anteroposterior diameter

Background

Left atrial (LA) volume (LAV) is one of the recommended key variables for evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. However, only LA anteroposterior diameter (LAAP) is available in numerous large-scale existing databases. Therefore, this study aimed to validate whether LV diastolic function could be evaluated with estimated LAV from LAAP.

Methods

A total of 552 inpatients with sinus rhythm were consecutively enrolled. LAV was measured by biplane Simpson’s disk summation method. LV diastolic function was evaluated according to the 2016 proposed recommendations. Best-fitting regression models of LAAP index (LAAPI)–LAV index (LAVI) were developed and equations with the highest F-value were chosen in the first 276 subjects (derivation set), and concordance for evaluating LV diastolic function between using estimated and observed LAVI was verified in the remaining 276 subjects (validation set).

Results

In the derivation set, the linear model has the highest F-value in all subjects and in the subjects with normal or depressed LV ejection fraction. In the validation set, using the linear equation (LAVI = 2.05 × LAAPI − 13.86), the higher area under curve and narrower range of difference were shown between estimated LAVI and observed LAVI, respectively. Further, concordance for diagnosis (overall proportion of agreement, 88.4%; κ = 0.79) and grading (overall proportion of agreement, 84.8%; κ = 0.74) of LV diastolic dysfunction was substantial between using estimated and observed LAVI.

Conclusions

LV diastolic function can be evaluated with estimated LAVI from LAAPI, which might provide a surrogate method when the direct measurement of LAV is not available.

Cardiac autotransplantation and ex vivo surgical repair of giant left atrium: a case presentation

BACKGROUND

Chronic Mitral Valve disease is strongly associated with Left atrial enlargement; the condition has a high mortality risk. Clinical manifestations include atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, thromboembolic events, and in cases of Giant Left Atrium (GLA) and a distorted cardiac silhouette. Full sternotomy, conventional open-heart surgery, reductive atrioplasty and atrioventricular valve repair are required to resolve symptoms. However, these procedures can be complicated due to the posterior location of the GLA and concomitant right lateral protrusion. Cardiac autotransplantation is superior under these conditions; it provides improved visual access to the posterior atrial wall and mitral valve, hence, facilitates corrective surgical procedures. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of patients undergoing cardiac autotransplantation as the primary treatment modality to resolve GLA. Moreover, we evaluated the procedural safety profile and technical feasibility.

CASE PRESENTATION

Four patients, mean EuroSCORE II of 23.7% ± 7.7%, presented with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter > 6.5 cm and a severe distorted cardiac silhouette; X-ray showed prominent right lateral protrusion. We performed cardiac autotransplantation using continuous retrograde perfusion with warm blood supplemented with glucose followed by atrioplasty, atrial plication, valve annuloplasty and valve repair on the explanted beating heart. The surgical approach reduced the left atrial area, mean reduction was - 90.71 cm² [CI95% -153.3 cm² to - 28.8 cm², p = 0.02], and normalized pulmonary arterial pressure, mean decrease - 11.25 mmHg [CI95% -15.23 mmHg to - 7.272 mmHg, p = 0.003]. 3 out of 4 patients experienced an uneventful postoperative course; 2 out of 4 patients experienced a transient return to sinus rhythm following surgery. One was operated on in 2017 and is still in good condition; two other patients survived for more than 10 years; Kaplan-Meier determined median survival is 10.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac autotransplantation is an elegant surgical procedure that facilitates the surgical remodelling of Giant Left Atrium. Surgical repair on the ex vivo beating heart, under continuous warm blood perfusion, is a safe procedure applicable also to high-risk patients.

Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Aims

This European Association Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Expert Consensus document aims at defining the main quantitative information on cardiac structure and function that needs to be included in standard echocardiographic report following recent ASE/EACVI chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations. The document focuses on general reporting and specific pathological conditions such as heart failure, coronary artery and valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies, and systemic diseases.

Methods and results

Demographic data (age, body surface area, blood pressure, and heart rhythm and rate), type (vendor and model) of ultrasound system used and image quality need to be reported. In addition, measurements should be normalized for body size. Reference normal values, derived by ASE/EACVI recommendations, shall always be reported to differentiate normal from pathological conditions. This Expert Consensus document suggests avoiding the surveillance of specific variable using different ultrasound techniques (e.g. in echo labs with high expertise in left ventricular ejection fraction by 3D and not by 2D echocardiography). The report should be also tailored in relation with different cardiac pathologies, quality of images, and needs of the caregivers.

Conclusion

The conclusion should be concise reflecting the status of left ventricular structure and function, the presence of left atrial and/or aortic dilation, right ventricular dysfunction, and pulmonary hypertension, leading to an objective communication with the patient health caregiver. Variation over time should be considered carefully, taking always into account the consistency of the parameters used for comparison.

Left atrial dimension is related to blood pressure variability in newly diagnosed untreated hypertensive patients

Variability in daily blood pressure (BPV) recorded 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is known to be related to left ventricular hypertrophy and an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether left atrium dimension, which increases early in hypertensive subjects, was related to BPV in a group of 167 drug-naive patients (100M/67F, age: 46±11yr). The patients were chosen among those consecutively sent by their general practitioners to confirm the existence of arterial hypertension and afterwards diagnosed as hypertensive (mean 24-h ABPM ⩾130/80 mm Hg). In each patient, the left atrial posteroanterior diameter index for height (LADi) and the left ventricular mass standardized for body surface area (LVMi) were measured using standardized echocardiographic methods. BPV was calculated as the weighted mean of daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure s.d.'s (ws.d.), according to the formula ws.d.=[(daytime s.d. × 10)+nighttime s.d. × 6)]/16. An increase in left atrial dimension (LADi>24 mm m(-1)) was present in 36 patients (21.6% of the total population). In a univariate regression, LVMi was significantly related to systolic BPV (r=0.24; P=0.02) only in men, whereas LADi was significantly related to both systolic and diastolic BPV in both genders. After adjusting for sex, age, BMI, heart rate, diastolic function and estimated glomerular filtration rate, both systolic and diastolic BPV remained significantly related to LADi (P=0.02 for both) but not to LVMi. In conclusion, this study suggests that BVP, as measured as BPws.d., is significantly and independently associated with increased LADi in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive hypertensive patients.

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.

Echocardiographic measurement of left atrial volume: Does the method matter?

BACKGROUND

Four two-dimensional echocardiographic methods (cube, ellipsoid, Simpson's and area-length) can be used to assess left atrial volume (LAV).

AIMS

To compare absolute LAV measurements and evaluate agreement regarding the semiquantitative assessment of degree of left atrial (LA) enlargement, between methods.

METHODS

We prospectively measured LAV in 51 healthy volunteers using the four methods, and defined thresholds for moderate (mean+2 standard deviations [SDs]) and severe (mean+4 SDs) LA enlargement for each method. In 372 patients referred for echocardiography, we compared absolute LAV measurements and agreement between methods.

RESULTS

LAV was significantly different between methods in the healthy volunteer group (11 ± 4, 17 ± 3, 26 ± 6 and 28 ± 7 mL/m(2), respectively; P<0.0001), resulting in different thresholds for moderate and severe LA enlargement. LAV was also significantly different in the 372 patients (30 ± 20, 47 ± 27, 61 ± 34 and 65 ± 36 mL/m(2), respectively; P<0.0001). Agreement regarding degree of LA enlargement (none, moderate, severe), using the area-length method as reference, was modest with the cube method (kappa=0.41), correct with the ellipsoid method (kappa=0.60) and excellent with Simpson's method (kappa=0.83).

CONCLUSION

The choice of the method had a major effect on assessment of degree of LA enlargement. Our results suggest that the cube and ellipsoid methods, which significantly underestimated LAV and provided modest agreement, should be disregarded. In contrast, Simpson's method and the area-length method were slightly different, but showed close agreement, and should be preferred, using dedicated thresholds (50 and 56 mL/m(2) respectively).

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.