The socioeconomic burden of acromegaly

Promising therapies for the treatment of acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare systemic disorder caused by an excess of growth hormone. Since surgical resection of the underlying tumor is not always successful, pharmacotherapy plays an invaluable role in managing this condition. While current treatment options are generally effective and well-tolerated, there remains significant room for improvement.

AREAS COVERED

This paper explores recent developments in the treatment of acromegaly that either propose new mechanisms of delivering established agents or introduce entirely new treatment strategies. It reviews available clinical data and discusses the progress of various new pharmacological agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Advancements in acromegaly pharmacotherapy are focused on overcoming current treatment limitations by developing more effective, tolerable, and personalized therapies. Emerging approaches, including small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, and antisense oligonucleotides, along with biomarker-driven precision medicine, aim to improve patient outcomes, minimize side effects, and enhance long-term disease management.

New treatments for acromegaly: Is a revolution underway?

The first-line treatment for acromegaly is transsphenoidal surgery. Somatostatin receptor ligands are usually prescribed if surgery fails, or, in some patients, as pre-surgical medical treatment. The efficacy and tolerance of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands is well established, but they incur unmet medical needs due to their mode of administration and side effects. We report results for new compounds that may be used in the near future as alternatives to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, with data on efficacy and tolerance: oral octreotide, paltusotine and long-acting subcutaneous octreotide are reviewed in detail, together with potential new compounds under investigation. We also discuss their potential role in the therapeutic armamentarium for acromegaly.

Patient perspectives on acromegaly disease burden: insights from a community meeting

Objective

A profound mismatch between biological and symptom control in acromegaly creates a high disease burden despite achieving optimal biological control. There is a great need to learn more about the perspectives of patients living with acromegaly.

Methods

Acromegaly Community hosted a virtual meeting in January 2021 and prepared a detailed report capturing participants' input on acromegaly symptoms and current and future treatment approaches. The findings of this report are reviewed and summarized in this study.

Results

Fatigue/muscle weakness (92%) and joint pain/arthritis (90%) are the two most common and troublesome symptoms reported by meeting participants. Acromegaly negatively impacts all aspects of daily living: social interaction (49%); exercise (42%); sports/recreational activities (39%); household activities (38%); attending school or job (38%); family relationships (33%); and walking (26%). Anxiety/depression is experienced by 75% of respondents. Eighty-three percent of patients underwent pituitary surgery, and over 71% of patients require medical therapy. Patients desire future improvements in medication efficacy, tolerability, and administration; mental health resources for themselves and their families; and other multimodal approaches to address their physical symptoms, specifically hunger, weight gain, muscle weakness, and joint pains.

Conclusion

Acromegaly patients experience significant physical and psychological burdens despite biochemical control, highlighting the need for comprehensive and patient-centered care. In particular, the impacts on activities of daily living (ADLs) and heavy psychosocial and socioeconomic burdens are striking. We advocate for periodic screening for impacted ADLs, multidisciplinary teams to proactively address these symptoms, and call for further research on under-evaluated aspects of the disease.

Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is due in almost all cases to a GH-secreting pituitary tumor. GH and IGF-1 excesses lead to its multi-system clinical manifestations and comorbidities. Acromegaly is under-diagnosed and typically presents with advanced disease. When early or mild, clinical recognition and biochemical confirmation are especially challenging. Individualized treatment may optimize patient outcome.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers challenges to diagnosing acromegaly and reviews therapies for acromegaly with a focus on those aspects that can be individualized.

EXPERT OPINION

The first step in diagnosing acromegaly is recognizing it clinically. To improve this, increase awareness and education of the general population and healthcare professionals about the acromegaly phenotype is needed. Once suspected clinically, IGF-1 measurement is the initial step in making the biochemical diagnosis. GH may be < 1.0 µg/L after oral glucose suppression in early/mild cases. GH and IGF-1 should be considered in concert. Providers should be aware of conditions that can alter GH and IGF-1 levels and each assay's performance. An individualized treatment approach is best employed. Surgery is preferred as initial treatment and medical therapy as initial adjuvant therapy. In individualizing therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of each option and predictors of response to them should be considered.

Ends of the spectrum best practices for early detection and multidisciplinary management of acromegaly

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is characterized by an insidious clinical presentation and delayed diagnosis. Longer delays are associated with more comorbidities which can persist after treatment of the growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA). Surgery is the primary therapy of GH-secreting PA, which can lead to durable remission. However, approximately 50% of patients require medical treatment postoperatively. Survival normalizes after achieving biochemical control. This mini-review will address ends of the spectrum challenges in acromegaly, including delayed diagnosis and management of the residual tumor and persistent comorbidities.

METHODS

We synthesize relevant literature and present a case of acromegaly that highlights the complexity of clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of persistent acromegaly.

RESULTS

Despite improved biochemical assays, most patients with acromegaly are diagnosed on average five years after initial symptoms. A high index of suspicion does not rely exclusively on acral enlargement, but also a constellation of manifestations and comorbidities suggestive of acromegaly. Medical therapy is required in patients with persistent biochemical disease. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the cornerstone of medical treatment and can be used alone or in combination with dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Improved options of medical treatment and careful consideration of comorbidities enables individualized patient management. Reoperation and radiation are considered for tumor progression despite medical therapy. In rare cases of resistant and aggressive tumors, neuro-oncology expertise is required.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased awareness through education targeting the multifaceted clinical presentation of acromegaly shortens the time to diagnosis and treatment. Multidisciplinary management by specialists increases the likelihood of biochemical and tumor control.

The changing landscape of acromegaly - an epidemiological perspective

Acromegaly is a rare disease and thus challenging to accurately quantify epidemiologically. In this comprehensive literature review, we compare different approaches to studying acromegaly from an epidemiological perspective and describe the temporal evolution of the disease pertaining to epidemiological variables, clinical presentation and mortality. We present updated epidemiological data from the population-based Danish cohort of patients with acromegaly (AcroDEN), along with meta-analyses of existing estimates from around the world.Based on this, we conclude that the incidence, prevalence and age at acromegaly diagnosis are all steadily increasing, but with considerable variation between studies. An increased number of incidental cases may contribute to the increase in incidence and age at diagnosis, respectively. The clinical features at presentation are trending toward a milder disease phenotype at diagnosis, and advances in therapeutic options have reduced the mortality of patients with acromegaly to a level similar to that of the general population. Moreover, the underlying cause of death has shifted from cardiovascular to malignant neoplastic diseases.

Preferences for different treatment options among people living with acromegaly in the US

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a rare hormonal disorder that results in enlargement of the face, hands and feet. It is associated with comorbidities, increased mortality, reduced quality of life and economic burden. Adequate treatment is critical to alleviate symptoms; however, the treatment burden is substantial. To understand how different treatment aspects might ease the burden, this study investigated preferences for treatment options among people with acromegaly in the US, using a choice experiment (CE).

METHODS

An online CE was conducted based on a similar study among the US general population. Respondents were recruited through Acromegaly Community in the US, and all eligible respondents were included. The survey assessed six treatment options that varied according to administration, frequency, storage, treatment setting, needle type and injection pain.

RESULTS

109 adults with acromegaly completed the survey between October and December 2022. On average, the population had lived with symptoms for 15 years, while the average number of years with the diagnosis was eight. Respondents preferred subcutaneous injections every fourth week and preferred them at home rather than at the hospital. Most respondents preferred subcutaneous injections right under the skin administered once every fourth week with a pen at home over oral capsules administered twice daily at home.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that new treatment options administered as subcutaneous injections right under the skin once every fourth week at home have the potential to lower the treatment burden among people with acromegaly, emphasizing the importance of taking each person's preference into consideration when choosing treatment.