Craniofacial, oral, and cervical morphological characteristics in Japanese patients with Apert syndrome or Crouzon syndrome

Skeletal Anterior Open Bite Attenuates the Chewing-Related Increase in Brain Blood Flow

The masticatory function of patients with skeletal anterior open bite (OPEN) is reported to be impaired compared with that of patients with normal occlusion (NORM). In this study, we compared brain blood flow (BBF) in patients with OPEN and NORM and investigated the factors related to BBF during mastication in patients with OPEN. The study included 17 individuals with NORM and 33 patients with OPEN. The following data were collected: number of occlusal contacts, jaw movement variables during mastication, and BBF measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy during chewing. The number of occlusal contacts, maximum closing and opening speeds, closing angle, and vertical amplitude were smaller in the OPEN than in the NORM group. Interestingly, BBF increased less in the OPEN group. Correlation analysis revealed that several parameters, including number of occlusal contacts and closing angle, were correlated with changes in BBF during mastication. These results suggest that not only occlusion but also jaw movement variables and factors related to masticatory muscles contribute to the chewing-related increase in BBF. In conclusion, BBF increases less during mastication in patients with OPEN than in those with NORM. In addition, the higher increase in BBF is correlated with jaw movement. Together, we discovered that OPEN exhibits significant adverse effects not only on masticatory function but also on brain function.

Genetic insights into the 'sandwich fusion' subtype of Klippel-Feil syndrome: novel FGFR2 mutations identified by 21 cases of whole-exome sequencing

BACKGROUND

Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by the fusion of two or more cervical vertebrae during early prenatal development. This fusion results from a failure of segmentation during the first trimester. Although six genes have previously been associated with KFS, they account for only a small proportion of cases. Among the distinct subtypes of KFS, "sandwich fusion" involving concurrent fusion of C0-1 and C2-3 vertebrae is particularly noteworthy due to its heightened risk for atlantoaxial dislocation. In this study, we aimed to investigate novel candidate mutations in patients with "sandwich fusion."

METHODS

We collected and analyzed clinical data from 21 patients diagnosed with "sandwich fusion." Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed, followed by rigorous bioinformatics analyses. Our focus was on the six known KFS-related genes (GDF3, GDF6, MEOX1, PAX1, RIPPLY2, and MYO18). Suspicious mutations were subsequently validated through in vitro experiments.

RESULTS

Our investigation revealed two novel exonic mutations in the FGFR2 gene, which had not previously been associated with KFS. Notably, the c.1750A > G variant in Exon 13 of FGFR2 was situated within the tyrosine kinase domain of the protein, in close proximity to several established post-translational modification sites. In vitro experiments demonstrated that this certain mutation significantly impacted the function of FGFR2. Furthermore, we identified four heterozygous candidate variants in two genes (PAX1 and MYO18B) in two patients, with three of these variants predicted to have potential clinical significance directly linked to KFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study encompassed the largest cohort of patients with the unique "sandwich fusion" subtype of KFS and employed WES to explore candidate mutations associated with this condition. Our findings unveiled novel variants in PAX1, MYO18B, and FGFR2 as potential risk mutations specific to this subtype of KFS.

Changes in mandibular position during midface distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in mandibular position during midface distraction. Midface distraction was performed in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis to increase upper airway volume. Although this treatment resulted in changes in occlusion, the concomitant changes in mandibular position were poorly understood. In this retrospective study, three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms were obtained before and after midface distraction in 15 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Perioperative polysomnography scores and changes in maxillary and mandibular position, mandibular volume, and upper airway volume were analyzed. Results showed a significant improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (from 20.6 ± 21.3 to 6.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.05) and upper airway volume (from 2951.65 ± 2286.38 to 5218.04 ± 3150.05 mm3, p < 0.001). When the lowest point of the sella turcica was set as the reference point, the mandible moved significantly in an anterior direction (from 47.9 ± 11.5 to 51.9 ± 9.8 mm, p < 0.05). Mandibular volume did not change significantly perioperatively (from 32530.19 ± 10726.01 to 35590.50 ± 14879.21 mm3, p = 0.10). There were positive correlations between the rates of improvement in AHI and the amount of mandibular movement in the anterior and inferior directions (both p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the mandible moved in the anterior-inferior direction after midface distraction, and the amount of movement correlated with improvement in respiratory function. Therefore, it is important to consider the position of the mandible when determining the direction of midface distraction, as it may influence the therapeutic effect.

The interaction between the nervous system and the stomatognathic system: from development to diseases

The crosstalk between the nerve and stomatognathic systems plays a more important role in organismal health than previously appreciated with the presence of emerging concept of the "brain-oral axis". A deeper understanding of the intricate interaction between the nervous system and the stomatognathic system is warranted, considering their significant developmental homology and anatomical proximity, and the more complex innervation of the jawbone compared to other skeletons. In this review, we provide an in-depth look at studies concerning neurodevelopment, craniofacial development, and congenital anomalies that occur when the two systems develop abnormally. It summarizes the cross-regulation between nerves and jawbones and the effects of various states of the jawbone on intrabony nerve distribution. Diseases closely related to both the nervous system and the stomatognathic system are divided into craniofacial diseases caused by neurological illnesses, and neurological diseases caused by an aberrant stomatognathic system. The two-way relationships between common diseases, such as periodontitis and neurodegenerative disorders, and depression and oral diseases were also discussed. This review provides valuable insights into novel strategies for neuro-skeletal tissue engineering and early prevention and treatment of orofacial and neurological diseases.

Nonsurgical orthodontic treatment for a patient with Sotos syndrome

Sotos syndrome is a genetic disorder characterized by overgrowth in childhood, specific facial manifestations, advanced bone age, and mental retardation. The purpose of this article is to describe the nonsurgical orthodontic treatment of a 10-year-old boy with a skeletal mandibular protrusion, unilateral posterior crossbite, and Sotos syndrome. After maxillary lateral expansion, the skeletal Class III relationship with an anterior crossbite improved because of mandibular clockwise rotation, whereas the facemask had a marginal effect. After growth at 16 years, he had a skeletal Class I relationship, and thus, conventional orthodontic treatment with preadjusted edgewise appliances was initiated. After 41 months of multibracket treatment, acceptable occlusion with a functional Class I relationship was obtained. One year postretention, few changes in occlusion and facial features were observed. Our results demonstrate that considering the maxillofacial vertical growth during the peripubertal period associated with Sotos syndrome, more attention should be paid to the early orthopedic treatment with the facemask and/or chincap.

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Dental Arches in Individuals with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Objective

Individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis present alterations in the dental arches due to anomalies caused by the early fusion of the craniomaxillary sutures. This study aimed to compare intradental and interdental dimensions between individuals with Apert and Crouzon syndromes and nonsyndromic controls.

Materials and Methods

Digital models were obtained from the archive of a public tertiary care hospital. The sample consisted of 34 patients (Apert n = 18, Crouzon n = 16) and 34 nonsyndromic controls matched for gender and age. Measurements of perimeter, length, intercanine and intermolar distances (upper and lower), overjet, and molar ratio were performed. Statistical comparisons were performed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05).

Results

Patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes have severely reduced maxillary transverse dimensions, perimeter, and length of the upper arch compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The lower arch is less impacted. Patients with Apert syndrome had an anterior crossbite (p < 0.001), while patients with Crouzon syndrome had an edge-to-edge bite (p <  0.011). Patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes do not have serious transverse proportion problems when comparing the upper and lower arches.

Conclusions

In this sample, both the Apert and Crouzon groups have severely compromised upper arches compared to the control group. Mild dentoalveolar expansion in the maxilla should be sufficient for the transverse adaptation of the dental arches before frontofacial advancement.

Craniofacial characteristics in Crouzon's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to strengthen the credibility of primary research results by combining open-source scientific material, namely a comparison of craniofacial features (Cfc) between Crouzon's syndrome (CS) patients and non-CS populations. All articles published up to October 7, 2021, were included in the search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this study. PECO framework was applied in the following ways: Those who have CS are denoted by the letter P, those who have been diagnosed with CS via clinical or genetic means by the letter E, those who do not have CS by the letter C, and those who have a Cfc of CS by the letter O. Independent reviewers collected the data and ranked the publications based on their adherence to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A total of six case-control studies were reviewed for this meta-analysis. Due to the large variation in cephalometric measures, only those published in at least two previous studies were included. This analysis found that CS patients had a smaller skull and mandible volumes than those without CS.in terms of SNA° (MD = -2.33, p = <0.001, I2 = 83.6%) and ANB°(MD = -1.89, p = <0.005, I2 = 93.1%)), as well as ANS (MD = -1.87, p = 0.001, I2 = 96.5%)) and SN/PP (MD = -1.99, p = 0.036, I2 = 77.3%)). In comparison to the general population, people with CS tend to have shorter and flatter cranial bases, smaller orbital volumes, and cleft palates. They differ from the general population in having a shorter skull base and more V-shaped maxillary arches.

Cleft Palate in Apert Syndrome

Apert syndrome is a rare genetic disorder characterized by craniosynostosis, midface retrusion, and limb anomalies. Cleft palate occurs in a subset of Apert syndrome patients. Although the genetic causes underlying Apert syndrome have been identified, the downstream signaling pathways and cellular mechanisms responsible for cleft palate are still elusive. To find clues for the pathogenic mechanisms of palatal defects in Apert syndrome, we review the clinical characteristics of the palate in cases of Apert syndrome, the palatal phenotypes in mouse models, and the potential signaling mechanisms involved in palatal defects. In Apert syndrome patients, cleft of the soft palate is more frequent than of the hard palate. The length of the hard palate is decreased. Cleft palate is associated most commonly with the S252W variant of FGFR2. In addition to cleft palate, high-arched palate, lateral palatal swelling, or bifid uvula are common in Apert syndrome patients. Mouse models of Apert syndrome display palatal defects, providing valuable tools to understand the underlying mechanisms. The mutations in FGFR2 causing Apert syndrome may change a signaling network in epithelial–mesenchymal interactions during palatogenesis. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of palatal defects in Apert syndrome may shed light on potential novel therapeutic solutions.

Three-dimensional analysis of the palatal morphology in growing patients with Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome

Patients with Apert syndrome or Crouzon syndrome present with severe defects in oral-maxillofacial growth and development. In this study, we conducted a quantitative three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the palatal morphology of patients with Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome. Four patients with Apert syndrome (average age, 11.0 ± 0.8 years) and five with Crouzon syndrome (average age, 10.1 ± 1.6 years) were investigated. The participants' maxillary dental casts were scanned and analyzed using 3D imaging. Palatal width, depth, cross-sectional area, and palatal angle (PW, PD, PCA, and PA, respectively) were measured, and standard scores were calculated based on sex- and age-matched Japanese standard values; the actual palatal surface areas (PSA) and palatal volumes (PV) were also measured. Our results show that patients with Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome had a very narrow PW (standard score: -3.79 and - 0.47, respectively). 3D analysis revealed that patients with Apert syndrome had a significantly shallower PD (standard score: -1.35) than those with Crouzon syndrome (standard score: 2.47), resulting in a smaller PCA (standard score: -5.13), PSA (5.49 cm² ), and PV (1.11 cm³ ) and larger PA (standard score: -0.12) than those in patients with Crouzon syndrome. This might be due to the former having a narrower and shallower palate caused by the predominant swelling of the palatal mucosa. These findings improve our understanding of the differences in palatal morphology between Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome patients.

Craniofacial morphology in Apert syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aims to compare Apert syndrome (AS) patients with non-AS populations (not clinically or genetically diagnosed) on craniofacial cephalometric characteristics (CCC) to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, an article published between 1st January 2000 to October 17th, 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with AS based on whether or not they had distinctive CCC compared to the non-AS population. Following are some examples of how PECO has been used: People with AS are labeled P; clinical or genetic diagnosis of AS is labeled E; individuals without AS are labeled C; CCC of AS are labeled O. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality-Assessment-Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. 13 studies were included in the systematic review. 8 out of 13 studies were score 7-8 in NOS scale, which indicated that most of the studies were medium to high qualities. Six case-control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability in CCC, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in N-S-PP (I2: 76.56%; P = 0.014; CI 1.27 to - 0.28) and Greater wing angle (I2: 79.07%; P = 0.008; CI 3.07-1.17) between AS and control subjects. Cleft palate, anterior open bite, crowding in the upper jaw, and hypodontia occurred more frequently among AS patients. Significant shortening of the mandibular width, height and length is the most reported feature in AS patients. CT scans can help patients with AS decide whether to pursue orthodontic treatment alone or to have their mouth surgically expanded. The role of well-informed orthodontic and maxillofacial practitioners is critical in preventing and rehabilitating oral health issues.

Effect of Early Spheno-Occipital Synchondrosis Fusion in Preadolescent Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis on Craniofacial Skeletal Patterns: A Preliminary Study Using Cephalometric Analysis

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of early spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) fusion in preadolescent patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC) on the craniofacial skeletal patterns. Twenty preadolescent SC patients were divided into the fused SOS (FS, n = 10; 8 Crouzon and 2 Apert) and not-fused SOS groups (NFS, n = 10; 9 Crouzon and 1 Apert). Lateral cephalograms (mean age: 9.60 years, cervical vertebral maturation index: stage I and II) were used to investigate the skeletal sagittal (ANB) and vertical patterns (SN-GoMe), upward inclination of the anterior cranial base (ACB; SN-FH), degree of midface hypoplasia (MH, SNA), retrusive position of orbitale (SNO), and forward position of the condyle in relation to sella (saddle angle). Using the ordinal values calculated by ethnic norm (criteria: moderate, over ±1 standard deviation, severe, over ±2 standard deviation), statistical analysis was performed. The FS group showed a higher percentage of severe MH than the NFS group (70% versus 10%, P < 0.05). Although the 2 groups did not differ in the distribution of ANB, SN-GoMe, saddle angle, and SN-FH (all P > 0.05), the FS group showed relatively higher percentages of severe Class III (100% versus 70%), severe hyper-divergent pattern (40% versus 10%), severely forward condyle position (30% versus 0%), and moderate and severe upward anterior cranial base inclination (90% versus 50%) than the NFS group. However, the 2 groups exhibited the same distribution of moderately and severely retrusive orbitale position ([50%, 20%], P > 0.05). Early SOS fusion in preadolescent SC patients might not be related to retrusive orbitale position, but to severe MH.