3D Analysis of maxillary incisor root inclinations in cases of unilateral maxillary canine impaction

Effects of single unilaterally impacted mesiodens on maxillary central incisors: A 3D quantitative assessment based on cone-beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Mesiodens usually lead to the malposition and abnormal morphology of maxillary central incisors.

AIM

To evaluate the detrimental effects of single unilaterally impacted mesiodens on the three-dimensional positions and morphology of the maxillary central incisor using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) examinations.

DESIGN

A total of 321 patients aged 5-17 years with single unilaterally impacted mesiodens were included and divided into two groups: mixed dentition group (5-10 years) and early permanent dentition group (11-17 years). CBCT data for these patients were retrospectively analyzed to compare the inclination, rotation, angulation, and morphology of maxillary central incisors between the affected and contralateral control sides. The morphology, orientation, and spatial location of mesiodens were also assessed.

RESULTS

Central incisors on the affected side showed significant palatal crown inclination, shorter root, shorter tooth, and greater crown-to-root ratio in both groups, whereas significant mesial crown angulation was only observed in the mixed dentition group.

CONCLUSION

Impacted mesiodentes result in the displacement and impaired root development of central incisors, strongly suggesting timely clinical management of these abnormal teeth, such as the early removal of mesiodens and orthodontic treatments.

Influence of alveolar bone thickness and bucco-palatal inclination on root resorption of lateral incisors in unilateral maxillary impacted canines: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the potential associations between alveolar bone thickness, bucco-palatal inclination of maxillary lateral incisors, and lateral incisor root resorption in patients with unilateral maxillary impacted canines (UMICs).

METHODS

A total of three hundred and five subjects (120 males, 185 females; mean age, 16.39 years; standard deviation, 4.04) with UMICs were included. Canine position and root resorption were assessed using CBCT. UMICs were divided into palatal, buccal and mid-alveolus groups (PICs, BICs and MAICs), with 117, 137 and 51 subjects, respectively. Alveolar bone thickness and bucco-palatal inclination of lateral incisors were measured using the Dolphin software.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lateral incisor root resorption was significantly lower in the BICs (13.9%) than MAICs (29.4%) and PICs (29.1%). Alveolar bone thickness of the apical area was smaller in UMICs with lateral incisor root resorption than no resorption in both PICs (8.33 ± 1.64 vs 10.53 ± 2.55 mm) and BICs (8.94 ± 1.85 vs 10.76 ± 2.28 mm). Furthermore, lateral incisors on the impacted side were more buccally inclined in PICs with lateral incisor root resorption than no resorption, while in both BICs and MAICs, there was no statistical difference between lateral incisor root resorption than no resorption. Moreover, alveolar bone thickness of the apical area, rather than bucco-palatal inclination of lateral incisors, was significantly correlated with lateral incisor root resorption both in PICs and BICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral incisor root resorption is less common in BICs. Thinner alveolar bone thickness at the apical area of lateral incisors can be considered as a potential risk factor for lateral incisor root resorption in UMICs.

Influence of the maxillary dimensions and lateral incisor anatomy on the palatal impaction of maxillary permanent canines: A three-dimensional case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of impacted upper permanent canines (IUPC) is a relatively common clinical finding. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between the upper permanent canines palatal impaction, lateral incisors morphology and the maxilla bone base.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cone-beam tomography files from 62 subjects were divided into 2 groups: impaction group (ICG/n=31; mean age 14.3±2.4) with 45 canines impacted on the palatal side and age- and sex-matched control group (CG/n=31; mean age 14.3±2.3), with 62 normally erupted canines. Linear and volumetric measurements of the lateral incisors, linear transversal measures and the maxillary anterior perimeter were taken. Independent Student's t-test was used for intergroup analysis with correction of Bonferroni.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found for crown length and root diameter (buccal-palatal) (P<0.005). The maxillary anterior perimeter in the ICG was reduced in relation to the GC but not significantly (P=0.008). The transverse skeletal variables of the maxilla were equivalent in the intergroup comparison (P>0.005).

CONCLUSION

Smaller dimensions in the crown length and in the upper permanent lateral incisors root buccal-palatal diameter were associated with the impaction of upper permanent canines on the palatal side. The maxillary transverse morphology did not show any association with the occurrence of this condition.

The labiopalatal impacted canine: Accurate diagnosis based on the position and size of adjacent teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study

INTRODUCTION

Labiopalatal impacted canines (L-PICs) occur when the canines lie between central and lateral incisors, with their tip palatal to the central incisor and part of their crown labial to the lateral incisor. Because of their unusual position, they are often misdiagnosed, and their orthodontic resolution fails. This study aims to provide clinicians with pathognomonic features for early and accurate positional diagnosis of L-PICs.

METHODS

The L-PIC sample included 21 subjects with full diagnostic records. The control group of normally erupted canines was taken from a previous study. Clinical photographs, 2-dimensional radiographs, and cone-beam computed tomography were used to evaluate the positions of the adjacent incisors and first premolars, the canine incisor index, and the mesiodistal width of the lateral vs central incisors.

RESULTS

Central incisors adjacent to L-PICs showed significant mesial root angulation, labial root inclination, and mesiolabial crown rotation, whereas lateral incisors presented significant distal root angulation, palatal root inclination, and mesiolabial crown rotation, in comparison to controls. The roots of the central and lateral incisors were divergent, in contrast to the controls, in which they were slightly convergent. The first premolar positions were not affected. The mean canine incisor index was significantly bigger in L-PICs vs the controls, suggesting a palatal canine. The lateral incisor widths were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the orthodontist with evidence-based clinical and radiographic red flags for diagnosing L-PIC, which may allow timely initiation of orthodontic treatment and correct planning of mechanotherapy.

Root morphology of lateral incisors adjacent to impacted maxillary canines: A cone-beam computed tomography retrospective cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

To compare the root morphology of the maxillary lateral incisors (MLIs) adjacent to an impacted (IMC) versus non-impacted maxillary canine (non-IMC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images derived from 154 subjects (with unilateral/bilateral impacted maxillary canines or without canine impaction). Each MLI was considered as a unit of analysis. Thus, the study group included 122 MLIs adjacent to impacted maxillary canine (IMCG) and the control group included 122 MLIs adjacent to a non-impacted maxillary canine (CG). Groups were matched by age, sex and evaluation side. Root length, root dilaceration angle and root convergence angle were evaluated in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Comparisons between groups were made with Student's t-test and the chi-square test with Bonferroni correction (P<0.008, P<0.01, respectively).

RESULTS

The root measurements of the MLIs showed some significant differences between the groups. The coronal root length was 0.52mm shorter but not highly significant (P=0.032), the coronal root dilaceration angle was 7.51° smaller (P<0.001), and the coronal root convergence angle was 1.28° greater (P<0.001) in the IMCG compared to the CG. The orientation of root dilaceration in the MLIs showed significant differences between the groups: it was mostly distopalatal in the GC (87.5%), to a lesser extent in the IMCG (58.9%) and also mesiopalatal in the IMCG (22.3%), (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The root morphology of MLIs adjacent to an IMC showed a tendency of shorter length, smaller root dilaceration and greater root convergence in the coronal section than MLIs adjacent to a non-IMC.