Spontaneous correction and new development of posterior crossbite from the deciduous to the mixed dentition

Analysis of the Influence of Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding upon the Origin of Posterior Crossbites

(1) Introduction. An analysis was made of posterior crossbites in deciduous dentition and their relation to the type of feeding received by the child, with the objective of determining the influence of the way in which the child is fed in the early stages of life on the development of posterior crossbites. (2) Material and methods. A total of 1401 preschool children between 3 and 6 years of age from Seville (Spain) were included in the study. An intraoral exploration was carried out to assess the presence of crossbites (uni- or bilateral, and functional or not). The study was completed with a parent or legal guardian questionnaire exploring the type of feeding received by the child in the first stages of life, as well as the presence of bad oral habits and their duration. (3) Results. A total of 276 children (19.7%) presented posterior crossbite in occlusion. Uponn centering the midlines, 197 were maintained, indicating that 79 were due to premature contacts (functional crossbites). There were no significant differences in crossbites among the children who had received breastfeeding, though bottle-feeding was seen to favor crossbite. (4) Conclusions. No statistically significant relationship was found between posterior crossbites and breastfeeding, though an association between posterior crossbites and bottle-feeding was observed, with the number of crossbites increasing with the duration of bottle-feeding.

Long-term stability of posterior crossbite correction, treated in the mixed or permanent dentition of growing children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

When treating posterior crossbite, the primary goal is to achieve long-term crossbite correction. The majority of studies however focus on relapse of the increase in the transverse dimension, but not relapse of the crossbite itself, which is an essential outcome. The aim of the present study was to determine long-term stability (2 years minimum post-treatment) of posterior crossbite correction, treated in mixed or early permanent dentitions of growing children. Following registration in PROSPERO (CRD42022348858), an electronic literature search including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and a manual search were conducted up to January 2023, to identify longitudinal studies looking into the long-term stability of crossbite correction in growing children. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were carried out, and subsequently, a random-effects meta-analyses models were used to calculate estimates for relapse of the crossbite and relapse at the transverse level. Twenty-two studies were included, of varying designs and quality, representing 1076 treated patients, with different expansion appliances and protocols. Meta-analysis results showed that 19.5% (95% CI: 15%; 25%) of patients present with relapse of posterior crossbite at long-term follow-up. At the transverse level, 19.3% of the total expansion (including overexpansion) relapsed (95% CI: 13%; 27%) regardless of whether there a was relapse of the crossbite itself. Data from existing studies, with a moderate level of evidence, indicate that the long-term stability of posterior crossbite correction in growing children is unfavourable in roughly 1 in 5 growing children, with crossbite relapse long-term. On average, 19% of the maxillary expansion performed (including overexpansion) relapses long-term, which may occur in cases with or without relapse of the crossbite.

Influence of bad oral habits upon the development of posterior crossbite in a preschool population

BACKGROUND

A study is made of posterior crossbite in deciduous dentition and its possible association to extrinsic factors (bad oral habits).

METHODS

A total of 1168 Spanish children between 3 and 6 years of age were included in the study. Exploration of the oral cavity was performed to assess the presence of crossbite (uni- or bilateral and/or functional), and a questionnaire was administered to the parents or caregivers to determine the presence of bad oral habits and their duration.

RESULTS

In occlusion, 19.7% of the cases (n = 230) presented uni- or bilateral posterior crossbite. On adopting centric relation confronting the midlines, crossbite persisted in 165 children, indicating that 65 cases were due to premature contacts (functional crossbite). The identified favoring factors were pacifier use, thumb sucking, oral breathing and tongue thrusting or immature swallowing.

DISCUSSION

Most studies in the literature report a relationship between posterior crossbite and bad oral habits. The proportion of posterior crossbites identified in our study (16.6%) is consistent with the data published by authors such as Kobayashi, Limeira or Paolantonio, among others, but differs from the results of Zhifei Zhou, Peres or Germa. In coincidence with most studies, we recorded a statistically significant association between posterior crossbite and bad oral habits.

CONCLUSIONS

Bad oral habits favor the appearance of posterior crossbite, and the duration of the habit, its intensity (in the case of thumb sucking) and type (in the case of pacifier use) act as influencing factors. Functional study characterized the types of posterior crossbites and identified those attributable to premature contacts. This aspect has not been addressed by previous studies, and we consider the findings to be very interesting for analyzing and identifying the features of true crossbites.