Morphometric analysis of the palatal shape and arch dimension in subjects with buccally displaced canine

Influence of the maxillary dimensions and anterior teeth anatomy on the buccal impaction of upper permanent canines: A three-dimensional case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of impacted upper permanent canines (IUPC) is a relatively common clinical finding. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the buccal impaction of upper permanent canines with their dimensions and the maxilla bone base.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cone beam computed tomography files of 66 patients were allocated into: impaction group (ICG/n=33/mean age 15.7±3.9 years), with 44 impacted canines by the buccal side; control group (CG/n=33/mean age 15.66±3.99 years), matched for age and sex, with 66 canines normally erupted. The following measurements were obtained from ICG and CG groups: linear and volumetric canine dimensions, linear measurements of upper permanent central and lateral incisors, measurements of the anterior perimeter and transverse segments of the maxilla. Independent Student's t-test was used for intergroup analysis with correction of Bonferroni (α=0,005).

RESULTS

Higher values were found in the means of the variables regarding to the anterior teeth crowns in the ICG group, however, without a significant difference (P<0,005). The upper arch anterior perimeter of the individuals with canine impaction through buccal area was reduced compared to CG (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that individuals with upper buccal impacted permanent canine showed a significantly smaller anterior perimeter of the maxillary arch when compared to the control group. Although greater canine mesiodistal diameter was found in this group, there is no statistical association with the occurrence of this condition.

Comparison between Digital Casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Measuring Maxillary Transverse Dimensions in Patients with Impacted Canines

Cone beam computed tomography (CBTCT) scans (n = 45) and digital dental casts (n = 45) were both used to measure the maxillary transverse dimensions in patients with impacted maxillary canines. The objectives were to explore the associations of these dimensions with the impaction and patient characteristics, and to compare the measurements between these techniques. The maxillary width was measured on scans and casts at the Walaridge, and the intermolar width and interpremolar width levels were measured at the first and second premolars (measured from the buccal grooves and the palatal cuspids, and the palatal and lingual amelocemental junctions). Two examiners independently compared the measurements between the control quadrants (without impaction) and the case quadrants (with impaction) in patients with unilateral impactions, and between the unilateral and bilateral impaction groups. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the interexaminer reliability and paired or independent Student’s t-tests and ANOVAs were used for comparisons. The ICCs were 0.887 and 0.919, globally, for the measurements on the CBCT scans and casts, respectively, which indicates the excellent interexaminer reliability. On the CBCT scans, statistically significant differences were found between the case and control quadrants in the transverse measurements at the lingual level on the upper first molars, and at the WALA ridge level on the upper second premolars (p < 0.05) in the unilateral impaction group. Significant differences were found between the case quadrants in the unilateral versus the bilateral groups at the WALA ridge on the second premolars in casts (p < 0.05), and at the lingual point on the first molars on the CBCT scans (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in the transverse measurements were observed between the impacted buccal and palatal canines on either the casts or CBCT scans. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the transverse measurements between digital models and CBCT scans.