UvrAB activity at a damaged DNA site: is unpaired DNA present?

Deciphering the essentiality and function of SxSx motif in Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB

The UvrB subunit is a central component of the UvrABC incision complex and plays a pivotal role in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. A conserved structural motif (the SxSx motif) present in UvrB is analogous to a similar motif (TxGx) in the helicases of superfamily 2, whose function is not fully understood. To elucidate the significance of the SxSx (Ser143-Val144-Ser145-Cys146) motif in Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB (MtUvrB), different variants of MtUvrB subunit were constructed and characterized. The SxSx motif indeed was found to be essential for MtUvrB function: while Ser143 and Cys146 residues within this motif were crucial for MtUvrB function, Ser145 plays an important but less essential role. The SxSx motif-deleted mutant was drastically attenuated and three single (S143A, S145A and C146A) mutants and a double (S143A/S145A) mutant exhibited various degrees of severity in their DNA-binding, DNA helicase and ATPase activities. Taken together, these results highlight a hitherto unrecognized role for SxSx motif in the catalytic activities of UvrB.

DNA wrapping is required for DNA damage recognition in the Escherichia coli DNA nucleotide excision repair pathway

Localized DNA melting may provide a general strategy for recognition of the wide array of chemically and structurally diverse DNA lesions repaired by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. However, it is not clear what causes such DNA melting and how it is driven. Here, we show a DNA wrapping-melting model supported by results from dynamic monitoring of the key DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions involved in the early stages of the Escherichia coli NER process. Using an analytical technique involving capillary electrophoresis coupled with laser-induced fluorescence polarization, which combines a mobility shift assay with conformational analysis, we demonstrate that DNA wrapping around UvrB, mediated by UvrA, is an early event in the damage-recognition process during E. coli NER. DNA wrapping of UvrB was confirmed by Förster resonance energy transfer and fluorescence lifetime measurements. This wrapping did not occur with readily denaturable damaged DNA substrates ("bubble" DNA), suggesting that DNA wrapping of UvrB plays an important role in the induction of DNA melting around the damage site. Analysis of DNA wrapping of mutant UvrB Y96A further suggests that a cooperative interaction between DNA wrapping of UvrA(2)B and contact of the beta-hairpin of UvrB with the bulky damage moiety may be involved in the local DNA melting at the damage site.

UvrB domain 4, an autoinhibitory gate for regulation of DNA binding and ATPase activity

UvrB, a central DNA damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair, has weak affinity for DNA, and its ATPase activity is activated by UvrA and damaged DNA. Regulation of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis by UvrB is poorly understood. Using atomic force microscopy and biochemical assays, we found that truncation of domain 4 of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB (UvrBDelta4) leads to multiple changes in protein function. Protein dimerization decreases with an approximately 8-fold increase of the equilibrium dissociation constant and an increase in DNA binding. Loss of domain 4 causes the DNA binding mode of UvrB to change from dimer to monomer, and affinity increases with the apparent dissociation constants on nondamaged and damaged single-stranded DNA decreasing 22- and 14-fold, respectively. ATPase activity by UvrBDelta4 increases 14- and 9-fold with and without single-stranded DNA, respectively, and UvrBDelta4 supports UvrA-independent damage-specific incision by Cho on a bubble DNA substrate. We propose that other than its previously discovered role in regulating protein-protein interactions, domain 4 is an autoinhibitory domain regulating the DNA binding and ATPase activities of UvrB.

Global transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus response to hydrogen peroxide

Staphylococcus aureus responds with protective strategies against phagocyte-derived reactive oxidants to infect humans. Herein, we report the transcriptome analysis of the cellular response of S. aureus to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress. The data indicate that the oxidative response includes the induction of genes involved in virulence, DNA repair, and notably, anaerobic metabolism.

The isomerization of the UvrB-DNA preincision complex couples the UvrB and UvrC activities

In Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair, the UvrB-DNA preincision complex plays a key role, linking adduct recognition to incision. We previously showed that the efficiency of the incision is inversely related to the stability of the preincision complex. We postulated that an isomerization reaction converts [UvrB-DNA], stable but incompetent for incision, into the [UvrB-DNA]' complex, unstable and competent for incision. Here, we identify two parameters, negative supercoiling and presence of a nick at the fifth phosphodiester bond 3' to the lesion, that accelerate the isomerization leading to an increasing incision efficiency. We also show that the [UvrB-DNA] complex is more resistant to a salt concentration increase than the [UvrB-DNA]' complex. Finally, we report that the [UvrB-DNA]' is recognized by UvrC. These data suggest that the isomerization reaction leads to an exposure of single-stranded DNA around the lesion. This newly exposed single-stranded DNA serves as a binding site and substrate for the UvrC endonuclease. We propose that the isomerization reaction is responsible for coupling UvrB and UvrC activities and that this reaction corresponds to the binding of ATP.

Localization of UvrA and effect of DNA damage on the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis

We found that the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA, which is involved in DNA damage recognition, localizes to the entire chromosome both before and after damage in living Bacillus subtilis cells. We suggest that the UvrA(2)B damage recognition complex is constantly scanning the genome, searching for lesions in the DNA. We also found that DNA damage induces a dramatic reconfiguration of the chromosome such that it no longer fills the entire cell as it does during normal growth. This reconfiguration is reversible after low doses of damage and is dependent on the damage-induced SOS response. We suggest that this reconfiguration of the chromosome after damage may be either a reflection of ongoing DNA repair or an active mechanism to protect the cell's genome. Similar observations have been made in Escherichia coli, indicating that the alteration of chromosome structure after DNA damage may be a widespread phenomenon.

The nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB, a helicase-like enzyme with a catch

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a universal DNA repair mechanism found in all three kingdoms of life. Its ability to repair a broad range of DNA lesions sets NER apart from other repair mechanisms. NER systems recognize the damaged DNA strand and cleave it 3', then 5' to the lesion. After the oligonucleotide containing the lesion is removed, repair synthesis fills the resulting gap. UvrB is the central component of bacterial NER. It is directly involved in distinguishing damaged from undamaged DNA and guides the DNA from recognition to repair synthesis. Recently solved structures of UvrB from different organisms represent the first high-resolution view into bacterial NER. The structures provide detailed insight into the domain architecture of UvrB and, through comparison, suggest possible domain movements. The structure of UvrB consists of five domains. Domains 1a and 3 bind ATP at the inter-domain interface and share high structural similarity to helicases of superfamilies I and II. Not related to helicase structures, domains 2 and 4 are involved in interactions with either UvrA or UvrC, whereas domain 1b was implicated for DNA binding. The structures indicate that ATP binding and hydrolysis is associated with domain motions. UvrB's ATPase activity, however, is not coupled to the separation of long DNA duplexes as in helicases, but rather leads to the formation of the preincision complex with the damaged DNA substrate. The location of conserved residues and structural comparisons with helicase-DNA structures suggest how UvrB might bind to DNA. A model of the UvrB-DNA interaction in which a beta-hairpin of UvrB inserts between the DNA double strand has been proposed recently. This padlock model is developed further to suggest two distinct consequences of domain motion: in the UvrA(2)B-DNA complex, domain motions lead to translocation along the DNA, whereas in the tight UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex, they lead to distortion of the 3' incision site.

Interaction of UvrA and UvrB proteins with a fluorescent single-stranded DNA. Implication for slow conformational change upon interaction of UvrB with DNA

UvrA and UvrB proteins play key roles in the damage recognition step in the nucleotide excision repair. However, the molecular mechanism of damage recognition by these proteins is still not well understood. In this work we analyzed the interaction between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) labeled with a fluorophore tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrA (ttUvrA) and UvrB (ttUvrB) proteins. TMR-labeled ssDNA (TMR-ssDNA) as well as UV-irradiated ssDNA stimulated ATPase activity of ttUvrB more strongly than did normal ssDNA, indicating that this fluorescent ssDNA was recognized as damaged ssDNA. The addition of ttUvrA or ttUvrB enhanced the fluorescence intensity of TMR-ssDNA, and the intensity was much greater in the presence of ATP. Fluorescence titration indicated that ttUvrA has higher specificity for TMR-ssDNA than for normal ssDNA in the absence of ATP. The ttUvrB showed no specificity for TMR-ssDNA, but it took over 200 min for the fluorescence intensity of the ttUvrB-TMR-ssDNA complex to reach saturation in the presence of ATP. This time-dependent change could be separated into two phases. The first phase was rapid, whereas the second phase was slow and dependent on ATP hydrolysis. Time dependence of ATPase activity and fluorescence polarization suggested that changes other than the binding reaction occurred during the second phase. These results strongly suggest that ttUvrB binds ssDNA quickly and that a conformational change in ttUrvB-ssDNA complex occurs slowly. We also found that DNA containing a fluorophore as a lesion is useful for directly investigating the damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB.

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.

Crystal structure of the DNA nucleotide excision repair enzyme UvrB from Thermus thermophilus

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most important DNA-repair mechanism in living organisms. In prokaryotes, three enzymes forming the UvrABC system initiate NER of a variety of structurally different DNA lesions. UvrB, the central component of this system, is responsible for the ultimate DNA damage recognition and participates in the incision of the damaged DNA strand. The crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus UvrB reveals a core that is structurally similar to core regions found in helicases, where they constitute molecular motors. Additional domains implicated in binding to DNA and various components of the NER system are attached to this central core. The architecture and distribution of DNA binding sites suggest a possible model for the DNA damage recognition process.

Damage increases the flexibility of duplex DNA

It is proposed that much of the recognition of specific types of damaged DNAs is based on accessible structural features, while much of the recognition of damaged DNAs, as a class, is based on flexibility. The more flexible a DNA the faster its diffusion rate. The diffusion rates of each member of a series of damaged duplex DNAs has been found to be significantly faster than that of the corresponding undamaged duplex DNA. The damaged sites studied include apurinic and apyrimidinic a basic sites, thymine glycol and urea. The presence of mismatched sites also increases the diffusion. Thus, damaged DNAs appear to have sufficient flexibility for recognition and the flexibility may allow damaged sites to act as a universal joint or hinge that allows distant sites on the DNA to come together.

Triple helix-directed psoralen crosslinks are recognized by Uvr(A)BC excinuclease

Pyrimidine oligonucleotides bind to the major groove of an oligopyrimidine-oligopurine DNA sequence by triple helix formation. A 14-mer oligopyrimidine 3'-psoralen-conjugate (P) and a doubly modified 5'-acridine/3'-psoralen-oligonucleotide (PA) were photo-crosslinked to their target site. The crosslinked complexes were tested regarding their sensitivity to Uvr(A)BC excinuclease/DNA complex formation and excision, and compared to free psoralen crosslinked to the same site (M). An electrophoretic mobility-shift assay showed that the crosslinked triple-helix did not hamper formation of the (A)2B complex under conditions where the third strand was bound to its target. In vitro excision experiments performed on damaged DNA fragments containing crosslinked 5-methoxypsoralen (M-target) confirmed that the psoralen photoadduct was recognized by Uvr(A)BC and that excision occurred at the crosslinked site. The major cleavage reaction took place on the 5'-side of oligopurine strand. The excision was less efficient on the 5'-side of the pyrimidine strand. The 3'-side incision either on the purine or pyrimidine strand was even weaker. With optimal Uvr(A) concentrations, it was observed that the incision reaction on (P)- and (PA)-modified targets was clearly inhibited compared to the (M)-modified target, reflecting an effect of the oligonucleotide on the recognition/excision process. These results demonstrate that a triple helix is efficient in promoting inhibition of Uvr(A)BC excision nuclease activity. These results could account for divergent findings concerning the effects of triple helix-forming oligonucleotides on repair systems and open new perspectives to study DNA repair processes through the use of bi-substituted triple helix-forming oligonucleotides.

Dual functions of DNA repair genes: molecular, cellular, and clinical implications

The complex series of DNA repair pathways that are used to repair damage to cellular DNA employ many different proteins. A substantial number of these have second functions. Defects in these multifunctional proteins in man can lead to widely differing clinical phenotypes depending on which of the functions is affected. This is illustrated most clearly in the transcription factor TFIIH, which is involved in both basal transcription and nucleotide excision repair. Different mutations in genes encoding TFIIH subunits can result in the highly cancer-prone repair disorder xeroderma pigmentosum, or the noncancer-prone multisystem disorder trichothiodystrophy, the features of which are probably a consequence of abnormalities in transcription. The involvement of repair proteins in other processes also poses interesting evolutionary questions.

A specific 3' exonuclease activity of UvrABC

Specific cutting of undamaged DNA by UvrABC nuclease is observed. It occurs seven nucleotides (nt) from the 3' terminus of oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded M13 DNA circles. Although the location of the UvrABC cut on undamaged DNA is similar to that of the cut on the 5' side of a damaged DNA site during the dual incision reaction, the cut of undamaged DNA is not an intermediate in the dual incision step. On DNA duplexes with a single AAF adduct, the anticipated cut at the eighth phosphodiester bond 5' of the lesion is present, but extra cuts at 7-nt increments are observed at the 15th and 22nd phosphodiester bonds. We suggest that these additional cuts are made by the UvrABC activity observed on undamaged DNA; such activity is referred to as ABC 3' exonuclease and may play a significant role by providing a suitable gap for RecA-mediated recombinational exchanges during repair of interstrand crosslinks and closely opposed lesions. This ABC 3' exonuclease activity depends on higher concentrations of Uvr proteins as compared with dual incision and may be relevant to reactions that occur when UvrA and UvrB are increased during SOS induction.

The limited strand-separating activity of the UvrAB protein complex and its role in the recognition of DNA damage

The recognition by Escherichia coli Uvr nucleotide excision repair proteins of a variety of lesions with diverse chemical structures and the presence of helicase activity in the UvrAB complex which can displace short oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded DNA led to a model in which this activity moves UvrAB along undamaged DNA to damaged sites where the lesion blocks further translocation and the protein-DNA pre-incision complex is formed. To evaluate this mechanism for damage recognition, we constructed substrates with oligonucleotides of different lengths annealed to single-stranded DNA circles and placed a single 2-(acetylamino)fluorene (AAF) lesion either on the oligonucleotide or on the circle. For the substrates with no lesion, the UvrAB complex effectively displaced a 22-mer but not a 27-mer or longer fragments. The presence of AAF on the oligonucleotide significantly increased the release of the 27-mer but oligomers of 30 or longer were not separated. Placing the lesion on the circular strand did not block the release of the fragments. Instead, the releasing activity of UvrAB was stimulated and also depended on the length of the annealed oligonucleotide. These observations do not agree with the predictions of a damage recognition mechanism that depends on helicase-driven translocation. Most likely, the strand-separating activity of UvrAB is a consequence of local changes occurring during the formation of a DNA-protein pre-incision complex at the damaged site and is not due to translocation of the protein along undamaged DNA to locate a lesion.