The anatomical aspects of adult aortic stenosis

Regulatory Role of Sex Hormones in Cardiovascular Calcification

Sex differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD), including aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular calcification, are well documented. High levels of testosterone, the primary male sex hormone, are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular calcification, whilst estrogen, the primary female sex hormone, is considered cardioprotective. Current understanding of sexual dimorphism in cardiovascular calcification is still very limited. This review assesses the evidence that the actions of sex hormones influence the development of cardiovascular calcification. We address the current question of whether sex hormones could play a role in the sexual dimorphism seen in cardiovascular calcification, by discussing potential mechanisms of actions of sex hormones and evidence in pre-clinical research. More advanced investigations and understanding of sex hormones in calcification could provide a better translational outcome for those suffering with cardiovascular calcification.

Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the intrinsic mechanism of valvular obstruction leading to aortic stenosis (AS) and is measurable by multidetector computed tomography. The link between sex and AS is controversial and that with AVC is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively performed multidetector computed tomography in 665 patients with AS (aortic valve area, 1.05±0.35 cm(2); mean gradient, 39±19 mm Hg) to measure AVC and to assess the impact of sex on the AVC-AS severity link in men and women. AS severity was comparable between women and men (peak aortic jet velocity: 4.05±0.99 versus 3.93±0.91 m/s, P=0.11; aortic valve area index: 0.55±0.20 versus 0.56±0.18 cm(2)/m(2); P=0.46). Conversely, AVC load was lower in women versus men (1703±1321 versus 2694±1628 arbitrary units; P<0.0001) even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area or aortic annular area (both P<0.0001). Thus, odds of high-AVC load were much greater in men than in women (odds ratio, 5.07; P<0.0001). Although AVC showed good associations with hemodynamic AS severity in men and women (all r>0.67; P<0.0001), for any level of AS severity measured by peak aortic jet velocity or aortic valve area index, AVC load, absolute or indexed, was higher in men versus women (all P≤0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large AS population, women incurred similar AS severity than men for lower AVC loads, even after indexing for their smaller body size. Hence, the relationship between valvular calcification process and AS severity differs in women and men, warranting further pathophysiological inquiry. For AS severity diagnostic purposes, interpretation of AVC load should be different in men and in women.

Comparison of diameter of ascending aorta in patients with severe aortic stenosis secondary to congenital versus degenerative versus rheumatic etiologies

Aortic root dilation has been previously reported to be associated with aortic stenosis (AS), but data to support this statement are scarce. The dimensions of the aortic root were measured at 4 levels (annulus, sinuses, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta) in 88 patients (mean age 71.2+/-9.7 years; 56% men) with severe AS who underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography immediately before aortic valve replacement. These patients were compared with 76 gender- and age-matched patients without AS who underwent transesophageal echocardiography for various indications. The etiology of aortic valve stenosis was degenerative in 62 (70.5%), bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in 15 (17.0%), and rheumatic in 11 (12.5%). The ascending aorta was significantly wider in AS with various etiologies (BAV, rheumatic, degenerative) than in the controls (39+/-6.9, 35.0+/-4.2, 33.1+/-4.1, and 31.3+/-3.7 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The dimensions of the sinuses and sinotubular junction were significantly less in those with AS of degenerative etiology than in the controls (29.5+/-4.0 vs 32.5+/-4.3 mm and 23.6+/-3.0 vs 26.8+/-3.0 mm, respectively, p<0.001). The prevalence of a dilated aorta (>37 mm) was 3.9%, 13.1%, 36.4%, and 60% in the control group and AS patients with degenerative, rheumatic, and BAV etiology, respectively (p<0.0001). In conclusion, patients with severe AS due to BAV had significant dilation of the aortic root. Patients with degenerative and rheumatic etiology had less remarkable dilation compared with control group, and most values were within the normal range.

Aortic valve replacement: current clinical practice and opportunities for quality improvement

This is a review of the current clinical practice and opportunities for quality improvement in aortic valve replacement surgery. The topics include trends and regional variation in procedure rates, and changes in the use of aortic valve replacement among the elderly. Recent developments guiding the choice of prosthetic valves and trends in in-hospital mortality rates for aortic valve surgery are summarized. Lastly, a discussion of topics relevant to clinical practice improvement including the implementation of clinical practice guidelines, the need for consensus on risk adjustment, better understanding of volume-outcome effects, and the opportunities for comprehensive assessment of aortic valve surgery.

Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

In two large, randomized, clinical trials long-term survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) was similar for patients receiving tissue and mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Higher bleeding rates among patients with mechanical valves, who must receive permanent oral anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolism, were offset by higher reoperation rates for valve degeneration among patients with tissue valves. Because the average age of patients undergoing AVR and clinical practices have changed considerably since the randomized clinical trials were conducted, we performed a decision analysis to reassess the optimal valve type for patients undergoing AVR.

METHODS

We used a Markov state-transition model to simulate the occurrence of valve-related events and life expectancy for patients undergoing AVR. Probabilities of clinical events and mortality were derived from the randomized clinical trials and large follow-up studies.

RESULTS

Although the two valve types were associated with similar life expectancy in 60-year-old patients (mean age of patients in the randomized clinical trials), tissue valves were associated with greater life expectancy than mechanical valves (10.7 versus 11.1 years) in 70-year-old patients (currently mean age of AVR patients). For 70-year-old patients, the effects of major bleeding complications (24%) with mechanical valves substantially outweighed those of reoperation for valve failure (12%) with tissue valves at 12 years. Of the clinical practice changes assessed, the recommended valve type was most sensitive to changes in bleeding rates with anticoagulation. However, bleeding rates would have to be 68% lower than those reported in the European randomized clinical trial to affect the recommended valve type for 70-year-old patients. Reoperation rates would have to be five times higher, and mortality rates at reoperation would have to be four times higher to affect the recommended valve type for 70-year-old patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mechanical valves are preferred for AVR patients less than 60 years old, most patients currently undergoing AVR are elderly and would benefit more from tissue valves.

A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the rate of familial occurrence of congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) by using echocardiography to screen family members.

BACKGROUND

Congenital BAV is a common anomaly that carries with it a significant risk of potential long-term cardiac complications. Despite several reports of the familial occurrence of BAV, the condition is not generally considered to be inherited.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with echocardiographically documented congenital BAV were interviewed to construct three-generation family pedigrees. All first-degree relatives were contacted to undergo echocardiography to specifically determine aortic valve morphology.

RESULTS

Of the 210 first-degree relatives, 190 (90.5%) agreed to undergo echocardiography. Four members had technically difficult studies. Of the remaining 186 subjects, 17 (9.1%) were identified as having BAV; 11 (36.7%) of the 30 families had at least one additional member with the condition. The male/female ratio of affected members in the 11 families was 1. In one family, two instances of male-to-male transmission were observed. The distribution of BAV in the majority of multiplex families is compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a high incidence of familial clustering in congenital BAV. We believe that the high rate of occurrence of the condition in immediate relatives justifies echocardiographic screening of first-degree relatives to anticipate and prevent future complications associated with this common cardiac malformation.

Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model

BACKGROUND

Valvular resistance and stroke work loss have been proposed as alternative measures of stenotic valvular lesions that may be less flow dependent and, thus, superior over valve area calculations for the quantification of aortic stenosis. The present in vitro study was designed to compare the impacts of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area as hemodynamic indexes of aortic stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a pulsatile aortic flow model, rigid stenotic orifices in varying sizes (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 cm2) and geometry were studied under different hemodynamic conditions. Ventricular and aortic pressures were measured to determine the mean systolic ventricular pressure (LVSPm) and the transstenotic pressure gradient (delta Pm). Transvalvular flow (Fm) was assessed with an electromagnetic flowmeter. Valvular resistance [VR = 1333.(delta Pm/Fm)] and stroke work loss [SWL = 100.(delta Pm/LVSPm)] were calculated and compared with aortic valve area [AVA = Fm/(50 square root of delta Pm)]. The measurements were performed for a large range of transvalvular flows. At low-flow states, flow augmentation (100-->200 mL/s) increased calculated valvular resistance between 21% (2.0 cm2 orifice) and 66% (0.5-cm2 orifice). Stroke work loss demonstrated an increase from 43% (2.0 cm2) to 100% (1.0 cm2). In contrast, Gorlin valve area revealed only a moderate change from 29% (2.0 cm2) to 5% (0.5 cm2). At physiological flow rates, increase in transvalvular flow (200-->300 mL/s) did not alter calculated Gorlin valve area, whereas valvular resistance and stroke work loss demonstrated a continuing increase. Our experimental results were adopted to interpret the results of three clinical studies in aortic stenosis. The flow-dependent increase of Gorlin valve area, which was found in the cited clinical studies, can be elucidated as true further opening of the stenotic valve but not as a calculation error due to the Gorlin formula.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the physiological range of flow, calculated aortic valve area was less dependent on hemodynamic conditions than were valvular resistance and stroke work loss, which varied as a function of flow. Thus, for the assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis, the Gorlin valve area is superior over valvular resistance and stroke work loss, which must be indexed for flow to adequately quantify the hemodynamic severity of the obstruction.

Surgery for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. A study of surgical risk and predictive factors

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular lesion occurring among elderly patients and has become extremely frequent because of changing demographics in industrialized countries. Surgical risk after the age of 70 has increased. The increasing older age of patients having surgery justifies an analysis of mortality predictive factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1976 and February 1993, we performed 2871 operations for aortic stenosis. This study concerns 675 patients (278 men and 397 women) who were > or = 75 years old. Mean age was 78.5 +/- 3 years. Associated lesions were found in 226 patients. A bioprosthesis was implanted in 632 patients (93.6%). Concomitant surgical procedures were performed in 133 patients. Surgical mortality was 12.4% (84 deaths). A longitudinal analysis has been carried out over four successive time periods to evaluate population evolution during these 17 years. Statistical analysis was performed on 46 variables. Multivariate analysis found age (P < .0001), left ventricular failure (P < .0001), lack of sinus rhythm (P < .01), and emergency status (P < .02) to be presurgical independent predictive factors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-reducing strategy should both favor relatively early surgery to avoid cardiac failure and emergency situations and pay careful attention to the use of myocardial protection and cardiopulmonary bypass. Indications for surgery should remain broad since analysis failed to determine specific high-risk groups to be eliminated, and surgery remains the only treatment for aortic stenosis.

Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to study pressure recovery in various models of aortic valve stenosis by performing hemodynamic measurements under physiologic conditions in a pulsatile aortic flow circuit. The results were used to validate calculations of pressure recovery based on theoretic considerations derived from fluid dynamics.

BACKGROUND

Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis has not been systematically analyzed.

METHODS

Stenoses varying in size, shape (circular, Y-shaped, slitlike) and inlet configuration (sharp-edged, nozzle-shaped inlet, artificially stenosed bioprostheses) were used. Aortic pressures were measured at multiple sites distal to the stenotic orifice to determine pressure gradients and recovery.

RESULTS

With decreasing orifice area (2, 1.5, 1 and 0.5 cm2) pressure recovery increased (5, 7, 10 and 16 mm Hg, respectively) and the index pressure recovery to maximal peak to peak gradient decreased (56%, 37%, 24% and 14%, respectively). For a given orifice size of 0.5 cm2, this index ranged between 12% for a Y-shaped orifice and 15% for a circular orifice with a nozzle (cardiac output 4 liters/min). Increasing the cardiac output increased pressure recovery, whereas the ratio of pressure recovery to maximal pressure gradient remained constant.

CONCLUSIONS

The index pressure recovery to transvalvular pressure gradient, which expresses the hemodynamic relevance of pressure recovery, decreases with increasing severity of aortic stenosis but is independent of transvalvular flow. Thus, pressure recovery is of minor importance in severe aortic stenosis but may account for discrepancies between Doppler and manometric gradients observed in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis or a prosthetic valve in the aortic position.

Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula

Because aortic stenosis results in the loss of left ventricular stroke work (due to resistance to flow through the valve and turbulence in the aorta), the percentage of stroke work that is lost may reflect the severity of stenosis. This index can be calculated from pressure data alone. The relation between percent stroke work loss and anatomic aortic valve orifice area (measured by planimetry from videotape) was investigated in a pulsatile flow model. Thirteen valves were studied (nine human aortic valves obtained at necropsy and four bioprosthetic valves) at stroke volumes of 40 to 100 ml, giving 57 data points. Valve area ranged from 0.3 to 2.8 cm2 and mean systolic pressure gradient from 3 to 84 mm Hg. Percent stroke work loss, calculated as mean systolic pressure gradient divided by mean ventricular systolic pressure x 100%, ranged from 7 to 68%. It was closely related to anatomic orifice area with an inverse exponential relation and was not significantly related to flow (r = -0.15). An orifice formula was derived that predicted anatomic orifice area with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.5 cm2 (orifice area [cm2] = 4.82 [2.39 x log percent stroke work loss], r = -0.94, SEE = 0.029). These results support the clinical use of percent stroke work loss as an easily obtained index of the severity of aortic stenosis.

Efficacy of aortic balloon valvoplasty: direct measurement of orificial area in a model with pulsatile flow

The efficacy of balloon valvoplasty of calcific aortic stenosis remains controversial. We studied, therefore, 5 human aortic valves obtained at necropsy in a positive-displacement pulse duplicator which delivered stroke volumes of 40-100 ml with a quasiphysiological waveform of flow. All valves had three leaflets without commissural fusion and were preserved in antibiotic solution before study. Orificial area was planimetered from videotape of opening of the valve and varied with flow in all cases. Valvoplasty with a 20 mm diameter balloon had no effect on the orifice of the normal valve but increased the orifice of 2 mildly calcified valves from 0.70-1.77 cm2 (range) at baseline to 1.06-1.95 cm2. In 2 valves with severe calcification of the leaflets, the orifice was increased from 0.31-0.82 cm2 to 0.73-1.07 cm2. Dual balloon valvoplasty achieved a variable but small further increase in orificial area. No valve showed tears of the leaflets or fracture of calcific deposits after valvoplasty. We conclude that balloon valvoplasty can acutely increase orificial area, independently of any change in stroke volume. In valves without commissural fusion, its mechanism appears to be an increase in the pliability of the leaflets which does not require macroscopic fracture of calcific deposits.