The long journey of interleukin-1 in acute and recurrent pericarditis

Novel Treatments in Refractory Recurrent Pericarditis

Refractory recurrent pericarditis is a troublesome condition that severely impairs the quality of life of affected patients and significantly increases healthcare spending. Until recently, therapeutic options included only a few medications and most of the patients resorted to chronic glucocorticoid treatment with steroid dependence. In the most recent decade, the introduction of interleukin-1 blockers in clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis due to their excellent efficacy and good safety profile. The rationale for the introduction of this class of medications in clinical practice is the autoinflammatory nature of recurrent pericarditis in a substantial rate of cases, with interleukin-1 being the main pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in this context. This review aims to discuss the contemporary available evidence from original research and real-world data on interleukin-1 blocker use in refractory recurrent pericarditis, in terms of indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, side effects, and recommended treatment protocols. Moreover, novel treatment proposals, such as hydroxychloroquine, beta blockers, and cannabidiol, which showed encouraging preliminary results, are addressed. Finally, gaps in knowledge, unmet needs, and future perspectives related to recurrent pericarditis are thoroughly discussed.

Pericarditis recurrence is associated with milder electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory findings

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) complicates approximately 30% of acute pericarditis (AP) cases. We sought to compare the prevalence and severity of objective findings seen in patients with RP. A retrospective single-center study during 2010-2019, including 765 patients diagnosed with AP. Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory findings were extracted from the local electronic health records. Recurrence during follow-up was documented in 134 patients (17.5%), with a median time to recurrence of 101 (± 59-251) days. The median age was 60 years (IQR 45-72), 68% were male. Most patients were defined as having idiopathic\viral pericarditis (64%). The clinical manifestation during the recurrent event of pericarditis was less prominent or attenuated when compared to the initial event-ECG signs (ST elevation 12% vs. 26%; p = 0.006, Knuckle sign 13% vs. 33%; p < 0.001, ST larger in lead L2 than L3 4% vs. 19%; p < 0.001), pericardial effusion moderate and above (11% vs. 30%; p = 0.02), and inflammatory markers (mean peak CRP levels 66 mg/l vs. 97 mg/l; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in the subgroup of patients defined as having idiopathic\viral pericarditis. Up to 20% of patients who did not have ECG signs or a significant pericardial effusion in their 1st event demonstrated these findings during the recurrence, though still to a lesser extent compared with those who had these signs in their 1st event. The objective findings of AP are less pronounced during recurrent events. Future studies should focus on the role of advanced biomarkers and imaging in defining true RP events.