The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: acute cardiovascular care and ischaemic heart disease

The Long-Term Prognostic Role of Nighttime Resting Heart Rate in Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

AIM

A close relationship exists between resting heart rate (RHR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Still, the prognostic importance of nighttime RHR in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with or without OSA remains unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, OSA was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index of ≥ 15 events/h, and the high nighttime RHR (HNRHR) was defined as a heart rate of ≥ 70 bpm. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Among the 1875 enrolled patients, the mean patient age was 56.3±10.5 years, 978 (52.2%) had OSA, and 425 (22.7%) were in HNRHR. The proportion of patients with HNRHR is higher in the OSA population than in the non-OSA population (26.5% vs. 18.5%; P＜0.001). During 2.9 (1.5, 3.5) years of follow-up, HNRHR was associated with an increased risk of MACCE in patients with OSA (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.09-2.23, P=0.014), but not in patients without OSA (adjust HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.69-1.84, P=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, a nighttime RHR of ≥ 70 bpm was associated with a higher risk of MACCE in those with OSA but not in those without it. This identifies a potential high-risk subgroup where heart rate may interact with the prognosis of OSA. Further research is needed to determine causative relationships and confirm whether heart rate control impacts cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ACS-OSA.

SYSTEMI - systemic organ communication in STEMI: design and rationale of a cohort study of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still causes significant mortality and morbidity despite best-practice revascularization and adjunct medical strategies. Within the STEMI population, there is a spectrum of higher and lower risk patients with respect to major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) or re-hospitalization due to heart failure. Myocardial and systemic metabolic disorders modulate patient risk in STEMI. Systematic cardiocirculatory and metabolic phenotyping to assess the bidirectional interaction of cardiac and systemic metabolism in myocardial ischemia is lacking.

METHODS

Systemic organ communication in STEMI (SYSTEMI) is an all-comer open-end prospective study in STEMI patients > 18 years of age to assess the interaction of cardiac and systemic metabolism in STEMI by systematically collecting data on a regional and systemic level. Primary endpoint will be myocardial function, left ventricular remodelling, myocardial texture and coronary patency at 6 month after STEMI. Secondary endpoint will be all-cause death, MACCE, and re-hospitalisation due to heart failure or revascularisation assessed 12 month after STEMI. The objective of SYSTEMI is to identify metabolic systemic and myocardial master switches that determine primary and secondary endpoints. In SYSTEMI 150-200 patients are expected to be recruited per year. Patient data will be collected at the index event, within 24 h, 5 days as well as 6 and 12 months after STEMI. Data acquisition will be performed in multilayer approaches. Myocardial function will be assessed by using serial cardiac imaging with cineventriculography, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Myocardial metabolism will be analysed by multi-nuclei magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Systemic metabolism will be approached by serial liquid biopsies and analysed with respect to glucose and lipid metabolism as well as oxygen transport. In summary, SYSTEMI enables a comprehensive data analysis on the levels of organ structure and function alongside hemodynamic, genomic and transcriptomic information to assess cardiac and systemic metabolism.

DISCUSSION

SYSTEMI aims to identify novel metabolic patterns and master-switches in the interaction of cardiac and systemic metabolism to improve diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms in myocardial ischemia for patient-risk assessment and tailored therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration Number: NCT03539133.

Clinical significance of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without prior stroke: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Whether obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with or without prior stroke remains unclear. We investigated the association of OSA with cardiovascular events in ACS patients with or without prior stroke.

METHODS

Between June 2015 and January 2020, we prospectively recruited eligible ACS patients who underwent cardiorespiratory polygraphy during hospitalization. We defined OSA as an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour. The primary composite end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.

RESULTS

Among 1927 patients enrolled, 207 patients had prior stroke (10.7%) and 1014 had OSA (52.6%). After a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, patients with stroke had significantly higher risk of MACCEs than those without stroke (hazard ratio [HR]:1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.98, P = 0.007). The multivariate analysis showed that patients with OSA had 2.0 times the risk of MACCEs in prior stroke group (41 events [33.9%] vs 18 events [20.9%]; HR:2.04, 95% CI:1.13-3.69, P = 0.018), but not in non-prior stroke group (186 events [20.8%] vs 144 events [17.4]; HR:1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.52, P = 0.10). No significant interaction was noted between prior stroke and OSA for MACCE (interaction P = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Among ACS patients, the presence of OSA was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with prior stroke. Further trials exploring the efficacy of OSA treatment in high-risk patients with ACS and prior stroke are warranted. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03362385.

Revascularization strategies versus optimal medical therapy in chronic coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of myocardial revascularization on outcomes and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) without left main (LM) disease or reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) may be influenced by the revascularization strategy adopted.

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis including 18 randomized controlled trials comparing different revascularization strategies, including angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), physiology-guided PCI and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), in patients with CCS without LM disease or reduced LVEF.

RESULTS

Compared with medical therapy, all revascularization strategies were associated with a reduction of the primary endpoint, as defined in each trial, the extent of which was modest with angiography-guided PCI (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99) and greater with physiology-guided PCI (IRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77) and CABG (IRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70). Moreover, angiography-guided PCI was associated with an increase of the primary endpoint compared to physiology-guided PCI (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.79) and CABG (IRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). CABG was the only strategy associated with reduced myocardial infarction (IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90), cardiovascular death (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89), and all-cause death (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99), but increased stroke (IRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.04-2.76).

CONCLUSIONS

In CCS patients without LM disease or reduced LVEF, physiology-guided PCI and CABG are associated with better outcomes than angiography-guided PCI. Compared with medical therapy, CABG is the only revascularization strategy associated with a reduction of myocardial infarction and death rates, at the cost of higher risk of stroke.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022313612).