Type A aortic dissection: optimal annual case volume for surgery

Short- and long-term outcomes in isolated vs. hybrid thoracoscopic ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis

AIMS

Both isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favourable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared with catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data. Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analysed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.83, P < 0.001] compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid thoracoscopic AF ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.

Defining the optimal annual institutional case volume for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes

Background

The Nuss procedure is the accepted standard approach to correct pectus excavatum. Still, is associated with potential major complications that are in part believed to be preventable as they might be the consequence of institutional case-volume differences. The objective is to evaluate the presence of a volume-outcome relation for the Nuss procedure and determine the optimal annual institutional case-volume threshold, defining high-volume centers.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed, considering studies from unique centers reporting on pectus excavatum patients who underwent the Nuss procedure. Primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively: the incidence of significant perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade-III and significant intraoperative complications) and bar displacement. The presence of a non-linear volume-outcome relation was evaluated through restricted-cubic-spline-analyses. If present, the optimal annual institutional case-volume was determined by the elbow method.

Results

Forty-nine studies from 49 unique centers were included, enrolling 13,352 patients in total. The significant perioperative complication rate was low [7.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-9.0%] and demonstrated a significant non-linear volume-outcome relation (P<0.001), even after covariate adjustment. The optimal annual institutional case-volume was determined at 73 cases/year (95% CI: 67-89). In this scenario, the number needed to treat to prevent a single perioperative complication compared to a low volume center was 11 (95% CI: 8-19). A similar volume-outcome relation (P<0.001) and optimal case volume of 73 cases/year was observed for bar displacement.

Conclusions

A significant volume-outcome relation for repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure exists with an optimal annual institutional case-volume of 73 cases/year. These findings provide rationale for centralization.

Long-Term Results and Quality of Life after Surgery for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A: Contemporary Single-Centre Experience

Background: Aortic dissection is still afflicted with significant morbidity and mortality. This research seeks to assess long-term outcomes and quality of life after emergency surgery for acute aortic dissection type A. Methods: A total of 413 patients were analysed, who had been operated upon between 2000 and 2016 at our centre. We compared our results of the early (2000-2007) versus late (2008-2016) period with regards to 30-day and follow-up mortality and need for reoperation, including risk factor analysis. Quality of life was assessed via the SF-36 survey. Results: Calculated perioperative risk by EuroSCORE increased significantly from early, 24.9%, to late, 38.0%, p < 0.001. Thirty-day rates of mortality decreased significantly from 26.7% to 17.4%, p = 0.03. Survival at 1-, 5-, and 10-years was 92.3% vs. 91.8% (p = 0.91), 75.2% vs. 81.0% (p = 0.29), and 53.4% vs. 69.7% (p = 0.04). Freedom from reoperation was comparable between groups at follow-up: 74.0% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.28. Quality of life was impaired. Conclusions: Despite more complex severity of disease and operative procedures, the results of surgery for type A aortic dissection improved significantly over time at 30-day and 10-year follow-up. Quality of life was significantly impaired compared to a healthy reference population.

The Year in Aortic Surgery: Selected Highlights From 2023

This article reviews the recent and relevant literature to the field of aortic surgery. Specific areas highlighted include outcomes of Stanford type A dissection, management of acute aortic syndromes, management of aortic aneurysms, and traumatic aortic injury. Although the focus was on articles from 2023, literature from prior years also was included, given that this article is the first of a series. Notably, the pertinent sections from the 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management Aortic Disease are discussed.

Exploring the relationship between case volume and intracranial aneurysm treatments with flow-diverters and flow-disruptors: Insights from the 2020 to 2021 Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology National Registry in Germany

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracranial aneurysm treatment using flow-diverters and flow-disruptors requires a higher level of expertise when compared to more traditional methods. Our hypothesis was that the procedural success and the rate of complications are dependent on the annual case load of a center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Conducting a retrospective analysis on the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology for the years 2020 to 2021, we examined flow-diverter and flow-disruptor procedures. We categorized centers into four groups according to their annual case load and proceeded to analyze success rates, complication rates, and fluoroscopy times across these centers.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in both flow-diverter and flow-disruptor cases concerning fluoroscopy time and the incidence of technical complications. However, within the subgroup of flow-disruptor cases, centers with lower case load exhibited significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic and clinically relevant complications. Additionally, it was noted that the rate of therapeutic success in the flow-diverter group significantly increased in centers with higher case volumes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the intention towards centralization of medical care especially for complex neuroendovascular procedures. Furthermore, our findings are an argument to further develop a standardized educational and procedural algorithm based on defined case numbers and training modules for complex neurovascular procedures as already implemented by the Database of the German Society for Interventional Radiology.