Coronary flow capacity and survival prediction after revascularization: physiological basis and clinical implications

Coronary bypass surgery for multivessel disease after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: why, for whom, how early?

Multivessel coronary artery disease is present in ∼50% of patients with acute coronary syndrome and, compared with single-vessel disease, entails a higher risk of new ischaemic events and a worse prognosis. Randomized controlled trials have shown the superiority of 'complete revascularization' over culprit lesion-only treatment. Trials, however, only included patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and evidence regarding complete revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after culprit lesion-only PCI ('hybrid revascularization') is lacking. The CABG after PCI is an open, non-negligible therapeutic option, for patients with non-culprit left main and/or left anterior descending coronary artery disease where evidence in chronic coronary syndrome patients points in several cases to a preference of CABG over PCI. This valuable but poorly studied 'PCI first-CABG later' option presents, however, relevant challenges, mostly in the need of interrupting post-stenting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for surgery to prevent excess bleeding. Depending on patients' clinical characteristics and coronary anatomical features, either deferring surgery after a safe interruption of DAPT or bridging DAPT interruption with intravenous short-acting antithrombotic agents appears to be a suitable option. Off-pump minimally invasive surgical revascularization, associated with less operative bleeding than open-chest surgery, may be an adjunctive strategy when revascularization cannot be safely deferred and DAPT is not interrupted. Here, the rationale, patient selection, optimal timing, and adjunctive strategies are reviewed for an ideal approach to hybrid revascularization in post-acute coronary syndrome patients to support physicians' choices in a case-by-case patient-tailored approach.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with coronary flow reserve impairment: A pilot meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is estimated to affect approximately 25% of the global population. Both, coronary artery disease and NAFLD are linked to underlying insulin resistance and inflammation as drivers of the disease. Coronary flow reserve parameters, including coronary flow reserve velocity (CFRV), baseline diastolic peak flow velocity (DPFV), and hyperemic DPFV, are noninvasive markers of coronary microvascular circulation. The existing literature contains conflicting findings regarding these parameters in NAFLD patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on major electronic databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify relevant studies. We pooled the standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the inverse-variance random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Four studies with 1139 participants (226 with NAFLD and 913 as controls) were included. NAFLD was associated with a significantly lower CFRV (SMD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.19, -0.36; P < .0002) and hyperemic DPFV (SMD: -0.73; 95% CI: -1.03, -0.44; P < .00001) than the controls. NAFLD demonstrated a statistically insignificant trend toward a reduction in baseline DPFV (SMD: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.38, 0.19; P = .52) compared to healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NAFLD are at a higher risk of coronary microvascular dysfunction, as demonstrated by reduced CFRV and hyperemic DPFV. The presence of abnormal coronary flow reserve in patients with NAFLD provides insights into the higher rates of cardiovascular disease in these patients. Early aggressive targeted interventions for impaired coronary flow reserve in subjects with NAFLD may lead to improvement in clinical outcomes.

Impact on cardiovascular outcome of coronary revascularization-induced changes in ischemic perfusion defect and myocardial flow reserve

PURPOSE

We evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of coronary revascularization-induced changes in ischemic total perfusion defect (ITPD) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) as assessed by 82Rb positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

The study included 102 patients referred to 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging before and after coronary revascularization. All patients were followed for the occurrence of cardiovascular events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, and heart failure) after the second imaging study.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 20 months, 21 events occurred. The clinical characteristics were comparable between patients with and without events. In the overall study population, after revascularization, there was a significant reduction (P < 0.001) of ITPD, while hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) (P < 0.01) and MFR (P < 0.05) significantly improved. Event rate was higher in patients with ITPD (P < 0.005) or MFR (P < 0.001) worsening compared to those with unchanged or improved ITPD or MFR. At Cox univariable analysis, ITPD and MFR worsening resulted in predictors of events (both P < 0.05). Patients with worsening of both ITPD and MFR had the worst event-free survival (log-rank 32.9, P for trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable CAD, worsening of ITPD and MFR after revascularization procedures is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events. Follow-up MPI with 82Rb PET/CT may improve risk stratification in patients submitted to coronary revascularization.