Does pre-treatment with aspirin and loading dose clopidogrel obviate the need for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during elective coronary stenting? A focus on peri-procedural myonecrosis†

Platelet Function and Pharmacologic Inhibition

Platelets have traditionally been understood within the context of hemostasis and hemorrhagic disorders. However, with increasing procedures being performed in smaller vessels and with an increasing incidence of atherosclerosis, the often critical role platelets play is more evident. Platelets are no longer viewed as “scaffolding” for the events of the coagulation cascade but rather as important catalysts in hemostasis, thrombosis, and fibrinolysis. Improved understanding of platelet physiology has led to developments of pharmacologic adjuncts resulting in improved patency rates and improved patient outcomes. This review addresses the physiology of platelet function and the impact of new pharmacologic agents in percutaneous intervention.

The Effect of High Dose Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin on Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients with Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to assess the effect of pretreatment with cilostazol and rosuvastatin combination before elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on peri-procedural myocardial injury (PPMIJ).

METHODS

We randomly assigned 172 patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective PCI to pre- treatment with Cilostazol 200mg and Rosuvastatin 40 mg (group 1), or to pretreatment with Rosuvastatin 40 mg group (group 2). The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMIJ defined as any cardiac troponin I (Tn I) level elevated above the upper normal limit (UNL). The occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PPMIN) was defined as a post-procedural increase in cTnI level ≥ 5 times above the UNL.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between group 1 (n = 86) and group 2 (n = 86). The rate of PPMIJ (21% vs. 24%, p = 0.58) and PPMIN (2.3% vs. 7%, p = 0.27) were similar between the two study groups. Subgroup analysis performed on those patients without statin therapy before PCI (53 patients in group 1 and 50 patients in group 2) showed that the incidence of PPMIJ was significantly lower in the group 1 patients without chronic statin treatment [17% (9/53) versus 34% (17/50); p = 0.04], but the rate of PPMIN was similar between the two groups for those patients without chronic statin treatment [1.9% (1/53) versus 10% (5/50); p = 0.07].

CONCLUSIONS

We found that adjunct cilostazol and rosuvastatin pre-treatment did not significantly reduce PPMIJ after elective PCI in patients with stable angina pectoris. However, adjunct cilostazol pre-treatment could reduce PPMIJ in patients without chronic statin therapy before elective PCI.

KEY WORDS

Cilostazol; Myocardial injury; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Statin.

Usefulness of early rule-in and rule-out biomarker protocols to estimate ischemia-induced myocardial injury in early chest pain presenters

Protocols to minimize the time between 2 measurements of troponin or a combination with copeptin have been developed to rapidly rule-in or rule-out myocardial injury (MI) in patients with chest pain. These fast track protocols to rule-in and rule-out MI are not sufficiently validated for early chest pain presenters. The "early presenter" model was tested in 107 stable patients after a short period of myocardial ischemia, induced by stenting of a significant coronary artery stenosis. High-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), and copeptin were measured at the start and 90, 180, and 360 minutes after stent implantation. MI was defined as a troponin level more than the upper limit of normal (ULN) and an absolute increase of >50% ULN on the 360-minute sample. A single combined measurement of troponin and copeptin 90 minutes after the onset of ischemia has a low diagnostic value. This increases when serial measurements with 90-minute intervals are included. For ruling in MI, the highest positive predictive value (with a 95% confidence interval [CI]) can be obtained when focusing only on the increase in troponin level, with a positive predictive value of 86% (70, 93) and 80% (67, 90) for hsTnT and hsTnI, respectively. For ruling out MI, a combined absence of any troponin more than the ULN and any significant increase in troponin level perform best with a negative predictive value of 75% (55, 89) and 75% (55, 89) for hsTnT and hsTnI, respectively. In conclusion, in early presenters, rapid biomarker protocols underestimate MI. A standard biomarker assessment after 3 hours is required to adequately rule-in or rule-out myonecrosis.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January Week 1 2013) and EMBASE (OVID, 1947 to Week 1 2013) on 11 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. We used odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty trials involving 66,689 patients were included. During PCI (48 trials with 33,513 participants) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers decreased all-cause mortality at 30 days (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) but not at six months (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.05). All-cause death or myocardial infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72) and at six months (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without acute coronary syndromes.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS (12 trials with 33,176 participants), IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of all-cause death at 30 days but not at six months, and reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with acute coronary syndromes. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January Week 1 2013) and EMBASE (OVID, 1947 to Week 1 2013) on 11 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. We used odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty trials involving 66,689 patients were included. During PCI (48 trials with 33,513 participants) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers decreased all-cause mortality at 30 days (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) but not at six months (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.05). All-cause death or myocardial infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72) and at six months (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without acute coronary syndromes.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS (12 trials with 33,176 participants), IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of all-cause death at 30 days but not at six months, and reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with acute coronary syndromes. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction.

A randomized study assessing the effects of pretreatment with cilostazol on periprocedural myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether cilostazol pretreatment reduces postprocedural myonecrosis (PPMN). Cilostazol pretreatment reduces PPMN after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with stable angina scheduled for elective PCI were randomly assigned to a 7-day pretreatment with Cilostazol (200 mg/day) or to a control group. Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were measured at baseline and at 6 and 24 hours after PCI. The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMN, defined as any CK-MB elevation above the upper normal limit (UNL). Aspirin and clopidogrel were co-administered for 7 days before PCI, and resistance to these agents was then assayed using the VerifyNow System.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the final analyzable cilostazol (n=54) and the control group (n=56). Despite a significantly greater % inhibition of clopidogrel in the cilostazol group (39±23% versus 25±22%, p=0.003), the incidence of PPMN was similar between the cilostazol group (24%) and the control group (25%, p=1.000). The rate of CK-MB elevation at ≥3 times UNL was also similar between the two groups (6% versus 5%, p=0.583). The incidence of cTnI increase over the UNL or to 3 times the UNL was not different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in terms of the rate of adverse events during follow- up, although the cilostazol group showed a tendency to have a slightly higher incidence of entry site hematoma.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrated that adjunctive cilostazol pretreatment might not significantly reduce PPMN after elective PCI in patients with stable angina.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects and safety of IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), and EMBASE (1980 to October 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-eight trials involving 62,417 patients were included. During PCI, IIb/IIIa blockers decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95) and at six months (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00). Death or MI was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72), and at 6 months (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.59; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without ACS.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS, IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or MI at 30 days (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.43; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of death and of death or MI at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with ACS. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or MI.

Triple antiplatelet therapy for preventing vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy is usually superior to mono therapy in preventing recurrent vascular events (VEs). This systematic review assesses the safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy in comparison with dual therapy in reducing recurrent vascular events.

METHODS

Completed randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), cerebrovascular disease or peripheral vascular disease were identified using electronic bibliographic searches. Data were extracted on composite VEs, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, death and bleeding and analysed with Cochrane Review Manager software. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

Twenty-five completed randomized trials (17,383 patients with IHD) were included which involving the use of intravenous (iv) GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban), aspirin, clopidogrel and/or cilostazol. In comparison with aspirin-based therapy, triple therapy using an intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor significantly reduced composite VEs and MI in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) (VE: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; MI: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.88) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (VE: OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.51; MI: OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17-0.38). A significant reduction in death was also noted in STEMI patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa based triple therapy (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.99). Increased minor bleeding was noted in STEMI and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa based triple therapy. Stroke events were too infrequent for us to be able to identify meaningful trends and no data were available for patients recruited into trials on the basis of stroke or peripheral vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple antiplatelet therapy based on iv GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was more effective than aspirin-based dual therapy in reducing VEs in patients with acute coronary syndromes (STEMI and NSTEMI). Minor bleeding was increased among STEMI and elective PCI patients treated with a GP IIb/IIIa based triple therapy. In patients undergoing elective PCI, triple therapy had no beneficial effect and was associated with an 80% increase in transfusions and an eightfold increase in thrombocytopenia. Insufficient data exist for patients with prior ischaemic stroke and peripheral vascular disease and further research is needed in these groups of patients.

Clinical relevance of clopidogrel unresponsiveness during elective coronary stenting: experience with the point-of-care platelet function assay-100 C/ADP

BACKGROUND

Early identification of nonresponders to clopidogrel may be important in identifying subgroups of patients that might be at risk for future thrombotic events.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed postclopidogrel platelet reactivity in 250 consecutive patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy with 160 mg aspirin and a 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel >12 hours before PCI. A platelet aggregation test was performed at the time of the intervention using a point-of-care assay, the Platelet Function Assay (PFA-100C/ADP; Dade-Behring, Deerfield, IL). Nonresponders were defined as having a PFA closure time of <71 seconds under dual oral antiplatelet therapy, reflecting normal platelet reactivity. Myonecrosis post-PCI constituted the primary end point and was defined as the release of creatine kinase-MB >1x the upper limit of normal on a sample taken 12 to 24 hours after intervention. The secondary end point was a composite end point of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis after 6 months.

RESULTS

The PFA closure time was available in 242 patients and ranged from 31 to 300 seconds with a mean value of 147 seconds. Nonresponders represented 7% (17/242) of the cases. Myonecrosis post-PCI occurred in 29 patients (12%) and was more common in nonresponders than in normal responders (29% vs 11%, respectively; P = .03 on multivariate analysis). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months occurred in 13 patients (1 sudden death possibly related to stent thrombosis and 12 post-PCI myocardial infarctions) and were more common in the nonresponder group (12% vs 5%, respectively; P = .06 on multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Unresponsiveness to clopidogrel as assessed by the point-of-care test PFA-100C/ADP is an independent major risk factor for thrombotic complications after coronary intervention.

Survival benefit with concomitant clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy at ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

To study clinical outcomes in patients given glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors with concomitant clopidogrel at the time of ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 30-day and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI from March 1, 1998, to December 31, 2006, stratified by administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with concomitant clopidogrel treatment at the time of ad hoc PCI.

RESULTS

The mean+/-SD age was 66.3+/-11.9 years in 5196 patients receiving compared with 67.8+/-11.8 years in 4681 patients not receiving a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (P<.001). Overall, 30-day unadjusted mortality was lower in patients who received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (1.0% vs 1.2%; P=.22). Long-term mortality was significantly lower (P<.001) in patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors at the time of PCI. After propensity analysis to adjust for the likelihood of receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors on the basis of clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, a significant reduction in 30-day mortality with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was identified (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.87; P=.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis (median follow-up, 48 months) revealed a significant improvement in long-term survival in patients receiving a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor at the time of ad hoc PCI that persisted after propensity adjustments (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.98; P=.021). Patients treated with drug-eluting stents showed a significant improvement in adjusted long-term mortality.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing elective or urgent ad hoc PCI, coadministration of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with reduced risk-adjusted 30-day and long-term mortality.

Effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when added to aspirin and heparin. However, the benefits of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients pretreated with clopidogrel are less clear. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of adding a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor to clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin before PCI. Five trials were identified via electronic searches of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The studies randomized a total of 5303 patients; 2654 received a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Two trials examined patients with acute coronary syndromes and 3 examined patients undergoing elective PCI. Loading doses of clopidogrel ranged from 375 to 600 mg. Follow-up ranged from 30 days to 1 year.Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition did not reduce the endpoints of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.22, P = 0.35 for death; OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.69-1.08, P = 0.19 for MI; and OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.81-1.15, P = 0.68 for target vessel revascularization). Analyses restricted to acute coronary syndromes trials yielded similar results (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.33-1.48, P = 0.35 for death; OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.59-1.03, P = 0.08 for MI). Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition increased major and minor bleeding (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.04-1.75, P = 0.02) driven by use of abciximab. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the analyses.

[Effectiveness and safety of triple antiaggregation in patients undergoing coronary intervention]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors) effectiveness and safety in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) or stable coronary disease referred for percutaneous coronary revascularization pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines by means of a systematic review.

SOURCE OF DATA

Electronic search using Medline, Embase, Pascal, Cochrane Library and ISI Proceedings and manual review of the articles found.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the clinical efficacy (risk of death or infarction) and safety (bleeding and thrombocytopenia) of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients pretreated with thienopyridines.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were obtained by duplicate.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (8,604 patients) were included. Addition of GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors reduced the risk of death or myo-cardial infarction at 30 days in those trials that included patients with NSTEACS (RR 0.67; 95%CI 0.56-0.80) but not in studies that excluded NSTEACS patients (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.75-1.53) (p test of interaction 0.0175), As a counterpart, GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors increased the risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors reduces the risk of adverse cardiac events in NSTEACS patients pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines but increases the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Its utilization in stable coronary patients does not seem justified.

Temporal trends in major angioplasty complications: technical issues and the case for on-site coronary surgery

The need for on-site cardiac surgery has been a component of guidelines for the practice of elective and emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, proportions of cases requiring emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) post-PCI have fallen. This audit of complications of PCI confirms the very low incidence of need for emergency CABG, despite increasingly complex PCI caseload. Although the availability of stents/antiplatelet pharmacotherapy probably has contributed to improved PCI outcomes, the avoidance of emergency CABG is not contingent on either extensive use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or strategies of universal stenting.

Actualización en cardiopatía isquémica 2005

This article is a review of the main developments in acute coronary syndromes reported in publications and conference presentations in 2005. It covers the pathophysiology, secondary prevention, prognosis, and treatment of ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, and the latest clinical practice guidelines.

Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update

During the past three decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has become one of the cardinal treatment strategies for stenotic coronary artery disease. Technical advances, including the introduction of new devices such as stents, have expanded the interventional capabilities of balloon angioplasty. At the same time, there has been a decline in the rate of major adverse cardiac events, including Q-wave acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and cardiac death. Despite these advances, the incidence of post-procedural cardiac marker elevation has not substantially decreased since the first serial assessment 20 years ago. As of now, these post-procedural cardiac marker elevations are considered to represent peri-procedural myocardial injury (PMI) with worse long-term outcome potential. Recent progress has been made for the identification of two main PMI patterns, one near the intervention site (proximal type, PMI type I) and one in the distal perfusion territory of the treated coronary artery (distal type, PMI type II) as well as for preventive strategies. Integrating these new developments into the wealth of clinical information on this topic, this review aims at giving a current perspective on the entity of PMI.

Clopidogrel: cardiologists' panacea or neurologists' headache?

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is a potent platelet inhibitor that has been demonstrated to be significantly more effective than aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease in the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) study. Furthermore, the benefit of clopidogrel compared with placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes, as well as those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving a standard therapy including aspirin, has been largely demonstrated by the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE), Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO), CLopidogrel as Adjunctive ReperfusIon TherapY-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI)28, and Clopidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial/Secon Chinese Cardiac Study (COMMIT/CCS-2) trials. However, in the Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with recent transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke (MATCH) trial, there was no clinical benefit of adding aspirin versus placebo to a standard therapy of clopidogrel in patients with cerebrovascular disease. The implications of these findings, as well as future perspectives from upcoming trials, shall be discussed herein.

Percutaneous coronary interventions for coronary artery disease: the long and short of optimizing medical therapy

Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and timely introduction of pharmacological treatment can have a significant bearing on the patient's health and outcome. In addition to treating the culprit lesion mechanically, admission for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) gives an opportunity for the interventional cardiologist to optimize medical therapy. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current medical literature pertaining to cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction and vascular event prevention in the setting of PCI, with emphasis on antiplatelet therapies, beta-blockers, HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors (statins) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with regard to therapy optimization during PCI and for chronic CAD. We discuss the effects of these oral therapies in reducing ischaemic events, thus augmenting the benefits of PCI, as well as preventing recurrent CV events after the procedure.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers for percutaneous coronary revascularization, and unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary revascularisation (i.e. coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stent implantation), and in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high in spite of treatment with aspirin and heparin. GP IIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of GP IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary revascularisation, and in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 1, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2001), EMBASE (1980 to Nov 1999), reference list of articles, medical websites and handsearch among abstracts from cardiology congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers with standard medical treatment during percutaneous coronary revascularisation, and in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A list of titles and abstracts was screened separately by two reviewers who assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Percutaneous coronary revascularisation: Fourteen trials involving 17,788 patients were included. GP IIb/IIIa blockers were associated with decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.52, 0.97)) but not at 6 months (OR 0.85 (0.66, 1.11)). Mortality or infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.62 (0.55, 0.70); ARR: 31 per 1,000), and at 6 months (OR 0.65 (0.58, 0.73); ARR: 38 per 1,000)), but severe bleeding was increased (10 per 1,000; OR 1.38 (1.04, 1.85)). Unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Eight trials involving 30,006 patients were included. GP IIb/IIIa blockers were not associated with decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90 (0.80, 1.02)) or at 6 months (OR: 1.01 (0.88, 1.16)). Mortality or infarction was decreased at 30 days (OR 0.91 (0.85, 0.98); ARR: 13 per 1,000)) and at 6 months (OR 0,88 (0.81, 0.95); ARR: 13 per 1,000)), although severe bleeding was increased (1 per 1,000; OR 1.27 (1.12, 1.44)).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of death at 30 days and markedly that of death or MI at 30 days and 6 months in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary revascularisation at a price of a moderate increased risk of severe bleeding. In contrast, in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, these agents do not reduce mortality, only slightly reduce the risk of death or MI, and slightly increase the risk for severe bleeding.