EMERALD, AIMI, and PROMISE: is there still a potential for embolic protection in primary PCI?

Intracoronary artery retrograde thrombolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with a tortuous coronary artery: A case report and review of the literature

Background

How to deal with large thrombus burdens of culprit’s blood vessel remains a great challenge in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old Chinese man was diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Coronary angiography revealed that the distal end of a tortuous left circumflex was completely occluded by a large amount of thrombus. Cutted balloon-directed intracoronary artery retrograde thrombolysis (ICART) with urokinase led to the restoration of coronary blood flow. Because there was no obvious plaque rupture or artery stenosis in the coronary artery, it was only dilated, and no stent was implanted.

Conclusion

Cutted balloon-directed ICART can be performed effectively and safely in some STEMI patients with tortuous coronary vessels and large thrombus. (REST or named ICART ClinicalTrials.gov number, ChiCTR1900023849).

Intracoronary artery retrograde thrombolysis combined with percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with diabetes mellitus: A case report and literature review

Background

The management of a large thrombus burden in patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes is still a worldwide problem.

Case presentation

A 74-year-old Chinese woman presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Angiography revealed massive thrombus formation in the mid-segment of the right coronary artery leading to vascular occlusion. The sheared balloon was placed far from the occlusion segment and urokinase (100,000 u) was administered for intracoronary artery retrograde thrombolysis, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 blood flow was restored within 7 min. At last, one stent was accurately implanted into the culprit’s vessel. No-reflow, coronary slow flow, and reperfusion arrhythmia were not observed during this process.

Conclusion

Intracoronary artery retrograde thrombolysis (ICART) can be effectively and safely used in patients with STEMI along with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, even if the myocardial infarction exceeds 12 h (REST or named ICART ClinicalTrials.gov number, ChiCTR1900023849).

Intracoronary arterial retrograde thrombolysis with percutaneous coronary intervention: a novel use of thrombolytic to treat acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Clearance of coronary arterial thrombosis is necessary in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is currently no highly-recommended method of thrombus removal during interventional procedures. We describe a new method for opening culprit vessels to treat STEMI: intracoronary arterial retrograde thrombolysis (ICART) with PCI.

Methods & Results

Eight patients underwent ICART. The guidewire was advanced to the distal coronary artery through the occlusion lesion. Then, we inserted a microcatheter into the distal end of the occluded coronary artery over the guidewire. Urokinase (5-10 wu) mixed with contrast agents was slowly injected into the occluded section of the coronary artery through the microcatheter. The intracoronary thrombus gradually dissolved in 3-17 min, and the effect of thrombolysis was visible in real time. Stents were then implanted according to the characteristics of the recanalized culprit lesion to achieve full revascularization. One patient experienced premature ventricular contraction during vascular revascularization, and no malignant arrhythmias were seen in any patient. No reflow or slow flow was not observed post PCI. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade and myocardial blush grade post-primary PCI was 3 in all eight patients. No patients experienced bleeding or stroke.

Conclusions

ICART was accurate and effective for treating intracoronary thrombi in patients with STEMI in this preliminary study. ICART was an effective, feasible, and simple approach to the management of STEMI, and no intraprocedural complications occurred in any of the patients. ICART may be a breakthrough in the treatment of acute STEMI.

No-Reflow Phenomenon

No-reflow is responsible for 40% of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention without complete myocardial reperfusion despite successful reopening of the infarct-related artery. This review describes the main pathophysiological mechanisms of no-reflow, its clinical manifestation, including the strong association with increased in-hospital mortality, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiac failure as well as the diagnostic methods. The latter ranges from simple angiographic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade score to more complex angiographic indexes, imaging techniques such as myocardial contrast echo or cardiac magnetic resonance, and surrogate clinical end points such as ST-segment resolution. This review also summarizes the strategies of prevention and treatment of no-reflow, considering the most recent studies results regarding medical therapy and devices.

Management of the no-reflow phenomenon

The lack of reperfusion of myocardium after prolonged ischaemia that may occur despite opening of the infarct-related artery is termed "no reflow". No reflow or slow flow occurs in 3-4% of all percutaneous coronary interventions, and is most common after emergency revascularization for acute myocardial infarction. In this setting no reflow is reported to occur in 30% to 40% of interventions when defined by myocardial perfusion techniques such as myocardial contrast echocardiography. No reflow is clinically important as it is independently associated with increased occurrence of malignant arrhythmias, cardiac failure, as well as in-hospital and long-term mortality. Previously the no-reflow phenomenon has been difficult to treat effectively, but recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of no reflow have led to several novel treatment strategies. These include prophylactic use of vasodilator therapies, mechanical devices, ischaemic postconditioning and potent platelet inhibitors. As no reflow is a multifactorial process, a combination of these treatments is more likely to be effective than any of these alone. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of no reflow and present the numerous recent advances in therapy for this important clinical problem.

Clinical significance of echo signal attenuation on intravascular ultrasound in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic plaque that shows echo signal attenuation (EA) without associated bright echoes is sometimes observed by intravascular ultrasound but its clinical significance remains unclear. We investigated the impact of EA on coronary perfusion and evaluated the pathological features of plaque with EA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 687 native coronary lesions in 687 consecutive patients (336 with acute coronary syndrome and 351 with stable angina pectoris) who underwent intravascular ultrasound before percutaneous coronary intervention. By subgroup analysis, 60 lesions (30 lesions with EA) treated with directional coronary atherectomy underwent pathological examination. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade after percutaneous coronary intervention were compared between lesions with and without EA in 627 lesions except directional coronary atherectomy subgroup. EA was observed in 245 lesions (35.7%), and coronary flow after percutaneous coronary intervention was worse for lesions with EA than without (final TIMI grade of 0 to 2: 15.4% versus 2.4%, P<0.001; final myocardial blush grade of 0 to 2: 45.6% versus 21.4%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between no reflow (TIMI grade 0 to 2) and EA (odds ratio, 5.59; 95% CI, 2.64 to 11.85; P<0.001), a baseline TIMI grade of 0 to 2 (odds ratio, 5.91; 95% CI, 2.79 to 12.5; P<0.001), and a large reference area (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.76; P=0.005) after controlling for other associated factors. Pathological examination revealed a significantly higher frequency of lipid-rich plaque with microcalcification in lesions with EA.

CONCLUSIONS

Atherosclerotic plaque with EA showed a significant association with no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention, suggesting the existence of fragile components susceptible to distal embolization.

Management of 'no-reflow' complicating reperfusion therapy

No-reflow phenomenon, defined as inadequate myocardial perfusion of the adequately dilated target vessel without evidence of angiographic mechanical obstruction. It is a multifactorial, well-recognised, secondary phenomenon following reperfusion therapy such as thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the no-reflow state are incompletely understood. Embolization of the atheromatous material to the distal vasculature and intense arteriole vasospasm caused by microembolization of platelet-rich thrombi that release vasoactive agents resulting in microvascular obstructions are likely mechanisms. Current prophylaxis and management strategies are derived from limited clinical data. Intracoronary verapamil, adenosine and nitroprusside have been most frequently studied and administered for angiographic no-reflow during PCI for acute myocardial infarction or saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions and have been shown to improve epicardial flow and microvascular perfusion. The use of distal embolic protection devices in SVG interventions also provide microvascular protection and improve clinical outcomes. However, by far the most important measures are prevention and anticipation during PCI as once no-reflow established, complete reversal of the situation may not be possible.

Putting the benefits of percutaneous coronary revascularization into perspective: from trials to guidelines

Prompt delivery of percutaneous coronary revascularization in the acute setting has been shown to decrease mortality, length of hospitalization, and patient recovery time. However, its routine use in stable coronary disease is less validated, especially in the absence of adequate medical treatment. Several studies have looked into the benefits of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Based on these studies, many clinical guidelines have been developed to aid in decision making. In this article, we outline the benefits and reality of percutaneous coronary revascularization. We explore the major trials and use the latest clinical guidelines as a framework for our discussion on the applicability of this procedure in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary disease.

Time-dependent benefit of initial thrombosuction on myocardial reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

In ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), dislodgement of thrombus within the culprit artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may cause distal embolisation and impaired myocardial reperfusion. Clinical results of thromboembolic protection strategies have been controversial. We conducted this study to investigate whether the benefit of thrombus removal is time dependent.

METHODS

Seventy-four STEMI patients within 12 h from onset were randomised to receive either primary PCI with initial thrombosuction (IT) or standard strategy. Results were analysed in subgroups according to the onset-to-lab time intervals (subgroup 1: 0-240 min, subgroup 2: 241-480 min and subgroup 3: 481-720 min).

RESULTS

The primary end-points were improvements in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow (DeltaTIMI) and myocardial blush grade (DeltaMBG) postprocedure. Better DeltaTIMI (2.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.5 +/- 1.3, p = 0.014) and DeltaMBG (2.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 1.5, p < 0.001) were observed in IT patients, compared with standard PCI patients. In onset-to-lab time subgroup analysis, the difference between IT and standard PCI is significant only in subgroup 2 (DeltaTIMI 2.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.3 +/- 1.2, p = 0.007; DeltaMBG 2.6 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.010), but not in the other two subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective randomised study shows that primary PCI with IT may improve epicardial flow and myocardial reperfusion in patients with STEMI, and this benefit is the most significant in patients treated within 4-8 h after symptom onset.

Thrombectomy for thrombus removal, filters for whatever else

Although effective in reducing the total embolic burden, many current thrombectomy devices might not be able to prevent the liberation of plaque components, which have been shown to be a potential contributor to the development of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mechanical thrombectomy options in complex percutaneous coronary interventions

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of thrombus-containing lesions are associated with an increased risk of acute complications and poorer long term vessel patency. Dealing with these vessels provides many technical challenges, especially with the significant risk of coronary no reflow and distal embolization. Pharmacological strategies, including intravenous and intracoronary glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors reduce intracoronary thrombus propagation, improve TIMI flow and are associated with a reduction in adverse event rates. Mechanical strategies (particularly embolic protection and thrombectomy catheters) help to improve coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion. However, their impact on clinical outcomes is less clear. The use of embolic protection devices is associated with better perfusion, blood flow, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI. However, the role for these devices in primary PCI and native coronary artery interventions is uncertain. This study examines the current approaches to manage thrombotic lesions during PCI and reviews the evidence in support of the different mechanical thrombectomy options that are available to the interventional cardiologist.