1
|
Galhardo A, Nuche J, Bedogni F, Testa L, Regueiro A, Cepas-Guillén P, Eleid MF, Chen S, Reisman M, Mengi S, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Real-Time Analysis of Conduction Disturbances During TAVR With the CARA Monitor. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)03386-1. [PMID: 39341432 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of conduction disturbances (CDs) remains the most frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the timing of electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and CDs during the TAVR procedure. OBJECTIVE To describe ECG changes throughout the TAVR procedure using the CARA monitor. METHODS Multicenter study including 196 prospectively enrolled patients with no CDs undergoing TAVR. All patients were monitored with the CARA system, which uses a 12-lead ECG to measure PQ and QRS intervals, QRS axis, and variations with each heartbeat at every step: baseline, wire insertion, pre-dilatation, valve deployment, post-dilatation, and end of procedure. RESULTS PQ and QRS intervals progressively increased throughout the procedure, with a cumulative increase from 169.0±20.0ms to 186.0±31.6ms (P<0.001) for the PQ interval and from 101.3±10.5ms to 126.0±25.4ms (P<0.001) for the QRS interval, from baseline to the end of the procedure. A significant increase in the number of patients with left axis deviation was observed (8% at baseline vs 32% at end of procedure, P<0.001). A total of 161 (82.4%) patients exhibited at least one CD episode (PQ>200ms, QRS>120ms, advanced heart block) during the procedure, with most episodes occurring during pre-dilatation and valve implantation maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS The CARA system facilitated real-time ECG monitoring, detecting subtle and progressive changes during TAVR. ECG changes occurred at each step, with most patients experiencing CDs, especially during pre-dilatation and valve implantation. The potential of ECG dynamics and timing for early detection of severe CDs should be explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attilio Galhardo
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Jorge Nuche
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shmuel Chen
- New-York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, New York, USA
| | - Mark Reisman
- New-York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, New York, USA
| | - Siddhartha Mengi
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harvey JE, Puri R, Grubb KJ, Yakubov SJ, Mahoney PD, Gada H, Coylewright M, Poulin MF, Chetcuti SJ, Sorajja P, Rovin JD, Eisenberg R, Reardon MJ. Decreasing pacemaker implantation rates with Evolut supra-annular transcatheter aortic valves in a large real-world registry. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024:S1553-8389(24)00493-7. [PMID: 38871537 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain a concern. We assessed the PPI rates over time in patients implanted with an Evolut supra-annular, self-expanding transcatheter valve from the US STS/ACC TVT Registry. METHODS Patients who underwent TAVR with an Evolut R, Evolut PRO or Evolut PRO+ valve between July 2018 (Q3) and June 2021 (Q2) were included. PPI rates were reported by calendar quarter. In-hospital PPI rates were reported as proportions and 30-day rates as Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox regression model was used to determine potential predictors of a new PPI within 30 days of the TAVR procedure. RESULTS From July 2018 to June 2021, 54,014 TAVR procedures were performed using Evolut valves. Mean age was 79.3 ± 8.8 years and 49.2 % were male. The 30-day PPI rate was 16.6 % in 2018 (Q3) and 10.8 % in 2021 (Q2, 34.9 % decrease, p < 0.001 for trend across all quarters). The in-hospital PPI rate decreased by 40.1 %; from 14.7 % in 2018 (Q3) to 8.8 % in 2021 (Q2) (p < 0.001 for trend across all quarters). Significant predictors of a new PPI within 30 days included a baseline conduction defect, history of atrial fibrillation, home oxygen, and diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION From 2018 to 2021, TAVR with an Evolut transcatheter heart valve in over 50,000 patients showed a significant decreasing trend in the rates of in-hospital and 30-day PPI, representing the lowest rate of PPI in any large real-world registry of Evolut. During the same evaluated period, high device success and shorter length of stay was also observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Harvey
- WellSpan York Hospital, 1001 S George Street, York, PA 17403, USA.
| | - Rishi Puri
- Cleveland Clinic, 2049 East 100(th) Street, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Kendra J Grubb
- Emory University, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Riverside Methodist-Ohio Health, 3535 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH 43214, USA
| | - Paul D Mahoney
- Sentara Healthcare, 600 Gresham Drive, Suite 8630A, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA
| | - Hemal Gada
- University of Pittsburgh-Pinnacle, 1000 N Front Street, Wormleysburg, PA 17043, USA
| | - Megan Coylewright
- Erlanger Heart and Lung Institute, 979 E 3rd Street, C-520, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA.
| | - Marie-France Poulin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Stanley J Chetcuti
- University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Paul Sorajja
- Minneapolis Heart Institute-Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, 920 E 28th Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
| | - Joshua D Rovin
- Morton Plant Hospital, 55 Pinellas St #320, Clearwater, FL 33756, USA.
| | - Ruth Eisenberg
- Medtronic, 8200 Coral Sea Street, Mounds View, MN 55112, USA.
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, 6550 Fannin St #1401, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Q, Fu Q, Xia Y, Wu Y. Predictors, clinical impact, and management strategies for conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1370244. [PMID: 38650916 PMCID: PMC11033487 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1370244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increasingly become a safe, feasible, and widely accepted alternative surgical treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the incidence of conduction abnormalities associated with TAVR, including left bundle branch block (LBBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB), remains high and is often correlated with risk factors such as the severity of valvular calcification, preexisting conditions in patients, and procedural factors. The existing research results on the impact of post-TAVR conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirements on prognosis, including all-cause mortality and rehospitalization, remain contradictory, with varied management strategies for post-TAVR conduction system diseases across different institutions. This review integrates the latest research in the field, offering a comprehensive discussion of the mechanisms, risk factors, consequences, and management of post-TAVR conduction abnormalities. This study provides insights into optimizing patient prognosis and explores the potential of novel strategies, such as conduction system pacing, to minimize the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yanqing Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Januszek R, Balan R. Predictors of New and Persistent New Left Bundle Branch Block One Year after the Implantation of a Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Prosthesis. Diseases 2023; 11:100. [PMID: 37606471 PMCID: PMC10443328 DOI: 10.3390/diseases11030100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conduction disorders following aortic valve replacement therapy (AVR), either surgical or percutaneous, are related to a higher risk of complete atrioventricular block and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). AIM The objective of this study was to assess risk factors regarding the incidence of new postoperative and persistent new left bundle branch block (LBBB) 1 year after the implantation of a sutureless/rapid-deployment (SURD) aortic valve prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The current study included 200 consecutive patients treated with isolated or concomitant AVR between May 2014 and May 2017 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery in Pasawa with SURD aortic valve EDWARDS INTUITY EliteTM implantation. The patients were divided according to the presence of new postoperative LBBB (67 patients, 33.5%) and persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR (35 patients, 17.5%). A comparative analysis was performed between patients with and without new LBBB after AVR and those with and without persistent LBBB 1 year after AVR. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to extract the risk factors of LBBB occurrence. RESULTS Among the risk factors for the lack of new LBBB development after AVR, Euroscore II (p < 0.001) was found, while for the occurrence of persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR, atrial fibrillation (p = 0.001), length of hospital stay (p = 0.001) and body mass index (p = 0.004) were noted. CONCLUSIONS Patients with new or persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR had lower mean Euroscore II and BMI values. Their stay at the hospital was also shorter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Januszek
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, 30-688 Kraków, Poland
| | - Robert Balan
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Passau, 94-032 Passau, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rivard L, Nault I, Krahn AD, Daneault B, Roux JF, Natarajan M, Healey JS, Quadros K, Sandhu RK, Kouz R, Greiss I, Leong-Sit P, Gourraud JB, Ben Ali W, Asgar A, Aguilar M, Bonan R, Cadrin-Tourigny J, Cartier R, Dorval JF, Dubuc M, Dürrleman N, Dyrda K, Guerra P, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim R, Macle L, Mondesert B, Moss E, Raymond-Paquin A, Roy D, Tadros R, Thibault B, Talajic M, Nozza A, Guertin MC, Khairy P. Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block. CJC Open 2023; 5:611-618. [PMID: 37720184 PMCID: PMC10502429 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI-an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Rivard
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew D. Krahn
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benoit Daneault
- Department of Cardiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Roux
- Department of Cardiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Madhu Natarajan
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S. Healey
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Quadros
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Roopinder K. Sandhu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Remi Kouz
- Department of Cardiology, Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Greiss
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Leong-Sit
- Department of Cardiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Walid Ben Ali
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anita Asgar
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Martin Aguilar
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raoul Bonan
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julia Cadrin-Tourigny
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raymond Cartier
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Dorval
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marc Dubuc
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicolas Dürrleman
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Guerra
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marina Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Reda Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laurent Macle
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Blandine Mondesert
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emmanuel Moss
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Raymond-Paquin
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Denis Roy
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rafik Tadros
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Thibault
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mario Talajic
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anna Nozza
- Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Guertin
- Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paul Khairy
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alabdaljabar MS, Eleid MF. Risk Factors, Management, and Avoidance of Conduction System Disease after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4405. [PMID: 37445439 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly developing modality to treat patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Conduction disease post TAVR is one of the most frequent and serious complications experienced by patients. Multiple factors contribute to the risk of conduction disease, including AS and the severity of valve calcification, patients' pre-existing conditions (i.e., conduction disease, anatomical variations, and short septum) in addition to procedure-related factors (e.g., self-expanding valves, implantation depth, valve-to-annulus ratio, and procedure technique). Detailed evaluation of risk profiles could allow us to better prevent, recognize, and treat this entity. Available evidence on management of conduction disease post TAVR is based on expert opinion and varies widely. Currently, conduction disease in TAVR patients is managed depending on patient risk, with minimal-to-no inpatient/outpatient observation, inpatient monitoring (24-48 h) followed by ambulatory monitoring, or either prolonged inpatient and outpatient monitoring or permanent pacemaker implantation. Herein, we review the incidence and risk factors of TAVR-associated conduction disease and discuss its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mackram F Eleid
- Division of Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rimskaya EM, Mironova NA, Sokolov SF, Golitsyn SP. [Left bundle branch block - dilated cardiomyopathy - heart failure: common links in the closed pathogenetic chain]. KARDIOLOGIIA 2023; 63:68-76. [PMID: 36880146 DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2023.2.n1773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
This review summarizes the available information on the epidemiology and prognosis of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), morphological alterations of the myocardium both resulting in and ensuing LBBB, cardiac biomechanics in LBBB, and possibilities of its correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Rimskaya
- Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | - N A Mironova
- Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | - S F Sokolov
- Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | - S P Golitsyn
- Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dar JA, Manickavasagam A, Jacob JR. Syncope After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Pace or Not? Circulation 2023; 147:442-446. [PMID: 36716253 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.063176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Javaid Ahmad Dar
- Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - John Roshan Jacob
- Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vilalta V, Cediel G, Mohammadi S, López H, Kalavrouziotis D, Resta H, Dumont E, Voisine P, Philippon F, Escabia C, Borrellas A, Alperi A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, Panagides V, Bayes-Genis A, Rodés-Cabau J. New-onset persistent left bundle branch block following sutureless aortic valve replacement. Heart 2022; 109:143-150. [PMID: 35842233 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence, predictive factors and prognostic value of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) in patients undergoing sutureless surgical aortic valve replacement (SU-SAVR). METHODS A total of 329 consecutive patients without baseline conduction disturbances or previous permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) who underwent SU-SAVR with the Perceval valve (LivaNova Group, Saluggia, Italy) in two centres from 2013 to 2019 were included. Patients were on continuous ECG monitoring during hospitalisation and 12-lead ECG was performed after the procedure and at hospital discharge. NOP-LBBB was defined as a new postprocedural LBBB that persisted at hospital discharge. Baseline, procedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiography data were collected in a dedicated database. RESULTS New-onset LBBB was observed in 115 (34.9%) patients, and in 76 (23.1%) persisted at hospital discharge. There were no differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between patients with (n=76) and without (n=253) NOP-LBBB. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (2.3-4.4 years), patients with NOP-LBBB had a higher incidence of PPI (14.5% vs 6.3%, p=0.016), but exhibited similar rates of all-cause mortality (19.4% vs 19.2%, p=0.428), cardiac mortality (8.1% vs 9.4%, p=0.805) and heart failure readmission (21.0% vs 23.2%, p=0.648), compared with the no/transient LBBB group. NOP-LBBB was associated with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up (delta: -5.7 vs +0.2, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS NOP-LBBB occurred in approximately a quarter of patients without prior conduction disturbances who underwent SU-SAVR and was associated with a threefold increased risk of PPI along with a negative impact on LVEF at follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Vilalta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Germán Cediel
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helena López
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Dimitri Kalavrouziotis
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helena Resta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Eric Dumont
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Voisine
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claudia Escabia
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Andrea Borrellas
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Xavier Carrillo
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Vassili Panagides
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Antoni Bayes-Genis
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pinnacchio G, Ruscio E, Rocco E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Aurigemma C, Romagnoli E, Scacciavillani R, Narducci ML, Bencardino G, Perna F, Spera FR, Comerci G, Bisignani A, Pelargonio G. Short-Term Atrioventricular Dysfunction Recovery after Post-TAVI Pacemaker Implantation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9100324. [PMID: 36286276 PMCID: PMC9604573 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) represents a frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to atrio-ventricular (AV) node injury. Predictors of early AV function recovery were investigated. We analyzed 50 consecutive patients (82 ± 6 years, 58% males, EuroSCORE: 7.8 ± 3.3%, STS mortality score: 5 ± 2.8%). Pacemaker interrogations within 4−6 weeks from PPI were performed to collect data on AV conduction. The most common indication of PPI was persistent third-degree (44%)/high-degree (20%) AV block/atrial fibrillation (AF) with slow ventricular conduction (16%) after TAVI. At follow-up, 13 patients (26%) recovered AV conduction (i.e., sinus rhythm with stable 1:1 AV conduction/AF with a mean ventricular response >50 bpm, associated with a long-term ventricular pacing percentage < 5%). At multivariate analysis, complete atrio-ventricular block independently predicted pacemaker dependency at follow-up (p = 0.019). Patients with persistent AV dysfunction showed a significant AV conduction time prolongation after TAVI (PR interval from 207 ± 50 to 230 ± 51, p = 0.02; QRS interval from 124 ± 23 to 147 ± 16, p < 0.01) compared to patients with recovery, in whom AV conduction parameters remained unchanged. Several patients receiving PPI after TAVI have recovery of AV conduction within a few weeks. Longer observation periods prior to PPI might be justified, and algorithms to minimize ventricular pacing should be utilized whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Pinnacchio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Eleonora Ruscio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Erica Rocco
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Scacciavillani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Narducci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Bencardino
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Perna
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raffaele Spera
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Comerci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Bisignani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gemma Pelargonio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pelargonio G, Scacciavillani R, Donisi L, Narducci ML, Aurigemma C, Pinnacchio G, Bencardino G, Perna F, Spera FR, Comerci G, Ruscio E, Romagnoli E, Crea F, Burzotta F, Trani C. Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:904828. [PMID: 35935649 PMCID: PMC9353552 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.904828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, a significant proportion of patients might recover AV conduction at follow-up. Objectives The aim of our study was to evaluate the recovery of AV conduction by determination through Wenckebach point in patients with PPI and therefore identify patients who could benefit from device reprogramming to avoid unnecessary RV pacing. Methods We enrolled 43 patients that underwent PM implantation after TAVI at our Department from January 2018 to January 2021. PM interrogation was performed at follow-up and patients with native spontaneous rhythm were further assessed for AV conduction through WP determination. Results A total of 43 patients requiring a PM represented the final study population, divided in patients with severely impaired AV conduction (no spontaneous valid rhythm or WP < 100; 26) and patients with valid AV conduction (WP ≥ 100; 17). In the first group patients had a significantly higher number of intraprocedural atrioventricular block (AVB) (20 vs. 1, p < 0.005), showed a significant higher implantation depth in LVOT (7.7 ± 2.2 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.05) and lower ΔMSID (-0.28 ± 3 vs. -3.94 ± 2, p < 0.05). Conclusion AV conduction may recover in a significant proportion of patients. In our study, valve implantation depth in the LVOT and intraprocedural AV block are associated with severely impaired AV conduction. Regular PM interrogation and reprogramming are required to avoid unnecessary permanent right ventricular stimulation in patients with AV conduction recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Pelargonio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Scacciavillani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Donisi
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Narducci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaetano Pinnacchio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Bencardino
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Perna
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raffaele Spera
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Comerci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ruscio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Crea
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rouleau SG, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, Long B. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications: A narrative review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med 2022; 56:77-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
13
|
Reza S, Bianchi M, Kovarovic B, Anam S, Slepian MJ, Hamdan A, Haj-Ali R, Bluestein D. A computational framework for post-TAVR cardiac conduction abnormality (CCA) risk assessment in patient-specific anatomy. Artif Organs 2022; 46:1305-1317. [PMID: 35083748 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac conduction abnormality (CCA)- one of the major persistent complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may lead to permanent pacemaker implantation. Localized stresses exerted by the device frame on the membranous septum (MS) which lies between the aortic annulus and the bundle of His, may disturb the cardiac conduction and cause the resultant CCA. We hypothesize that the area-weighted average maximum principal logarithmic strain (AMPLS) in the MS region can predict the risk of CCA following TAVR. METHODS Rigorous finite element-based modeling analysis was conducted in two patients (Balloon expandable TAVR recipients) to assess post-TAVR CCA risk. Following the procedure one of the patients required permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation while the other did not (control case). Patient-specific aortic root was modeled, MS was identified from the CT image, and the TAVR deployment was simulated. Mechanical factors in the MS region such as logarithmic strain, contact force, contact pressure, contact pressure index (CPI) and their time history during the TAVR deployment; and anatomical factors such as MS length, implantation depth, were analyzed. RESULTS Maximum AMPLS (0.47 and 0.37, respectively), contact force (0.92 N and 0.72 N, respectively), and CPI (3.99 and 2.86, respectively) in the MS region were significantly elevated in the PPM patient as compared to control patient. CONCLUSION Elevated stresses generated by TAVR devices during deployment appear to correlate with CCA risk, with AMPLS in the MS region emerging as a strong predictor that could be used for preprocedural planning in order to minimize CCA risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Symon Reza
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| | - Matteo Bianchi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| | - Brandon Kovarovic
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| | - Salwa Anam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| | - Marvin J Slepian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ashraf Hamdan
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rami Haj-Ali
- The Fleischman Faculty of Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Danny Bluestein
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee KH, Yagishita A, Ohno Y, Sakai T, Sakai K, Miyamoto J, Horinouchi H, Sakama S, Kamioka N, Murakami T, Ayabe K, Amino M, Yoshioka K, Ikari Y. Late-onset atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 2:607-613. [PMID: 34988505 PMCID: PMC8703188 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rarely occur late after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The clinical features of this phenomenon and its association with periprocedural conduction disturbances remain uncertain. Objectives We aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of late-onset atrioventricular block (AVB) after TAVR. Methods This single-center study included 246 patients undergoing TAVR. Late-onset AVB was defined as AVB ≥1 month after the TAVR. Results Periprocedural AVB (periAVB) occurred in 43 patients (17%). Patients with periAVB had a higher rate of right bundle branch block (47% vs 7%, P < .0001). Of the 43 patients with periAVB, 15 underwent PPI (35%) at a median duration of 6 days, whereas 1 of the remaining 203 patients without periAVB underwent PPI within 1 month (0.5%). During a median follow-up duration of 365 days, late-onset AVB occurred in 10 of 230 patients without PPI within 1 month (4%) at a median duration of 76 days. All 10 patients presented transient periprocedural atrioventricular conduction disturbances, including 8 patients with periAVB (80%), all of whom recovered within 1 month, and 9 patients underwent self-expanding valve implantation (90%). The mortality rate in patients with PPI within 1 month was higher than in those without, although the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 0.97–9.05, log-rank P = .09). Conclusion Late-onset AVB occurred in a minority of patients undergoing TAVR. Greater vigilance is warranted, particularly in patients with transient conduction disturbances during the periprocedural period following self-expanding valve implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atsuhiko Yagishita
- Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Atsuhiko Yagishita, Department of Cardiology, Tokai University, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
McInerney A, Vera-Urquiza R, Tirado-Conte G, Marroquin L, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Nuñez-Gil I, Pozo E, Gonzalo N, de Agustín JA, Escaned J, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Nombela-Franco L. Pre-dilation and Post-dilation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Indications, Benefits and Risks. Interv Cardiol 2021; 16:e28. [PMID: 34721667 PMCID: PMC8532006 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. In recent years, an emphasis has been placed on simplification of the procedure. Balloon predilation was initially considered a mandatory step to cross and prepare the stenotic aortic valve, but several studies demonstrated the feasibility of performing TAVR without balloon valvuloplasty. Balloon postdilation of the implanted valve is sometimes required to optimise results, although many patients do not require this step. Contemporary consensus advocates an individualised approach to TAVR procedures and so balloon pre- and post-dilation are performed selectively. This review aims to outline the advantages and disadvantages of balloon pre- and post-dilation and to identify the scenarios in which they are required during TAVR procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela McInerney
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Luis Marroquin
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Iván Nuñez-Gil
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Pozo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | - Nieves Gonzalo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Javier Escaned
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Macaya
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57070695. [PMID: 34356976 PMCID: PMC8303948 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57070695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Conduction disturbances such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) and complete atrio-ventricular block (cAVB) are relatively frequent complications following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the dynamics of these conduction blocks to further understand luxating factors and predictors for their persistency. Materials and Methods: We prospectively included 157 consecutive patients who underwent a TAVI procedure. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at specific time points during the TAVI procedure and at follow-up until at least six months post-procedure. Results: Of the 106 patients with a narrow QRS complex (nQRS) before TAVI, ~70% developed LBBB; 28 (26.4%) being classified as super-transient (ST-LBBB), 20 (18.9%) as transient (T-LBBB) and 24 (22.6%) as persistent (P-LBBB). Risk of LBBB was higher for self-expandable (SE) than for balloon-expandable (BE) prostheses and increased with larger implant depth. During the TAVI procedure conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior, as illustrated by alternating kinds of blocks in 18 cases. Most LBBBs developed during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and at positioning and deployment of the TAVI prosthesis. The incidence of LBBB was not significantly different between patients who did and did not undergo BAV prior to TAVI implantation (65.3% and 74.2%, respectively (p = 0.494)). Progression to cAVB was most frequent for patients with preexisting conduction abnormalities (5/34) patients) and in patients showing ST-LBBB (6/28). Conclusions: During the TAVI procedure, conduction disturbances showed a dynamic behavior with alternating types of block in 18 cases. After a dynamic period of often alternating types of block, most BBBs are reversible while one third persist. Patients with ST-LBBB are most prone to progressing into cAVB. The observation that the incidence of developing LBBB after TAVI is similar with and without BAV suggests that a subgroup of patients has a substrate to develop LBBB regardless of the procedure.
Collapse
|
17
|
Poels TT, Stassen R, Kats S, Veenstra L, van Ommen V, Kietselaer B, Houthuizen P, Maessen JG, Prinzen FW. Effective Distance between Aortic Valve and Conduction System Is an Independent Predictor of Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57050476. [PMID: 34064932 PMCID: PMC8150689 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Persistent left bundle branch block (P-LBBB) has been associated with poor clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. We hypothesized that the distance from the aortic valve to the proximal conduction system, expressed as the effective distance between the aortic valve and conduction system (EDACS), can predict the occurrence of P-LBBB in patients undergoing a TAVI procedure. Materials and methods: In a retrospective study, data from 269 patients were analyzed. EDACS was determined using two longitudinal CT sections. Results: Sixty-four of the patients developed P-LBBB. EDACS ranged between −3 and +18 mm. EDACS was significantly smaller in P-LBBB than in non-P-LBBB patients (4.6 (2.2–7.1) vs. 8.0 (5.8–10.2) mm, median values (interquartile range); p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.78 for predicting P-LBBB based on EDACS. In patients with EDACS of ≤3 mm and >10 mm, the chance of developing P-LBBB was ≥50% and <10%, respectively. Conclusions: A small EDACS increases the risk for the development of P-LBBB during TAVI by a factor of >25. As EDACS can be measured pre-procedurally, it may be a valuable additional factor to weigh the risks of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas T. Poels
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Robert Stassen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Suzanne Kats
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Leo Veenstra
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Vincent van Ommen
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Bastiaan Kietselaer
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.V.); (V.v.O.); (B.K.)
| | - Patrick Houthuizen
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, P.O. Box 1350, 5623EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Jos G. Maessen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (S.K.); (J.G.M.)
| | - Frits W. Prinzen
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, P.O. Box 616, 6229ER Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kroon HG, van Gils L, Ziviello F, van Wiechen MPH, Ooms JFW, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Maugenest AM, Goudzwaard JA, Cummins P, Lenzen M, Kardys I, Daemen J, Mattace-Raso F, de Jaegere PPT, Van Mieghem NM. Clinical consequences of consecutive self-expanding transcatheter heart valve iterations. Neth Heart J 2021; 30:140-148. [PMID: 33914259 PMCID: PMC8881514 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-021-01568-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare early clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with three consecutive generations of self-expanding valves (SEVs). Methods Clinical endpoints of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with CoreValve, Evolut R or Evolut PRO were included in a prospective database. Results TAVI was performed with CoreValve (n = 116), Evolut R (n = 160) or Evolut PRO (n = 92). Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed a tendency towards lower permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates compared to CoreValve (CoreValve 27% vs Evolut R 16% vs Evolut PRO 18%, p = 0.091). By multivariable regression analysis CoreValve had a significantly higher risk for PPI (odds ratio (OR) 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31–5.94, p = 0.008) compared to Evolut R, while Evolut R and PRO were similar. Severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurred only with CoreValve, but no significant difference was observed in moderate PVL (10% vs 8% vs 6%, p = 0.49). CoreValve had a tendency towards a higher risk for more-than-mild PVL as compared with the Evolut platform (R + PRO) (OR 2.46, 95% CI 0.98–6.16, p = 0.055). No significant differences in all-cause mortality (7% vs 4% vs 1%, p = 0.10), stroke (6% vs 3% vs 2%, p = 0.21) or major vascular complications (10% vs 12% vs 4%, p = 0.14) were observed. Conclusions TAVI with self-expanding valves was safe, and device iterations may result in a lower need for PPI. More-than-mild PVL seemed to occur less often with repositionable technology. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-021-01568-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H G Kroon
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L van Gils
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Ziviello
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P H van Wiechen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J F W Ooms
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z Rahhab
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N El Faquir
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A-M Maugenest
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A Goudzwaard
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Cummins
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Lenzen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Kardys
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Daemen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Mattace-Raso
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P P T de Jaegere
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kroon HG, van Gils L, Ziviello F, van Wiechen M, Ooms J, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Maugenest AM, Kardys I, Daemen J, de Jaegere PP, Van Mieghem NM. Impact of baseline and newly acquired conduction disorders on need for permanent pacemakers with 3 consecutive generations of self-expanding transcatheter aortic heart valves. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2021; 34:40-45. [PMID: 33547024 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTIONS We aimed to compare conduction dynamics and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after CoreValve, Evolut R and PRO (transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)). METHODS Patients were stratified based on conduction at baseline; Cohort A had normal conduction, Cohort B had conduction abnormalities including atrioventricular (AV)-block, fascicular block or complete bundle branch block. Three different dynamic QRS-patterns were defined: stable QRS-duration, transient QRS-prolongation and persistent QRS-prolongation. We performed multivariable regression analysis to estimate the effect of the three separate transcatheter heart valves (THV's) on need for PPI at 30 days. RESULTS TAVR was performed with CoreValve (N = 113), Evolut R (N = 157) or Evolut PRO (N = 92). Conduction dynamics were similar between the different THVs. Overall, Evolut R and PRO showed a tendency towards less PPI compared to CoreValve (17% vs. 19% vs. 27%, P = 0.08), which was driven by a lower PPI rate in Cohort A (6% vs. 11% vs. 25%, P = 0.002). Need for PPI was restricted to patients with persistent QRS-prolongation in Cohort A (26/106) but did not correlate with conduction dynamics in Cohort B. In multivariable logistic regression analysis the use of Evolut R (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.78, P = 0.008) and PRO (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.91, P-value = 0.028) were independently associated with less need for PPI. CONCLUSION The newer generations Evolut R and PRO were associated with less PPI compared to CoreValve. Acquired persistent conduction abnormalities predicted PPI after TAVR only in patients with normal conduction at baseline. Our findings may help identify eligible patients for early discharge after Evolut R/PRO TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert G Kroon
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart van Gils
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francesca Ziviello
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten van Wiechen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris Ooms
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Zouhair Rahhab
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nahid El Faquir
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie Maugenest
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isabella Kardys
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Daemen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter P de Jaegere
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Neuburger PJ, Pospishil L, Ibrahim H. Anesthetic Management of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of the 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:982-986. [PMID: 33441272 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neuburger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
| | - Liliya Pospishil
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Homam Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen S, Chau KH, Nazif TM. The incidence and impact of cardiac conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:452-467. [PMID: 33312903 PMCID: PMC7724062 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-av-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has developed into an established therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the spectrum of surgical risk. Despite improvements in transcatheter heart valve (THV) technologies and procedural techniques, cardiac conduction disturbances, including high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), remain frequent complications. TAVR-related conduction disturbances occur due to injury to the conduction system from interactions with interventional equipment and the transcatheter valve stent frame. Risk factors for post-TAVR conduction disturbances have been identified and include clinical characteristics, baseline electrocardiogram findings (right bundle branch block), anatomic factors, and potentially modifiable procedural factors (type of transcatheter valve, depth of implantation, over-sizing). New-onset LBBB and PPM implantation after TAVR have been shown to be associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes, including mortality and heart failure hospitalization. These clinical consequences are likely to be of increasing importance as TAVR is utilized in younger and lower risk population. This review provides an updated overview of the literature regarding the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of TAVR-related conduction disturbances, as well as proposed strategies for the management of this frequent clinical challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shmuel Chen
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine H Chau
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tamim M Nazif
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Haghiashtiani G, Qiu K, Zhingre Sanchez JD, Fuenning ZJ, Nair P, Ahlberg SE, Iaizzo PA, McAlpine MC. 3D printed patient-specific aortic root models with internal sensors for minimally invasive applications. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2020; 6:eabb4641. [PMID: 32923641 PMCID: PMC7455187 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgeries have numerous advantages, yet complications may arise from limited knowledge about the anatomical site targeted for the delivery of therapy. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating aortic stenosis. Here, we demonstrate multimaterial three-dimensional printing of patient-specific soft aortic root models with internally integrated electronic sensor arrays that can augment testing for TAVR preprocedural planning. We evaluated the efficacies of the models by comparing their geometric fidelities with postoperative data from patients, as well as their in vitro hemodynamic performances in cases with and without leaflet calcifications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that internal sensor arrays can facilitate the optimization of bioprosthetic valve selections and in vitro placements via mapping of the pressures applied on the critical regions of the aortic anatomies. These models may pave exciting avenues for mitigating the risks of postoperative complications and facilitating the development of next-generation medical devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Kaiyan Qiu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Jorge D. Zhingre Sanchez
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Zachary J. Fuenning
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | | | | | - Paul A. Iaizzo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Institute for Engineering in Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Michael C. McAlpine
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Institute for Engineering in Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Akdemir B, Roukoz H. A single-centre cohort and short-term follow-up of patients who developed persistent new onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Acta Cardiol 2020; 75:360-365. [PMID: 31984845 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1713520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: The most common conduction abnormality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) with an exact frequency that varies based on the valve system used for TAVR. PPM implantation in patients with persistent new onset LBBB post TAVR is controversial. The primary objective of this study is to report PPM utilisation and mortality in this patient population.Methods: A TAVR registry included patients older than 18 years who underwent TAVR between March 2012 and June 2015 at University of Minnesota Medical Centre. After exclusion, 151 patients were divided into two groups; patients with persistent new onset LBBB after TAVR (new LBBB, n = 47) and patients without persistent new onset LBBB (no new LBBB, n = 104).Results: Among the 151 patients, 47 (31.1%) patients developed new-onset LBBB after the procedure and persisted at discharge. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (52.5 ± 11.1 vs. 56.4 ± 10.8, p: .047) and mean aortic valve gradient (40.6 ± 11.5 vs. 45.7 ± 14.1, p: .022) were significantly higher in no new LBBB group. Among those with new LBBB, there was a significantly higher rate of PPM implant during index hospitalisation (14.9%, vs. 0%, p < .001). LVEF remained significantly lower at 1 year follow up in new LBBB group compared to no new LBBB group (51.8 ± 11.2 vs. 57.6 ± 8.3, p: .002). Also in new LBBB group, there was a non-significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality in 1 year compared to no new LBBB group (14.9% vs. 9.6% p: .34). There were no significant differences between patients with and without new LBBB with respect to PPM implant after discharge in 1 year (2.13% vs. 3.8% p: .58), length of stay (7.3 ± 7.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.7 p: .09), post-op atrial fibrillation (AF) (16.3% vs. 8.5% p: .20).Conclusions: New onset LBBB was frequent conduction problem post TAVR and one-third of patients with new onset LBBB persisted at discharge. New LBBB after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of PPM implantation during the index hospitalisation but not after discharge. Our findings suggest that early PPM implantation for post-TAVR LBBB is not indicated without complete or high degree AV block. Further research is required to identify the patients with new LBBB who would progress to advanced AV block or heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baris Akdemir
- Cardiovascular Division, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Henri Roukoz
- Cardiovascular Division, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Subramani S, Arora L, Krishnan S, Hanada S, Sharma A, Ramakrishna H. Analysis of Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:1082-1093. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.07.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
25
|
Ait Said M, Coquard C, Horvilleur J, Manenti V, Fiorina L, Lacotte J, Salerno F. [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conduction disturbances]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2019; 68:443-449. [PMID: 31668339 DOI: 10.1016/j.ancard.2019.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently becoming the treatment of choice for patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Despite several technical improvements, the incidence of conduction disturbances has not diminished and remains TAVI's major complication. These disturbances include the occurrence of left bundle branch block and/or high-grade atrioventricular block often requiring pacemaker implantation. The proximity of the aortic valve to the conduction system (conduction pathways) accounts for the occurrence of these complications. Several factors have been identified as carrying a high risk of conduction disturbances like the presence of pre-existing right bundle branch block, the type of valve implanted, the volume of aortic and mitral calcifications, the size of the annulus and the depth of valve implantation. Left bundle branch block is the most frequent post TAVI conduction disturbance. Whereas the therapeutic strategy for persistent complete atrioventricular block is simple, it becomes complex in the presence of fluctuating changes in PR interval and left bundle branch block duration. The QRS width threshold value (150-160 ms) indicative of the need for pacemaker implantation is still being debated. Although there are currently no recommendations regarding the management of these conduction disturbances, the extension of TAVI indications to patient at low surgical risk calls for a standardization of our practice. However, a decision algorithm was recently proposed by a group of experts composed of interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists and cardiac surgeons. There are still uncertainties about the appropriate timing of pacemaker implantation and the management of new onset left bundle branch block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ait Said
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France.
| | - C Coquard
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| | - J Horvilleur
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| | - V Manenti
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| | - L Fiorina
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| | - J Lacotte
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| | - F Salerno
- ICPS Jacques Cartier, groupe Ramsay Générale de Santé, 6, avenue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Rodés-Cabau J, Ellenbogen KA, Krahn AD, Latib A, Mack M, Mittal S, Muntané-Carol G, Nazif TM, Sondergaard L, Urena M, Windecker S, Philippon F. Management of Conduction Disturbances Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:1086-1106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
28
|
Muntané-Carol G, Guimaraes L, Ferreira-Neto AN, Wintzer-Wehekind J, Junquera L, del Val D, Faroux L, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. How does new-onset left bundle branch block affect the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve repair? Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:589-602. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1624161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - David del Val
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kanjanauthai S, Bhasin K, Pirelli L, Kliger CA. Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2019. [DOI: 10.15420/usc.2018.7.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been established as a therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are of intermediate or higher surgical risk. Several periprocedural complications are reduced with newer transcatheter heart valve generations; however, conduction abnormalities and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation have remained unchanged and are the most frequent TAVR complications. The close relationship of the atrioventricular node and left bundle branch to the subaortic region explains these potential conduction abnormalities. This article highlights conduction abnormalities after TAVR with a focus on basic conduction system anatomy in relation to the aortic valve, the mechanism, incidence, predisposing factors for occurrence, impact on mortality and finally, proposed treatment algorithms for management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kabir Bhasin
- Valve and Structural Heart Center, Lenox Hill Heart and Lung, New York, NY
| | - Luigi Pirelli
- Valve and Structural Heart Center, Lenox Hill Heart and Lung, New York, NY
| | - Chad A Kliger
- Valve and Structural Heart Center, Lenox Hill Heart and Lung, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saadi M, Tagliari AP, Danzmann LC, Bartholomay E, Kochi AN, Saadi EK. Update in Heart Rhythm Abnormalities and Indications for Pacemaker After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 33:286-290. [PMID: 30043922 PMCID: PMC6089127 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Rhythm abnormalities following transcatheter aortic valve implantation
(TAVI) and indications for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) were reviewed,
which aren't well established in the current guidelines. New left bundle branch
block and atrioventricular block are the most common electrocardiographic
changes after TAVI. PPI incidence ranges from 9-42% for self-expandable and
2.5-11.5% for balloon expandable devices. Not only anatomical variations in
conduction system have an important role in conduction disorders, but different
valve characteristics and their relationship with cardiac structures as well.
Previous right bundle branch block has been confirmed as one of the most
significant predictors for PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Saadi
- Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, RS, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Tagliari
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Luiz Cláudio Danzmann
- Department of Cardiology, Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, RS, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Bartholomay
- Department of Cardiology, Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, RS, Brazil
| | - Adriano Nunes Kochi
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Keller Saadi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Orvin K, Herzberg H, Golovchiner G, Kadmon E, Omelchenko A, Assali A, Vaknin-Assa H, Sagie A, Shapira Y, Vaturi M, Kornowski R, Barsheshet A. Relation of Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening to Needfor Permanent Pacemaker After Transcatheter AorticValve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2018; 122:833-837. [PMID: 30032864 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can potentially alter conduction system function due to the mechanical force applied to the conduction system by the proximal edge of the valve, particularly the CoreValve. Some reasons for post-TAVI advanced atrioventricular block have been identified. We investigated whether the degree of the motion of the basal left ventricular (LV) walls impacted the development of advanced atrioventricular block post-TAVI. A total of 407 patients (82.1 ± 6.2 years) without prior permanent pacemakers (PPMs) underwent TAVI using CoreValve (70%) or Edwards-SAPIEN (30%) prosthetic devices. The LV fractional shortening (FS) of the basal segments was measured in each patient, and the association between FS and PPM requirement, or new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) was evaluated. During hospitalization, 64 patients (15.7%) required PPM implantation, and 128 patients (31.4%) required PPM implantation or developed new LBBB. Independent predictors of PPM implantation included preprocedural right bundle branch block, CoreValve prosthetic device, valve implantation depth, and FS. Patients with high FS (≥40%, upper tertile) had a 2.5-fold increased risk of PPM implantation (p = 0.004) and a 1.8-fold increased risk of PPM or new LBBB (p = 0.020). Every 10% increment in FS was consistently associated with an adjusted 42% increased risk of PPM implantation (p = 0.015) and with an adjusted 43% increased risk of PPM implantation or new LBBB (p = 0.005). Thus, in our cohort, LV FS was independently associated with the need for PPM implantation during hospitalization. Hence, this simple echocardiographic measure can be used to identify patients who are at risk after TAVI.
Collapse
|
32
|
Mangieri A, Montalto C, Pagnesi M, Lanzillo G, Demir O, Testa L, Colombo A, Latib A. TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018; 5:85. [PMID: 30018969 PMCID: PMC6038729 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a worldwide accepted alternative for treating patients at intermediate or high risk for surgery. In recent years, the rate of complications has markedly decreased except for new-onset atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction block that remains the most common complication after TAVI. Although procedural, clinical, and electrocardiographic predisposing factors have been identified as predictors of conduction disturbances, new strategies are needed to avoid such complications, particularly in the current TAVI era that is moving quickly toward the percutaneous treatment of low-risk patients. In this article, we will review the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of conduction disturbances after TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ozan Demir
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Testa
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Azeem Latib
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Computed tomography (CT) assessment of the membranous septal anatomy prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2018; 19:626-631. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
34
|
Atrioventricular and intraventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 52:315-322. [DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0391-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
35
|
Perrin N, Perrin T, Hachulla AL, Frei A, Müller H, Roffi M, Cikirikcioglu M, Ellenberger C, Licker MJ, Burri H, Noble S. Conduction disorders using the Evolut R prosthesis compared with the CoreValve: has anything changed? Open Heart 2018; 5:e000770. [PMID: 29632681 PMCID: PMC5888433 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim We compared early postprocedural and midterm evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following implantation of the new generation Evolut R (ER) prosthesis in comparison with the previous generation CoreValve (CV) system using routinely recorded ECG up to 6-month follow-up. Methods All consecutive patients treated by transcathether aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic self-expanding devices for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in a single centre between October 2011 and February 2016 were considered for inclusion. ECGs recorded at baseline, day 1 after TAVI, discharge and 6 months were retrospectively analysed. At each time-point, intrinsic rhythm, PR interval, QRS axis and duration, and atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction were analysed. Atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction following TAVI at discharge and at 6 months were compared intrasubject at the different time intervals and between patients receiving the ER versus the CV prosthesis. Results Among the 113 patients included in the analysis (51% female, 83.3±6.2 years), 60 (53%) patients received the CV and 53 (47%) patients received the ER. Compared with patients in the CV group, those in the ER group had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (6.3±3.1vs 4.8±3.6, P=0.02). Patients in the ER group in comparison with those in the CV group more frequently had postprocedural PR interval (57%vs23%, respectively, P=0.004) and QRS prolongation (76%vs50%, P=0.03) at discharge. Incidence of complete atrioventricular block was similar between both groups (9%vs18%, P=0.3) up to 6-month follow-up. No difference in term of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) (34%vs28%, P=0.8) or permanent pacemaker implantation rates (32.1%vs31.7%, P=1.0) was reported. Conclusions Patients with the ER had greater postprocedural atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction delays than those with the CV at discharge, with however similar incidence of high-degree atrioventricular block, new LBBB and permanent pacemaker implantation up to 6-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Perrin
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tilman Perrin
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Lise Hachulla
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Angela Frei
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hajo Müller
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marco Roffi
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Marc-Joseph Licker
- Anaesthesiology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Haran Burri
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephane Noble
- Cardiology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Campelo-Parada F, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, Regueiro A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Del Trigo M, Chamandi C, Rodríguez-Gabella T, Auffret V, Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, DeLarochellière R, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Philippon F, Pérez-Castellano N, Puri R, Macaya C, Rodés-Cabau J. Cronología y evolución de los trastornos de conducción asociados con el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica: impacto de la valvuloplastia aórtica con balón. Rev Esp Cardiol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2017.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
37
|
Conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY : JGC 2018; 15:105-112. [PMID: 29434632 PMCID: PMC5803544 DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
In the last few years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an alternative procedure in patients with severe aortic stenosis and high risk for surgical aortic replacement. Due to the anatomic correlation between aortic valve structure and conduction system of the heart, one of the most common complications after TAVI is conduction system disturbances which including bundle branch block, complete heart block and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Although these disturbances are usually not lethal, they may have a great influence on patients' state and long term-survival. Several risk factors for conduction disturbances have been identified which including age, anatomy of the heart, periprocedural factors, type of implanted valve, preexisting abnormalities and comorbidities. As this technique becomes more familiar to physicians, patients should be carefully screened for risk factors for the development of conduction abnormalities after TAVI in order to provide effective prevention and proper treatment.
Collapse
|
38
|
Rocatello G, El Faquir N, De Santis G, Iannaccone F, Bosmans J, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Segers P, De Beule M, de Jaegere P, Mortier P. Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Elucidate the Role of Contact Pressure in the Development of New Conduction Abnormalities After Catheter-Based Implantation of a Self-Expanding Aortic Valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:e005344. [DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.117.005344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Rocatello
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Nahid El Faquir
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Gianluca De Santis
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Francesco Iannaccone
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Johan Bosmans
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Ole De Backer
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Lars Sondergaard
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Patrick Segers
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Matthieu De Beule
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Peter de Jaegere
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| | - Peter Mortier
- From the IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Belgium (G.R., P.S., M.D.B.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.E.F., P.d.J.); FEops NV, Ghent, Belgium (G.D.S., F.I., M.D.B., P.M.); University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium (J.B.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (O.D.B., L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hengstenberg C, Husser O. A new hope - low permanent pacemaker rates with selfexpanding transcatheter heart valves. EUROINTERVENTION 2017; 13:1255-1257. [PMID: 29260715 DOI: 10.4244/eijv13i11a196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hengstenberg
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Timing of Conduction Abnormalities Leading to Permanent Pacemaker Insertion After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation—A Single-Centre Review. Can J Cardiol 2017; 33:1660-1667. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
41
|
Monteiro C, Ferrari ADL, Caramori PRA, Carvalho LAF, Siqueira DADA, Thiago LEKS, Perin M, Lima VCD, Guérios E, Brito Junior FSD. Permanent Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Predictors and Evolution of Left Ventricular Function. Arq Bras Cardiol 2017; 109:550-559. [PMID: 29185614 PMCID: PMC5783436 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established
procedure; however, atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker
implantation (PPI) is a common complication. Objectives To determine the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of PPI after
TAVI, focusing on how PPI affects left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
after TAVI. Methods The Brazilian Multicenter TAVI Registry included 819 patients submitted to
TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis from 22 centers from January/2008 to
January/2015. After exclusions, the predictors of PPI were assessed in 670
patients by use of multivariate regression. Analysis of the ROC curve was
used to measure the ability of the predictors; p < 0.05 was the
significance level adopted. Results Within 30 days from TAVI, 135 patients (20.1%) required PPI. Those patients
were older (82.5 vs. 81.1 years; p = 0.047) and mainly of the male sex
(59.3% vs 45%; p = 0.003). Hospital length of stay was longer in patients
submitted to PPI (mean = 15.7 ± 25.7 vs. 11.8 ± 22.9 days; p
< 0.001), but PPI affected neither all-cause death (26.7% vs. 25.6%; p =
0.80) nor cardiovascular death (14.1% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.84). By use of
multivariate analysis, the previous presence of right bundle-branch block
(RBBB) (OR, 6.19; 3.56-10.75; p ≤ 0.001), the use of
CoreValve® prosthesis (OR, 3.16; 1.74-5.72; p ≤
0.001) and baseline transaortic gradient > 50 mm Hg (OR, 1.86; 1.08-3.2;
p = 0.025) were predictors of PPI. The estimated risk of PPI ranged from 4%,
when none of those predictors was present, to 63%, in the presence of all of
them. The model showed good ability to predict the need for PPI: 0.69
(95%CI: 0.64 - 0.74) in the ROC curve. The substudy of 287 echocardiograms
during the 1-year follow-up showed worse LVEF course in patients submitted
to PPI (p = 0.01). Conclusion BRD prévio, gradiente aórtico médio > 50 mmHg e
CoreValve® são preditores independentes de implante de MPD
pós-TAVI. Ocorreu implante de MPD em aproximadamente 20% dos casos de
TAVI, o que prolongou a internação hospitalar, mas não
afetou a mortalidade. O implante de MPD afetou negativamente a FEVE
pós-TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cláudio Monteiro
- Centro de Pesquisas Cardiovasculares do Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Andres Di Leoni Ferrari
- Centro de Pesquisas Cardiovasculares do Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Marco Perin
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| | - Valter C de Lima
- Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Enio Guérios
- Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR - Brazil - Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sandau KE, Funk M, Auerbach A, Barsness GW, Blum K, Cvach M, Lampert R, May JL, McDaniel GM, Perez MV, Sendelbach S, Sommargren CE, Wang PJ. Update to Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 136:e273-e344. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
43
|
Khounlaboud M, Flécher E, Fournet M, Le Breton H, Donal E, Leclercq C, Mabo P, Leguerrier A, Daubert C. Predictors and prognostic impact of new left bundle branch block after surgical aortic valve replacement. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2017; 110:667-675. [PMID: 28964778 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch block (LBBB) induces mechanical dyssynchrony that may lead to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. AIMS To evaluate the incidence, predictors and clinical impact of new LBBB in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS After exclusion of patients with pre-existing LBBB, a previous pacemaker or a paced rhythm at hospital discharge, 547 consecutive patients undergoing SAVR were included. All-cause death, cardiovascular death and the combined outcome of all-cause death or a first heart failure event were assessed at 3months and 1year. Patients with and without new LBBB were compared. RESULTS New LBBB occurred in 4.6% of patients after SAVR (compared with 16.4% of patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation during the study period). Previous valve surgery and an immediate postoperative paced rhythm were independent predictors of new LBBB. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or the combined outcome of all-cause death or a first heart failure event between patients with and without new LBBB. However, new LBBB was associated with a trend towards functional deterioration and more heart failure events at 1year. CONCLUSION At 1-year follow-up, new LBBB did not have a significant impact on clinical outcome, but was associated with worse functional status and more heart failure events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moukda Khounlaboud
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Service de cardiologie, centre hospitalier, 10, rue Marcel-Proust, 22000 Saint-Brieuc, France.
| | - Erwan Flécher
- Service de chirurgie cardiaque, thoracique et vasculaire, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Maxime Fournet
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Hervé Le Breton
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Erwan Donal
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Christophe Leclercq
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Philippe Mabo
- Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Alain Leguerrier
- Service de chirurgie cardiaque, thoracique et vasculaire, hôpital Pontchaillou/CHU, 35000 Rennes, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Claude Daubert
- Faculté de médecine, université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France; LTSI Inserm U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Auffret V, Puri R, Urena M, Chamandi C, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation 2017; 136:1049-1069. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.028352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-accepted option for treating patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate to high or prohibitive surgical risk. TAVR-related conduction disturbances, mainly new-onset left bundle-branch block and advanced atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation, remain the most common complication of this procedure. Furthermore, improvements in TAVR technology, akin to the increasing experience of operators/centers, have translated to a major reduction in periprocedural complications, yet the incidence of conduction disturbances has remained relatively high, with perhaps an increasing trend over time. Several factors have been associated with a heightened risk of conduction disturbances and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR, with prior right bundle-branch block and transcatheter valve type and implantation depth being the most commonly reported. New-onset left bundle-branch block and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation may have a significant detrimental association with patients’ prognosis. Consequently, strategies intended to reduce the risk and to improve the management of such complications are of paramount importance, particularly in an era when TAVR expansion toward treating lower-risk patients is considered inevitable. In this article, we review the available evidence on the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical association of conduction disturbances after TAVR and propose a strategy for the management of these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Auffret
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Rishi Puri
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Marina Urena
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Chekrallah Chamandi
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Tania Rodriguez-Gabella
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - François Philippon
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- From University Hospital Pontchaillou, Cardiology and Vascular Disease Department, CIC-IT 804, Rennes 1 University, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM U1099, France (V.A.); Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (V.A., R.P., C.C., T.R.-G., F.P., J.R.,-C.); and Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France (M.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Campelo-Parada F, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, Regueiro A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Del Trigo M, Chamandi C, Rodríguez-Gabella T, Auffret V, Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, DeLarochellière R, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Philippon F, Pérez-Castellano N, Puri R, Macaya C, Rodés-Cabau J. Timing of Onset and Outcome of New Conduction Abnormalities Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Role of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 71:162-169. [PMID: 28566243 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Little is known about the timing of onset and outcome of conduction abnormalities (CA) following balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to examine the timing of CA and determine the impact of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) on the persistence of these abnormalities. METHODS A total of 347 patients were included. Of these, 75 had a continuous electrocardiogram recording and a 6-lead electrocardiogram at each step of the procedure. RESULTS In the transcatheter aortic valve implantation population undergoing continuous electrocardiogram monitoring, new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) or third-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 48 (64%) and 16 (21.3%) patients, with 51.5% of CA occurring before valve implantation. Left bundle branch block persisted more frequently at hospital discharge (53.8 vs 22.7%; P=.028) and at 1-month follow-up (38.5 vs 13.6%; P=.054) when occurring before valve implantation. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty prior to valve implantation was used in 264 (76.1%) patients, and 78 (22.5%) had persistent LBBB or complete atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation. Persistent LBBB or unresolved atrioventricular block at 1 month occurred more frequently in the BAV group (76.1 vs 47.6%; P=.021), and the use of BAV was associated with a lack of CA resolution (OR, 3.5; 95%CI, 1.17-10.43; P=.021). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing a balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation, more than half of CA occurred before valve implantation. Early occurrence of CA was associated with a higher rate of persistence at 1-month follow-up. The use of BAV was associated with an increased risk of CA persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marina Urena
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Cardiology, Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital-Paris VII University, Paris, France
| | - Ander Regueiro
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - María Del Trigo
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Chekrallah Chamandi
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Vincent Auffret
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | - Jean-Michel Paradis
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Eric Dumont
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Carlos Macaya
- Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Barkagan M, Topilsky Y, Steinvil A, Aviram G, Ben-Shoshan J, Finkelstein A, Banai S, Keren G, Shmilovich H. Aortoventricular annulus shape as a predictor of pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2017; 18:425-429. [DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000000497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
47
|
Surkova E, Badano LP, Bellu R, Aruta P, Sambugaro F, Romeo G, Migliore F, Muraru D. Left bundle branch block: from cardiac mechanics to clinical and diagnostic challenges. Europace 2017; 19:1251-1271. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
48
|
Auffret V, Regueiro A, Campelo-Parada F, del Trigo M, Chiche O, Chamandi C, Puri R, Rodés-Cabau J. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement without balloon predilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 90:839-850. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Auffret
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory; Rennes 1 University; Rennes France
| | - Ander Regueiro
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | | | - María del Trigo
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | - Olivier Chiche
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | | | - Rishi Puri
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Gils L, Tchetche D, Lhermusier T, Abawi M, Dumonteil N, Rodriguez Olivares R, Molina-Martin de Nicolas J, Stella PR, Carrié D, De Jaegere PP, Van Mieghem NM. Transcatheter Heart Valve Selection and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Pre-Existent Right Bundle Branch Block. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:JAHA.116.005028. [PMID: 28258051 PMCID: PMC5524025 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.005028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Right bundle branch block is an established predictor for new conduction disturbances and need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the absolute rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related PPM implantations in patients with pre‐existent right bundle branch block and categorize for different transcatheter heart valves. Methods and Results We pooled data on 306 transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients from 4 high‐volume centers in Europe and selected those with right bundle branch block at baseline without a previously implanted PPM. Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether PPM rate differed among transcatheter heart valves after adjustment for confounders. Mean age was 83±7 years and 63% were male. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.3 (interquartile range, 4.1–10.2). The following transcatheter valve designs were used: Medtronic CoreValve (n=130; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN); Edwards Sapien XT (ES‐XT; n=124) and Edwards Sapien 3 (ES‐3; n=32; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA); and Boston Scientific Lotus (n=20; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA). Overall permanent pacemaker implantation rate post‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement was 41%, and per valve design: 75% with Lotus, 46% with CoreValve, 32% with ES‐XT, and 34% with ES‐3. The indication for PPM implantation was total atrioventricular block in 98% of the cases. Lotus was associated with a higher PPM rate than all other valves. PPM rate did not differ between ES‐XT and ES‐3. Ventricular paced rhythm at 30‐day and 1‐year follow‐up was present in 81% at 89%, respectively. Conclusions Right bundle branch block at baseline is associated with a high incidence of PPM implantation for all transcatheter heart valves. PPM rate was highest for Lotus and lowest for ES‐XT and ES‐3. Pacemaker dependency remained high during follow‐up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Masieh Abawi
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
|