Estimating individual lifetime benefit and bleeding risk of adding oral anticoagulation to aspirin for patients with stable cardiovascular disease: directions from COMPASS?

Panax notoginseng preparation plus aspirin versus aspirin alone on platelet aggregation and coagulation in patients with coronary heart disease or ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effects of Panax notoginseng preparations (PNP) containing Panax Notoginseng Saponins (PNS) or Panaxatriol Saponin (PTS) on platelet aggregation and coagulation in the adjuvant treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) and ischemic stroke (IS). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the combination of PNP and aspirin (ASA) versus ASA alone for CHD or IS were searched in eight databases. Subgroup analysis was performed according to saponin category. When statistical heterogeneity was significant, sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out approach. Funnel plot, Egger' test, and Begg' test was adopted to detect publication bias. Results: Twenty RCTs involving 2216 patients were analyzed. Compared with ASA alone, PNP plus ASA had a stronger inhibitory effect on in PAgR [PNS, WMD = -6.10 (-7.25, -4.95), p < 0.00001; PTS, WMD = -3.53 (-4.68, -2.38), p < 0.00001]; PNS plus ASA better reduced FIB [WMD = -0.43 (-0.49, -0.36)] and DD [WMD = -0.59 (-0.67, -0.51), p < 0.00001], while PLT (p = 0.07) and PT (p = 0.34) were not significantly different; PTS plus ASA better prolonged PT [WMD = 1.90 (1.47, 2.32), p < 0.00001] and PT-INR [WMD = 0.22 (0.11, 0.32), p < 0.0001], whereas no significant difference in DD (p = 0.1) and bleeding-related events (positive fecal occult blood, p = 0.96; upper gastrointestinal bleeding, p = 0.67; subcutaneous hemorrhage, p = 0.51; bulbar conjunctival hemorrhage, p = 0.51; hematuria, p = 0.58). There was no significant difference between PNP plus ASA and ASA alone in terms of gastrointestinal side effect (PNS, p = 0.65; PTS, p = 0.56) and urticaria (PNS, p = 0.57; PTS, p = 0.55). Conclusion: PNP combined with ASA might produce stronger antiplatelet aggregation and anticoagulation effects without increasing bleeding risk, gastrointestinal side effects, and urticaria compared with ASA alone. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42022339234.

Aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban - the dual pathway concept in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults in western nations. In the last decades, tremendous research has been conducted in the field of secondary prevention in order to reduce recurrent cardiovascular events. This review summarizes the novel dual pathway concept of aspirin and very low-dose rivaroxaban, from mechanisms to clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease, very low-dose rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, when combined with aspirin, reduced the rate of recurrent ischemic events, at the cost of increased bleeding. This effect was present in patients with ischemic heart disease, as well as in patients with atherosclerosis in other beds, such as in peripheral arterial disease. Sub-studies from the COMPASS trial examined other high-risk populations who might benefit the most from this regimen.

EXPERT OPINION

There are currently multiple antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment regimens for patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. The dual pathway concept is a novel approach that combines both mechanisms. Identifying patients who might benefit the most in terms of ischemic events at the least bleeding events still remains a challenge, yet prescribing this combination to high-risk patients might be the most effective.