Present and future of coronary risk assessment

Sudden cardiac death in ischaemic heart disease: coronary thrombosis or myocardial fibrosis?

The mechanisms underlying sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) caused by coronary atherosclerosis are not yet clarified. For decades, acute coronary causes have been sought as the main triggers of SCD in these patients. In fact, angiographic and pathological studies in cardiac arrest survivors and SCD victims, respectively, consistently show that acute plaque events occur in ∼50% of SCD of patients with IHD. Among the acute events, plaque rupture and erosion triggering acute coronary thrombosis remain the main substrates; however, a significant percentage of plaque haemorrhage (20%) is identified by pathological studies. Its role in acute coronary thrombosis is unknown and deserves future intravascular imaging developments. In the remaining 50% of SCD, the atherosclerotic coronary disease shows the characteristics of structural stability. More recent studies have focused attention not only on the coronary tree and on the search for acute complications of atherosclerotic plaques but also on myocardial tissue, identifying replacement and patchy fibrosis as the most frequent findings in the post-mortem hearts of these patients, a feature followed by cardiac hypertrophy, as assessed by the heart weight, usually associated with fibrosis. The possibility of characterizing myocardial fibrosis in vivo, besides confirming the pathological data, now offers new risk stratification perspectives to prevent SCD in IHD, alongside the consolidated secondary prevention criteria based on left ventricular dysfunction.

Quantitative analysis of in-TIPS thrombosis in abdominal CT

Purpose

To identify transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) thrombosis in abdominal CT scans applying quantitative image analysis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively screened 184 patients to include 20 patients (male, 8; female, 12; mean age, 60.7 ± 8.87 years) with (case, n = 10) and without (control, n = 10) in-TIPS thrombosis who underwent clinically indicated contrast-enhanced and unenhanced abdominal CT followed by conventional TIPS-angiography between 08/2014 and 06/2020. First, images were scored visually. Second, region of interest (ROI) based quantitative measurements of CT attenuation were performed in the inferior vena cava (IVC), portal vein and in four TIPS locations. Minimum, maximum and average Hounsfield unit (HU) values were used as absolute and relative quantitative features. We analyzed the features with univariate testing.

Results

Subjective scores identified in-TIPS thrombosis in contrast-enhanced scans with an accuracy of 0.667 – 0.833. Patients with in-TIPS thrombosis had significantly lower average (p < 0.001), minimum (p < 0.001) and maximum HU (p = 0.043) in contrast-enhanced images. The in-TIPS / IVC ratio in contrast-enhanced images was significantly lower in patients with in-TIPS thrombosis (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found for unenhanced images. Analyzing the visually most suspicious ROI with consecutive calculation of its ratio to the IVC, all patients with a ratio < 1 suffered from in-TIPS thrombosis (p < 0.001, sensitivity and specificity = 100%).

Conclusion

Quantitative analysis of abdominal CT scans facilitates the stratification of in-TIPS thrombosis. In contrast-enhanced scans, an in-TIPS / IVC ratio < 1 could non-invasively stratify all patients with in-TIPS thrombosis.

•

Quantitative image analyses of CT scans allow the diagnosis of in-TIPS thrombosis.

•

Negative quantitative image analysis may reduce the necessity of an angiography.

•

Unenhanced CT scans have no additional benefit for diagnosis of in-TIPS thrombosis.