Low QRS voltages and left ventricular hypertrophy: a risky association

Prevalence and determinants of low QRS voltages and QRS fragmentation in children and adolescents undergoing sports pre-participation screening

AIMS

Low QRS voltages (LQRSV) in limb leads and QRS fragmentation (FQRS) are possible electrocardiographic signs of myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyopathy, but they are not listed in current criteria for interpreting athlete's electrocardiogram (ECG). We investigated the prevalence and determinants of LQRSV and FQRS in a cohort of young apparently healthy athletes undergoing pre-participation screening (PPS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed a consecutive series of 2140 ECG obtained during PPS of young athletes (mean age 12.5 ± 2.6 years, 7-18-year-old, 49% males). The peak-to-peak QRS voltage was measured in all limb leads, and LQRSV were defined when maximum value was <0.5 mV. Fragmented QRS morphologies were grouped into five patterns. Lead aVR was not considered. Maximum peak-to-peak QRS voltage in limb leads was 1.4 ± 0.4 mV, similar between younger and older athletes, but significantly lower in females than males (1.35 ± 0.38 mV vs. 1.45 ± 0.42 mV; P < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between maximal QRS voltages and body mass index (BMI), but not with type of sport or training load. Only five (0.2%) individuals showed LQRSV. At least one fragmented QRS complex was identified in 831 (39%) individuals but excluding the rSr' pattern in V1-V2, only 10 (0.5%) showed FQRS in ≥2 contiguous leads. They were older than those without FQRS, but did not differ in terms of gender, BMI, type of sport, or training load.

CONCLUSION

Low QRS voltages in limb leads and FQRS in ≥2 contiguous leads excluding V1-V2 are rare in young apparently healthy athletes and are not related to the type and intensity of sport activity. Therefore, they may require additional testing to rule out an underlying disease particularly when other abnormalities are present.

Prevalence and clinical significance of low QRS voltages in healthy individuals, athletes, and patients with cardiomyopathy: implications for sports pre-participation cardiovascular screening

Low QRS voltages (LQRSV), defined as a QRS amplitude from peak to nadir < 0.5 mV in all limb leads, are an emerging diagnostic finding on the electrocardiogram (ECG). In healthy individuals and athletes, LQRSV are rare (2.2-4% of elite athletes, 0.5% of recreational athletes, and 0.3% of sedentary individuals). LQRSV athletes commonly show ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) on exercise, and up to 40% of those with LQRSV and VAs have late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The prevalence of LQRSV in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy ranges from 17-40%, predicts left ventricular (LV) involvement, and is correlated with more extensive LGE replacement on CMR. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), LQRSV ranges from 0.7-11%. LQRSV-HCM patients have more segments with LGE, despite relatively smaller LV mass, suggesting a more advanced clinical stage and a worse prognosis. In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), LQRSV range from 6-7%, but may be higher (36%) in certain genetic forms of DCM. On a follow-up, LQRSV are independently associated with incident cardiac events, such as sudden death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, or appropriate internal cardioverter defibrillator discharge. In cardiac amyloid, LQRSV range from 34-66% and demonstrate a negative prognostic value, with worse clinical outcomes regardless of underlying biologic, genetic, and clinical variables. In conclusion, LQRSV deserve careful consideration for exclusion of arrhythmogenic substrates in healthy individuals, athletes, and patients. While additional research is needed, it is reasonable that LQRSV should trigger clinical investigation to exclude underlying diseases at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias.

Should ECG criteria for Low QRS voltage (LQRSV) be specific for Sex?

INTRODUCTION

Low QRS peak-to-nadir voltage (LQRSV) is associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and other cardiomyopathies. Recent studies have proposed criteria for LQRSV when screening athletes for cardiovascular disease. These criteria have not yet been evaluated in a large population of healthy young athletes.

METHODS

The target population was 10,728 (42.5% female, 57.5% male, mean age 18.1 ± 4.3 years) athletes who participated in mass ECG screenings between 2014 and 2021 at multiple sites across the United States including grade schools (11%), high schools (32%), colleges (50%), and professional athletic teams (6%) with digitally recorded ECGs and a standardized protocol. Since by design, complete follow up for outcomes and the results of testing were not available. Including only ECGs from initial evaluation among athletes 14-35 years of age and excluding those with right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block, Wolf-Parkinson-White pattern, reversed leads and 3 clinically diagnosed cardiomyopathies at Stanford, 8,679 (58% males, 42% females) remained eligible for analysis. QRS voltage was analyzed for each ECG lead and LQRSV criteria were applied and stratified by sex.

RESULTS

QRS voltage was lower in all leads in female athletes compared to male athletes. Using traditional limb lead criteria or precordial lead criteria, the prevalence of LQRSV was significantly lower in males than females (P < .001). Strikingly, LQRSV using the Sokolow-Lyon Index was present in 1.9% of males and 9.8% of females (P < .001). Applying first percentile for LQRS amplitude criteria provided possible values for screening young athletes for LQRSV.

CONCLUSIONS

LQRSV is more common among female athletes than male athletes using established criteria. Using first percentile sex-specific cut points should be considered in future analyses. Proposed novel LQRSV criteria in young athletes should be specific for males and females.

Electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular scar in athletes with right bundle branch block premature ventricular beats

AIMS

Right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) have been associated with the presence of non-ischaemic left ventricular scar (NLVS) in athletes. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify clinical and electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of the presence of NLVS in athletes with RBBB VAs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-four athletes [median age 39 (24-53) years, 79% males] with non-sustained RBBB VAs underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement in order to exclude the presence of a concealed structural heart disease. Thirty-six athletes (56%) showed NLVS at CMR and were assigned to the NLVS positive group, whereas 28 athletes (44%) to the NLVS negative group. Family history of cardiomyopathy and seven different ECG variables were statistically more prevalent in the NLVS positive group. At univariate analysis, seven ECG variables (low QRS voltages in limb leads, negative T waves in inferior leads, negative T waves in limb leads I-aVL, negative T waves in precordial leads V4-V6, presence of left posterior fascicular block, presence of pathologic Q waves, and poor R-wave progression in right precordial leads) proved to be statistically associated with the finding of NLVS; these were grouped together in a score. A score ≥2 was proved to be the optimal cut-off point, identifying NLVS athletes in 92% of cases and showing the best accuracy (86% sensitivity and 100% specificity, respectively). However, a cut-off ≥1 correctly identified all patients with NLVS (absence of false negatives).

CONCLUSION

In athletes with RBBB morphology non-sustained VAs, specific ECG abnormalities at 12-lead ECG can help in detecting subjects with NLVS at CMR.

ISE/ISHNE expert consensus statement on the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: The change of the paradigm

The ECG diagnosis of LVH is predominantly based on the QRS voltage criteria. The classical paradigm postulates that the increased left ventricular mass generates a stronger electrical field, increasing the leftward and posterior QRS forces, reflected in the augmented QRS amplitude. However, the low sensitivity of voltage criteria has been repeatedly documented. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and proposal of a new paradigm. The theoretical background for voltage measured at the body surface is defined by the solid angle theorem, which relates the measured voltage to spatial and non-spatial determinants. The spatial determinants are represented by the extent of the activation front and the distance of the recording electrodes. The non-spatial determinants comprise electrical characteristics of the myocardium, which are comparatively neglected in the interpretation of the QRS patterns. Various clinical conditions are associated with LVH. These conditions produce considerable diversity of electrical properties alterations thereby modifying the resultant QRS patterns. The spectrum of QRS patterns observed in LVH patients is quite broad, including also left axis deviation, left anterior fascicular block, incomplete and complete left bundle branch blocks, Q waves, and fragmented QRS. Importantly, the QRS complex can be within normal limits. The new paradigm stresses the electrophysiological background in interpreting QRS changes, i.e., the effect of the non-spatial determinants. This postulates that the role of ECG is not to estimate LV size in LVH, but to understand and decode the underlying electrical processes, which are crucial in relation to cardiovascular risk assessment.

ISE/ISHNE Expert Consensus Statement on ECG Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Change of the Paradigm. The joint paper of the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter Monitoring and Noninvasive Electrocardiology

The ECG diagnosis of LVH is predominantly based on the QRS voltage criteria, i.e. the increased QRS complex amplitude in defined leads. The classical ECG diagnostic paradigm postulates that the increased left ventricular mass generates a stronger electrical field, increasing the leftward and posterior QRS forces. These increased forces are reflected in the augmented QRS amplitude in the corresponding leads. However, the clinical observations document increased QRS amplitude only in the minority of patients with LVH. The low sensitivity of voltage criteria has been repeatedly documented. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and proposal of a new paradigm.

The pivotal role of ECG in cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of pathologies characterized by structural and functional alterations of the heart. Recent technological advances in cardiovascular imaging offer an opportunity for deep phenotypic and etiological definition. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the first-line diagnostic tool in the evaluation of both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Some electrocardiographic signs are pathognomonic or fall within validated diagnostic criteria of individual cardiomyopathy such as the inverted T waves in right precordial leads (V1-V3) or beyond in individuals with complete pubertal development in the absence of complete right bundle branch block for the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy of the right ventricle (ARVC) or the presence of low voltages typically seen in more than 60% of patients with amyloidosis. Most other electrocardiographic findings such as the presence of depolarization changes including QRS fragmentation, the presence of epsilon wave, the presence of reduced or increased voltages as well as alterations in the repolarization phase including the negative T waves in the lateral leads, or the profound inversion of the T waves or downsloping of the ST tract are more non-specific signs which can however raise the clinical suspicion of cardiomyopathy in order to initiate a diagnostic procedure especially using imaging techniques for diagnostic confirmation. Such electrocardiographic alterations not only have a counterpart in imaging investigations such as evidence of late gadolinium enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging, but may also have an important prognostic value once a definite diagnosis has been made. In addition, the presence of electrical stimulus conduction disturbances or advanced atrioventricular blocks that can be seen especially in conditions such as cardiac amyloidosis or sarcoidosis, or the presence of left bundle branch block or posterior fascicular block in dilated or arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathies are recognized as a possible expression of advanced pathology. Similarly, the presence of ventricular arrhythmias with typical patterns such as non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia of LBBB morphology in ARVC or non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia with an RBBB morphology (excluding the "fascicular pattern") in arrhythmogenic left ventricle cardiomyopathy could have a significant impact on the course of each disease. It is therefore clear that a learned and careful interpretation of ECG features can raise suspicion of the presence of a cardiomyopathy, identify diagnostic "red flags" useful for orienting the diagnosis toward specific forms, and provide useful tools for risk stratification. The purpose of this review is to emphasize the important role of the ECG in the diagnostic workup, describing the main ECG findings of different cardiomyopathies.