2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Imaging of Cardiac Fibrosis: An Update, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Fibrosis

Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is defined as excessive production and deposition of extra-cellular matrix proteins that result in pathologic myocardial remodeling. Three types of MF have been identified: replacement fibrosis from tissue necrosis, reactive fibrosis from myocardial stress, and infiltrative interstitial fibrosis from progressive deposition of nondegradable material such as amyloid. Although echocardiography, nuclear medicine, and CT play important roles in the assessment of MF, MRI is pivotal in the evaluation of MF, with the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique used as a primary end point. The LGE technique focuses on the pattern and distribution of gadolinium accumulation in the myocardium and assists in the diagnosis and establishment of the cause of both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. LGE MRI also aids prognostication and risk stratification. In addition, LGE MRI is used to guide the management of patients considered for ablation for arrhythmias. Parametric mapping techniques, including T1 mapping and extracellular volume measurement, allow detection and quantification of diffuse fibrosis, which may not be detected by LGE MRI. These techniques also allow monitoring of disease progression and therapy response. This review provides an update on the imaging of MF, including prognostication and risk stratification tools, electrophysiologic considerations, and disease monitoring.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Predictors of improvement in left ventricular systolic function after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure

AIMS

The current management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure (HF) remains a significant challenge. Catheter ablation (CA) has been shown to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in these patients, but which patients can benefit from CA is still poorly understood. The aim of our study was to determine the predictors of improved ejection fraction in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) complicated with HF undergoing CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 435 patients with persistent AF underwent an initial CA between January 2019 and March 2023 in our hospital. We investigated consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within one month before CA. According to the LVEF changes at 6 months, these patients were divided into an improved group (fulfilling the '2021 Universal Definition of HF' criteria for LVEF recovery) and a nonimproved group. Eighty patients were analyzed, and the improvement group consisted of 60 patients (75.0%). In the univariate analysis, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.005) and low voltage zones in the left atrium (P = 0.043) were associated with improvement of LVEF. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that the suitable cutoff value for left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) was 59 mm (sensitivity: 85.0%, specificity: 55.0%, area under curve: 0.709). A multivariate analysis showed that LVDd (OR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P = 0.005) and low voltage zones (LVZs) (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.96, P = 0.043) were significantly independently associated with the improvement of LVEF. Additionally, parameters were significantly improved regarding the left atrial diameter, LVDd and ventricular rate after radiofrequency catheter ablation (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) occurred in 75.0% of patients. Our study provides additional evidence that LVDd < 59 mm and no low voltage zones in the left atrium can be used to jointly predict the improvement of LVEF after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Cfa-circ002203 was upregulated in rapidly paced atria of dogs and involved in the mechanisms of atrial fibrosis

Background and aims

The role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease is gradually being elucidated; however, their roles in atrial fibrillation (AF)-related fibrosis are largely unknown. This study aimed to characterize the different circRNA profiles in the rapid-pacing atria of dogs and explore the mechanisms involved in atrial fibrosis.

Methods

A rapid right atrial-pacing model was established using electrical stimulation from a pacemaker. After 14 days, atrial tissue was collected for circRNA sequencing analysis. In vitro fibrosis was established by stimulating canine atrial fibroblasts with angiotensin II (Ang II). The fibroblasts were transfected with siRNA and overexpressing plasmids to explore the effects of cfa-circ002203 on fibroblast proliferation, migration, differentiation, and the expression of fibrosis-related proteins.

Results

In total, 146 differentially expressed circRNAs were screened, of which 106 were upregulated and 40 were downregulated. qRT-PCR analysis showed that cfa-circ002203 was upregulated in both in vivo and in vitro fibroblast fibrosis models. The upregulation of cfa-circ002203 enhanced proliferation and migration while weakening the apoptosis of fibroblasts. Western blotting showed that cfa-circ002203 overexpression increased the protein expression levels of fibrosis-related indicators (Col I, Col III, MMP2, MMP9, and α-SMA) and decreased the protein expression levels of pro-apoptotic factors (Bax and Caspase 3) in Ang II-induced fibroblast fibrosis.

Conclusion

Cfa-circ002203 might serve as an active promoter of the proliferation, migration, and fibrosis of atrial fibroblasts and is involved in AF-induced fibroblast fibrosis.

Catheter ablation improved ejection fraction in persistent AF patients: a DECAAF-II sub analysis

AIMS

The aim of our study was to assess differences in post-ablation atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and burden and to quantify the change in LVEF across different congestive heart failure (CHF) subcategories of the DECAAF-II population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Differences in the primary outcome of AF recurrence between CHF and non-CHF groups was calculated. The same analysis was performed for the three subgroups of CHF and the non-CHF group. Differences in AF burden after the 3-month blanking period between CHF and non-CHF groups was calculated. Improvement in LVEF was calculated and compared across the three CHF groups. Improvement was also calculated across different fibrosis stages. There was no significant differences in AF recurrence and AF burden after catheter ablation between CHF and non-CHF patients and between different CHF subcategories. Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) experienced the greatest improvement in EF following catheter ablation (CA, 16.66% ± 11.98, P < 0.001) compared to heart failure with moderately reduced LVEF, and heart failure with preserved EF (10.74% ± 8.34 and 2.00 ± 8.34 respectively, P-value < 0.001). Moreover, improvement in LVEF was independent of the four stages of atrial fibrosis (7.71 vs. 9.53 vs. 5.72 vs. 15.88, from Stage I to Stage IV respectively, P = 0.115).

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation burden and recurrence after CA is similar between non-CHF and CHF patients, independent of the type of CHF. Of all CHF groups, those with HFrEF had the largest improvement in LVEF after CA. Moreover, the improvement in ventricular function seems to be independent of atrial fibrosis in patients with persistent AF.

Characterization of Atrial Substrate to Predict the Success of Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The Prospective, Multicenter MASH-AF II (Multipolar Atrial Substrate High Density Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation) Study

Background Left atrial substrate may have mechanistic relevance for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to analyze the relationship between low-voltage zones (LVZs), transition zones, and AF recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective multicenter study on consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation-only approach. LVZs and transition zones (0.5-1 mV) were analyzed offline on high-density electroanatomical maps collected before pulmonary vein isolation. Overall, 262 patients (61±11 years, 31% female) with paroxysmal (130 pts) or persistent (132 pts) AF were included. After 28 months of follow-up, 73 (28%) patients experienced recurrence. An extension of more than 5% LVZ in paroxysmal AF and more than 15% in persistent AF was associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4 [95% CI, 2.0-9.8], P<0.001 and HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.7], P=0.04, respectively). Significant association was found between LVZs and transition zones and between LVZs and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (both P<0.001). Thirty percent of patients had significantly increased LAVI without LVZs. Eight percent of patients had LVZs despite normal LAVI. Older age, female sex, oncological history, and increased AF recurrence characterized the latter subgroup. Conclusions In patients undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation, the impact of LVZs on outcomes occurs with lower burden in paroxysmal than persistent AF, suggesting that not all LVZs have equal prognostic implications. A proportional area of moderately decreased voltages accompanies LVZs, suggesting a continuous substrate instead of the dichotomous division of healthy or diseased tissue. LAVI generally correlates with LVZs, but a small subgroup of patients may present with disproportionate atrial remodeling, despite normal LAVI.

Low-Voltage Myocardium-Guided Ablation Trial of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Clinically effective ablation approaches for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still being debated. So far, ablation targets and strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have failed to show systematic outcome improvement in randomized controlled clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether PVI plus individualized substrate ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium improves outcome in patients with persistent AF. We randomly assigned 324 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive PVI alone (163 patients; PVI only) or PVI plus substrate modification (161 patients; PVI+SM). The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia longer than 30 seconds after single ablation, with 3 months blanking, using serial 7-day electrocardiogram recordings over 12 months of observation. Patients were also encouraged to receive implantable cardiac monitors. RESULTS: The primary study end point occurred in 75 PVI-only patients (50%) and in 54 PVI+SM patients (35%) (Kaplan–Meier event rate estimates: hazard ratio=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.43 to 0.88, log rank P=0.006). Adverse events occurred in three PVI-only patients (1.8%) and in six PVI+SM patients (3.7%) (difference: −1.9 percentage points, 95% CI=−5.5 to 1.7 percentage points). Implant monitoring was used in 242 patients. Among them, 65 PVI-only patients (55%) versus 47 PVI+SM patients (39%) experienced recurrences (difference: 15 percentage points, 95% CI=3 to 28 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, PVI plus individualized ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium significantly improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02732626.)

Low-Voltage Area at the Anterior Wall of the Left Atrium Is Associated With Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With a Low CHA2DS2-VA Score

Background

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in patients at low risk of thromboembolism (TE) does not mean “no risk.” We sought to assess the risk factors associated with TE in clinically low-risk AF patients with a non-gender CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (CHA₂DS₂-VA score) of 0 or 1.

Methods

In this single-center cross-sectional study, NVAF patients with a CHA₂D-VA score of 0 or 1 who underwent index high-density bipolar voltage mapping of the left atrium (LA) and AF ablation were consecutively enrolled from 2017 to 2020. The population was divided into patients with and without TE history before voltage mapping. AF patients with CHA₂DS₂-VA score of 0 to 1 before TE (TE group) were analyzed and compared with clinically low-risk AF patients without TE history (non-TE group). The association among LA low voltage area (LVA), other clinical factors and TE history was analyzed with logistic regression.

Results

In the TE group, LVA was more prevalent [15/25 (60%) vs. 105/359 (29.2%), p = 0.003] and more preferentially located at the anterior wall [8/15 (53%) vs. 24/105 (23%), p = 0.025]. Among patients with LVA, the activation time from the sinus node to the left atrial appendage was significantly longer in the TE group (77.09 ± 21.09 vs. 57.59 ± 15.19 ms, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LVA at the anterior wall of the LA [OR: 4.17 (95% CI: 1.51 to 11.51); p = 0.006] and being female [OR: 3.40 (95% CI: 1.36 to 8.51); p = 0.009] were associated with TE history.

Conclusions

LVA at the anterior wall of the LA is associated with TE history in NVAF patients with a low CHA₂DS₂-VA score.

Selvester QRS Score Predicts Improvement of LVEF in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Systolic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) comorbid with atrial fibrillation is reversible, but recovery is limited in a subset of patients. The Selvester QRS (S-QRS) score is an electrocardiogram-based assessment that reportedly reflects myocardial scar/damage. We evaluated the predictability of S-QRS score for the recovery of left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in persistent AF (PeAF) patients with LVSD undergoing catheter ablation (CA).

METHOD

CA was performed in 51 PeAF patients with reduced LVEF (<40%); S-QRS scores were measured after restoration of sinus rhythm. LVEF was re-evaluated at one year after CA; LVEF recovery was related to the S-QRS score.

RESULTS

The median [interquartile range] S-QRS score was 1 points [0-2]. LVEF increased from 32% [28-37] at baseline to 56% [49-57] at one year after CA. Thirty-seven patients achieved normalization of LVEF (≥50%, Group A); 14 patients did not (Group B). Group A had significantly lower S-QRS scores than Group B (0 point [0-2] vs. 2 points [2-3], p<0.05). In univariate/multivariate analyses, S-QRS score was an independent predictor of LVEF normalization. In the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off value of S-QRS score was 2 points for prediction of the LVEF normalization (AUC = 0.75). Patients with low S-QRS score (<2 points) had greater LVEF improvement than those with high S-QRS score (≥2 points, ΔLVEF: 23% [17-28] vs. 17% [12-24], p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

S-QRS scoring non-invasively assesses the improvement of LVEF in PeAF patients with LVSD after CA. A high S-QRS score may indicate underlying myocardial scar/damage associated with unknown etiologies for LVSD other than PeAF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Drastic Cardiac Reverse Remodeling Following Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

In the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure, rate control is recommended, whereas the implication of rhythm control remains controversial. We experienced a 65-year-old man who had compensated heart failure due to hypertensive heart disease and atrial fibrillation with well-controlled heart rate (<100 bpm). At three months following the catheter ablation procedure, the left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 40% up to 65%. The implication of rhythm control using catheter ablation in improving cardiac reverse remodeling should be validated in large-scale clinical studies.

Left atrial phasic transport function closely correlates with fibrotic and arrhythmogenic atrial tissue degeneration in atrial fibrillation patients: cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and voltage mapping

AIMS

To characterize the association of phasic left atrial (LA) transport function and LA fibrosis guided by multimodality imaging containing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking and bipolar voltage mapping.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients presenting for first-time ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent CMR prior to the ablation procedure. LA phasic indexed volumes (LA-Vi) and emptying fractions (LA-EF) were calculated and CMR feature tracking guided LA wall motion analysis was performed. LA bipolar voltage mapping was carried out in sinus rhythm to find areas of low voltage as a surrogate for fibrosis and arrhythmogenesis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Low-voltage areas (LVAs) were present in 70 patients (42%). Contrary to LA volume, CMR based LA-EF [odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.96, P = 0.005] and LA booster pump strain rate (SR) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P = 0.001) significantly predicted presence and extent of LVA in multivariate logistic regression analysis for patients scanned in SR. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, LA-EF <40% carried a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 76% (area under the curve 0.8; 95% CI 0.71-0.89) to predict presence of LVA. For patients scanned in AF only minimal LA-Vi on CMR (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; P = 0.002) predicted presence of LVA.

CONCLUSION

For patients scanned in SR LA-EF and LA booster pump SR are closely linked to the presence and extent of LA LVA.