Mechanical circulatory support in the management of life-threatening arrhythmia

State of the Art: Mapping Strategies to Guide Ablation in Ischemic Heart Disease

Catheter ablation to prevent ventricular tachycardia (VT) that emerges late after a myocardial infarction aims to interrupt the re-entry substrate. Interruption of potential channels and regions of slow conduction that can be identified during stable sinus or paced rhythm is often effective and a number of substrate markers for guiding this approach have been described. While there is substantial agreement with different markers in some patients, the different markers select different regions for ablation in others. Mapping during VT to identify critical re-entry circuit isthmuses is likely more specific, and most useful when VT is incessant or frequent during the procedure or when sinus rhythm substrate ablation fails. Both approaches are often combined. These methods for identifying and characterizing post-infarct-related arrhythmia substrate and the re-entry circuits are reviewed.

Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward

This article will discuss the past, present, and future of ventricular tachycardia ablation and the continuing contribution of the Europace journal as the platform for publication of milestone research papers in this field of ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Electrical storm management in structural heart disease

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition characterized by at least three separate episodes of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over 24 h, each requiring therapeutic intervention, including implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Patients with ICDs in secondary prevention are at higher risk of ES and the most common presentation is that of scar-related monomorphic VAs. Electrical storm represents a major unfavourable prognostic marker in the history of patients with structural heart disease, with an associated two- to five-fold increase in mortality, heart transplant, and heart failure hospitalization. Early recognition and prompt treatment are crucial to improve the outcome. Yet, ES management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach and well-defined protocols and networks to guarantee a proper patient care. Acute phase stabilization should include a comprehensive clinical assessment, resuscitation and sedation management skills, ICD reprogramming, and acute sympathetic modulation, while the sub-acute/chronic phase requires a comprehensive heart team evaluation to define the better treatment option according to the haemodynamic and overall patient's condition and the type of VAs. Advanced anti-arrhythmic strategies, not mutually exclusive, include invasive ablation, cardiac sympathetic denervation, and, for very selected cases, stereotactic ablation. Each of these aspects, as well as the new European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommendations, will be discussed in the present review.

Management of hemodynamically stable wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Management of hemodynamically stable, incessant wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) in patients who already have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is challenging. First-line treatment is performed by medical staff who have no knowledge on programmed ICD therapy settings and there is always some concern for unexpected ICD shock. In these patients, a structured approach is necessary from presentation to therapy. The present review provides a systematic approach in four distinct phases to guide any physician involved in the management of these patients: PHASE I: assessment of hemodynamic status and use of the magnet to temporarily suspend ICD therapies, especially shocks; identification of possible arrhythmia triggers; risk stratification in case of electrical storm (ES).

PHASE II

The preparation phase includes reversal of potential arrhythmia "triggers", mild patient sedation, and patient monitoring for therapy delivery. Based on resource availability and competences, the most adequate therapeutic approach is chosen. This choice depends on whether a device specialist is readily available or not. In the case of ES in a "high-risk" patient an accelerated patient management protocol is advocated, which considers urgent ventricular tachycardia transcatheter ablation with or without mechanical cardiocirculatory support.

PHASE III

Therapeutic phase is based on the use of intravenous anti-arrhythmic drugs mostly indicated in this clinical context are presented. Device interrogation is very important in this phase when sustained monomorphic VT diagnosis is confirmed, then ICD ATP algorithms, based on underlying VT cycle length, are proposed. In high-risk patients with intractable ES, intensive patient management considers MCS and transcatheter ablation.

PHASE IV

The patient is hospitalized for further diagnostics and management aimed at preventing arrhythmia recurrences.

Three-dimensional mapping, recording and ablation in simulated and induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias during mechanical circulatory support using the percutaneous heart pump

PURPOSE

Due to their internal rotating magnets, conventional impeller-driven percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) yield high-frequency electrogram artifact and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when used with magnetic-based 3D electroanatomic mapping systems. The new percutaneous heart pump (PHP; Abbott, Chicago, IL) is a 14-French, 5-L/min, impeller axial-flow PVAD with a novel design that utilizes an external motor.

METHODS

We evaluated the feasibility of 3D mapping and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in vivo during PHP mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in simulated ventricular tachycardia (pacing at 300 ms) and ventricular flutter (VFL, pacing at 200 ms) and also during ventricular fibrillation (VF) in a porcine model. Anterograde (right ventricular), transseptal, retrograde, and epicardial right and left ventricular 3D mapping (EnSite/CARTO) and RFA were performed in 6 swine using high-density mapping and force-sensing RFA catheters (TactiCath/ThermoCool). Surface and intracardiac electrograms and 3D maps were analyzed for noise/interference with and without MCS using PHP in sinus rhythm and simulated VT/VFL and VF.

RESULTS

Mapping and RFA proved feasible in the presence of MCS using PHP. The mean arterial pressure in sinus rhythm was 55 ± 2 mmHg (baseline) and 84 ± 4 mmHg during MCS with PHP and well-maintained during simulated VT (73 ± 8 mmHg) and VFL (65 ± 2 mmHg) and even in VF (65 ± 5 mmHg). No electrogram noise/artifact, EMI, or 3D map distortions were observed during mapping/RFA with either of two mapping systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocardial and epicardial 3D mapping and RFA in the presence of PHP are feasible and offer significant MCS during simulated VT/VFL and VF. Furthermore, PHP yielded no electrogram noise/artifact, EMI, or 3D mapping distortions in conjunction with magnetic-based 3D mapping systems.

Mechanical circulatory support in ventricular arrhythmias

In atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, reduced time for ventricular filling and loss of atrial contribution lead to a significant reduction in cardiac output, resulting in cardiogenic shock. This may also occur during catheter ablation in 11% of overall procedures and is associated with increased mortality. Managing cardiogenic shock and (supra) ventricular arrhythmias is particularly challenging. Inotropic support may exacerbate tachyarrhythmias or accelerate heart rate; antiarrhythmic drugs often come with negative inotropic effects, and electrical reconversions may risk worsening circulatory failure or even cardiac arrest. The drop in native cardiac output during an arrhythmic storm can be partly covered by the insertion of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices guaranteeing end-organ perfusion. This provides physicians a time window of stability to investigate the underlying cause of arrhythmia and allow proper therapeutic interventions (e.g., percutaneous coronary intervention and catheter ablation). Temporary MCS can be used in the case of overt hemodynamic decompensation or as a “preemptive strategy” to avoid circulatory instability during interventional cardiology procedures in high-risk patients. Despite the increasing use of MCS in cardiogenic shock and during catheter ablation procedures, the recommendation level is still low, considering the lack of large observational studies and randomized clinical trials. Therefore, the evidence on the timing and the kinds of MCS devices has also scarcely been investigated. In the current review, we discuss the available evidence in the literature and gaps in knowledge on the use of MCS devices in the setting of ventricular arrhythmias and arrhythmic storms, including a specific focus on pathophysiology and related therapies.

ECMO-Supported Ablation and Percutaneous Repair of Severe Valvulopathy: A Winning Combination in a Complex Clinical Case

In this case report, we describe a complex case of a 67-year-old patient who was suffering from acute heart failure with electrical storm. Clinical case management was based on an integrated approach comprising two different procedures that were complementary and synergistic, and that allowed the patient to reach acute stabilization and to demonstrate mid-term clinical improvement. Complex clinical settings, such as electrical and hemodynamic instability, require complex solutions. The use of an integrated approach that allows physiopathological mechanisms to work together may be beneficial for these patients.