1
|
Wörmann J, Strik M, Jurisic S, Stout K, Elrefai M, Becher N, Schaer B, van Stipdonk A, Srinivasan NT, Ploux S, Breitenstein A, Kron J, Roberts PR, Toennis T, Linz D, Dulai R, Hermes-Laufer J, Koneru J, Erküner Ö, Dittrich S, van den Bruck JH, Schipper JH, Sultan A, Rosenberger KD, Steven D, Lüker J. Occurrence of premature battery depletion in a large multicentre registry of subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Europace 2024; 26:euae170. [PMID: 38885309 PMCID: PMC11218560 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have become established in preventing sudden cardiac death, with some advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems, including a lower incidence of lead failures. Despite technological advancements, S-ICD carriers may suffer from significant complications, such as premature battery depletion (PBD), that led to an advisory for nearly 40 000 patients. This multicentre study evaluated the incidence of PBD in a large set of S-ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from patients implanted with S-ICD models A209 and A219 between October 2012 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA were reviewed. Incidence and implications of PBD, defined as clinically observed sudden drop in battery longevity, were analysed and compared to PBD with the definition of battery depletion within 60 months. Prospectively collected clinical data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports. This registry is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05713708). Of the 1112 S-ICD devices analysed, 547 (49.2%) were equipped with a potentially affected capacitor linked to PBD occurrence, currently under Food and Drug Administration advisory. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 24-63] months. Clinically suspected PBD was observed in 159 (29.1%) of cases, with a median time to generator removal or replacement of 65 (IQR 55-72) months, indicative of significant deviations from expected battery lifespan. Manufacturer confirmation of PBD was made in 91.7% of devices returned for analysis. No cases of PBD were observed in devices that were not under advisory. CONCLUSION This manufacturer-independent analysis highlights a notable incidence of PBD in patients equipped with S-ICD models under advisory, and the rate of PBD in this study corresponds to the rate currently estimated by the manufacturer. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the largest contemporary peer-reviewed study cohort investigating the actual incidence of PBD in S-ICD patients. These findings emphasize the importance of post-market registries in collaboration between clinicians and the manufacturer to optimize safety and efficacy in S-ICD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wörmann
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Marc Strik
- CHU de Bordeaux, service de Cardiologie-électrophysiologie et stimulation cardiaque, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Stjepan Jurisic
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kara Stout
- Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Mohamed Elrefai
- Cardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - Nina Becher
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beat Schaer
- Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Antonius van Stipdonk
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Neil T Srinivasan
- Department of Electrophysiology, The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, UK
- Circulatory Health Research Group, Medical Technology Research Centre, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
| | - Sylvain Ploux
- CHU de Bordeaux, service de Cardiologie-électrophysiologie et stimulation cardiaque, INSERM, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Alexander Breitenstein
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jordana Kron
- Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Paul R Roberts
- Cardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - Tobias Toennis
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Linz
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rajdip Dulai
- Department of Electrophysiology, The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, UK
| | - Julia Hermes-Laufer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jay Koneru
- Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Ömer Erküner
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Dittrich
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Hendrik Schipper
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Arian Sultan
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin D Rosenberger
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Steven
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jakob Lüker
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grymuza M, Chmielewska-Michalak L, Katarzyńska-Szymańska A, Migaj J, Lesiak M, Mitkowski P. Recall devices: Defects at initial visit and during remote monitoring supported follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2022; 45:1320-1322. [PMID: 35766408 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In March 2021, Biotronik informed about the risk of premature battery depletion in a group of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Following the manufacturers' recommendation, our center executed a recall and introduced remote monitoring in patients with susceptible devices.This study reports the rate of premature battery depletion in our center and events found in RM-supported follow-up. METHODS Single-centre observational study. RESULTS Out of the 206 susceptible implanted devices, 125 patients appeared for the visit and remote monitoring was introduced in 107 (83%) patients. Until the visit, 3 (2.4%) devices required replacement due to battery depletion, and a further 3 (2.4%) devices had unexpected battery depletion during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The recalled devices had a higher rate of battery exhaustion than expected, while other device or lead defects were less common. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Grymuza
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dluga str 1/2, Poznań, 61-848, Poland
| | - Lidia Chmielewska-Michalak
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dluga str 1/2, Poznań, 61-848, Poland
| | | | - Jacek Migaj
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dluga str 1/2, Poznań, 61-848, Poland
| | - Maciej Lesiak
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dluga str 1/2, Poznań, 61-848, Poland
| | - Przemysław Mitkowski
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dluga str 1/2, Poznań, 61-848, Poland
| |
Collapse
|