Effectiveness and safety of a single freeze strategy of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: an EHRA systematic review and meta-analysis

Using computed tomography atrial myocardial thickness maps in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: the UTMOST AF II randomized clinical trial

AIMS

Whether adjusting the duration of ablation based on left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) provides extra benefits for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. We studied the safety and efficacy of tailored cryoballoon PV isolation (CB-PVI) based on LAWT for paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-seven patients with paroxysmal AF refractory to anti-arrhythmic drug were randomized 1:1 to either LAWT-guided CB-PVI (n = 135) and empirical CB-PVI (n = 142). Empirical CB-PVI was performed using a 28 mm cryoballoon with recommended application for 240 s per ablation. Cryoapplication in the LAWT-guided group was titrated (additional application for 120 s at PVs, where >25% of the circumference includes segments with LAWT > 2.5 mm and reduced baseline application to 180 s at PVs where >75% of the circumference includes segments with LAWT < 1.5 mm) according to the computed tomography LAWT colour map. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 s without antiarrhythmic medication, after a single ablation procedure. During a mean follow-up of 18.7 months, patients in the LAWT-guided CB-PVI group (70.8%) had a higher event-free rate from primary endpoint than those in the empirical CB-PVI group (54.4%; hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.99; P = 0.043). No differences were observed between the groups in complication rates (3.0% in LAWT-guided vs. 4.9% in empirical CB-PVI). The total procedure time was extended in the LAWT group than in the empirical group (mean 70.2 vs. 65.2 min, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The LAWT-guided energy titration strategy improved freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, compared with conventional strategy.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Integrated dilator-needle transseptal crossing device in atrial fibrillation cryoballoon ablation procedures

INTRODUCTION

In cryoballoon ablation (CBA) procedures, transseptal access (TSA) is generally achieved using a standard sheath and needle system that is exchanged for the cryoballoon delivery sheath and dilator over a long wire. Sheath exchange has been related with air embolic events. Recently, an integrated dilator-needle system assembled to the cryoballoon sheath was introduced. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an integrated TSA tool compared with the traditional approach in atrial fibrillation CBA procedures.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for CBA procedures were randomized 1:1 to traditional TSA (t-TSA) or integrated TSA (i-TSA). TSA time was defined as time from superior vena cava to LA insertion of the cryoballoon delivery sheath, after sheath exchange (t-TSA) or directly (i-TSA).

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (76 males, mean age 59 ± 10 years) were randomized, 48 patients underwent t-TSA, and 49 i-TSA. Mean TSA time was 5 min 59 s ± 5 min 36 s in the t-TSA group and 2 min 59 s ± 2 min 14 s in the i-TSA group (p < .001). Total fluoroscopy time, skin-to-skin procedure time, and LA dwell time were respectively 15 ± 6, 69 ± 16, and 44 ± 12 min in the t-TSA group and 13 ± 6, 65 ± 15, and 43 ± 11 min in the i-TSA group (p = ns). No clinically significant acute complications related to TSA were noted in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This is the first randomized study comparing both TSA approaches. TSA in CBA procedures using this integrated tool enables a safe and efficient workflow, reducing TSA time and avoiding sheath exchange.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Versus Cryoballoon for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results From a Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is currently the gold standard technique for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has recently emerged as an interesting nonthermal alternative energy for PVI. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of PVI using the pentaspline PFA catheter in comparison to cryoballoon ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2021 and December 2022, we included all consecutive patients of our center in whom a first PVI-only procedure was performed using PFA or cryoballoon. The choice of the energy was based on patients' preference between general anesthesia (PFA) and local anesthesia (cryoballoon). The primary end point was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 3-month blanking period. A total of 301 patients (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 220 patients) underwent a first PVI procedure performed using PFA (n=151) or cryoballoon (n=150). Complete short-term PVI was obtained in 144 of 150 patients (96%) in the cryoballoon group and in all patients of the PFA group (P=0.01). Procedure duration was significantly longer in the cryoballoon group. Transient and persistent phrenic nerve injuries were observed in the cryoballoon group only (13/150 and 2/150, respectively). One-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in the PFA group compared with the cryoballoon group (87.9% versus 77.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.96]; P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, comparative, real-life study suggested that PFA could overcome safety limitations of cryoballoon with optimal effectiveness. Randomized controlled studies are required to further investigate the potential superiority of PFA over cryoballoon.

Length of hospital stay for elective electrophysiological procedures: a survey from the European Heart Rhythm Association

AIMS

Electrophysiological (EP) operations that have traditionally involved long hospital lengths of stay (LOS) are now being undertaken as day case procedures. The coronavirus disease-19 pandemic served as an impetus for many centres to shorten LOS for EP procedures. This survey explores LOS for elective EP procedures in the modern era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An online survey consisting of 27 multiple-choice questions was completed by 245 respondents from 35 countries. With respect to de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations, day case procedures were reported for 79.5% of implantable loop recorders, 13.3% of pacemakers (PMs), 10.4% of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and 10.2% of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. With respect to CIED generator replacements, day case procedures were reported for 61.7% of PMs, 49.2% of ICDs, and 48.2% of CRT devices. With regard to ablations, day case procedures were reported for 5.7% of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, 10.7% of left-sided ablations, and 17.5% of right-sided ablations. A LOS ≥ 2 days for CIED implantation was reported for 47.7% of PM, 54.5% of ICDs, and 56.9% of CRT devices and for 54.5% of AF ablations, 42.2% of right-sided ablations, and 46.1% of left-sided ablations. Reimbursement (43-56%) and bed availability (20-47%) were reported to have no consistent impact on the organization of elective procedures.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variation in the LOS for elective EP procedures. The LOS for some procedures appears disproportionate to their complexity. Neither reimbursement nor bed availability consistently influenced LOS.

Single-shot technique of cryoablation for atrial fibrillation has comparable effective and safety outcomes compared to standard technique: insights from multiple clinical studies

Background

Although there are many freezing protocols available, the optimal freezing dose is still not determined. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different freeze strategies of CBA in the treatment of AF.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 1st December 2022. Studies comparing the outcomes between single-shot technique and standard technique of cryoablation were included. Subgroup analysis identified potential determinants for single-shot technique procedure.

Results

Our search resulted in 3407 records after deduplication. A total of 17 qualified studies met our inclusion criteria. Compared with standard technique, single-shot technique of cryoablation has a comparable rate of freedom from AF/AT(RR 1.00; P = 0.968), a trend for lower rate of procedure complications (RR 0.80; P = 0.069), a lower rate in transient phrenic paralysis (t-PNP) (RR 0.67; P = 0.038), a similar rate in persistent phrenic paralysis (per-PNP) (RR 1.15; P = 0.645), as well as a comparable procedure parameters. Importantly, potentially significant treatment covariable interactions in procedure complications were found in freeze strategy subgroup, male proportion subgroup and age subgroup, including single-shot freeze (RR 1.02; P = 0.915) and TTI-guided (RR 0.63; P = 0.007) with interaction P = 0.051, high male proportion (RR 0.54; P = 0.005) and a low male proportion (RR 0.94; P = 0.759) with interaction P = 0.074, as well as age ≥ 65 (RR0.91; P = 0.642) and age <65 (RR 0.54; P = 0.006),interaction P = 0.090. Meanwhile, only one significant treatment covariable interactions in procedure complications was found in the hypertension subgroup, including HT > 60% (RR 0.89; P = 0.549) and HT ≤ 60% (RR 0. 46; P < 0.01) with interaction P = 0.043.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that single-shot technique of cryoablation has comparable effective and safety outcomes for AF ablation compared to standard technique.

A novel saline-based occlusion tool allows for dye-less cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation and fluoroscopy reduction

Background

Cryoballoon (CB)- based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains guided by fluoroscopy and dye. The novel saline injection-based occlusion tool allows for pulmonary vein (PV)-occlusion assessment without the need for dye injection.

Aim

To compare KODEX-EPD guided CB-PVI using the novel saline injection-based workflow with conventional cryoablation for acute efficacy, fluoroscopy exposure and dye volume.

Methods

Consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF)- patients undergoing CB-PVI in conjunction with KODEX-EPD (Cryo^EPD group) were analyzed. Patients undergoing conventional CB-PVI (Cryo group) in the same time period acted as controls.

Results

One hundred forty patients [91/140 (65%) persistent AF] were studied. Seventy patients underwent Cryo^EPD procedures [64 ± 13 years, 21 (30%) female] and seventy patients underwent Cryo procedures [68 ± 10 years, 27 (39%) female].A total of 560 PVs were identified and successfully isolated. Mean procedure time was 66 ± 15 min for the Cryo^EPD group, and 65 ± 19 min for the Cryo group (p = 0.3). Fluoroscopy time (Cryo^EPD 6 ± 4 min; Cryo 13 ± 6 min, p < 0.001) and dose area product (Cryo^EPD 193 [111; 297] cGycm²; Cryo 381 [268; 614] cGycm², p < 0.001) were lower in patients undergoing Cryo^EPD compared with Cryo procedures. No dye was needed in the Cryo^EPD group while 53 ± 18 ml dye per patient were administered for the Cryo group (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was comparable between both groups (p = 0.5).

Conclusion

KODEX-EPD guided AF-ablation enables dye-free CB-based PVI with reduced fluoroscopy exposure when compared to conventional CB-ablation, without differences in acute procedural outcomes or procedure duration.

Effectiveness and safety of a time to isolation strategy of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies with a control group to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a time to isolation (TTI)-based strategy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) without language restrictions were searched. The intervention assessed was a TTI-based strategy of CBA in the treatment of AF. TTI was defined as the time from the start of freezing to the last recorded pulmonary veins' potential. The comparison of interest was intended conventional protocol of CBA. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Nine studies were deemed eligible (N = 2289 patients). Eight studies reported freedom from atrial arrhythmia and pooled results showed a marginally similar success rate between the two protocols (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.56). A prespecified subgroup analysis verified that a high dose TTI strategy (with >120 s duration of cryotherapy post-TTI) compared to the conventional protocol could significantly increase the patients without atrial arrhythmia during follow-up (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.05-1.83). TTI strategy could also significantly decrease total procedure time (SMD: -26.24 min; 95% CI: -36.90 to -15.57) and phrenic nerve palsy incidence (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.84).

CONCLUSION

Moderate confidence evidence suggests that an individualized CBA dosing strategy based on TTI and extended (>2 min post-TTI) duration of CBA is accompanied by fewer recurrences post-AF ablation.

Use of a novel integrated dilator-needle system in cryoballoon procedures: a zero-exchange approach

BACKGROUND

Recently, a novel integrated dilator-needle system (AcQCross Qx, Acutus Medical) was introduced to reduce the number of exchanges for a transseptal access. This system can be used in combination with large bore sheaths. In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a zero-exchange approach with the AcQCross system in cryoballoon procedures.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, we included 40 patients (AcQCross: n = 20; control group: n = 20) who underwent a cryoballoon procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In the AcQCross and control group, patients underwent ablation with POLARx (Boston Scientific) and Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro, Medtronic) in equal numbers (n = 10). In the AcQCross group, the AcQGuide Max sheath (Acutus Medical) was used in all POLARx cases.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the study population were comparable between groups. In the AcQCross group, there was a reduction in procedure time (49.7 ± 9.0 min vs. 59.6 ± 8.1 min, P < 0.001) and time from puncture until balloon delivery (15.5 ± 6.8 min vs. 21.5 ± 7.4 min, P = 0.01) in comparison with the control group. The balloon in body time, fluoroscopy time, number of cryoapplications, and biophysical parameters were similar between groups. There was one temporary phrenic nerve injury in the AcQCross group. Importantly, no signs of air embolism were noted with the AcQGuide Max sheath.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the novel AcQCross system improves procedural efficacy in cryoballoon procedures by reducing the number of exchanges.